Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff. However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of nerve injury, infection, tumor, or fracture. The analysis included 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs performed for primary cuff-intact osteoarthritis with 2-year minimum follow-up. Defining preoperative ER weakness as strength <3.3 kilograms (7.2 pounds), 3 cohorts were created and matched: (1) weak aTSAs (n = 74) vs. normal aTSAs (n = 74), (2) weak rTSAs (n = 38) vs. normal rTSAs (n = 38), and (3) weak rTSAs (n = 60) vs. weak aTSAs (n = 60). We compared range of motion, outcome scores, strength, complications, and revision rates at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Despite weak aTSAs having poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER (P < .001), neither of these deficits persisted postoperatively compared with the normal cohort. Likewise, weak rTSAs had poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER, overhead motion, and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .029). However, no statistically significant differences were found between preoperatively weak and normal rTSAs. When comparing weak aTSA vs. weak rTSA, no differences were found in preoperative and postoperative outcomes, proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, and complication and rate of revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In preoperatively weak patients with cuff-intact primary osteoarthritis, aTSA leads to similar postoperative strength, range of motion, and outcome scores compared with patients with normal preoperative strength, indicating that preoperative weakness does not preclude aTSA use. Furthermore, patients who were preoperatively weak in ER demonstrated improved postoperative rotational motion after undergoing aTSA and rTSA, with both groups achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates.

Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation.

Aims: Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE. Methods: This was a retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates. Results: Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups.

Evaluation of additional causes of hip pain in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is an increasingly prevalent pathology in young and active patients, that has contributing factors from both abnormal hip morphology as well as abnormal hip motion. Disease progression can be detrimental to patient quality of life in the short term, from limitations on sport and activity, as well as the long term through early onset of hip arthritis. However, several concurrent or contributing pathologies may exist that exacerbate hip pain and are not addressed by arthroscopic intervention of cam and pincer morphologies. Lumbopelvic stiffness, for instance, places increased stress on the hip to achieve necessary flexion. Pathology at the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joint may exist concurrently to FAIS through aberrant muscle forces. Additionally, both femoral and acetabular retro- or anteversion may contribute to impingement not associated with traditional cam/pincer lesions. Finally, microinstability of the hip from either osseous or capsuloligamentous pathology is increasingly being recognized as a source of hip pain. The present review investigates the pathophysiology and evaluation of alternate causes of hip pain in FAIS that must be evaluated to optimize patient outcomes.

Hip Arthroscopic Microfracture Augmented With Platelet-Rich Plasma-Infused Micronized Cartilage Allograft Significantly Improves Functional Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate functional outcomes and survivorship in patients at 1 year after undergoing arthroscopic microfracture augmented with hyaline allograft for symptomatic chondral defects of the hip. METHODS: Consecutive patients with and without prior hip procedures presenting with Outerbridge grade IV chondral lesion of the acetabulum or femoral head were prospectively followed. Patients underwent hip microfracture augmented with hyaline allograft suspended in autologous platelet-rich plasma between October 2016 and April 2018. Extent of cartilage degeneration was quantified using the chondromalacia severity index (CMI). Patient functional scores, including Tegner, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) were collected preoperatively and at minimum 1-year postoperatively. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was analyzed. Statistical significance was established at P < .05. Pearson's coefficient analysis was performed to identify preoperative variables correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (86.4%) had minimum 1-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis, with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 38.3 ± 9.1 years and 27.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2, respectively. Comparison of baseline and postoperative score averages demonstrated significant improvements in Tegner scores (3.7 ± 2.9 vs 5.1 ± 2.6; P = .003), HOS-ADL (63.3 ± 16.4 vs 89.1 ± 14.5; P < .001), HOS-SSS (40.8 ± 20.4 vs 79.5 ± 21.6; P < .001), mHHS (61.5 ± 16.2 vs 87.0 ± 17.7; P < .001), and NAHS (56.6 ± 14.9 vs 78.7 ± 18.3; P < .001). The percentage of patients who achieved MCID for HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, mHHS, and NAHS were 89.8%, 83.0%, 75.6%, and 81.6%, respectively. Overall, 91.8% of patients met the threshold for achieving MCID in at least one outcome score. Of the 57 patients, 5 (8.8%) failed clinically, with 1 (1.8%) undergoing revision surgery and 4 (6.9%) undergoing conversion to total hip arthroplasty. There was a direct correlation between preoperative alpha angle and postoperative HOS-ADL. Femoral chondral lesion size and CMI inversely correlated with postoperative HOS-ADL. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hip chondral defects with microfracture and hyaline allograft augmentation demonstrated excellent survivorship and significantly improved patient report outcomes at 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Anatomic Considerations Regarding the Placement of a Retrograde Intramedullary Fibular Screw.

The purpose of this study was to identify the ideal start site for a retrograde intramedullary fibular cortical screw based on its relationship to the surrounding soft tissue structures and to assess for damage to the surrounding soft tissue structures caused during placement of the screw. Four fresh frozen cadavers underwent fluoroscopic placement of a 3.5 mm cortical screw utilizing a standardized protocol. No damage to the peroneal tendons were noted in any cadaver with the foot in an inverted and plantarflexed position. The closest structure to the center of the screw head was the anterior talofibular ligament anteriorly (3.33 mm range: 3-4 mm) and the calcaneofibular ligament posteriorly (2.66 mm, range: 2-3 mm). Two screws violated the malleolar fossa medially and were noted to impinge on the lateral process of the talus. The ideal start site for a 3.5 mm intramedullary fibular screw is at the midline on the lateral radiograph and 3.0 mm lateral to the malleolar fossa on the AP radiograph. This avoids damage to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and prevents impingement on the lateral process of the talus. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):078-081, 2021).

Comparing the Efficiency, Radiation Exposure, and Accuracy Using C-Arm versus O-Arm With 3D Navigation in Placement of Transiliac-Transsacral and Iliosacral Screws: A Cadaveric Study Evaluating an Early Career Surgeon.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency, radiation exposure to surgeon and patient, and accuracy of C-arm versus O-arm with navigation in the placement of transiliac-transsacral and iliosacral screws by an orthopaedic trauma fellow, for a surgeon early in practice. METHODS: Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were obtained. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to assess for safe corridors in the S1 and S2 segments. Iliosacral screws were assigned to the S1 segment in dysmorphic pelvises. Screws were randomized to modality and laterality. An orthopaedic trauma fellow placed all screws. Time of procedure and radiation exposure to the cadaver and surgeon were recorded. Three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons rated the safety of each screw on postoperative computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Six normal and 6 dysmorphic pelvises were identified. Eighteen transiliac-transsacral screws and 6 iliosacral screws were distributed evenly between C-arm and O-arm. Average operative duration per screw was significantly shorter using C-arm compared with O-arm (15.7 minutes ± 6.1 vs. 23.7 ± 8.5, P = 0.014). Screw placement with C-arm exposed the surgeon to a significantly greater amount of radiation (3.87 × 10 rads vs. 0.32 × 10, P < 0.001) while O-arm exposed the cadaver to a significantly greater amount of radiation (0.03 vs. 2.76 rads, P < 0.001). Two S2 transiliac-transsacral screws (1 C-arm and 1 O-arm) were categorized as unsafe based on scoring. There was no difference in screw accuracy between modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A difference in accuracy between modalities could not be elucidated, whereas efficiency was improved with utilization of C-arm, with statistical significance. A statistically significant increase in radiation exposure to the surgeon using C-arm was found, which may be clinically significant over a career. The results of this study can be extrapolated to a fellow or surgeon early in practice. The decision between use of these modalities will vary depending on surgeon preference and hospital resources.

Ulnar Nerve Enlargement at the Medial Epicondyle Negatively Correlates With Nerve Conduction Velocity in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: In cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), chronic compression often occurs at the origin of the flexor carpi ulnaris at the medial epicondyle. Motor nerve conduction velocity (NCV) across the elbow is assessed preoperatively to corroborate the clinical impression of CuTS. The purpose of this study was to correlate preoperative NCV to the direct measurements of ulnar nerve size about the elbow at the time of surgery in patients with clinical and/or electrodiagnostic evidence of CuTS. Methods: Data from 51 consecutive patients who underwent cubital tunnel release over a 2-year period were reviewed. Intraoperative measurements of the decompressed nerve were taken at 3 locations: at 4 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle, at the medial epicondyle, and at the distal aspect of Osborne fascia at the flexor aponeurotic origin. Correlation analysis was performed comparing nerve size measurements to slowing of ulnar motor nerve conduction velocities (NCV) below the normal threshold of 49 m/s across the elbow. Results: Enlargement of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle and nerve compression at the flexor aponeurotic origin was a consistent finding. The mean calculated cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve was 0.21 cm2 above the medial epicondyle, 0.30 cm2 at the medial epicondyle, and 0.20 cm2 at the flexor aponeurotic origin (P < .001). There was an inverse correlation between change in nerve diameter and NCV slowing (r = -0.529, P < .001). Conclusions: For patients with significantly reduced preoperative NCV and clinical findings of advanced ulnar neuropathy, surgeons can expect nerve enlargement, all of which may affect their surgical decision-making.