A phase III study of high-dose intensification without hematopoietic progenitor cells support for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

Patients with more than nine ipsilateral lymph node involvement or inflammatory breast cancer have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. We studied the efficacy of high-dose intensification, comparing it with the standard dose chemotherapy for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer. Patients with inflammatory breast cancer or more than nine ipsilateral lymph node involvement without evidence of distant metastasis were randomized to receive either standard dose 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) every 3 weeks for nine courses (control) or six courses of FAC followed by two courses of cyclophosphamide (5.25 g/m2), etoposide (1,500 mg/m2), and cisplatin (165 mg/m2) (HDCVP). The study was terminated in 1998 because of slow accrual of patients. Forty-six patients were entered in the study. At 4 years, the overall survival was 72.8% (SE 11.9%) and 61.7% (SE 12.4%), and disease-free survival were 45.5% (SE 12.3%) and 33.7% (SE 11.9%) for the control and HDCVP groups, respectively (p = 0.757 and 0.720). With the small number of patients in our study, a small overall survival benefit of high-dose intensification compared with the standard therapy cannot be excluded. However, any substantial benefit is unlikely.

Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada.

A comprehensive understanding of the cost components of common illnesses is a necessary first step towards ensuring optimal use of scarce healthcare resources. Since breast cancer is the commonest malignancy affecting Canadian women, we estimated the direct healthcare costs associated with the lifetime management of a cohort of 17700 women diagnosed in 1995. Using a multiplicity of data sources, treatment algorithms, follow-up and disease progression patterns were determined by age (<50; >/=50 years) for all four stages of breast cancer at diagnosis, as well as for the management of local and distant recurrence. Statistics Canada's Population Health Model (POHEM) was used to integrate the data from the different sources and to estimate the lifetime costs, discounted at 0, 3 and 5% rates. The average undiscounted lifetime cost per case of treating women diagnosed with breast cancer varied by stage, from $36,340 for stage IV or metastatic disease, to $23,275 for stage I patients. The total cost of treatment for the cohort diagnosed in 1995 was estimated to be over 454 million Canadian dollars. Hospitalisation (mainly for initial treatment and terminal care) represented 63% of the lifetime costs of care delivery. Disease costing models are valuable tools for optimising the use of scare resources without compromising the health status of individual patients. The breast cancer costing model has recently been used to assess the cost impact and cost-effectiveness of providing radiotherapy to all patients undergoing breast surgery, and of performing outpatient breast surgery.

Clinical characteristics and the impact of surgery and chemotherapy on survival of patients with advanced and metastatic bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a retrospective study.

We retrospectively analyzed data from the clinical charts of 126 patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) referred to the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center. The patient group consisted of 49 men (39%) and 77 women (61%). The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. Most patients were smokers (85%). At diagnosis, 53% were stage Ia-IIIa and 47% were stage IIIb and IV. Forty-one percent of the patients with advanced and metastatic stages (IIIb, IV) underwent surgery. Multifocal disease was present at diagnosis in 41% of the patients, including 6% who had stage IIIb multifocal disease confined to a single lobe. Surgery was associated with prolonged survival in patients with multifocal unilobar or multilobar disease (P = 0.0001). While this apparent benefit of surgery may have been due to selection bias, it supports further exploration of surgery as therapy for multifocal disease. While patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced disease did not survive longer than patients not receiving chemotherapy, chemotherapy was used primarily in patients with more aggressive disease, suggesting that selection bias may have contributed to its apparent lack of benefit. Of the 30 patients treated with chemotherapy, only 3 (10%) achieved an objective response. One third of the patients (34%) developed distant metastases, with a predilection for the brain and bone.

Concurrent use of multiple low dose chemotherapy agents with differing mechanisms of action as a strategy vs passive resistance: A pilot study.

Resistance may be classified as active (or competitive) (due to excess amount of a factor) vs passive (or non-competitive) (due to a deficiency of a factor). Passive resistance may be important in human solid tumors. In passive resistance, the dose-response curve may be shallow, or may flatten at a relatively low dose. We hypothesized that, if passive resistance were important, it might be advantageous to use low doses of multiple concurrent chemotherapy agents with differing mechanisms of action, rather than using high doses of 2 or 3 drugs. We combined single day cisplatin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2, epirubicin 40 mg/m2, paclitaxel 60 mg/m2, and vinblastine 2.5 mg/m2, with 5 days of 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2, folinic acid 20 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 4 mg orally q.i.d. every 3 weeks. In later cohorts, doses were escalated, and tamoxifen and verapamil were added. Twenty-three patients were entered. ECOG performance status was 1 in 15 patients and 2 in 8. Number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 0 in 4 patients, 1 in 4, 2 in 8, 3 in 4, 4 in 2, and 7 in 1. Sixteen patients had prior radiotherapy, and 3 had no prior therapy. Myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia were frequent, and 4 heavily pretreated patients died of pneumonia contracted while neutropenic. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and fatigue were also prominent. Among 9 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one had a partial remission, 4 had stable disease (including 3 with minor objective responses). Two additional non-small cell lung cancer patients also had objective tumor regression, but were coded as failures, since one had tumor progression in <6 weeks and the other died of respiratory failure (thought to be due to severe mucous plugging) one week after his first course of treatment. Among 14 patients with other tumor types, there was one partial response (esophageal carcinoma), 6 patients with stable disease for >6 weeks (including minor responses in one patient each with adenocarcinomas of kidney and breast), and 7 failures (including one patient with adenocarcinoma unknown primary who had minor tumor regression lasting 4 weeks). Despite the unacceptably high toxic death rate, median survival time was 24 weeks (range, 1 week to >104 weeks). This regimen is toxic, but survival duration is longer than would be expected in this heavily pre-treated population. Doses recommended for further study are those used in the first treatment cohort (as described above). Since myelosuppression is the major toxic effect, hemopoietic growth factors might prove helpful with this regimen.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for nonmetastatic breast cancer in Canada, and their associated costs.

In an era of fiscal restraint, it is important to evaluate the resources required to diagnose and treat serious illnesses. As breast cancer is the major malignancy affecting Canadian women, Statistics Canada has analysed the resources required to manage this disease in Canada, and the associated costs. Here we report the cost of initial diagnosis and treatment of nonmetastatic breast cancer, including adjuvant therapies. Treatment algorithms for Stages I, II, and III of the disease were derived by age group (< 50 or > or = 50 years old), principally from Canadian cancer registry data, supplemented, where necessary, by the results of surveys of Canadian oncologists. Data were obtained on breast cancer incidence by age, diagnostic work-up, stage at diagnosis, initial treatment, follow-up practice, duration of hospitalization and direct care costs. The direct health care costs associated with 'standard' diagnostic and therapeutic approaches were calculated for a cohort of 17,700 Canadian women diagnosed in 1995. Early stage (Stages I and II) breast cancer represented 87% of all incident cases, with 77% of cases occurring in women > or = 50 years. Variations were noted in the rate of partial vs total mastectomy, according to stage and age group. Direct costs for diagnosis and initial treatment ranged from $8014 for Stage II women > or = 50 years old, to $10,897 for Stage III women < 50 years old. Except for Stage III women < 50 years old, the largest expenditure was for hospitalization for surgery, followed by radiotherapy costs. Chemotherapy was the largest cost component for Stage III women < 50 years old. This report describes the cost of diagnosis and initial treatment of nonmetastatic breast cancer in Canada, assuming current practice patterns. A second report will describe the lifetime costs of treating all stages of breast cancer. These data will then be incorporated into Statistics Canada's Population Health Model (POHEM) to perform cost-effectiveness studies of new therapeutic interventions for breast cancer, such as the cost-effectiveness of day surgery, or of radiotherapy to all breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery.

Follow-up practices for patients with early stage breast cancer: a survey of Canadian oncologists.

The value of routine follow-up programs for patients with early stage breast cancer remains an area of controversy. In recent years, the cost-effectiveness of routine investigations has been questioned, and 2 prospective randomized clinical trials have shown no survival advantage to more intensive diagnostic follow-up approaches. Under the auspices of the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, a national survey of the practice patterns of Canadian surgical, radiation and medical oncologists was undertaken to measure current Canadian standards of care and to determine average costs of 5-year follow-up for patients completing primary treatment for stage I and II breast cancer. Standardized questionnaires were sent out to 130 surgeons, 59 radiation oncologists and 89 medical oncologists. The overall response rate was 44%. Based on the frequency of follow-up visits and investigations recommended by respondents, an average cost per patient for a 5-year follow-up plan was derived for each subspecialist group: $791, $911 and $904 for surgeons, radiation oncologists and medical oncologists respectively. Use of a less interventionist follow-up program was estimated to result in a cost saving of $300 per patient over 5 years. The results indicate that, for the most part, Canadian oncologists have been influenced by the available literature concerning follow-up practices and are ordering fewer routine tests. Further cost savings to the Canadian health care system could be achieved with the adoption of even less interventionist follow-up programs.

Paclitaxel plus hydroxyurea as second line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

We tested paclitaxel (Taxol) and low dose hydroxyurea as second line therapy in 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer since both drugs are active against non-small cell lung cancer in other settings, and since hydroxyurea may reverse chemotherapy resistance by disrupting double minute chromosomes. Hydroxyurea 500 mg was given orally each Monday, Wednesday, Friday starting 1 week before paclitaxel, and continuing until removal from study. Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 was given i.v. over > or = 1 h every 3 weeks with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine. Patients could have paclitaxel doses escalated to 175 mg/m2 in course 2 and to 200 mg/m2 in course 3, where tolerated. Sixteen males and 14 females were treated. All patients had previously received a single cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen and 23 had previously received radiotherapy. Twelve patients had adenocarcinomas, six had squamous cell carcinomas, and 12 had large cell carcinomas. Eight patients had Stage IIIb cancers and 22 had Stage IV. Paclitaxel doses were 135 mg/m2 in 56 courses, 175 mg/m2 in 24, and 200 mg/m2 in 15. Treatment was well tolerated. Median granulocyte nadirs were 2.5 (x 10(9)/l) for paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, 1.8 for 175 mg/m2, and 1.3 for 200 mg/m2. No patient developed febrile neutropenia, and none required a dose reduction. Two patients had reversible anaphylaxis. Other toxicities were quite tolerable. They included fatigue, myalgias, dizziness, paresthesias, diarrhea, alopecia, mucositis, flushing, headache, swollen red hands, and anxiety. One patient had a partial remission and 15 had stable disease (including six with minor responses). Median survival was 20 (95% CI, 12-34) weeks, with 19% of patients remaining alive at 1 year from initiation of treatment. This is a well-tolerated regimen with modest activity as second line chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin regimens. Higher doses would be feasible and other strategies are now being explored.