Changes in smell and taste perception related to COVID-19 infection: a case-control study.

The main aim of the present study was to psychophysically evaluate smell and taste functions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to compare those results with a group of healthy subjects. Another aim of the study was to assess the relationship of changes in patients' smell and taste functions with a number of clinical parameters, symptoms, and other physiological signs as well as with severity of disease. Olfactory and gustatory functions were tested in 61 hospitalized patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and in a control group of 54 healthy individuals. Overall, we found a significant impairment of olfactory and gustatory functions in COVID-19 patients compared with the control group. Indeed, about 45% of patients self-reported complaints about or loss of either olfactory or gustatory functions. These results were confirmed by psychophysical testing, which showed a significantly reduced performance in terms of intensity perception and identification ability for both taste and smell functions in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, gustatory and olfactory impairments tended to be more evident in male patients suffering from more severe respiratory failure (i.e., pneumonia with need of respiratory support need during hospitalization).

The spectrum of thyroid function tests during hospitalization for SARS COV-2 infection.

OBJECTIVE: Alterations in thyroid function tests (TFTs) have been recorded during SARS-CoV-2 infection as associated to either a destructive thyroiditis or a non-thyroidal illness. METHODS: We studied 144 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to a single center in intensive or subintensive care units. Those with previous thyroid dysfunctions or taking interfering drugs were excluded. Differently from previous reports, TSH, FT3, FT4, thyroglobulin (Tg), anti-Tg autoantibodies (TgAb) were measured at baseline and every 3-7 days. C-reacting protein (CRP), cortisol and IL-6 were also assayed. RESULTS: The majority of patients had a normal TSH at admission, usually with normal FT4 and FT3. Low TSH levels were found either at admission or during hospitalization in 39% of patients, associated with low FT3 in half of the cases. FT4 and Tg levels were normal, and TgAb-negative. TSH and FT3 were invariably restored at the time of discharge in survivors, whereas were permanently low in most deceased cases, but only FT3 levels were predictors of mortality. Cortisol, CRP and IL-6 levels were higher in patients with low TSH and FT3 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of our COVID-19 patients without interfering drugs had normal TFTs both at admission and during follow-up. In this series, the transient finding of low TSH with normal FT4 and low FT3 levels, inversely correlated with CRP, cortisol and IL-6 and associated with normal Tg levels, is likely due to the cytokine storm induced by SARS-Cov-2 with a direct or mediated impact on TSH secretion and deiodinase activity, and likely not to a destructive thyroiditis.

Platelet and Endothelial Activation as Potential Mechanisms Behind the Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19 Patients.

The authors hypothesized that the cytokine storm described in COVID-19 patients may lead to consistent cell-based tissue factor (TF)-mediated activation of coagulation, procoagulant microvesicles (MVs) release, and massive platelet activation. COVID-19 patients have higher levels of TF+ platelets, TF+ granulocytes, and TF+ MVs than healthy subjects and coronary artery disease patients. Plasma MV-associated thrombin generation is present in prophylactic anticoagulated patients. A sustained platelet activation in terms of P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte aggregate formation, and altered nitric oxide/prostacyclin synthesis are also observed. COVID-19 plasma, added to the blood of healthy subjects, induces platelet activation similar to that observed in vivo. This effect was blunted by pre-incubation with tocilizumab, aspirin, or a P2Y12 inhibitor.

Reverse ventricular remodeling and improved functional capacity after ventricular resynchronization in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular resynchronization is a non-pharmacological treatment for advanced heart failure refractory to drug therapy and with intraventricular conduction delay. We describe the time course of echocardiographic and functional recovery after resynchronization in 31 patients (mean age 67 +/- 8 years). METHODS: We evaluated NYHA class, echocardiogram, respiratory function, and cardiopulmonary test before pacemaker implantation (baseline), after 1-3 months (short-term evaluation), and 10-15 months afterwards (long-term evaluation, n = 21 patients). Mortality at 1 year was considered. RESULTS: Both at short and long-term, patients improved NYHA class, ventricular function, and ventricular volumes. Already at short-term, we observed an increase in oxygen consumption at peak exercise (12.6 +/- 0.6 vs 10.5 +/- 0.5 ml/kg/min), oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (9.8 +/- 0.6 vs 8.3 +/- 0.6 ml/kg/min) and oxygen pulse (8.3 +/- 0.5 vs 7.5 +/- 0.5 ml/beat). Ventilatory efficacy (VE/VCO2 slope) and alveolo-capillary diffusion (estimated by the measurement of lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide - DLCO) improved only at long-term (VE/VCO2: 40.7 +/- 1.6 vs 45.3 +/- 1.8; DLCO: 70.3 +/- 2.7 vs 59.4 +/- 5.9% of predicted, p = 0.05). The 1-year mortality was 9.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular resynchronization is linked to a fast and prolonged recovery of NYHA class, echocardiographic variables and stress tolerance. The improvement of indexes known to carry a prognostic value confirms that ventricular resynchronization can positively interfere with the evolution of the disease.

Assessment of overall blood pressure variability and its different components.

Blood pressure (BP) is characterized by continuous fluctuations, including fast changes lasting only a few seconds as well as slower and more prolonged variations, with a time constant of minutes or hours. Assessing the relative contribution of these different components to overall blood pressure variance is now possible through a number of mathematical approaches, either in the time or in the frequency domain (spectral analysis). Due to its complex nature, a precise and detailed assessment of blood pressure variability can be obtained only from the analysis of continuous, beat-by-beat, blood pressure recordings. Some information, however, can also be derived from analysis of discontinuous blood pressure tracings, such as those commonly performed in a clinical setting. This would require that attention is paid both to the quality of the recordings and to the selection of suitable analysis methods that should cope with the discontinuous nature of the measurements to be processed and to their intrinsic low sampling frequency.

Daily life blood pressure changes are steeper in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects.

Target organ damage in hypertensive patients is related to their increased average blood pressure and greater 24-hour blood pressure variability. Whether the rate of blood pressure changes is also greater in hypertension, producing a greater stress on arterial walls, is not known, however. Our study aimed at addressing this issue by computer analysis of 24-hour ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure recordings in 34 subjects (29 males), 13 normotensive subjects and 21 uncomplicated hypertensive subjects (mean age+/-SD, 40.4+/-11.8 years). The number, slope (mm Hg/s), and length (beats) of systolic blood pressure ramps of 3 or more consecutive beats characterized by a progressive increase (+) or reduction (-) in systolic blood pressure of at least 1 mm Hg per beat were computed for each hour and for the whole 24-hour period. Twenty-four-hour average systolic blood pressure was 112.9+/-2.1 and 159.4+/-5.7 mm Hg in normotensive and hypertensive subjects, respectively. Over the 24 hours, the number and length of systolic blood pressure ramps were similar in both groups, whereas the slope was markedly different (24-hour mean+/-SE slope, 4.80+/-0.30 in normotensives and 6.50+/-0.40 mm Hg/s in hypertensives, P<0.05). Ramp slope was not influenced by age or reflex pulse interval changes, but it was greater for higher ramp initial systolic blood pressure values. Thus, in daily life, hypertensive subjects are characterized by steeper blood pressure changes than normotensives, and this, regardless of the mechanisms, may have clinical implications, because it may be associated with greater traumatic effect on the vessel walls of hypertensive patients.