Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 12(1): 75-79, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27749791

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a microtubule-stabilizing agent and belongs to the taxane group of chemotherapeutic drugs. It is used to treat numerous malignancies, such as breast and lung cancers. A rare side effect of this drug includes cystoid macular edema (CME), which is presumed to resolve after cessation of Paclitaxel. We present a case of topical Dorzolamide 2% (Trusopt) having a possible successful effect in the treatment of Paclitaxel-related nonresolving CME. By highlighting this rare ocular side effect of a common chemotherapeutic agent, which fails to resolve upon cessation of the drug alone, we suggest a possible treatment that may help other ophthalmologists in their management of similar cases. METHODS: A retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 74-year-old female, with no previous ocular history, presented to eye clinic complaining of bilateral gradual painless reduction in vision for the past 1 month. Medical history included left-sided breast carcinoma with bone and pulmonary metastases. She was on three chemotherapeutic agents-Herceptin, Denosumab, and Paclitaxel. On examination, her best corrected visual acuities were 6/12 in the right eye and 6/18 in the left eye. Fundus examination revealed bilateral CME, which was confirmed on ocular coherence tomography scan. Central macular thickness was 378 µm in the right eye and 354 µm in the left eye. Fundus fluorescein angiography did not reveal any leakage of fluid. Electrodiagnostic tests helped exclude carcinoma-associated retinopathy. Paclitaxel-related CME was suspected, and after discussions with the oncologist, this medication was stopped. After 4 weeks, the patient's vision had deteriorated (best corrected visual acuities = 6/18 right eye and 6/36 left eye) with increased CME (central macular thickness = 397 µm right eye and 356 µm left eye). Hypertrophic retinal pigment epithelial changes started to develop. Because of the nonresolving CME, the patient was started on topical Dorzolamide 2% (Trusopt) three times daily to both eyes. Four weeks later, her vision had improved (best corrected visual acuities = 6/12 right eye and 6/18 left eye). Ocular coherence tomography scan showed near-complete resolution of CME in both eyes (central macular thickness = 287 µm right eye and 282 µm left eye). At the last follow-up visit (3 months after starting topical Dorzolamide), CME had resolved completely and best corrected visual acuities improved to 6/9 in both eyes. CONCLUSION: Cystoid macular edema is a rare side effect of the chemotherapeutic drug Paclitaxel. Imaging in Paclitaxel-related CME reveals fluid on ocular coherence tomography scan without leakage on fundus fluorescein angiography, which is in keeping with our findings. There are no recommended treatment guidelines for this condition because of the unclear mechanism of pathology. Treatment strategies have focused on Paclitaxel cessation, which appears to result in spontaneous resolution of CME and improvement in visual acuity. In our patient's case, worsening vision combined with persistent CME and development of retinal pigment epithelial changes after the initial 4 weeks of Paclitaxel cessation indicated that irreversible reduction in vision was a real possibility if we persisted with the drug cessation treatment plan alone. However, a combination of Paclitaxel cessation and topical Dorzolamide 2% TDS (Trusopt) appeared to be effective in reducing her nonresolving CME with no adverse side effects. We can thus postulate that Dorzolamide 2% TDS might have helped to accelerate the resolution of CME, resulting in improved visual acuity, and could be considered as an early treatment option helping to avoid possible irreversible pigmentary changes at the macula that may lead to reduction in vision. Although further research is required, our case report displays a promising treatment strategy and outcome for this rare nonresolving Paclitaxel-related side effect.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/induzido quimicamente , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Tiofenos/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Anidrase Carbônica/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Soluções Oftálmicas/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Acuidade Visual
2.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 8(1): 13-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25372199

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report a case study of a patient with Leber miliary aneurysms with macular edema refractory to various treatment modalities. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a 35-year-old man who had multiple Leber miliary aneurysms with exudation and edema involving the macula. The patient's data were collected from case notes over a 3-year period of management of the condition. RESULTS: The patient's Leber miliary aneurysm with exudation and macular edema was refractory to various treatment modalities, including laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, photodynamic therapy, and cryotherapy. However, recently, the patient showed a good response to treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implants. His macular edema and vision have improved with these injections. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone implants should be considered along with other treatment options when planning treatment of Leber miliary aneurysms. However, the long-term stability of the disease with these injections is not known.


Assuntos
Aneurisma/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Retinianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Implantes de Medicamento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 28(12): 2173-6, 2002 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12498855

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the nature and frequency of anterior chamber contamination during phacoemulsification. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 80 patients having routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery were recruited into this prospective study. Bacterial cultures from the intraoperative anterior chamber aspirates from the patients were assessed. RESULTS: Anterior chamber fluid aspirates were positive for bacteria in 37 eyes (46.25%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common aerobe and Propionibacterium acnes, the most common anaerobe. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that phacoemulsification has no proven advantage over conventional extracapsular cataract extraction in reducing intraoperative bacterial contamination.


Assuntos
Câmara Anterior/microbiologia , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/microbiologia , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Câmara Anterior/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humor Aquoso/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Polimetil Metacrilato , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA