Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 39(8): 1704-1715, 2023 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identifying individuals at risk for falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation can ensure timely implementation of falls prevention strategies to minimize the negative personal and health system consequences of falls. OBJECTIVES: To compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of fallers and non-fallers; and evaluate the ability of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Morse Falls Scale (MFS) to predict falls in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. METHODS: A longitudinal study involving a secondary analysis of health record data from 818 patients with stroke admitted to an urban, rehabilitation hospital was conducted. A fall was defined as having ≥1 fall during the hospital stay. Cut-points on the BBS and MFS, alone and in combination, that optimized sensitivity and specificity for predicting falls, were identified. RESULTS: Low admission BBS score and admission to a low-intensity rehabilitation program were associated with falling (p < .05). Optimal cut-points were 29 for the BBS (sensitivity: 82.4%; specificity: 57.4%) and 30 for the MFS (sensitivity: 73.2%; specificity: 31.4%) when used alone. Cut-points of 45 (BBS) and 30 (MFS) in combination optimized sensitivity (74.1%) and specificity (42.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A BBS cut-point of 29 alone appears superior to using the MFS alone or combined with the BBS to predict falls.


Assuntos
Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Longitudinais , Análise de Dados Secundários , Equilíbrio Postural , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico
2.
PLoS One ; 6(10): e26239, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22028840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Working in healthcare is often considered a risk factor for influenza; however, this risk has not been quantified. We aimed to systematically review evidence describing the annual incidence of influenza among healthy adults and healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched OVID MEDLINE (1950 to 2010), EMBASE (1947 to 2010) and reference lists of identified articles. Observational studies or randomized trials reporting full season or annual influenza infection rates for healthy, working age adult subjects and HCWs were included. Influenza infection was defined as a four-fold rise in antibody titer, or positive viral culture or polymerase chain reaction. From 24,707 citations, 29 studies covering 97 influenza seasons with 58,245 study participants were included. Pooled influenza incidence rates (IR) (95% confidence intervals (CI)) per 100 HCWs per season and corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) (95% CI) as compared to healthy adults were as follows. All infections: IR 18.7 (95% CI, 15.8 to 22.1), IRR 3.4 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.7) in unvaccinated HCWs; IR 6.5 (95% CI, 4.6 to 9.1), IRR 5.4 (95% CI, 2.8 to 8.0) in vaccinated HCWs. Symptomatic infections: IR 7.5 (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.7), IRR 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.5) in unvaccinated HCWs, IR 4.8 (95% CI, 3.2 to 7.2), IRR 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.7) in vaccinated HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to adults working in non-healthcare settings, HCWs are at significantly higher risk of influenza.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Adulto , Humanos
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(2): 144-50, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20017635

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand the behavioral determinants of hand hygiene in our hospital. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on 17 focus groups. SETTING: Mount Sinai Hospital, an acute care tertiary hospital affiliated with the University of Toronto. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 153 healthcare workers (HCWs) representing all major patient care job categories. METHODS: Focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was independently conducted by 3 investigators. RESULTS: Participants reported that the realities of their workload (eg, urgent care and interruptions) make complete adherence to hand hygiene impossible. The guidelines were described as overly conservative, and participants expressed that their judgement is adequate to determine when to perform hand hygiene. Discussions revealed gaps in knowledge among participants; most participants expressed interest in more information and education. Participants reported self-protection as the primary reason for the performance of hand hygiene, and many admitted to prolonged glove use because it gave them a sense of protection. Limited access to hand hygiene products was a source of frustration, as was confusion related to hospital equipment as potential vehicles for transmission of infection. Participants said that they noticed other HCWs' adherence and reported that others HCWs' hygiene practices influenced their own attitudes and practices. In particular, HCWs perceive physicians as role models; physicians, however, do not see themselves as such. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm previous findings that hand hygiene is practiced for personal protection, that limited access to supplies is a barrier, and that role models and a sense of team effort encourage hand hygiene. Educating HCWs on how to manage workload with guideline adherence and addressing contaminated hospital equipment may improve compliance.


Assuntos
Grupos Focais/métodos , Desinfecção das Mãos , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais de Ensino , Higiene/normas , Canadá , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Desinfecção das Mãos/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(3): 249-56, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19199825

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an institution-wide infection control education program on the rate of transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). DESIGN: Before-and-after study. SETTING: A 472-bed, urban, university-affiliated hospital.Intervention. During the period March-May 2004, all hospital staff completed a mandatory infection control education program, including the receipt of hospital-specific MRSA data and case-based practice with additional precautions. OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of nosocomial MRSA acquisition was calculated as the number of cases of nosocomial MRSA acquisition per 100 days that a person with MRSA colonization or infection detected at admission is present in the hospital ("admission MRSA" exposure-days) for 3 time periods: June 2002-February 2003 (before the Toronto outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS]), June 2003-February 2004 (after the outbreak of SARS), and June 2004-February 2005 (after education). A case of nosocomial acquisition of MRSA colonization or infection represented a patient first identified as colonized or infected more than 72 hours after admission or at admission after a previous hospitalization. RESULTS: The rate of nosocomial acquisition of MRSA colonization or infection was 8.8 cases per 100 admission MRSA exposure-days for the period before SARS, 3.8 cases per 100 admission MRSA exposure-days for the period after SARS (P<.001 for before SARS vs after SARS), and 1.9 cases per 100 admission MRSA exposure-days for the period after education (P=.02 for after education vs before education). The volume of alcohol-based handrub purchased was apparently stable, with 4,010 L during fiscal year 2003-2004 (April 2003-March 2004) compared with 3,780 L during fiscal year 2004-2005. The observed rate of compliance with hand washing did not change significantly (40.9% during education vs 44.2% after education; P=.23). The total number of patients screened for MRSA colonization was not different in the 3 periods. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nosocomial acquisition of MRSA colonization or infection decreased after SARS and was further reduced in association with a hospital-wide education program.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Educação em Saúde/normas , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Programas Obrigatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Hospitais , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/epidemiologia , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/transmissão , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(7): 600-6, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18624667

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients exposed to an MRSA-colonized roommate. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A 472-bed acute-care teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. PATIENTS: Inpatients who shared a room between 1996 and 2004 with a patient who had unrecognized MRSA colonization. METHODS: Exposed roommates were identified from infection-control logs and from results of screening for MRSA in the microbiology database. Completed follow-up was defined as completion of at least 2 sets of screening cultures (swab samples from the nares, the rectum, and skin lesions), with at least 1 set of samples obtained 7-10 days after the last exposure. Chart reviews were performed to compare those who did and did not become colonized with MRSA. RESULTS: Of 326 roommates, 198 (61.7%) had completed follow-up, and 25 (12.6%) acquired MRSA by day 7-10 after exposure was recognized, all with strains indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis from those of their roommate. Two (2%) of 101 patients were not colonized at day 7-10 but, with subsequent testing, were identified as being colonized with the same strain as their roommate (one at day 16 and one at day 18 after exposure). A history of alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR], 9.8 [95% confidence limits {CLs}, 1.8, 53]), exposure to a patient with nosocomially acquired MRSA (OR, 20 [95% CLs, 2.4, 171]), increasing care dependency (OR per activity of daily living, 1.7 [95% CLs, 1.1, 2.7]), and having received levofloxacin (OR, 3.6 [95% CLs, 1.1, 12]) were associated with MRSA acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: Roommates of patients with MRSA are at significant risk for becoming colonized. Further study is needed of the impact of hospital antimicrobial formulary decisions on the risk of acquisition of MRSA.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 30(5): 404-10, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at increased risk of influenza-related complications, but research to examine barriers to maternal influenza vaccination has been limited and no studies have assessed the barriers to vaccinating pregnant women in Canada. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to assess (1) how the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of Canadian maternity care providers influence their discussion and recommendation patterns, and (2) how the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of Canadian women, along with care providers' recommendations, influence their acceptance of influenza vaccine during pregnancy. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys, one of maternity care providers and one of postpartum women, were carried out between December 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that high levels of provider knowledge about maternal vaccination (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.56-4.46), positive attitudes towards influenza vaccination (OR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.43-3.68), and increased age (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.06) were associated with recommending influenza vaccine to pregnant women. Similarly, women who had higher levels of knowledge about maternal vaccination (OR = 3.46; 95% CI 1.31-9.17), positive attitudes towards influenza vaccination (OR = 4.69; 95% CI 1.63-13.5), and a recommendation from their maternity care provider (OR = 32.3; 95% CI 10.4-100) were more likely to be vaccinated during pregnancy. One of the most striking provider barriers identified was uncertainty about who bears responsibility for discussion, recommendation, and vaccination. CONCLUSION: Maternity care provider recommendation was found to be an important element in increasing influenza vaccination rates during pregnancy. Clarity about responsibility for providing vaccine is needed.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Vacinação/psicologia
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(5): 398-403, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419360

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Most nosocomial acquistion of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is due to cross-transmission. We sought to identify risk factors for acquisition of VRE by roommates of patients colonized or infected with VRE. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A 472-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS: All patients who shared a room with a patient colonized or infected with VRE at our hospital between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2006 were identified. These roommates of VRE-positive patients were screened by rectal swab culture on days 2, 5, and 7 after the last exposure to the index patient. Chart reviews were performed to identify risk factors for VRE colonization in these roommates. RESULTS: Eighty-eight roommates of patients colonized or infected with VRE were identified. Of the 38 roommates with complete follow-up, 8 (21%) became colonized with VRE. These 8 roommates were older (median, 87.5 vs 62.5 years of age; P = .001), had longer duration of room exposure (median, 8.5 vs 4 days; P = .002), and were more likely to have a urinary catheter (odds ratio [OR], 16 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.7-152]; P = .005), an elevated serum creatinine level (OR, 17 [95% CI, 1.4-196]; P = .02), low serum albumin level (OR, 9.9 [95% CI, 1.3-113]; P = .01), and recent third-generation cephalosporin use (OR, 8.3 [95% CI, 1.5-47]; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Roommates of patients identified as colonized or infected with VRE are at substantial risk of becoming colonized, with the degree of risk increasing in older and more frail patients. VRE control programs should pay particular attention to such patients.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/transmissão , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Resistência a Vancomicina , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
8.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 95(24): 1869-77, 2003 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14679156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The benefits of aminoglycoside antibiotics, such as tobramycin, administered as a once-daily dose to manage febrile neutropenia, have been demonstrated in many patient populations. However, toxicity and safety data are lacking for pediatric stem cell transplant recipients, who are at especially high risk for aminoglycoside-related toxicity and infectious morbidity. In particular, the relative nephrotoxicity and efficacy of tobramycin administered as a single daily dose or as three daily doses among this patient population is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind controlled study of tobramycin dosing among children 18 years or younger who had fever and neutropenia while undergoing stem cell transplantation. From October 2000 through November 2002, 60 children were randomly assigned to receive intravenous tobramycin, as either a single daily dose (n = 29) or every 8 hours (n = 31), in combination with either piperacillin or ceftazidime (intravenous). Tobramycin doses were adjusted to achieve pharmacokinetic targets. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity, as represented by the maximal percent increase in serum creatinine concentration throughout the episode of febrile neutropenia relative to the baseline serum creatinine concentration. Efficacy was a secondary outcome and was defined as survival of the episode without modification of the antibacterial regimen. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In a modified intent-to-treat analysis, the mean maximal percent increase in serum creatinine concentration was 32% (N = 26) in the once daily dose group and 51% (N = 28) in the every 8 hours dose group (difference = 19%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0% to 38%; P =.054). Among patients evaluable for efficacy, 12 (46%) of 26 patients in the once daily dose group and five (19%) of 27 patients in the every 8 hours dose group survived the episode of febrile neutropenia without requiring antibacterial treatment modification (difference = 27%, 95% CI = 4% to 52%; P =.03). There was one death in each group. CONCLUSIONS: In febrile neutropenic children undergoing stem cell transplantation, tobramycin may be less nephrotoxic and more efficacious when administered as a once daily dose than when administered every 8 hours.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Febre/etiologia , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutropenia/complicações , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Tobramicina/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Criança , Creatinina/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/metabolismo , Masculino , Tobramicina/farmacocinética , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Nutr Cancer ; 46(1): 1-14, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12925298

RESUMO

There is accumulating evidence that vitamin E may have different roles in the prevention and treatment of cancer. The purpose of this review is to summarize and evaluate this evidence and to suggest future avenues of research. A comprehensive literature review of vitamin E and cancer was conducted. Articles were organized into the following categories: 1) cancer prevention, 2) direct antineoplastic activity, 3) augmentation of chemotherapy effects, and 4) attenuation or treatment of chemotherapy toxicity. The evidence was systematically evaluated using guidelines developed by the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. There is evidence to suggest that those individuals with higher serum vitamin E levels and those receiving vitamin E supplementation have a decreased risk of some cancers, including lung, prostate, stomach, and gastrointestinal carcinoma. However, these results differed depending on the study design and the population studied. There is insufficient evidence to support anticancer activity and attenuation of chemotherapy toxicity by vitamin E. Vitamin E is likely to be important in the prevention of some cancers. The therapeutic role of vitamin E is poorly understood. Further research will be required before routine use of vitamin E in patients with cancer can be advocated in the clinical setting.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Vitamina E/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...