Early administration of norepinephrine in sepsis: Multicenter randomized clinical trial (EA-NE-S-TUN) study protocol.

One of the most important components of sepsis management is hemodynamic restoration. If the target mean arterial pressure (MAP) is not obtained, the first recommendation is for volume expansion, and the second is for norepinephrine (NE). We describe the methodology of a randomized multicenter trial aiming to assess the hypothesis that low-dose NE given early in adult patients with sepsis will provide better control of shock within 6 hours from therapy starting compared to standard care. This trial includes ICU septic patients in whom MAP decrease below 65 mmHg to be randomized into 2 groups: early NE-group versus standard care-group. The patient's attending clinician will determine how much volume expansion is necessary to meet the target of a MAP > 65 mm Hg. If this target not achieved, after at least 30 ml/kg and guided by the available indices of fluid responsiveness, NE will be used in a usual way. The latter must follow a consensual schedule elaborated by the investigating centers. Parameters to be taken at inclusion and at H6 are: lactates, cardiac ultrasound parameters (stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), E/E' ratio), and P/F ratio. MAP and diuresis are recorded hourly. Our primary outcome is the shock control defined as a composite criterion (MAP > 65 mm Hg for 2 consecutive measurements and urinary output > 0.5 ml/kg/h for 2 consecutive hours) within 6 hours. Secondary outcomes: Decrease in serum lactate> 10% from baseline within 6 hours, the received fluid volume within 6 hours, variation of CO and E/E', and 28 days-Mortality. The study is ongoing and aims to include at least 100 patients per arm. This study is likely to contribute to support the indication of early initiation of NE with the aim to restrict fluid intake in septic patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05836272).

Differences in leucocytes and inflammation-based indices among critically ill patients owing to SARS-CoV-2 variants during several successive waves of COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Inflammatory indices are useful informative markers in assessing the severity of the COVID-19 disease course; however, their involvements during series waves of SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreaks in critical patients with COVID-19 remain unclear. Hence, we aimed to ascertain the changing dynamics of the combined inflammatory indices (NLR, dNLR, CLR, LMR, PLR, SII, and SIRI) and their associations with clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients during serial waves of SARS-CoV-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 163 severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU during six SARS-CoV-2 waves. RESULTS: We found that most of patients admitted to the ICU were from the fourth wave. Patients in the fourth wave were considerably younger and had the highest percentage of ARDS than other waves. The highest CRP was found in the first wave, while the lowest in patients admitted in the sixth wave. Although most of the COVID-19 waves were marked with leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and lymphocytopenia, the lowest of both NLR and dNLR were found in the fourth wave "Delta wave" and the lowest of both CLR and SII were observed in "Omicron wave". Interestingly, during most of the COVID-19 waves, the derived combined inflammatory ratio NLR, dNLR, CLR, SII and SIRI were sustained at high levels in fatal cases at the last day of hospitalization, while these indices declined in the alive group at the end of ICU hospitalization. No major difference was identified in lymphocyte count between admission and the last day of hospitalization in both deceased and recovered COVID-19 patients during Delta and Omicron waves. Moreover, patients admitted in the Omicron wave had less severe disease compared to those admitted in the Delta wave. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in survival rates or the probability of respiratory failure between six successive COVID-19 waves. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results showed marked differences in the alteration of nonspecific inflammation and damage in the adaptive immune response during the six serial SARS-CoV-2 waves. Considering the inflammatory response of infectious diseases, embedding inflammatory indices informative markers into routine clinical testing offers the potential to mitigate the impact of future pandemics of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases.