Efficacy and safety of interleukin-1 blockers in kidney transplant recipients with familial Mediterranean fever: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data on use of interleukin (IL)-1 blockers in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) are very limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra and canakinumab in the transplantation setting. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included KTRs who suffered from AA amyloidosis caused by FMF and treated with anakinra or canakinumab (study group, n = 36). Using propensity score matching, we selected 36 patients without FMF or amyloidosis from our database of 696 KTRs as the control group. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. Biopsy-confirmed graft rejection, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), proteinuria and number of monthly attacks were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: All KTRs with FMF began IL-1 blocker therapy with anakinra and nine (25%) were switched to canakinumab. Overall death was more frequent in the study group (19.4% vs 0%) (P = .005); however, overall graft loss was comparable between study (27.8%) and control groups (36.1%) (P = .448). Five- and 10-year graft survival rates were significantly higher in the study group (94.4% and 83.3%, respectively) than in the control group (77.8% and 63.9%, respectively) (P = .014 and P < .001, respectively). Rejections were numerically lower in study group (8.3% vs 25%), but it did not reach to statistical significance (P = .058). When compared with the pre-treatment period, with IL-1 blockers, the number of attacks per month (P < .001), and eGFR (P = .004), hsCRP (P < .001) and ESR (P = .026) levels were lower throughout the follow-up, whereas proteinuria levels were not. CONCLUSIONS: Anakinra and canakinumab are effective in KTRs suffering from FMF; however, the mortality rate may be of concern.

Dipyridamole does not have any additive effect on the prevention of COVID-19 coagulopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SaRS-Cov-2) associated respiratory disease (COVID-19), announced as a pandemic, is a multisystem syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 directly infects and damages vascular endothelial cells, which leads to microvascular dysfunction and promotes a procoagulant state. Dipyridamole (DP) acts as a reversible phosphodiesterase inhibitor and is used mainly as an antiplatelet agent. It is hypothetised that it has possible activities in COVID-19. DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: We report our retrospective, real-world results of DP added to low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of 462 clinically diagnosed and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We compared anticoagulation with and without DP addition with no administration of anticoagulation in the same time frame. The primary outcome was proven or highly suspected coagulopathy within 30 days of hospitalization. RESULTS: Definitive coagulopathy has been diagnosed in 3 (3.5%) of 85 LMWH administered patients and 7 (2.13%) of 328 DP + LMWH received patients (P=0.456). Five cases with definitive coagulopathy were not initiated any anticoagulation at the time of the event. The multivariate analysis showed that DP addition to the anticoagulant approach did not have any impact on the risk of demonstrated coagulopathy and highly-suspected coagulopathy. CONCLUSION: We think that our clinical experience is valuable in showing the real-life results of DP + LMWH treatment in COVID-19. This approach did not affect the coagulopathy rate. Our data did also not document an additive effect of DP in the COVID-19 outcome. Prospective controlled trials would give more convincing results regarding the role of DP in COVID-19 endothelial dysfunction and clinical outcome.

Initial complete blood count score and predicting disease progression in COVID-19 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus has caused a pandemic since it was first detected in Wuhan in December 2019. The mortality rate is high in moderate and severe cases. Our study aimed to screen the CBC parameters as a useful predictive factor for COVID-19 resulting in critical illness. METHODS: A total of 285 patients with positive PCR results were analyzed. The median age was 55 (24-90), and 64.2% of patients were male. Sixty-eight percent of cases were hospitalized with moderate, 32% with severe disease at initial admission. RESULTS: We found that lymphocyte count <620/mcl, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >6, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) >350 were predictive of the outcome. We scored our cohort 0-3 for these three parameters. Patients with a score of 2-3 were more likely to have progressive disease, anti-cytokine treatment, intensive care admission, intubation, and death, compared to patients with a score of 0-1. Additionally, they tended to be hospitalized for longer (median 11.5 days, mean 15.6), compared to those with a score 0 or 1 (median 9 days, mean 11.3). Twenty-eight of 38 cases with scores of 2-3 were discharged (73.6%), whereas the rate was 89% for patients with a score of 0-1 (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Based on the absolute lymphocyte count (<620/mcl, NLR >6, PLR >350), our three-parameter score was able to predict disease progression, and the likelihood of anti-cytokine treatment, intubation, and death. We think that COVID-19 patients presenting with moderate to severe pneumonia, and having scores of 2 or 3 on our scale, should be closely monitored and robustly supported.