Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico , Paralisia Cerebral , Exercício Físico , Deficiências da Aprendizagem , Educação Física e Treinamento , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Transtornos da Visão , Adolescente , Atitude , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Criança , Teste de Esforço , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Pais/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Professores Escolares/psicologiaRESUMO
Thirty-five youth with visual impairments (13.5 +/- 2.1 yrs, 13 girls and 22 boys) walked four 100-meter distances while wearing two units (right and left placement) of three brands of voice-announcement (VA) pedometers (Centrios Talking Pedometer, TALKiNG Pedometer, and Sportline Talking Calorie Pedometer 343) and a reference pedometer (NL2000). Registered pedometer steps for each trial were recorded, compared to actual steps assessed via digital video. Inter-unit agreement between right and left VA pedometer placement was low (ICC range .37 to .76). A systematic error was observed for the VA pedometers on the left placement (error range 5.6% to 12.2%), while right placement VA pedometers were at or below +/- 3% from actual steps (range 2.1% to 3.3%). The reference pedometer was unaffected by placement (ICC .98, error approximately 1.4%). Overall, VA pedometers demonstrated acceptable accuracy for the right placement, suggesting this position is necessary for youth with visual impairments.
