An Increase in HSF1 Expression Directs Human Mammary Epithelial Cells toward a Mesenchymal Phenotype.

HSF1 is a well-known heat shock protein expression regulator in response to stress. It also regulates processes important for growth, development or tumorigenesis. We studied the HSF1 influence on the phenotype of non-tumorigenic human mammary epithelial (MCF10A and MCF12A) and several triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. MCF10A and MCF12A differ in terms of HSF1 levels, morphology, growth in Matrigel, expression of epithelial (CDH1) and mesenchymal (VIM) markers (MCF10A are epithelial cells; MCF12A resemble mesenchymal cells). HSF1 down-regulation led to a reduced proliferation rate and spheroid formation in Matrigel by MCF10A cells. However, it did not affect MCF12A proliferation but led to CDH1 up-regulation and the formation of better organized spheroids. HSF1 overexpression in MCF10A resulted in reduced CDH1 and increased VIM expression and the acquisition of elongated fibroblast-like morphology. The above-mentioned results suggest that elevated levels of HSF1 may direct mammary epithelial cells toward a mesenchymal phenotype, while a lowering of HSF1 could reverse the mesenchymal phenotype to an epithelial one. Therefore, HSF1 may be involved in the remodeling of mammary gland architecture over the female lifetime. Moreover, HSF1 levels positively correlated with the invasive phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer cells, and their growth was inhibited by the HSF1 inhibitor DTHIB.

HSF1 Can Prevent Inflammation following Heat Shock by Inhibiting the Excessive Activation of the ATF3 and JUN&FOS Genes.

Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1), a transcription factor frequently overexpressed in cancer, is activated by proteotoxic agents and participates in the regulation of cellular stress response. To investigate how HSF1 level affects the response to proteotoxic stress, we integrated data from functional genomics analyses performed in MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma cells. Although the general transcriptional response to heat shock was impaired due to HSF1 deficiency (mainly chaperone expression was inhibited), a set of genes was identified, including ATF3 and certain FOS and JUN family members, whose stress-induced activation was stronger and persisted longer than in cells with normal HSF1 levels. These genes were direct HSF1 targets, suggesting a dual (activatory/suppressory) role for HSF1. Moreover, we found that heat shock-induced inflammatory response could be stronger in HSF1-deficient cells. Analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas data indicated that higher ATF3, FOS, and FOSB expression levels correlated with low HSF1 levels in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, reflecting higher heat shock-induced expression of these genes in HSF1-deficient MCF7 cells observed in vitro. However, differences between the analyzed cancer types were noted in the regulation of HSF1-dependent genes, indicating the presence of cell-type-specific mechanisms. Nevertheless, our data indicate the existence of the heat shock-induced network of transcription factors (associated with the activation of TNFα signaling) which includes HSF1. Independent of its chaperone-mediated cytoprotective function, HSF1 may be involved in the regulation of this network but prevents its overactivation in some cells during stress.

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) cooperates with estrogen receptor α (ERα) in the regulation of estrogen action in breast cancer cells.

Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), a key regulator of transcriptional responses to proteotoxic stress, was linked to estrogen (E2) signaling through estrogen receptor α (ERα). We found that an HSF1 deficiency may decrease ERα level, attenuate the mitogenic action of E2, counteract E2-stimulated cell scattering, and reduce adhesion to collagens and cell motility in ER-positive breast cancer cells. The stimulatory effect of E2 on the transcriptome is largely weaker in HSF1-deficient cells, in part due to the higher basal expression of E2-dependent genes, which correlates with the enhanced binding of unliganded ERα to chromatin in such cells. HSF1 and ERα can cooperate directly in E2-stimulated regulation of transcription, and HSF1 potentiates the action of ERα through a mechanism involving chromatin reorganization. Furthermore, HSF1 deficiency may increase the sensitivity to hormonal therapy (4-hydroxytamoxifen) or CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib). Analyses of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database indicate that HSF1 increases the transcriptome disparity in ER-positive breast cancer and can enhance the genomic action of ERα. Moreover, only in ER-positive cancers an elevated HSF1 level is associated with metastatic disease.

About 70% of breast cancers rely on supplies of a hormone called estrogen ­ which is the main hormone responsible for female physical characteristics ­ to grow. Breast cancer cells that are sensitive to estrogen possess proteins known as estrogen receptors and are classified as estrogen-receptor positive. When estrogen interacts with its receptor in a cancer cell, it stimulates the cell to grow and migrate to other parts of the body. Therefore, therapies that decrease the amount of estrogen the body produces, or inhibit the receptor itself, are widely used to treat patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. When estrogen interacts with an estrogen receptor known as ERα it can also activate a protein called HSF1, which helps cells to survive under stress. In turn, HSF1 regulates several other proteins that are necessary for ERα and other estrogen receptors to work properly. Previous studies have suggested that high levels of HSF1 may worsen the outcomes for patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers, but it remains unclear how HSF1 acts in breast cancer cells. Vydra, Janus, Kus et al. used genetics and bioinformatics approaches to study HSF1 in human breast cancer cells. The experiments revealed that breast cancer cells with lower levels of HSF1 also had lower levels of ERα and responded less well to estrogen than cells with higher levels of HSF1. Further experiments suggested that in the absence of estrogen, HSF1 helps to keep ERα inactive. However, when estrogen is present, HSF1 cooperates with ERα and enhances its activity to help cells grow and migrate. Vydra, Janus, Kus et al. also found that cells with higher levels of HSF1 were less sensitive to two drug therapies that are commonly used to treat estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. These findings reveal that the effect HSF1 has on ERα activity depends on the presence of estrogen. Therefore, cancer therapies that decrease the amount of estrogen a patient produces may have a different effect on estrogen receptor-positive tumors with high HSF1 levels than tumors with low HSF1 levels.

Inhibition of the Heat Shock Protein A (HSPA) Family Potentiates the Anticancer Effects of Manumycin A.

Manumycin A (MA) is a well-tolerated natural antibiotic showing pleiotropic anticancer effects in various preclinical in vitro and in vivo models. Anticancer drugs may themselves act as stressors to induce the cellular adaptive mechanism that can minimize their cytotoxicity. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) as cytoprotective factors can counteract the deleterious effects of various stressful stimuli. In this study, we examined whether the anticancer effects of MA can be counteracted by the mechanism related to HSPs belonging to the HSPA (HSP70) family. We found that MA caused cell type-specific alterations in the levels of HSPAs. These changes included concomitant upregulation of the stress-inducible (HSPA1 and HSPA6) and downregulation of the non-stress-inducible (HSPA2) paralogs. However, neither HSPA1 nor HSPA2 were necessary to provide protection against MA in lung cancer cells. Conversely, the simultaneous repression of several HSPA paralogs using pan-HSPA inhibitors (VER-155008 or JG-98) sensitized cancer cells to MA. We also observed that genetic ablation of the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) transcription factor, a main transactivator of HSPAs expression, sensitized MCF7 cells to MA treatment. Our study reveals that inhibition of HSF1-mediated heat shock response (HSR) can improve the anticancer effect of MA. These observations suggest that targeting the HSR- or HSPA-mediated adaptive mechanisms may be a promising strategy for further preclinical developments.

The periphilin 1-like BFAR isoform 3 is highly expressed in transcriptionally silent oocytes and involved in RNA metabolism.

The mouse 3110001I22Rik gene located in the first intron of Bfar is considered as a Bfar variant coding for the BFARv3 protein. However, it differs from other BFAR isoforms and resembles periphilin 1 (PPHLN1) due to its two (Lge1 and serine-rich) conserved domains. We identified the BFARv3/EGFP-interacting proteins by co-immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry, which revealed 40S ribosomal proteins (RPS3, RPS14, RPS19, RPS25, RPS27), histones (H1.2, H1.4, H3.3C), proteins involved in RNA processing and splicing (SFPQ, SNRPA1, HNRNPA3, NONO, KHDRBS3), calcium signaling (HPCAL1, PTK2B), as well as HSD17B4, GRB14, POSTN, and MYO10. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that both Lge1 and Ser-rich domains of BFARv3 were necessary for binding to RNA-interacting factors NONO and SFPQ, known to be components of paraspeckles. Reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation and the proximity ligation assay confirmed that both BFARv3 and PPHLN1 could interact with NONO and SFPQ, suggesting a new function for PPHLN1 as well. BFARv3 and its Lge1 or Ser-rich-deficient mutants preferentially localize in the nucleus. We found an accumulation of BFARv3/EGFP (but not its mutated forms) in the nuclear granules, which was enhanced in response to arsenite treatment and ionizing radiation. Although Bfar v3 is expressed ubiquitously in mouse tissues, its expression is the highest in metaphase II oocytes. The BFARv3 interactome suggests its role in RNA metabolism, which is critical for the transcriptionally silent MII oocyte. Mouse BFARv3 has no ortholog in the human genome, thus it may contribute to the differences between these two species observed in oocyte maturation and early embryonic development.

Pro-death signaling of cytoprotective heat shock factor 1: upregulation of NOXA leading to apoptosis in heat-sensitive cells.

Heat shock can induce either cytoprotective mechanisms or cell death. We found that in certain human and mouse cells, including spermatocytes, activated heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) binds to sequences located in the intron(s) of the PMAIP1 (NOXA) gene and upregulates its expression which induces apoptosis. Such a mode of PMAIP1 activation is not dependent on p53. Therefore, HSF1 not only can activate the expression of genes encoding cytoprotective heat shock proteins, which prevents apoptosis, but it can also positively regulate the proapoptotic PMAIP1 gene, which facilitates cell death. This could be the primary cause of hyperthermia-induced elimination of heat-sensitive cells, yet other pro-death mechanisms might also be involved.

17ß-Estradiol Activates HSF1 via MAPK Signaling in ERα-Positive Breast Cancer Cells.

Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) is a key regulator of gene expression during acute environmental stress that enables the cell survival, which is also involved in different cancer-related processes. A high level of HSF1 in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients correlated with a worse prognosis. Here we demonstrated that 17ß-estradiol (E2), as well as xenoestrogen bisphenol A and ERα agonist propyl pyrazole triol, led to HSF1 phosphorylation on S326 in ERα positive but not in ERα-negative mammary breast cancer cells. Furthermore, we showed that MAPK signaling (via MEK1/2) but not mTOR signaling was involved in E2/ERα-dependent activation of HSF1. E2-activated HSF1 was transcriptionally potent and several genes essential for breast cancer cells growth and/or ERα action, including HSPB8, LHX4, PRKCE, WWC1, and GREB1, were activated by E2 in a HSF1-dependent manner. Our findings suggest a hypothetical positive feedback loop between E2/ERα and HSF1 signaling, which may support the growth of estrogen-dependent tumors.

Interplay between HSF1 and p53 signaling pathways in cancer initiation and progression: non-oncogene and oncogene addiction.

BACKGROUND: The p53 and HSF1 transcription factors are key players in cellular responses to stress. They activate important signaling pathways triggering adaptive mechanisms that maintain cellular homeostasis. HSF1 is mainly activated by proteotoxic stress, and its induction leads to the synthesis of chaperones that provide proteome integrity. The p53 protein, which is primarily activated in response to DNA damage, causes cell cycle arrest allowing for DNA repair or directs cells to apoptosis, thereby maintaining genome integrity. Both signaling pathways are also involved in neoplastic transformation and tumor progression. Loss of tumor suppressor abilities of the wild-type p53 protein results in oncogenesis, whereas proper HSF1 action, though non-oncogenic itself, actively supports this process. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe in detail the interplay between the p53 and HSF1 signaling pathways, with particular emphasis on the molecular mechanisms involved, as well as their importance for normal cellular behavior, cancer development, the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapies and their toxicity. Detailed knowledge of the complex interplay between HSF1 and p53 may form a basis for the design of new protocols for cancer treatment.

PHLDA1 Does Not Contribute Directly to Heat Shock-Induced Apoptosis of Spermatocytes.

Spermatocytes are among the most heat-sensitive cells and the exposure of testes to heat shock results in their Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1)-mediated apoptosis. Several lines of evidence suggest that pleckstrin-homology-like domain family A, member 1 (PHLDA1) plays a role in promoting heat shock-induced cell death in spermatogenic cells, yet its precise physiological role is not well understood. Aiming to elucidate the hypothetical role of PHLDA1 in HSF1-mediated apoptosis of spermatogenic cells we characterized its expression in mouse testes during normal development and after heat shock. We stated that transcription of Phlda1 is upregulated by heat shock in many adult mouse organs including the testes. Analyzes of the Phlda1 expression during postnatal development indicate that it is expressed in pre-meiotic or somatic cells of the testis. It starts to be transcribed much earlier than spermatocytes are fully developed and its transcripts and protein products do not accumulate further in the later stages. Moreover, neither heat shock nor expression of constitutively active HSF1 results in the accumulation of PHLDA1 protein in meiotic and post-meiotic cells although both conditions induce massive apoptosis of spermatocytes. Furthermore, the overexpression of PHLDA1 in NIH3T3 cells leads to cell detachment, yet classical apoptosis is not observed. Therefore, our findings indicate that PHLDA1 cannot directly contribute to the heat-induced apoptosis of spermatocytes. Instead, PHLDA1 could hypothetically participate in death of spermatocytes indirectly via activation of changes in the somatic or pre-meiotic cells present in the testes.

SPEN protein expression and interactions with chromatin in mouse testicular cells.

SPEN (spen family transcription repressor) is a nucleic acid-binding protein putatively involved in repression of gene expression. We hypothesized that SPEN could be involved in general downregulation of the transcription during the heat shock response in mouse spermatogenic cells through its interactions with chromatin. We documented predominant nuclear localization of the SPEN protein in spermatocytes and round spermatids, which was retained after heat shock. Moreover, the protein was excluded from the highly condensed chromatin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments clearly indicated interactions of SPEN with chromatin in vivo However, ChIP-Seq analyses did not reveal any strong specific peaks both in untreated and heat shocked cells, which might suggest dispersed localization of SPEN and/or its indirect binding to DNA. Using in situ proximity ligation assay we found close in vivo associations of SPEN with MTA1 (metastasis-associated 1), a member of the nucleosome remodeling complex with histone deacetylase activity, which might contribute to interactions of SPEN with chromatin.

Active heat shock transcription factor 1 supports migration of the melanoma cells via vinculin down-regulation.

Heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1), the major regulator of stress response, is frequently activated in cancer and has an apparent role in malignant transformation. Here we analyzed the influence of the over-expression of a constitutively active transcriptionally-competent HSF1 mutant form on phenotypes of mouse and human melanoma cells. We observed that the expression of active HSF1 supported anchorage-independent growth in vitro, and metastatic spread in the animal model in vivo, although the proliferation rate of cancer cells was not affected. Furthermore, active HSF1 enhanced cell motility, reduced the adherence of cells to a fibronectin-coated surface, and affected the actin cytoskeleton. We found that although the expression of active HSF1 did not affect levels of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers, it caused transcriptional down-regulation of vinculin, protein involved in cell motility, and adherence. Functional HSF1-binding sites were found in mouse and human Vcl/VCL genes, indicating a direct role of HSF1 in the regulation of this gene. An apparent association between HSF1-induced down-regulation of vinculin, increased motility, and a reduced adherence of cells suggests a possible mechanism of HSF1-mediated enhancement of the metastatic potential of cancer cells.

Crosstalk between HSF1 and HSF2 during the heat shock response in mouse testes.

Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) is the primary transcription factor responsible for the response to cellular stress, while HSF2 becomes activated during development and differentiation, including spermatogenesis. Although both factors are indispensable for proper spermatogenesis, activation of HSF1 by heat shock initiates apoptosis of spermatogenic cells leading to infertility of males. To characterize mechanisms assisting such heat induced apoptosis we studied how HSF1 and HSF2 cooperate during the heat shock response. For this purpose we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and the proximity ligation approaches. We looked for co-occupation of binding sites by HSF1 and HSF2 in untreated (32 °C) or heat shocked (at 38 °C or 43 °C) spermatocytes, which are cells the most sensitive to hyperthermia. At the physiological temperature or after mild hyperthermia at 38 °C, the sharing of binding sites for both HSFs was observed mainly in promoters of Hsp genes and other stress-related genes. Strong hyperthermia at 43 °C resulted in an increased binding of HSF1 and releasing of HSF2, hence co-occupation of promoter regions was not detected any more. The close proximity of HSF1 and HSF2 (and/or existence of HSF1/HSF2 complexes) was frequent at the physiological temperature. Temperature elevation resulted in a decreased number of such complexes and they were barely detected after strong hyperthermia at 43 °C. We have concluded that at the physiological temperature HSF1 and HSF2 cooperate in spermatogenic cells. However, temperature elevation causes remodeling of chromatin binding and interactions between HSFs are disrupted. This potentially affects the regulation of stress response and contributes to the heat sensitivity of these cells.