Modifiable Mechanical Ventilation Targets Are Associated With Improved Survival in Ventilated VA-ECLS Patients.

BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung protective ventilation (LPV) improves patient outcomes by minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. The value of LPV in ventilated patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is not known, but the extracorporeal circuit provides a unique opportunity to modify ventilatory parameters to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that CS patients on VA-ECLS who require mechanical ventilation (MV) may benefit from low intrapulmonary pressure ventilation (LPPV), which has the same end goals as LPV. METHODS: The authors queried the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) registry for hospital admissions between 2009 and 2019 for CS patients on VA-ECLS and MV. They defined LPPV as peak inspiratory pressure at 24 hours on ECLS of <30 cm H2O. Positive end-expiration pressure and dynamic driving pressure (DDP) at 24 hours were also studied as continuous variables. Their primary outcome was survival to discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed that adjusted for baseline Survival After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation score, chronic lung conditions, and center extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume. RESULTS: A total of 2,226 CS patients on VA-ECLS were included: 1,904 received LPPV. The primary outcome was higher in the LPPV group vs the no-LPPV group (47.4% vs 32.6%; P < 0.001). Median peak inspiratory pressure (22 vs 24 cm H2O; P < 0.001) as well as DDP (14.5 vs 16 cm H2O; P < 0.001) were also significantly lower in those surviving to discharge. The adjusted OR for the primary outcome with LPPV was 1.69 (95% CI: 1.21-2.37; P = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: LPPV is associated with improved outcomes in CS patients on VA-ECLS requiring MV.

Area Deprivation Index and Distress Community Index Scores Are Not Associated With Short-Term and Long-Term Extracorporeal Life Support Outcomes.

Distressed Communities Index (DCI) and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) are two composite ranking scores that report community level socioeconomic status (SES) by ZIP codes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of SES as estimated by DCI and ADI scores on short-term and long-term outcomes after extracorporeal life support (ECLS) at a quaternary medical center. All patients on ECLS between January 1, 2015 and August 31, 2020 (N = 428) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee, had their ADI and DCI scores calculated. Primary outcome was mortality during index hospitalization, and secondary outcome was survival to end of study follow-up. There was no significant difference in primary outcome between the top 25% ADI vs . bottom 75% ADI (53.8% vs . 50.6%; p = 0.56) or between top 25% DCI vs . bottom 75% DCI (56.1 vs . 49.2; p = 0.21). Adjusted odds ratio for the primary outcome with ADI and DCI was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.63-2.0; p = 0.67) and 1.28 (95% CI, 0.70-2.34; p = 0.41), respectively. Additionally, there was no significant difference in long-term survival curves based on their ADI or DCI scores. In conclusion, SES as estimated by baseline DCI and ADI scores does not appear to impact short- or long-term survival post-ECLS at a large volume center. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A951.

Co-occurrence of Myocardial Sarcoidosis and Left Ventricular Non-compaction in a Patient with Advanced Heart Failure.

A 46-year-old man with systolic heart failure, end-stage renal disease on dialysis, ventricular tachycardia and pulmonary sarcoidosis presented with decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock of unknown aetiology. The hospital course was complicated by worsening shock requiring inotropic and mechanical circulatory support, as well as eventual dual heart and kidney transplantation. Cardiac imaging was used to assess the aetiology of the patient's non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, including a PET scan and cardiac MRI. Imaging demonstrated findings consistent with left ventricular non-compaction, but was inconclusive for cardiac sarcoidosis. After eventual heart transplantation, histopathology of the patient's explanted heart showed evidence of both non-compaction and cardiac sarcoidosis. In this case report, the authors review the pathophysiology of both cardiac sarcoidosis and left ventricular non-compaction, and highlight a multimodality approach to the diagnosis of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients with Aortic Insufficiency.

Background: Worsening aortic insufficiency (AI) is a known sequela of prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support with a significant impact on patient outcomes. While medical treatment may relieve symptoms, it is unlikely to halt progression. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are among non-medical interventions available to address post-LVAD AI. Limited data are available on outcomes with either SAVR or TAVR for the management of post-LVAD AI. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample data collected for hospital admissions between the years 2015 and 2018 for patients with pre-existing continuous-flow LVAD undergoing TAVR or SAVR for AI were queried. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, MI, pacemaker implantation, need for open aortic valve surgery, vascular complications and cardiac tamponade. Results: Patients undergoing TAVR were more likely to receive their procedure during an elective admission (57.1 versus 30%, p=0.002), and a significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities, as assessed by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, was observed in the SAVR group (29 versus 18; p=0.0001). We observed a significantly higher prevalence of the primary composite outcome in patients undergoing SAVR (30%) compared with TAVR (14.3%; p=0.001). Upon multivariable analysis adjusting for the type of admission and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, TAVR was associated with significantly lower odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio 0.243; 95% CI [0.06-0.97]; p=0.045). Conclusion: In this nationally representative cohort of LVAD patients with post-implant AI, it was observed that TAVR was associated with a lower risk of adverse short-term outcomes compared with SAVR.