Lysine analogue use during cancer surgery: a survey from a Canadian tertiary care centre.

Background: When used during surgery, antifibrinolytic hemostatic agents such as lysine analogues are effective at reducing blood loss and the need for transfusions. Despite proven efficacy, use of hemostatic agents remains low during some surgeries. Our objective was to explore surgeon opinions about, and use of lysine analogues in, oncologic surgeries at a large tertiary care academic institution. Methods: We administered a survey to surgeons who perform high-transfusion-risk oncologic surgeries at a large academic hospital in Ottawa, Ontario. Design and distribution of the survey followed a modified Dillman method. To ensure that the survey questionnaire was relevant, clear, and concise, we performed informant interviews, cognitive interviews, and pilot-testing. The final survey consisted of 19 questions divided into 3 sections: respondent demographics, use of hemostatic agents, and potential clinical trial opinions. Results: Of 28 surgeons, 24 (86%) participated. When asked to indicate the frequency of lysine analogue use, "never" accounted for 46% of the responses, and "rarely" (<10% of the time) accounted for 23% of the responses. Reasons for never using included "unfamiliar with benefits" and "prefer alternatives." Fifteen surgeons (63%) felt that a trial was needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of lysine analogues in their cancer field. Conclusions: Our survey found that lysine analogues are infrequently used during oncologic surgeries at our institution. Many surgeons are unfamiliar with the benefits and side effects of lysine analogues and, alternatively, use topical hemostatic agents. Our results demonstrate that future trials exploring the efficacy and safety of lysine analogues in oncologic surgery are needed.

The epidemiology of multicomponent blood transfusion: a systematic review.

We performed a systematic review to describe the prevalence of multicomponent blood transfusion and, as a secondary objective, to determine patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion. There is a lack of literature on the epidemiology of multicomponent transfusion as most studies concentrate on a single blood product and its utilisation. Patient care and blood management can be optimised by better understanding the patients who receive multicomponent transfusions. The databases Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews were searched. Observational cohort and cross-sectional studies of hospital patients reporting on multicomponent transfusion prevalence or on patient characteristics and outcomes associated with multicomponent transfusion were included. A descriptive synthesis of studies was performed. A total of 37 eligible studies were included. It was found that multicomponent transfusion prevalence varied greatly by patient population and by the combination of blood products given in the multicomponent transfusion. Multicomponent-transfused patients included burn, cardiac surgery, liver surgery and transplant, cancer, infectious diseases, trauma and intensive care unit patients. Five studies found associations between multicomponent transfusion and adverse health outcomes; however, these findings are likely confounded by indication. The overall quality of evidence was low given a fair-to-poor individual study quality, inconsistent multicomponent transfusion prevalence estimates and confounding by indication. Further research is needed to better understand the epidemiology of multicomponent transfusion, including studies on multicomponent transfusion in haematological cancer patients and studies looking for patient characteristics that can better predict multicomponent transfusion need.

A multicentred study to validate a consensus bleeding assessment tool developed by the biomedical excellence for safer transfusion collaborative for use in patients with haematological malignancy.

BACKGROUND: There continues to be uncertainty about the optimal approach to documenting bleeding data in platelet transfusion trials, with a desire to apply a common assessment tool across all trials. With this in mind, a consensus bleeding assessment tool (BAT) has been developed by the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) collaborative, based on review of data collection forms used in published randomized trials and following content validation with a range of healthcare professionals at seven haematology centres through BEST members. This study aimed to evaluate reliability and reproducibility of the consensus BAT. METHODS: Replicated clinical assessments of bleeding were undertaken by participants with haematological malignancies recruited at four haematology centres in an international, multicentred, observational study. Concordance of repeat assessments was calculated for agreement in site and grade of bleeding observed. RESULTS: Forty patients consented to participate, and 13 trained bleeding assessors collected these data. Bleeding assessments were carried out on 113 separate days. Of all 225 bleeding assessments, 204 were compared for grade concordance, and 160 were compared for site concordance. There was very good grade concordance (83%, 95% confidence interval 74-93%) and good bleeding site concordance (69%, 95% confidence interval 57-79%) in observations of bleeding. Discordance was primarily in relation to assessing skin bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Alongside a structured training programme, levels of concordance for a consensus BAT were high. Researchers using assessment tools for bleeding need to balance comprehensive data collection against potential loss of accuracy for some types of bleeding, such as skin findings.

Prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent reversal of warfarin: an international survey of hospital protocols.

For emergent warfarin reversal, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4FPCCs) are recommended by many international guidelines. We surveyed international clinical sites including members of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Most sites have emergent warfarin reversal protocols (53% use PCC, 25% use PCC+ plasma and 2% use plasma alone); however, variation between adjusted dosing and fixed dosing was observed.

Aneurysmal SubArachnoid Hemorrhage-Red Blood Cell Transfusion And Outcome (SAHaRA): a pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is common in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) and is a potential critical modifiable factor affecting secondary injury. Despite physiological evidence and management guidelines that support maintaining a higher haemoglobin level in patients with aSAH, current practice is one of a more restrictive approach to transfusion. The goal of this multicentre pilot trial is to determine the feasibility of successfully conducting a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion trial in adult patients with acute aSAH and anaemia (Hb ≤100 g/L), comparing a liberal transfusion strategy (Hb ≤100 g/L) with a restrictive strategy (Hb ≤80 g/L) on the combined rate of death and severe disability at 12 months. METHODS: Design This is a multicentre open-label randomised controlled pilot trial at 5 academic tertiary care centres. Population We are targeting adult aSAH patients within 14 days of their initial bleed and with anaemia (Hb ≤110 g/L). Randomisation Central computer-generated randomisation, stratified by centre, will be undertaken from the host centre. Randomisation into 1 of the 2 treatment arms will occur when the haemoglobin levels of eligible patients fall to ≤100 g/L. Intervention Patients will be randomly assigned to either a liberal (threshold: Hb ≤100 g/L) or a restrictive transfusion strategy (threshold: Hb ≤80 g/L). Outcome Primary: Centre randomisation rate over the study period. Secondary: (1) transfusion threshold adherence; (2) study RBC transfusion protocol adherence; and (3) outcome assessment including vital status at hospital discharge, modified Rankin Score at 6 and 12 months and Functional Independence Measure and EuroQOL Quality of Life Scale scores at 12 months. Outcome measures will be reported in aggregate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the host centre (OHSN-REB 20150433-01H). This study will determine the feasibility of conducting the large pragmatic RCT comparing 2 RBC transfusion strategies examining the effect of a liberal strategy on 12-month outcome following aSAH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02483351; Pre-results.

Eltrombopag after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in a case of poor graft function and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Late graft failure after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can result from the failed engraftment of long-term engrafting cells. The use of thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists (TRA) has been extensively studied and remains an important component of experimental ex vivo stem cell expansion protocols, but its use in allogeneic transplantation is still evolving. METHODS: We describe the use of eltrombopag, a TRA, to stimulate the rescue of late graft failure in a patient following allogeneic HCT, and we performed a systematic review of published studies describing the use of TRAs following allogeneic transplantation. RESULTS: A total of eight publications were identified from our systematic search and included observational case studies (five studies, total of seven patients) that primarily addressed ITP or isolated thrombocytopenia at various time points after allogeneic HCT and prospective clinical trials (three studies, total of 177 patients with 95 patients receiving TRAs). No studies reported specifically on the use of TRAs for the treatment of trilineage graft failure as a means of in vivo stem cell expansion. The use of TRAs following allogeneic HCT appears safe and promising. CONCLUSION: The use of eltrombopag or other TRAs to treat poor graft function after allogeneic HCT is intriguing and warrants further study.

[The ABLE study: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of fresh red cell units to improve the outcome of transfused critically ill adults]. / L'étude ABLE : un essai clinique randomisé sur l'effet de la durée d'entreposage des concentrés érythrocytaires transfusés en réanimation.

Red blood cell units are stored up to 42 days post-collection. The standard policy of blood banks is to deliver the oldest units in order to limit blood wastage. Many caregivers believe that giving fresh rather than old units can improve the outcome of their transfused patients. The ABLE study aims to check if the transfusion of red blood cell units stored seven days or less (fresh arm) improve the outcome of transfused critically ill adults compared to patients who received units delivered according to the standard delivery policy (control arm). From March 2009 to May 2014, 1211 patients were allocated to the fresh arm, 1219 to the control arm (length of storage: 6.1 ± 4.9 and 22.0 ± 8.4 days respectively, P<0.001). The primary outcome measure was 90-day all-cause mortality post-randomisation: there were 448 deaths (37.0%) in the fresh arm and 430 (35.3%) in the control arm (absolute risk difference: 1.7%; 95% confidence interval: -2.1% to 5.5%). In a survival analysis, the risk of death was higher in the fresh arm (hazard ratio: 1.1; 95%CI: 0.9 to 1.2), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.38). The same trend against the fresh arm was observed with all but one secondary outcome measures. The conclusion is that the transfusion of red blood cell units stored seven days or less does not improve the outcome of critically ill adults compared to the transfusion of units stored about three weeks (22.0 ± 8.4 days).

Platelet transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB

BACKGROUND: The AABB (formerly, the American Association of Blood Banks) developed this guideline on appropriate use of platelet transfusion in adult patients. METHODS: These guidelines are based on a systematic review of randomized, clinical trials and observational studies (1900 to September 2014) that reported clinical outcomes on patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic platelet transfusions. An expert panel reviewed the data and developed recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RECOMMENDATION 1: The AABB recommends that platelets should be transfused prophylactically to reduce the risk for spontaneous bleeding in hospitalized adult patients with therapy-induced hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. The AABB recommends transfusing hospitalized adult patients with a platelet count of 10 × 109 cells/L or less to reduce the risk for spontaneous bleeding. The AABB recommends transfusing up to a single apheresis unit or equivalent. Greater doses are not more effective, and lower doses equal to one half of a standard apheresis unit are equally effective. (Grade: strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: The AABB suggests prophylactic platelet transfusion for patients having elective central venous catheter placement with a platelet count less than 20 × 109 cells/L. (Grade: weak recommendation; low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: The AABB suggests prophylactic platelet transfusion for patients having elective diagnostic lumbar puncture with a platelet count less than 50 × 109 cells/L. (Grade: weak recommendation; very-low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 4: The AABB suggests prophylactic platelet transfusion for patients having major elective nonneuraxial surgery with a platelet count less than 50 × 109 cells/L. (Grade: weak recommendation; very-low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 5: The AABB recommends against routine prophylactic platelet transfusion for patients who are nonthrombocytopenic and have cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The AABB suggests platelet transfusion for patients having bypass who exhibit perioperative bleeding with thrombocytopenia and/or evidence of platelet dysfunction. (Grade: weak recommendation; very-low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 6: The AABB cannot recommend for or against platelet transfusion for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy who have intracranial hemorrhage (traumatic or spontaneous). (Grade: uncertain recommendation; very-low-quality evidence).(AU)

A pilot prospective study of the vascular repair response following red cell transfusion in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes including infection, delayed recovery and increased mortality in some patient populations. Circulating cells that yield endothelial-like vascular progenitor cell (VPC) clusters are correlated with vascular repair and recovery after ischaemic injury. The impact of red cell transfusion on VPC clusters and vascular repair remains uncertain. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively enrolled patients admitted to intensive care requiring red cell transfusion and subjects at low likelihood of requiring red cell transfusion. Levels of VPC clusters and plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines were compared. A total of 17 patients were recruited and had blood samples collected at time of enrolment and at 24-48 h, 48-72 h and 1 week following transfusion. RESULTS: We could not discern differences in the number of VPC clusters between transfused patients (n = 6) and non-transfused subjects (n = 11) at baseline or throughout the study period. VPC cluster levels demonstrated wide variance and were highest at 24-h post-enrolment in the entire cohort. Furthermore, levels of all 16 cytokines analysed were not significantly different between transfused and non-transfused patients and we did not observe a correlation between cytokine concentrations and levels of circulating VPC-cluster forming cells in the overall study population. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that assessment of vascular repair responses after red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients is challenging. Although our study did not allow us to discern an influence of red cell transfusion on VPC cluster levels or angiogenic cytokines, new methods evaluating vascular repair mechanisms may be required.

Elicitation of utility scores in Canada for immune thrombocytopenia treated with romiplostim or watch and rescue.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to obtain utilities, or preference-based quality-of-life values, from the Canadian general public, for potential health states experienced by immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients receiving either romiplostim (a new thrombopoietin mimetic agent) or 'watch and rescue' therapy. Utilities are needed to conduct a cost-utility analysis of romiplostim for formulary and reimbursement decisions. METHODS: An electronic Time Trade-off (TTO) survey was developed and administered to a sample of the general public in Canada, with 12 distinct health states derived from two randomized clinical trials of romiplostim vs watch and rescue treatment. Two pilot tests assessed interpretability and respondent burden. In the final survey, each subject was administered the TTO for four randomly-selected health states. Descriptive statistics were computed for utility scores, and differences between health states were evaluated with an analysis of variance model. RESULTS: Eight hundred and twenty-one adults completed the TTO survey. Mean age was 36.4 (SD = 15) years; 63% were female. Mean (SD) utility scores ranged from 0.476 (0.271) for the most severe health state (significant bleeding) to 0.633 (0.282) for the least severe health state depicting successful treatment with romiplostim. Statistical significance was found on the mean difference between the most severe health state and five other health states (p < 0.05). After adjusting utilities for matching Canadian demographic parameters, no substantial difference was found between original utility scores and adjusted scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of the Canadian general public's preference for 12 ITP health states pertaining to romiplostim treatment or watch and rescue. This study had a number of limitations, the main ones being the lack of perfect match in demographics between this sample and the Canadian population, as well as the fact that the scenario descriptions were based on both published literature and expert opinion. Despite those limitations, the obtained utility scores may be used in cost-utility models of romiplostim as a treatment for ITP patients in Canada.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a fractionated blood product whose off-label use for treating a variety of conditions, including spontaneous recurrent miscarriage, has continued to grow in recent years. Its high costs and short supply necessitate improved guidance on its appropriate applications. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating IVIG for treatment of spontaneous recurrent miscarriage. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search strategy was applied to Medline (1966 to June 2005) and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (June 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials comparing all dosages of IVIG to placebo or an active control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently extracted data using a standardised data collection form. Measures of effect were derived for each trial independently, and studies were pooled based on clinical and methodologic appropriateness. MAIN RESULTS: We identified eight trials involving 442 women that evaluated IVIG therapy used to treat recurrent miscarriage. Overall, IVIG did not significantly increase the odds ratio (OR) of live birth when compared with placebo for treatment of recurrent miscarriage (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78-2.10). There was, however, a significant increase in live births following IVIG use in women with secondary recurrent miscarriage (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.09-6.73), while those with primary miscarriage did not experience the same benefit (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-1.26). AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS: IVIG increased the rates of live birth in secondary recurrent miscarriage, but there was insufficient evidence for its use in primary recurrent miscarriage.

Dalteparin as periprocedure anticoagulation for patients on warfarin and at high risk of thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients taking warfarin and at high risk for thromboembolic complications have traditionally been hospitalized for two to three days to receive standard treatment with intravenous heparin both prior to and following procedures while their international normalized ratio (INR) is subtherapeutic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of protocol implementation for outpatient anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin to eliminate or reduce the length of hospital admission needed solely for anticoagulation. METHODS: Patients included were receiving warfarin for a prosthetic heart valve, mitral valve disease with atrial fibrillation, or recent episode of venous thromboembolism. Warfarin was discontinued four days prior to the procedure. Subcutaneous dalteparin 200 units/kg was given on the two mornings prior to the procedure and restarted 12-24 hours after the procedure until the INR was in the therapeutic range. Warfarin was reinitiated on the evening of surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent 26 procedures. There were two minor bleeding complications, and one patient experienced a transient ischemic attack. Patients received a median of five days of dalteparin. The INR returned to the therapeutic range on the median postoperative day 4. All patients avoided two days of hospitalization prior to the procedure (i.e., no patients needed to be admitted preoperatively for anticoagulation). A median of four days would have been required for the sole purpose of postoperative anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient perioperative anticoagulation with dalteparin for high-risk patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation appears feasible and warrants further study.

Fludarabine in alkylator-resistant follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Follicular small cell and follicular mixed small and large cell lymphoma (FL) are incurable with conventional chemotherapy, and generally follow a relapsing course, eventually becoming resistant to first-line therapy with alkylating agents. Fludarabine is a novel chemotherapeutic agent that is effective in FL, but its role in alkylator-resistant disease remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with alkylator-resistant FL treated with fludarabine. Patients were identified from pharmacy records and included if they fulfilled criteria for alkylator-resistant FL. Resistance was defined as failure to achieve a partial response, progression while on therapy, or relapse within six months of completing therapy. Seventeen patients met the criteria of alkylator-resistant FL and were included in the analysis. All patients received fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) for five days. A median of 2.5 courses of fludarabine was given. One patient had a complete remission and eight patients had partial remissions, for an overall response rate of 53%. Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months and median overall survival was 15.4 months for all patients. Four patients underwent subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation; all required additional salvage chemotherapy for post-fludarabine relapses. Three patients remain in remission more than 12 months post-transplantation. Fludarabine produces partial responses in patients with advanced refractory FL; however, the duration of the response limits its utility in alkylator-resistant disease.