Factores asociados al desarrollo de estenosis ureteral después de la ureteroscopia para cálculos ureterales impactados: estudio multicéntrico del grupo de trabajo de endourología y urolitiasis de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos de la Asociación Europea de Urología / Factors associated with ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral stones. A multicenter study by EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working party

Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre la impactación de los cálculos ureterales y la formación de estenosis ureterales y los factores asociados. Material y métodos Se analizaron retrospectivamente los registros médicos de todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía endoscópica por cálculos ureterales impactados en 3 hospitales universitarios de Turquía, Reino Unido y España entre junio de 2019 y enero de 2022. Los parámetros examinados incluyeron los datos demográficos del paciente, lateralidad, tamaño y localización del cálculo, tiempo entre el inicio de los síntomas y la cirugía, tipo de ureteroscopia (rígida/flexible), presencia de nefrostomía o catéter doble J antes de la ureteroscopia, complicaciones intraoperatorias (avulsión/perforación), estado libre de cálculos, número de procedimientos necesarios para obtener un estado libre de cálculos y los resultados de las pruebas de imagen postoperatorias. Resultados Un total de 41 pacientes, 25 varones y 16 mujeres, de 3 instituciones fueron incluidos en el estudio. La edad media de los pacientes era de 48,2±13,5 años. La mediana del diámetro mayor de los cálculos fue de 9mm (RIC: 8mm). Catorce (34,1%) pacientes desarrollaron estenosis ureteral después de la ureteroscopia. No hubo diferencias entre los pacientes que desarrollaron estenosis ureteral y los que no la desarrollaron en cuanto a la lateralidad, la localización, la hidronefrosis y la multiplicidad de los cálculos (p=0,58, p=0,14, p=0,79 y p=0,31, respectivamente). Los pacientes que desarrollaron estenosis ureteral presentaron una tasa más elevada de derivación urinaria preoperatoria, como nefrostomía o catéter doble J (p=0,000). Conclusión La interrupción del paso de la orina por el uréter mediante derivación urinaria con nefrostomía o catéter doble J antes de la cirugía de cálculos ureterales podría favorecer la formación de estenosis ureteral en el postoperatorio. (AU)

Objective: To determine the relation between ureteral stone impaction and ureteral stricture formation and associated factors. Material and methods We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent endoscopic ureteral stone surgery for impacted ureteral stone at 3 academic institutions in Turkey, United Kingdom and Spain between June 2019 and January 2022. Examined parameters included patient demographics, stone side, size and localization, time between initiation of symptoms and surgery, type of ureteroscopy (rigid/flexible), presence of nephrostomy or double-J stent prior to ureteroscopy, intraoperative complications (avulsion/perforation), stone-free status, number of procedures required for stone-free status, postoperative imaging results. Results A total of 41 patients whom 25 were male and 16 were female, from 3 institutions were included the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.2±13.5 years. The median largest diameter of the stones was 9mm (IQR: 8mm). Fourteen (34.1%) patients developed ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy. There was no difference between patients who developed ureteral strictures and patients who did not developed strictures in terms of stone laterality, stone location, hydronephrosis and multiplicity (p=0.58, p=0.14, p=0.79 and p=0.31, respectively). Patients who developed ureteral strictures had a higher rate of preoperative urinary diversion such as nephrostomy or double-J stent (p=0.000). Conclusion Interruption of urine passage through ureter via urinary diversion such as nephrostomy or double-J stent prior to ureteral stone surgery might lead ureteral stricture formation in the postoperative period. (AU)

El bloqueo del plano del músculo erector espinal antes de la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque reduce el tiempo de fluoroscopia y facilita el tratamiento de la litiasis renal: estudio prospectivo aleatorizado / Erector spinae plane block prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy decreases fluoroscopy time and promise a comfortable procedure for renal stones: a prospective randomized study

Introducción y objetivos Comparar la eficacia del bloqueo del plano del erector espinal (BPEE) y el diclofenaco sódico intramuscular (IM) en términos del manejo del dolor y su impacto sobre el estado libre de cálculos en pacientes sometidos a litotricia extracorpórea de ondas de choque (LEOCh). Pacientes y materiales El estudio incluyó a pacientes sometidos a LEOCh por litiasis renal en nuestro centro. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a los grupos de BPEE (Grupo 1: n = 31) y de 75 mg de diclofenaco sódico IM (Grupo 2: n = 30). Se registraron los datos demográficos de los pacientes, el tiempo de fluoroscopia durante la LEOCh, el número de focalizaciones, el total de disparos administrados, el voltaje, las tasas libre de cálculos (TLC), el método de analgesia, el número de sesiones de LEOCh, la puntuación de la Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) la localización de los cálculos, el tamaño máximo de los cálculos, el volumen de los cálculos y las unidades Hounsfield (UH). Resultados Un total de 61 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos grupos en cuanto al tamaño, el volumen y la densidad de los cálculos, la duración de la LEOCh, el total de disparos administradas, el voltaje, el índice de masa corporal (IMC), el estado libre de cálculos y la localización de los cálculos. El tiempo de fluoroscopia y el número de veces que fue necesario focalizar el cálculo fueron significativamente inferiores en el grupo 1 con respecto al grupo 2 (p:0,002, p:0,021, respectivamente). La puntuación EVA fue significativamente inferior en el grupo 1 en comparación con el grupo 2 (p<0,001). Conclusiones Observamos que la puntuación EVA del grupo BPEE era menor que la del grupo de diclofenaco sódico IM y, aunque no de manera estadísticamente significativa, conseguimos una tasa libre de cálculos más alta en la primera sesión en el grupo BPEE. ... (AU)

Introduction and Objectives To compare the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intramuscular (i.m.) diclofenac sodium in regard to pain management and impact on stone-free status in patients undergoing SWL. Patients or Materials The study included patients who underwent SWL for kidney stones in our institution. The patients were randomly assigned to the ESPB (Group 1: n = 31) and i.m. 75 mg diclofenac sodium (Group 2: n = 30) groups. The demographic data of the patients, fluoroscopy time during SWL, number of need of targeting, total shocks given, voltage, stone free rates (SFR), analgesy method, number of SWL sessions, VAS score, stone location, maximum stone size, stone volume and Hounsfield unit (HU) were also recorded. Results A total of 61 patients were included the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to stone size, volume and density, SWL duration, total shocks given, voltage, BMI, stone-free status and stone location. Fluoroscopy time and number of need for stone targeting were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 (p:0.002, p:0.021, respectively). The VAS score was significantly lower for group 1 compared to group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions We observed that the VAS score was lower in the ESPB group compared to i.m. diclofenac sodium group and although it was not statistically significant, we achieved a higher rate of stone-free status in the first session in ESPB group. Most importantly, the patients in the ESPB group were exposed to less fluoroscopy and radiation. (AU)

Factors associated with ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral stones? A multicenter study by EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working party.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between ureteral stone impaction and ureteral stricture formation and associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent endoscopic ureteral stone surgery for impacted ureteral stone at three academic institutions in Turkey, United Kingdom and Spain between June 2019 and January 2022. Examined parameters included patient demographics, stone side, size and localization, time between initiation of symptoms and surgery, type of ureteroscopy (rigid/flexible), presence of nephrostomy or double-J stent prior to URS, intraoperative complications (avulsion/perforation, stone-free status, number of procedures required for stone-free status, postoperative imaging results. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients whom 25 were male and 16 were female, from 3 institutions were included the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 ±â€¯13.5 years. The median largest diameter of the stones was 9 mm (IQR: 8 mm). Total 14 (34.1%) patients developed ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy. There was no difference between patients who developed ureteral strictures and patients who did not developed strictures in terms of stone laterality, stone location, hydronephrosis and multiplicity, p = 0.58, p = 0.14, p = 0.79 and p = 0.31. Patients who developed ureteral strictures had a higher rate of preoperative urinary diversion such as nephrostomy or DJS, p = 0.000. CONCLUSION: Interruption of urine passage through ureter via urinary diversion such as nephrostomy or DJS stent prior to ureteral stone surgery might lead ureteral stricture formation in the postoperative period.

Erector spinae plane block prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy decreases fluoroscopy time and promise a comfortable procedure for renal stones: A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intramuscular (i.m.) diclofenac sodium in regard to pain management and impact on stone-free status in patients undergoing SWL. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: The study included patients who underwent SWL for kidney stones in our institution. The patients were randomly assigned to the ESPB (Group 1: n = 31) and i.m. 75 mg diclofenac sodium (Group 2: n = 30) groups. The demographic data of the patients, fluoroscopy time during SWL, number of need of targeting, total shocks given, voltage, stone free rates (SFR), analgesy method, number of SWL sessions, VAS score, stone location, maximum stone size, stone volume and Hounsfield unit (HU) were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were included the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to stone size, volume and density, SWL duration, total shocks given, voltage, BMI, stone-free status and stone location. Fluoroscopy time and number of need for stone targeting were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 (p = 0.002, p = 0.021, respectively). The VAS score was significantly lower for group 1 compared to group 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that the VAS score was lower in the ESPB group compared to i.m. diclofenac sodium group and although it was not statistically significant, we achieved a higher rate of stone-free status in the first session in ESPB group. Most importantly, the patients in the ESPB group were exposed to less fluoroscopy and radiation.

Polymorphisms of eNOS, catalase, and myeloperoxidase genes in prostate cancer in Turkish men: preliminary results.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of neoplasm in European males. Genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to PCa development and progression. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between PCa and polymorphisms in the genes encoding endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), catalase (CAT), and myeloperoxidase (MPO). In total, 193 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups: PCa (78), benign prostate hyperplasia (40), and control males (75). The parameters assessed included body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, presence of prostatism, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason scores of prostate specimens, as well as polymorphisms in eNOS-G894T, CAT- 262T, and MPO G-463T genes. BMI and smoking status of controls and patient groups showed no significant difference. CAT-262T gene polymorphism was found to be homozygous in 35.4% of PCa patients, which was 4.02-fold that in the controls (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in eNOS-G894T and MPO G-463T gene polymorphisms between any of the groups. In conclusion, we found catalase levels to be associated with PCa diagnosis and PSA value. We did not find any significant differences between groups for other polymorphisms, but we believe that further studies with a large sample size may be needed before drawing definite conclusions.

Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiases, renal cysts, and solid renal masses. This result has brought the question of whether all donors with these urologic disorders should be rejected for donation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient records of all living kidney transplantations performed from 2004 to 2014. RESULTS: Among 251 living-related donor kidney transplantations, 51 donors (20.3%) had urologic disorders. Mean donor age was significantly higher in donors with urologic disorders than in the standard donor group (50 y vs 41 y). The identified disorders were 32 renal cysts, 8 urolithiases, 3 renal tumors, 6 adrenal adenomas, and 2 microscopic hematurias. After nephrectomy, the graft kidneys with cysts were inspected carefully and all of the cortical-peripheral cysts were decorticated. Renal tumors were excised in 3 renal units. Transplantations had proceeded after the confirmation of low malignancy potentials of the lesions with safe surgical margins. Two out of 8 patients had undergone stone removal with ex vivo ureteroscopy and 1 by means of pyelotomy incision because of calix neck stenosis. None of those donors and recipients developed clinically significant renal stone disease with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neither donors nor recipients of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria patients developed any problem with a mean 28 months' follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic urologic problems are very common. The significance of these asymptomatic pathologies is unclear. Our results suggest that in a selected group, at least some of these candidates can be accepted for donation.