Beyond conventional bounds: Surpassing system limits for stereotactic ablative (SAbR) lung radiotherapy using CBCT-based adaptive planning system.

PURPOSE: Online adaptive radiotherapy relies on a high degree of automation to enable rapid planning procedures. The Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine (IOE) was originally designed for conventional treatments so it is crucial to provide clear guidance for lung SAbR plans. This study investigates using the Ethos IOE together with adaptive-specific optimization tuning structures we designed and templated within Ethos to mitigate inter-planner variability in meeting RTOG metrics for both online-adaptive and offline SAbR plans. METHODS: We developed a planning strategy to automate the generation of tuning structures and optimization. This was validated by retrospective analysis of 35 lung SAbR cases (total 105 fractions) treated on Ethos. The effectiveness of our planning strategy was evaluated by comparing plan quality with-and-without auto-generated tuning structures. Internal target volume (ITV) contour was compared between that drawn from CT simulation and from cone-beam CT (CBCT) at time of treatment to verify CBCT image quality and treatment effectiveness. Planning strategy robustness for lung SAbR was quantified by frequency of plans meeting reference plan RTOG constraints. RESULTS: Our planning strategy creates a gradient within the ITV with maximum dose in the core and improves intermediate dose conformality on average by 2%. ITV size showed no significant difference between those contoured from CT simulation and first fraction, and also trended towards decreasing over course of treatment. Compared to non-adaptive plans, adaptive plans better meet reference plan goals (37% vs. 100% PTV coverage compliance, for scheduled and adapted plans) while improving plan quality (improved GI (gradient index) by 3.8%, CI (conformity index) by 1.7%). CONCLUSION: We developed a robust and readily shareable planning strategy for the treatment of adaptive lung SAbR on the Ethos system. We validated that automatic online plan re-optimization along with the formulated adaptive tuning structures can ensure consistent plan quality. With the proposed planning strategy, highly ablative treatments are feasible on Ethos.

Rethinking the potential role of dose painting in personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy.

Fractionated radiotherapy was established in the 1920s based upon two principles: (1) delivering daily treatments of equal quantity, unless the clinical situation requires adjustment, and (2) defining a specific treatment period to deliver a total dosage. Modern fractionated radiotherapy continues to adhere to these century-old principles, despite significant advancements in our understanding of radiobiology. At UT Southwestern, we are exploring a novel treatment approach called PULSAR (Personalized Ultra-Fractionated Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy). This method involves administering tumoricidal doses in a pulse mode with extended intervals, typically spanning weeks or even a month. Extended intervals permit substantial recovery of normal tissues and afford the tumor and tumor microenvironment ample time to undergo significant changes, enabling more meaningful adaptation in response to the evolving characteristics of the tumor. The notion of dose painting in the realm of radiation therapy has long been a subject of contention. The debate primarily revolves around its clinical effectiveness and optimal methods of implementation. In this perspective, we discuss two facets concerning the potential integration of dose painting with PULSAR, along with several practical considerations. If successful, the combination of the two may not only provide another level of personal adaptation ("adaptive dose painting"), but also contribute to the establishment of a timely feedback loop throughout the treatment process. To substantiate our perspective, we conducted a fundamental modeling study focusing on PET-guided dose painting, incorporating tumor heterogeneity and tumor control probability (TCP).

An AI-based approach for modeling the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Personalized, ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (PULSAR) is designed to administer tumoricidal doses in a pulsed mode with extended intervals, spanning weeks or months. This approach leverages longer intervals to adapt the treatment plan based on tumor changes and enhance immune-modulated effects. In this investigation, we seek to elucidate the potential synergy between combined PULSAR and PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy using experimental data from a Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) syngeneic murine cancer model. Employing a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) model, we simulated the treatment response by treating irradiation and anti-PD-L1 as external stimuli occurring in a temporal sequence. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) The model can simulate tumor growth by integrating various parameters such as timing and dose, and (2) The model provides mechanistic interpretations of a "causal relationship" in combined treatment, offering a completely novel perspective. The model can be utilized for in-silico modeling, facilitating exploration of innovative treatment combinations to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Advanced modeling techniques, coupled with additional efforts in biomarker identification, may deepen our understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the combined treatment.

BIOGUIDE-X: A First-in-Human Study of the Performance of Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET)-guided radiation therapy is a novel tracked dose delivery modality that uses real-time PET to guide radiation therapy beamlets. The BIOGUIDE-X study was performed with sequential cohorts of participants to (1) identify the fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose for PET-guided therapy and (2) confirm that the emulated dose distribution was consistent with a physician-approved radiation therapy plan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study included participants with at least 1 FDG-avid targetable primary or metastatic tumor (2-5 cm) in the lung or bone. For cohort I, a modified 3 + 3 design was used to determine the FDG dose that would result in adequate signal for PET-guided therapy. For cohort II, PET imaging data were collected on the X1 system before the first and last fractions among patients undergoing conventional stereotactic body radiation therapy. PET-guided therapy dose distributions were modeled on the patient's computed tomography anatomy using the collected PET data at each fraction as input to an "emulated delivery" and compared with the physician-approved plan. RESULTS: Cohort I demonstrated adequate FDG activity in 6 of 6 evaluable participants (100.0%) with the first injected dose level of 15 mCi FDG. In cohort II, 4 patients with lung tumors and 5 with bone tumors were enrolled, and evaluable emulated delivery data points were collected for 17 treatment fractions. Sixteen of the 17 emulated deliveries resulted in dose distributions that were accurate with respect to the approved PET-guided therapy plan. The 17th data point was just below the 95% threshold for accuracy (dose-volume histogram score = 94.6%). All emulated fluences were physically deliverable. No toxicities were attributed to multiple FDG administrations. CONCLUSIONS: PET-guided therapy is a novel radiation therapy modality in which a radiolabeled tumor can act as its own fiducial for radiation therapy targeting. Emulated therapy dose distributions calculated from continuously acquired real-time PET data were accurate and machine-deliverable in tumors that were 2 to 5 cm in size with adequate FDG signal characteristics.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) is an emerging non-invasive definitive treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly when surgery is not ideal. Employing ablative doses, SAbR delivered in one to five fractions to the primary tumor has been shown to achieve high local control rates with favorable toxicity profile in multiple retrospective and prospective series, and has dispelled previous notions of RCC radio-resistance. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests possible immunomodulatory effects, leading to clinical investigations of SAbR in combination with systemic and surgical management in patients with metastatic disease. In this review, we summarize key evidence supporting SAbR delivered to the primary tumor including preclinical rationale, dose escalation studies, recent prospective trials, and outcomes from ongoing multi-institutional registries. We also discuss areas of active clinical investigation including the use of primary SAbR in combination with systemic therapies in patients with metastatic disease. The accumulated body of evidence supports SAbR as promising indication being increasingly incorporated into the multi-disciplinary management of primary RCC.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a prospective study using the NeuroPoint Alliance Stereotactic Radiosurgery Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The literature on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) managed using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies mainly on single-institution studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is a literature gap on clinical and radiological outcomes of SRS for NSCLC metastases in real-world practice. The objective of this study was to benchmark mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing SRS for NSCLC BMs and identify risk factors for these outcomes using a national quality registry. METHODS: The SRS Registry of the NeuroPoint Alliance was used for this study. This registry included patients from 16 enrolling sites who underwent SRS from 2017 to 2022. Data are prospectively collected without a prespecified research purpose. The main outcomes of this analysis were overall survival (OS), out-of-field recurrence, local progression, and intracranial progression. All time-to-event investigations included Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four patients were identified, with a mean age of 66.7 years and a female proportion of 48.5%. Most patients (84.5%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80-100, and the mean baseline EQ-5D score was 0.539 quality-adjusted life years. A single lesion was present in 53.4% of the patients, and 29.1% of patients had 3 or more lesions. The median OS was 28.1 months, and independent predictors of mortality included no control of primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1), KPS of 80 (HR 2.4) or lower (HR 2.4), coronary artery disease (HR 2.8), and 5 or more lesions present at the time of SRS treatment (HR 2.3). The median out-of-field progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.8 months, and the median local PFS was unreached. Intralesional hemorrhage was an independent risk factor of local progression, with an HR of 6.0. The median intracranial PFS was 14.0 months and was predicted by the number of lesions at the time of SRS (3-4 lesions, HR 2.2; 5-14 lesions, HR 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world prospective study, the authors used a national quality registry and found favorable OS in patients with NSCLC BMs undergoing SRS compared with results from previously published RCTs. The intracranial PFS was mainly driven by the emergence of new lesions rather than local progression. A greater number of lesions at baseline was associated with out-of-field progression, while intralesional hemorrhage at baseline was associated with local progression.

Intramedullary brachytherapy for the treatment of long bone metastatic disease: A case report.

Case: A 56-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma and femoral lesions with impending pathologic fracture was indicated for intramedullary brachytherapy (IMBT) and intramedullary nail. Conclusions: IMBT + intramedullary nail is a new technique for the treatment of long bone metastases. IMBT maximizes radiation to the tumor and minimizes radiation to surrounding tissues. It allows the patient to resume systemic treatment expediently. Our cadaver model and patient were both treated for femoral metastases; however, this technique allows for the treatment of any long bone. This is a safe technique that minimizes treatment time compared with other standard radiation regimens.

Modeling gamma knife radiosurgical toxicity for multiple brain metastases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation oncology protocols for single fraction radiosurgery recommend setting dosing criteria based on assumed risk of radionecrosis, which can be predicted by the 12 Gy normal brain volume (V12). In this study, we show that tumor surface area (SA) and a simple power-law model using only preplan variables can estimate and minimize radiosurgical toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 245-patient cohort with 1217 brain metastases treated with single or distributed Gamma Knife sessions was reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models and power-law models determined which modeling parameters best predicted V12. The V12 power-law model, represented by a product of normalized Rx dose Rxn, and tumor longest axial dimension LAD (V12 âˆ¼ Rxn1.5*LAD2), was independently validated using a secondary 63-patient cohort with 302 brain metastases. RESULTS: Surface area was the best univariate linear predictor of V12 (adjR2 = 0.770), followed by longest axial dimension (adjR2 = 0.755) and volume (adjR2 = 0.745). The power-law model accounted for 90% variance in V12 for 1217 metastatic lesions (adjR2 = 0.906) and 245 patients (adjR2 = 0.896). The average difference ΔV12 between predicted and measured V12s was (0.28 ± 0.55) cm3 per lesion and (1.0 ± 1.2) cm3 per patient. The power-law predictive capability was validated using a secondary 63-patient dataset (adjR2 = 0.867) with 302 brain metastases (adjR2 = 0.825). CONCLUSION: Surface area was the most accurate univariate predictor of V12 for metastatic lesions. We developed a preplan model for brain metastases that can help better estimate radionecrosis risk, determine prescription doses given a target V12, and provide safe dose escalation strategies without the use of any planning software.

Updates on radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations: Proceedings of 6th annual ImmunoRad conference.

Focal radiation therapy (RT) has attracted considerable attention as a combinatorial partner for immunotherapy (IT), largely reflecting a well-defined, predictable safety profile and at least some potential for immunostimulation. However, only a few RT-IT combinations have been tested successfully in patients with cancer, highlighting the urgent need for an improved understanding of the interaction between RT and IT in both preclinical and clinical scenarios. Every year since 2016, ImmunoRad gathers experts working at the interface between RT and IT to provide a forum for education and discussion, with the ultimate goal of fostering progress in the field at both preclinical and clinical levels. Here, we summarize the key concepts and findings presented at the Sixth Annual ImmunoRad conference.

Evaluation of fan-beam kilovoltage computed tomography image quality on a novel biological-guided radiotherapy platform.

Background and Purpose: A recently developed biology-guided radiotherapy platform, equipped with positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), provides both anatomical and functional image guidance for radiotherapy. This study aimed to characterize performance of the kilovoltage CT (kVCT) system on this platform using standard quality metrics measured on phantom and patient images, using CT simulator images as reference. Materials and Methods: Image quality metrics, including spatial resolution/modular transfer function (MTF), slice sensitivity profile (SSP), noise performance and image uniformity, contrast-noise ratio (CNR) and low-contrast resolution, geometric accuracy, and CT number (HU) accuracy, were evaluated on phantom images. Patient images were evaluated mainly qualitatively. Results: On phantom images the MTF10% is about 0.68 lp/mm for kVCT in PET/CT Linac. The SSP agreed with nominal slice thickness within 0.7 mm. The diameter of the smallest visible target (1% contrast) is about 5 mm using medium dose mode. The image uniformity is within 2.0 HU. The geometric accuracy tests passed within 0.5 mm. Relative to CT simulator images, the noise is generally higher and the CNR is lower in PET/CT Linac kVCT images. The CT number accuracy is comparable between the two systems with maximum deviation from the phantom manufacturer range within 25 HU. On patient images, higher spatial resolution and image noise are observed on PET/CT Linac kVCT images. Conclusions: Major image quality metrics of the PET/CT Linac kVCT were within vendor-recommended tolerances. Better spatial resolution but higher noise and better/comparable low contrast visibility were observed as compared to a CT simulator when images were acquired with clinical protocols.

Quality Metric to Assess Adequacy of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer Placement for Prostate Radiation Therapy and Association of Metric Score With Rectal Toxicity Outcomes.

Purpose: Although hydrogel spacer placement (HSP) minimizes rectal dose during prostate cancer radiation therapy, its potential benefit for modulating rectal toxicity could depend on the achieved prostate-rectal separation. We therefore developed a quality metric associated with rectal dose reduction and late rectal toxicity among patients treated with prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials: A quality metric consisting of prostate-rectal interspace measurements from axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging simulation images was applied to 42 men enrolled in a multi-institutional phase 2 study using HSP with prostate SBRT (45 Gy in 5 fractions). A score of 0, 1, or 2 was assigned to a prostate-rectal interspace measurement of <0.3 cm, 0.3 to 0.9 cm, or ≥1 cm, respectively. An overall spacer quality score (SQS) was computed from individual scores at rectal midline and ±1 cm laterally, located at the prostate base, midgland, and apex. Associations of SQS with rectal dosimetry and late toxicity were evaluated. Results: The majority of the analyzed cohort had an SQS of 1 (n = 17; 41%) or 2 (n = 18; 43%). SQS was associated with maximum rectal point dose (rectal Dmax; P = .002), maximum dose to 1 cc of rectum (D1cc; P = .004), and volume of rectum receiving ≥100% of prescription dose (V45; P = .046) and ≥40 Gy (V40; P = .005). SQS was also associated with a higher incidence of (P = .01) and highest-graded late rectal toxicity (P = .01). Among the 20 men who developed late grade ≥1 rectal toxicity, 57%, 71%, and 22% had an SQS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Men with an SQS of 0 or 1 compared with 2 had 4.67-fold (95% CI, 0.72-30.11) or 8.40-fold (95% CI, 1.83-38.57) greater odds, respectively, of developing late rectal toxicity. Conclusions: We developed a reliable and informative metric for assessing HSP, which appears to be associated with rectal dosimetry and late rectal toxicity after prostate SBRT.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control. Objective: To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020. Interventions: Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord. Results: A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.

Consensus Quality Measures and Dose Constraints for Lung Cancer From the Veterans Affairs Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance Program and ASTRO Expert Panel.

PURPOSE: For patients with lung cancer, it is critical to provide evidence-based radiation therapy to ensure high-quality care. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Radiation Oncology Program partnered with the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) as part of the VA Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance to develop lung cancer quality metrics and assess quality of care as a pilot program in 2016. This article presents recently updated consensus quality measures and dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A series of measures and performance standards were reviewed and developed by a Blue-Ribbon Panel of lung cancer experts in conjunction with ASTRO in 2022. As part of this initiative, quality, surveillance, and aspirational metrics were developed for (1) initial consultation and workup; (2) simulation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery; and (3) follow-up. The DVH metrics for target and organ-at-risk treatment planning dose constraints were also reviewed and defined. RESULTS: Altogether, a total of 19 lung cancer quality metrics were developed. There were 121 DVH constraints developed for various fractionation regimens, including ultrahypofractionated (1, 3, 4, or 5 fractions), hypofractionated (10 and 15 fractionations), and conventional fractionation (30-35 fractions). CONCLUSIONS: The devised measures will be implemented for quality surveillance for veterans both inside and outside of the VA system and will provide a resource for lung cancer-specific quality metrics. The recommended DVH constraints serve as a unique, comprehensive resource for evidence- and expert consensus-based constraints across multiple fractionation schemas.

Life-threatening hemoptysis in patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

Hemoptysis is a complication of intrathoracic tumors, both primary and metastatic, and the risk may be increased by procedural interventions as well as Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR). The risk of hemoptysis with SAbR for lung cancer is well characterized, but there is a paucity of data about intrathoracic metastases. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of life-threatening/fatal hemoptysis (LTH) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) chest metastases with a focus on SAbR. We systematically evaluated patients with RCC at UT Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) Kidney Cancer Program (KCP) from July 2005 to March 2020. We queried Kidney Cancer Explorer (KCE), a data portal with clinical, pathological, and experimental genomic data. Patients were included in the study based on mention of "hemoptysis" in clinical documentation, if they had a previous bronchoscopy, or had undergone SAbR to any site within the chest. Two hundred and thirty four patients met query criteria and their records were individually reviewed. We identified 10 patients who developed LTH. Of these, 4 had LTH as an immediate procedural complication whilst the remaining 6 had prior SAbR to ultra-central (UC; abutting the central bronchial tree) metastases. These 6 patients had a total of 10 lung lesions irradiated (UC, 8; central 1, peripheral 1), with a median total cumulative SAbR dose of 38 Gray (Gy/ lesion) (range: 25-50 Gy). Other risk factors included intrathoracic disease progression (n = 4, 67%), concurrent anticoagulant therapy (n = 1, 17%) and concurrent systemic therapy (n = 4, 67%). Median time to LTH from first SAbR was 26 months (range: 8-61 months). Considering that 130 patients received SAbR to a chest lesion during the study period, the overall incidence of LTH following SAbR was 4.6% (6/130). The patient population that received SAbR (n = 130) was at particularly high risk for complications, with 67 (52%) having two or more chest metastaes treated, and 29 (22%) receiving SAbR to three or more lesions. Overall, the risk of LTH following SAbR to a central or UC lesion was 10.5% (6/57). In conclusion, SAbR of RCC metastases located near the central bronchial tree may increase the risk of LTH.

Phase 2 Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Renal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are localized and managed by active surveillance, surgery, or minimally invasive techniques. Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) may provide an innovative non-invasive alternative although prospective data are limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether SAbR is effective in the management of primary RCCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with biopsy-confirmed radiographically enlarging primary RCC (≤5 cm) were enrolled. SAbR was delivered in either three (12 Gy) or five (8 Gy) fractions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was local control (LC) defined as a reduction in tumor growth rate (compared with a benchmark of 4 mm/yr on active surveillance) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included LC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), safety, and preservation of kidney function. Exploratory tumor cell-enriched spatial protein and gene expression analysis were conducted on pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Target accrual was reached with the enrollment of 16 ethnically diverse patients. Radiographic LC at 1 yr was observed in 94% of patients (15/16; 95% confidence interval: 70, 100), and this was accompanied by pathologic evidence of tumor response (hyalinization, necrosis, and reduced tumor cellularity) in all patients. By RECIST, 100% of the sites remained without progression at 1 yr. The median pretreatment growth rate was 0.8 cm/yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3, 1.4), and the median post-treatment growth rate was 0.0 cm/yr (IQR: -0.4, 0.1, p < 0.002). Tumor cell viability decreased from 4.6% to 0.7% at 1 yr (p = 0.004). With a median follow-up of 36 mo for censored patients, the disease control rate was 94%. SAbR was well tolerated with no grade ≥2 (acute or late) toxicities. The average glomerular filtration rate declined from a baseline of 65.6 to 55.4 ml/min at 1 yr (p = 0.003). Spatial protein and gene expression analyses were consistent with the induction of cellular senescence by radiation. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that SAbR is effective for primary RCC supporting its evaluation in comparative phase 3 clinical trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this clinical trial, we investigated a noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer and found that it was safe and effective.

Preliminary Evaluation of PTV Margins for Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostatic Fossa.

PURPOSE: In modern trials, traditional planning target volume (PTV) margins for postoperative prostate radiation therapy have been large (7-10 mm) to account for both daily changes in patient positioning and target deformation. With daily adaptive radiation therapy, these interfractional changes could be minimized, potentially reducing the margins required for treatment and improving adjacent normal-tissue dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021. Patients receiving conventionally fractionated postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for prostate cancer with pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (pre-CBCT and post-CBCT, respectively) were included (248 paired images). Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical target volumes (pre-CTVs and post-CTVs) were contoured by a single observer on all CBCTs and verified by a second observer. Motion was calculated from pre-CTV to that of the post-CTV, and predicted margins were calculated with van Herk's formula. Adequate coverage of the proposed planning target volume (PTV) margin expansions (pre-PTV) were verified by determining overlap with post-CTV. In a smaller cohort (25 paired images), dosimetric changes with the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional plans in the Ethos emulator environment. RESULTS: The estimated margins predicted to achieve ≥95% CTV coverage for 90% of the population were 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.2 mm (x-, y-, and z -xes, respectively), with 95% of the absolute region of interest displacement being within 1.9 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.1 mm. After symmetrically expanding all pre-CTVs by 3 mm, the percentage of paired images achieving ≥95% CTV coverage was 97.1%. When comparing adaptive plans (3-mm margins) with scheduled plans (7-mm margins), rectum dosimetry significantly improved, with an average relative reduction in V40Gy[cc] of 59.2% and V65Gy[cc] of 79.5% (where V40Gy and V65Gy are defined as the volumes receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy or higher dose, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Online daily adaptive radiation therapy could significantly decrease PTV margins for prostatic PORT and improve rectal dosimetry, with a symmetrical expansion of 3 mm achieving excellent coverage in this cohort. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.

On the feasibility of improved target coverage without compromising organs at risk using online adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation (A-SPBI).

PURPOSE: Describe an early-adopting institution's experience with online adaptive radiation for stereotactic partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of 22 women treated between May 2021 and March 2022 with adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. A total of 106 of 110 fractions were evaluated for dosimetric changes in target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. Patient set up with stereotactic wooden frame and adapted per fraction. Treatment and planning times were collected prospectively by radiation therapists. RESULTS: Scheduled PTV30 Gy was <95% in 72.1% and <90% in 38.5% of fractions, and both PTV and CTV coverage were improved significantly after adaption, and 83.7% of fractions were delivered as adapted per physician choice. There was no difference in OAR coverage. Average adaptive treatment planning took 15 min and average time-on-couch was 34.4 min. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive stereotactic breast irradiation resulted in improved target coverage with equivalent dosing to OARs in an efficient and tolerated treatment time. Improved target coverage allowed for decreased PTV margins compared to prior trial protocols that may improve acute and late toxicities.