Arterial stiffness in acute COVID-19 and potential associations with clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) interferes with the vascular endothelium. It is not known whether COVID-19 additionally affects arterial stiffness. METHODS: This case-control study compared brachial-ankle pulse wave (baPWV) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocities (cfPWV) of acutely ill patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: Twenty-two COVID-19 patients (50% females, 77 [67-84] years) were compared with 22 age- and sex-matched controls. In COVID-19 patients, baPWV (19.9 [18.4-21.0] vs. 16.0 [14.2-20.4], P = 0.02) and cfPWV (14.3 [13.4-16.0] vs. 11.0 [9.5-14.6], P = 0.01) were higher than in the controls. In multiple regression analysis, COVID-19 was independently associated with higher cfPWV (ß = 3.164, P = 0.004) and baPWV (ß = 3.532, P = 0.003). PWV values were higher in nonsurvivors. In survivors, PWV correlated with length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 appears to be related to an enhanced PWV reflecting an increase in arterial stiffness. Higher PWV might be related to an increased length of hospital stay and mortality.

Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast. METHODS: In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared. RESULTS: Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm ± 1.8 mm, P < 0.001; A: 1.0 mm ± 1.9 mm, P = 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm ± 2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm ± 2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: -0.4 mm ± 2.4 mm; A: -0.6 mm ± 2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.