Influence of sealer type on treatment outcome of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article was to Evaluate the influence of sealer on the outcome of non-surgical endodontic treatment or retreatment of permanent teeth with apical periodontitis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020205951). METHODOLOGY: A systematic review of original clinical studies was carried out following PRISMA guidelines to answer whether the type of sealer used in endodontic treatment or retreatment influences the repair of apical periodontitis determined by clinical and radiographic parameters. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database, until May 2023. Gray literature and a hand search of reference lists were also performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies. RESULTS: Among 1046 studies, a total of 819 were selected by title and abstract, resulting in 23 for full-text review. In total, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (1467 patients/teeth with apical periodontitis). The quality assessment using RoB2 included five randomized control trials, of which four had medium risk and one had a low risk of bias. According to the NOS scale, five studies were classified as low risk and one study was considered as medium risk of bias. The sealer type and obturation techniques varied, and the mean follow-up time was 3.7 years. Most studies used two-dimensional radiographic criteria to assess the treatment outcome sealers and not cements. Eight studies did not find significant differences when comparing cements. The healing rates ranged from 56.7% to 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review support that the current endodontic sealers do not seem to influence the treatment outcome of permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. Although the studies had medium and low risk of bias, the results should be interpreted with caution. More randomized studies of long-term outcomes comparing filling materials are needed to strengthen this claim and allow for a meta-analysis.

Comparison of different methods of analysis of maxillary sinus volume and validation of a new proposal using cone beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: develop and validate a formula, through a discriminant analysis of sex estimation, evaluating maxillary sinus in cone beam computed tomography scans in a Brazilian population, comparing this formula with two other existing ones. METHODS: 190 cone beam CT scans of Brazilian adults were retrospectively evaluated by an independent examiner. Measurements were performed in the right and left MS region: height, width, length, distance between the breasts, distance between infraorbital foramina, and volume in the ITK software. The sample was divided into female and male. T test, ANOVA, Tukey test and the ROC Curve was performed (p > 0,05). RESULTS: statistically significant differences were found in relation to the maximum height of the MS both right (p = 0,001) and left (p = 0,026) between sexes and the maximum length in the right MS (p = 0,01). Regarding the comparison of MS volume according to the different analysis methods, statistically significant differences were found between sexes for the right MS when using the method by Bangi et al. (p = 0,012) and the volume of the left MS in females (p < 0,001). Comparing the three classification models, statistically significant differences were found between the proposed method and the classification by Bangi et al. (p < 0.007). The ROC curve showed greater accuracy in the classification proposed in this work. CONCLUSION: the new proposed formula obtained better predictions of sexual dimorphism, when compared to classifications already described in the literature.

Influence of sealer type on treatment outcome of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review

Abstract The purpose of this article was to Evaluate the influence of sealer on the outcome of non-surgical endodontic treatment or retreatment of permanent teeth with apical periodontitis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020205951). Methodology: A systematic review of original clinical studies was carried out following PRISMA guidelines to answer whether the type of sealer used in endodontic treatment or retreatment influences the repair of apical periodontitis determined by clinical and radiographic parameters. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database, until May 2023. Gray literature and a hand search of reference lists were also performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies. Results: Among 1046 studies, a total of 819 were selected by title and abstract, resulting in 23 for full-text review. In total, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (1467 patients/teeth with apical periodontitis). The quality assessment using RoB2 included five randomized control trials, of which four had medium risk and one had a low risk of bias. According to the NOS scale, five studies were classified as low risk and one study was considered as medium risk of bias. The sealer type and obturation techniques varied, and the mean follow-up time was 3.7 years. Most studies used two-dimensional radiographic criteria to assess the treatment outcome sealers and not cements. Eight studies did not find significant differences when comparing cements. The healing rates ranged from 56.7% to 90%. Conclusions: The results of this review support that the current endodontic sealers do not seem to influence the treatment outcome of permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. Although the studies had medium and low risk of bias, the results should be interpreted with caution. More randomized studies of long-term outcomes comparing filling materials are needed to strengthen this claim and allow for a meta-analysis.

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo foi avaliar a influência do cimento no resultado do tratamento ou retratamento endodôntico não cirúrgico de dentes permanentes com periodontite apical (registro PROSPERO: CRD42020205951). Metodologia: Uma revisão sistemática de estudos clínicos originais foi realizada seguindo as diretrizes PRISMA para responder se o tipo de cimento usado no tratamento ou retratamento endodôntico influencia a reparação da periodontite apical determinada por parâmetros clínicos e radiográficos. Pesquisas eletrônicas foram realizadas no PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus e no banco de dados Cochrane Library, até maio de 2023. A literatura cinza e uma pesquisa manual das listas de referências também foram realizadas. O risco de viés foi avaliado usando Cochrane RoB2 para os estudos randomizados e Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) para coorte prospectiva e retrospectiva e estudos de caso-controle. Resultados: Entre 1.046 estudos, um total de 819 foram selecionados por título e resumo, resultando em 23 para revisão de texto completo. No total, 11 estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão (1.467 pacientes/dentes com periodontite apical). A avaliação de qualidade usando RoB2 incluiu cinco estudos randomizados de controle, dos quais quatro tinham risco médio e um tinha baixo risco de viés. De acordo com a escala NOS, cinco estudos foram classificados com baixo risco e um estudo foi considerado com médio risco de viés. O tipo de cimento e as técnicas de obturação variaram, e o tempo médio de acompanhamento foi de 3,7 anos. A maioria dos estudos utilizou critérios radiográficos bidimensionais para avaliar o resultado do tratamento. Oito estudos não encontraram diferenças significativas ao comparar os cimentos. As taxas de reparação variaram de 56,7% a 90%. Conclusões: Os resultados desta revisão suportam que os cimentos endodônticos atuais não parecem influenciar o resultado do tratamento de dentes permanentes com periodontite apical. Embora os estudos tiveram médio e baixo risco de viés, os resultados devem ser interpretados com cautela. Mais estudos randomizados de resultados de longo prazo comparando materiais de obturação são necessários para fortalecer essa afirmação e permitir uma meta-análise.

Pediatric erythema multiforme induced by topical imiquimod: a case report.

Erythema multiforme (EM) is a rare immune-mediated reaction with mucocutaneous involvement. This case report describes the development of EM in a 9-year-old girl after treatment with imiquimod, a topical immunomodulator used in the management of some dermatologic conditions. Because imiquimod-related EM is rare, particularly in children, this article also reviews the potential adverse effects of this drug and the main characteristics of imiquimod-induced EM, especially in similar cases reported in the literature. Clinicians should be aware that topical imiquimod can induce EM, and this medication should be added to the extensive list of drugs that can trigger the condition.

Psammomatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma: an analysis of 2 cases affecting the mandible with review of the literature.

Juvenile ossifying fibroma (JOF) is a rare fibro-osseous neoplasm, defined as a variant of the ossifying fibroma that arises within the craniofacial bones. Two subgroups, juvenile psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (PsJOF) and juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma, have been delineated by their histology. PsJOF occurs predominantly in the sinonasal and orbital bones. This work reports on 2 cases of extensive PsJOF in the body of the right mandible as well as reviews the literature regarding the radiographic and histologic features, treatment, and prognosis of PsJOF of the jaws.

Tratamento cirúrgico de fibroma cemento-ossificante: relato de caso clínico / Surgical treatment of cemento-ossifying fibroma: case report

As lesões fibro-ósseas constituem um grupo de patologias caracterizadas pela substituição de tecido ósseo normal por tecido fibroso benigno contendo quantidades variadas de material mineralizado. A displasia fibrosa óssea, o fibroma ossificante, o fibroma cemento-ossificante e a displasia cemento-óssea são as mais frequentes. Na literatura, a classificação e a terminologia das lesões fibro-ósseas apresentam-se ainda confusas e controversas, pois essas patologias exibem, freqüentemente, características clínicas e morfológicas muito semelhantes. O fibroma cemento-ossificante é uma neoplasia benigna que faz parte do grupo das lesões fibro-ósseas. Caracteriza-se por crescimento bem delimitado e eventualmente encapsulado, apresentando quantidades variáveis de tecido mineralizado semelhante ao osso e cemento. São lesões incomuns, que tendem a ocorrer durante a 3ª e 4ª décadas de vida, com uma predileção pelo gênero feminino. Acomete preferencialmente a mandíbula. Este trabalho tem por objetivo descrever e discutir um caso clínico-cirúrgico de fibroma cemento ossificante.

Fibro-osseous lesions of bone are a group of diseases characterized by replacement of normal bone tissue with benign fibrous tissue containing different amounts of mineralized material. The most frequent are fibrous dysplasia, ossifying fibroma, cemento-ossifying fibroma, and osteofibrous dysplasia. In the literature, classification and terminology of these entities remain confusing and controversial, since these lesions show some clinical and morphologic similarities. Cemento-ossifying fibroma is a benign neoplasia that is a part of the group of the fibroosseous lesions. It is characterized by well delimited growth and occasionally encapsulated, presenting changeable amounts of mineralized tissue similar to the bone and cemento. They are uncommon lesions that tend to occur during the 3rd and 4th decades of life, mainly in females and preferentially appearing in the mandible. The aim of this work is to describe and discuss a clinical surgical case of cemento-ossifying fibroma.