Cost-utility analysis of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine for adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy at concurrent time with radiation therapy (RT) or at adjuvant time alone in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is used with several regimens. The cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare administration of two 5-FU regimens and capecitabine in the aspect of provider and societal viewpoint. METHODS: Stage II or III rectal cancer patients who received pre-operative or post-operative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were compared by using decision tree model between (I) 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV) for 5 days per cycle (Mayo Clinic regimen); (II) 5-FU continuous infusion (CI) for 120-h per cycle (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 protocol); (III) standard regimen of capecitabine. All probability data were extracted from landmark study. Direct medical costs were the cost from database of Drug Medical Supply Information Center, while direct non-medical cost and utility were interviewed from stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The time horizon of this study was 5 years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the final result in this study, which determined as the numerator of the difference of costs among three drug regimens, and the difference of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from each drug was the denominator. RESULTS: 5-FU plus LV was the cheapest and least efficacy for adjuvant treatment of LARC in both provider and societal viewpoint. In provider viewpoint, the ICERs of 5-FU CI and capecitabine were 334,550 THB/QALY (US $9,840/QALY) and 189,935 THB/QALY (US $5,586/QALY), respectively, with the corresponding societal viewpoint of 264,447 THB/QALY (US $7,778/QALY) and 119,120 THB/QALY (US $3,504/QALY) when 5-FU plus LV was used as comparator. The most influential parameter for value of treatment was acquisition cost of capecitabine. At the willingness to pay for one QALY gained in Thailand (160,000 THB or US $4,706), 5-FU plus LV, 5-FU CI and capecitabine had probabilities of cost-effectiveness of 63%, 2% and 35%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine was the most expensive regimen but produced the higher effectiveness than 5-FU plus LV and 5-FU CI. The most influential parameter in the model was acquisition cost of capecitabine.

Comparison and consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for CT- and MR-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To create and compare consensus clinical target volume (CTV) contours for computed tomography (CT) and 3-Tesla (3-T) magnetic resonance (MR) image-based cervical-cancer brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three experts in gynecologic radiation oncology contoured the same 3 cervical cancer brachytherapy cases: 1 stage IIB near-complete response (CR) case with a tandem and ovoid, 1 stage IIB partial response (PR) case with tandem and ovoid with needles, and 1 stage IB2 CR case with a tandem and ring applicator. The CT contours were completed before the MRI contours. These were analyzed for consistency and clarity of target delineation using an expectation maximization algorithm for simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE), with κ statistics as a measure of agreement between participants. The conformity index was calculated for each of the 6 data sets. Dice coefficients were generated to compare the CT and MR contours of the same case. RESULTS: For all 3 cases, the mean tumor volume was smaller on MR than on CT (P<.001). The κ and conformity index estimates were slightly higher for CT, indicating a higher level of agreement on CT. The Dice coefficients were 89% for the stage IB2 case with a CR, 74% for the stage IIB case with a PR, and 57% for the stage IIB case with a CR. CONCLUSION: In a comparison of MR-contoured with CT-contoured CTV volumes, the higher level of agreement on CT may be due to the more distinct contrast medium visible on the images at the time of brachytherapy. MR at the time of brachytherapy may be of greatest benefit in patients with large tumors with parametrial extension that have a partial or complete response to external beam. On the basis of these results, a 95% consensus volume was generated for CT and for MR. Online contouring atlases are available for instruction at http://www.nrgoncology.org/Resources/ContouringAtlases/GYNCervicalBrachytherapy.aspx.

Radiation dose escalation using intensity modulated radiation therapy for gross unresected node-positive endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine rates of nodal control and survival in patients with endometrial cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with dose escalation to unresected nodal disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 2005 and April 2011, 22 endometrial-cancer patients received IMRT with dose escalation to gross nodal disease with curative intent. Twelve were treated for recurrent disease (RD) and 10 in the primary setting, of whom 5 had a hysterectomy. The boost area included pelvic nodes in 9 patients (41%), paraaortic nodes (PAN) in 6 (27%) and both pelvic and PAN in 7 (32%). The median gross nodal dose was 63 Gy (range, 55-65). Rates of local control, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 37.6 months (range, 10-88). Median nodal size was 2.25 cm (range, 1-6.9). The median time to first relapse after IMRT was 12 months (range, 6-49). Relapses occurred in 5/12 RD (42%), 1/5 hysterectomy (20%), and 5/5 inoperable cases. Nodal relapses occurred in-field in 3/12 RD and 1/5 hysterectomy patients. At 3 years, nodal control was 86%, DFS was 58% and OS was 68%. Three patients experienced grade 3 late hematologic toxicity (anemia). No late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In endometrial cancer, the use of IMRT for dose escalation to gross nodal disease is feasible with acceptable rates of toxicity. Patients with nodal recurrence or unresectable nodal disease after a hysterectomy may benefit from radiation dose escalation.

Vaginal brachytherapy for early stage uterine papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To report clinical outcomes following adjuvant high-dose-rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VB) for early-stage uterine papillary serous (UPSC) and clear cell (CC) endometrial cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study of Stage I and II papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancer treated with post-operative HDR VB between October 2005 and May 2012 was performed. A total of 37 patients were identified, 26 with UPSC, 9 with CC and 2 with mixed UPSC/CC. After total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, VB was administered without external-beam radiation with a dose of 24 Gy in 6 fractions prescribed to the vaginal surface. Chemotherapy was given to 30 patients (75%). RESULTS: The median follow up time was 24.8 months (range, 2.0 to 71.5 months). Four patients relapsed, 2 with UPSC and 2 with CC. The initial site of relapse was concurrent vagina, pelvic/para-aortic nodes and abdominal wall (1), pelvic/para-aortic nodes (1) and para-aortic nodes alone (2). The 2-year vaginal-control rate was 96.8%. The pelvic-control rate including vaginal and nodal relapse was 93.5%. The 2-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 89.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HDR VB as the sole adjuvant treatment modality for early-stage UPSC/CC is associated with a low rate of vaginal relapse and excellent survival outcomes. This novel low-dose regimen for VB is safe and effective.

Duodenal and other gastrointestinal toxicity in cervical and endometrial cancer treated with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy to paraaortic lymph nodes.

PURPOSE: To characterize the rates of acute and late duodenal and other gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities among patients treated for cervical and endometrial cancers with extended-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (EF-IMRT) to the paraaortic nodes and to analyze dose-volume relationships of GI toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-three patients with endometrial or cervical cancer underwent EF-IMRT to the paraaortic nodes, of whom 46 met the inclusion criteria for GI toxicity and 45 for duodenal toxicity analysis. The median prescribed dose to the paraaortic nodes was 54 Gy (range, 41.4-65 Gy). The 4 duodenal segments, whole duodenum, small bowel loops, peritoneum, and peritoneum plus retroperitoneal segments of colon were contoured retrospectively, and dosimetric analysis was performed to identify dose-volume relationships to grade ≥3 acute (<90 day) and late (≥90 day) GI toxicity. RESULTS: Only 3/46 patients (6.5%) experienced acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity and 3/46 patients (6.5%) experienced late grade ≥3 GI toxicity. The median dose administered to these 6 patients was 50.4 Gy. One of 12 patients who received 63 to 65 Gy at the level of the renal hilum experienced grade 3 GI toxicity. Dosimetric analysis of patients with and without toxicity revealed no differences between the mean absolute or fractional volumes at any 5-Gy interval between 5 Gy and the maximum dose. None of the patients experienced duodenal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of paraaortic nodes with IMRT is associated with low rates of GI toxicities and no duodenal-specific toxicity, including patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy. This technique may allow sufficient dose sparing of the bowel to enable safe dose escalation to at least 65 Gy.

A novel low dose fractionation regimen for adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy in early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate local control, survival and toxicity in patients with early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus treated with adjuvant high-dose-rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone using a novel low dose regimen. METHODS: We reviewed records of 414 patients with stage IA to stage II endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with VB alone from 2005 to 2011. Of these, 157 patients with endometrioid histology received 24 Gy in 6 fractions of HDR vaginal cylinder brachytherapy and constitute the study population. Dose was prescribed at the cylinder surface and delivered twice weekly in the post-operative setting. Local control and survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All 157 patients completed the prescribed course of VB. Median follow-up time was 22.8 months (range, 1.5-76.5). Two patients developed vaginal recurrence, one in the periurethral region below the field and one in the fornix after treatment with a 2.5-cm cylinder. Three patients developed regional recurrence in the para-aortic region. Two patients developed distant metastasis (lung and carcinomatosis). The 2-year rate of vaginal control was 98.6%, locoregional control was 97.9% and disease-free survival was 96.8%. The 2-year overall survival rate was 98.7%. No Grade 2 or higher vaginal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary or skin long-term toxicity was reported for any patient. CONCLUSION: Vaginal brachytherapy alone in early-stage endometrial cancer provides excellent results in terms of locoregional control and disease-free survival. The fractionation scheme of 24 Gy in 6 fractions prescribed to the cylinder surface was well-tolerated with minimal late toxicity.