RESUMO
Background: Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Spinal anaesthetic has been associated with an increased risk of POUR, whilst other risk factors remain unclear. This study aims to identify modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors of POUR for THA and TKA patients. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to our hospital over the course of 6 weeks from September to October 2021 for a THA or TKA. All patients who underwent elective THA/TKA were included, and trauma cases were excluded. Results: Ninety-two consecutive patients were included in this study. The overall rate of POUR was 17%. A shorter operative duration resulted in a reduced risk of POUR (median duration of non-retention patients, 88 min vs. 100 min POUR patients; odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99, p = 0.018). The median bladder volume of patients with urinary retention at the point of diagnosis was 614 mL (range, 298-999 mL). The arthroplasty type, anaesthetic technique, pre-operative morphine use, body mass index, age, cardiovascular disease, and renal disease were found to have no significant association with POUR. Conclusions: A reduced operative time of arthroplasty surgery is associated with a decreased risk of POUR. Patients with a prolonged operative time should have an increased frequency of micturition monitoring in the immediate post-operative period.
RESUMO
Stress fractures are often associated to activities that requires repetitive stress such as running. However, insufficiency-type stress fractures can also occur in patients with risk factors such as rheumatoid arthritis. Diagnosis of stress fracture would require a thorough clinical evaluation along with radiological imaging. However, this may be difficult due to how it mimics other musculoskeletal problems. The case of a woman in her 60s presenting with 2 months of severe ipsilateral right knee and ankle pain is used as an example. Based on initial clinical assessment and plain radiograph, her provisional diagnosis was osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis secondary to rheumatoid disease. However, MRI scan revealed that she had multifocal stress fractures in her knee, ankle and foot. Hence, we hope that this case study can allow clinicians to consider multifocal stress fracture as a possible diagnosis in patients with risk factors and to have lower threshold in performing MRI scans.