Coping strategies and psychosocial resources among women living with metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study.

Objective: Despite more women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), this population is underrepresented in cancer survivorship research. Few studies have assessed how women with MBC cope with their cancer experience. This qualitative study describes the coping strategies and psychosocial resources utilized by women living with MBC.Methods: Twenty-two women with MBC participated in four focus groups. Transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Codes derived from participants' responses were subsequently condensed into themes.Results: We identified 12 coping strategies and psychosocial resources and grouped them into five themes: Behavioral Coping Strategies (i.e. stress management, active coping and planning); Cognitive Coping Strategies and Psychological Resources (i.e. cognitive reappraisal, optimism, mindfulness, positive thinking, and religious coping); Existential Approach-Oriented Coping (i.e. acceptance, values-based living, and identity integration); Avoidance (i.e. avoidant coping); and Interpersonal Resources and Seeking Social Support (i.e. social support).Conclusions: Women living with MBC utilize several engagement and disengagement coping strategies, as well as intrapersonal and interpersonal resources. This study provides useful perspectives of women living with MBC that may inform the development of psychosocial interventions. Further research is needed to assess coping strategies and psychosocial resources across different subgroups of MBC patients and determine their impact on cancer outcomes.

Characterizing unique supportive care needs among women living with metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study.

Background: Women with metastatic breast cancer face unique challenges as they cope with life-limiting prognoses and arduous treatments. However, the vast majority of research has focused on optimizing quality of life in women with early-stage, non-metastatic breast cancer and little is known about supportive care needs among women living with metastatic cancer. As part of a larger project that sought to inform the development of a psychosocial intervention, the aim of this study was to characterize supportive care needs among women with metastatic breast cancer and elucidate challenges unique to living with a life-limiting prognosis. Methods: Four, two-hour focus groups with 22 women were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in Dedoose using a general inductive approach to code categories and extract themes. Results: A total of 16 codes emerged from 201 participant comments regarding supportive care needs. Codes were collapsed into four supportive care need domains: 1. psychosocial, 2. physical and functional, 3. health system and information, and 4. sexuality and fertility needs. The most prevalent needs were breast cancer-related symptom burden (17.4%), lack of social support (14.9%), uncertainty (10.0%), stress management (9.0%), patient-centered care (7.5%), and sexual functioning (7.5%). More than half of needs (56.2%) were in the psychosocial domain and more than two-thirds of needs (76.8%) were in the psychosocial and physical and functional domains. Supportive care needs unique to living with metastatic breast cancer included the cumulative effects of continuously undergoing cancer treatment on symptom burden, worry from scan-to-scan regarding response to cancer treatments, diagnosis-related stigma and social isolation, end-of-life concerns, and misconceptions regarding metastatic breast cancer. Conclusions: Findings suggest that women with metastatic breast cancer have unique supportive care needs compared to women with early-stage breast cancer that are specific to living with a life-limiting prognosis and are not typically captured in existing self-report measures of supportive care needs. Results also highlight the importance of addressing psychosocial concerns and breast cancer-related symptoms. Women with metastatic breast cancer may benefit from early access to evidence-based interventions and resources that specifically address their supportive care needs and optimize quality of life and wellbeing.

Study design and protocol for tailored Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to optimize quality of life in women living with metastatic breast cancer.

Women living with metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer face unique challenges, including arduous treatments, side effects, chronic symptom burden, and emotional distress. Nevertheless, most research has paradoxically focused on optimizing quality of life in women with early-stage, non-metastatic breast cancer. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an evidence-based, third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy that focuses on creating 'a life worth living' by promoting meaning and purpose and optimizing quality of life. ACT may be particularly well-suited for women with metastatic breast cancer as it addresses salient existential concerns, while allowing for the co-occurrence of feelings of grief and loss that are normal and expected when facing a life-limiting prognosis. This manuscript describes the rationale and study design of a pilot randomized controlled trial to develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored ACT intervention for women living with metastatic breast cancer. Participants (N = 30) will be randomized 1:1 to either ACT, cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM), or a usual care control. Both ACT and CBSM are 8-week, group-based interventions that will be delivered online. Primary outcomes are rates of acceptance, retention, and satisfaction. Preliminary effects on variables of interest, including meaning and purpose, psychological flexibility, and several domains of quality of life, will also be examined. Findings will inform the conduct of a full-scale randomized controlled trial of our tailored ACT intervention in women living with metastatic breast cancer.