Diagnostic impact of RNA-based next-generation sequencing fusion panel for solid tumors: A single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVES: Gene rearrangements frequently act as oncogenic driver mutations and determine the onset and progression of cancer. RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is being used with increasing frequency for solid tumors. The purpose of our study is to investigate the feasibility and utility of an RNA-based NGS fusion panel for solid tumors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-institution review of fusion panels requested between May 2022 and March 2023. Demographic, clinical, pathologic, and molecular findings of the patients were reviewed. The utility of the RNA-based NGS fusion panel for the pathologic diagnosis of solid tumors was assessed. RESULTS: Our study included 345 cases, and a fusion event was identified in 24.3% (78/321) of cases. Among the 110 cases submitted for diagnostic purposes, a fusion event was detected in 42.7% (47/110) of cases. The results led to refinement or clarification of the initial diagnosis in 31.9% (15/47) of cases and agreement or support for the initial diagnosis in 59.6% (28/47) of cases. Furthermore, our study indicated that the overall cellularity (tumor and normal tissue) of the tested specimen influences the success of the testing process. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study demonstrated the feasibility and utility of an RNA-based NGS fusion panel for a wide variety of solid tumors in the appropriate clinicopathologic context. These findings warrant further validation in larger studies involving multiple institutional patient cohorts.

Evaluation of MetaSystems Automated Fluorescent Microscopy System for the Machine-Assisted Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Clinical Samples.

Manual reading of fluorescent acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy slides is time-intensive and technically demanding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MetaSystems' automated fluorescent AFB slide scanner and analyzer. Auramine O-stained slides corresponding to 133 culture-positive and 363 culture-negative respiratory (n = 284), tissue (n = 120), body fluid (n = 81), and other (n = 11) sources were evaluated with the MetaSystems Mycobacteria Scanner running the NEON Metafer AFB Module. The sensitivity and specificity of the MetaSystems platform was measured as a standalone diagnostic and as an assistant to technologists to review positive images. Culture results were used as the reference method. The MetaSystems platform failed to scan 57 (11.5%) slides. The MetaSystems platform used as a standalone had a sensitivity of 97.0% (129/133; 95% CI 92.5 to 99.2) and specificity of 12.7% (46/363; 95% CI 9.4 to 16.5). When positive scans were used to assist technologists, the MetaSystems platform had a sensitivity of 70.7% (94/133; 95% CI 62.2 to 78.3) and specificity of 89.0% (323/363; 95% CI 85.3 to 92.0). The manual microscopy method had a sensitivity of 79.7% (106/133; 95% CI 71.9 to 86.2) and specificity of 98.6% (358/363; 95% CI 96.8 to 99.6). The sensitivity of the MetaSystems platform was not impacted by smear grade or mycobacterial species. The majority (70.3%) of false positive smears had ≥2+ smear results with the MetaSystems platform. Further performance improvements are needed before the MetaSystems' automated fluorescent AFB slide reader can be used to assist microscopist in the clinical laboratory.