Incidence of ocular surface squamous neoplasia in pterygium specimens.

OBJECTIVE: Pterygium and ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) have been recognized as likely related conditions and share similar risk factors such as ultraviolet radiation and chronic inflammation. The purpose of this study is to review the incidence of OSSN in pathology specimens sent as pterygium at a single tertiary centre between 2010 and 2022. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients operated on for pterygium between 2010 and 2022 at the University of Montreal Health Centre. Data collected include baseline demographics, results of pathology specimen, and clinical information for cases diagnosed as OSSN on pathology. RESULTS: A total of 1559 patients were operated on for a clinical diagnosis of pterygium between 2010 and 2022, of which 854 patients (55%) were male. A total of 1142 specimens had available pathology reports, and most of the specimens were consistent with pterygium on pathology (1105 of 1142; 97%). There was an unexpected finding of 3 cases of OSSN (3 of 1142; 0.3%). Other diagnosis besides pterygium were seen in 3% of specimens (34 of 1142), including nevus (n = 12), spheroidal degeneration (n = 3), pyogenic granuloma (n = 3), and lymphangiectasia (n = 2). The 3 cases of OSSN included an 81-year-old male of French-Canadian background, a 52-year-old male of South Asian background, and a 59-year-old female of French-Canadian background. The pathology was diagnosed as conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3, CIN grade 2, and CIN grade 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The finding of OSSN in pterygium is rare in our population but can be clinically difficult to distinguish. It is important to send all pterygium specimens for pathology.

Survey: Preferred practice patterns in the diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid amongst cornea specialists.

PURPOSE: To evaluate preferred diagnostic tools and treatment decision-making factors in cases suspicious of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) amongst ophthalmologists and cornea specialists. METHODS: Web-based survey, consisting of 14 multiple choice questions, posted to the Cornea Society Listserv Keranet, the Canadian Ophthalmological Society Cornea Listserv, and the Bowman Club Listserv. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight ophthalmologists participated in the survey. Eighty-six percent (86%) of respondents were cornea trained and practiced in either North America or Europe (83%). Most respondents (72%) routinely perform conjunctival biopsies for all suspicious cases of MMP. For those who do not, fear that biopsy will exacerbate inflammation was the most common reason to defer investigation (47%). Seventy-one percent (71%) performed biopsies from perilesional sites. Ninety-seven percent (97%) ask for direct (DIF) studies and 60% for histopathology in formalin. Most do not recommend biopsy at other non-ocular sites (75%), nor do they perform indirect immunofluorescence for serum autoantibodies (68%). Immune-modulatory therapy is started following positive biopsy results for most (66%), albeit most (62%) would not let a negative DIF influence the choice of starting treatment should there be clinical suspicion of MMP. Differences in practice patterns as they relate to level of experience and geographical location are contrasted to the most up-to-date available guidelines. CONCLUSION: Responses to the survey suggest that there is heterogeneity in certain practice patterns for MMP. Biopsy remains an area of controversy in dictating treatment plans. Identified areas of need should be targeted in future research.