Phenotyping chronic respiratory diseases with airways obstruction.

Given the high prevalence of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) in Vietnam, there is an urgent need to establish a simplified strategy for categorising patients as either having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This classification would streamline the application of treatment recommendations outlined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).Patients with obstructive lung function were classified as having COPD, asthma, or ACO based on GINA/GOLD guidelines. We hypothesised that ACO-like asthma (ACO-A) would present with positive skin prick tests (SPTs) or early onset of symptoms without a history of tuberculosis (TB), while those with ACO-like COPD (ACO-B) would exhibit negative SPTs and late onset of symptoms and/or a history of TB.Among 235 patients, the prevalence of asthma, ACO-A, ACO-B, and COPD was respectively 21%, 22%, 17%, and 40%. Allergic history, rhinitis, and childhood asthma were associated with ACO-A, while high cumulative smoking was correlated with ACO-B. Socio-economic and demographic parameters, medical history, clinical features, smoking habits, lung function, and para-clinical investigations significantly differed between "all asthma" (i.e., individuals with asthma combined with ACO-A) and "all COPD" (i.e., individuals with COPD combined with ACO-B).Based on SPTs, history of TB, and onset age, ACO patients may be defined as people with asthma or COPD..

Users of biologics in clinical practice: would they be eligible for phase III clinical studies? Cohort Study in the French Psoriasis Registry PSOBIOTEQ.

BACKGROUND: Numerous inclusion and exclusion criteria are involved in phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials investigating the safety and efficacy of biologics. This questions the generalization of results. METHODS: In this cohort study, we applied inclusion/exclusion criteria for phase III trials from original protocols (adalimumab - REVEAL, ustekinumab - PHOENIX, brodalumab - AMAGINE, secukinumab FIXTURE) to all patients enrolled in the PsoBioTeq prospective registry who received a biological agent for the first time between July 2012 and November 2017. We then compared the efficacy, drug survival and occurrence of adverse events between patients who satisfied/did not satisfy the eligibility criteria for these phase III trials. RESULTS: A total of 1267 patients were enrolled, of whom 993 (78.4%) were not eligible for at least one RCT (randomized controlled trial) and 251 (19.1%) did not meet the PASI/PGA severity requirements. Apart from disease severity, the most frequent criteria resulting in exclusion were as follows: non-plaque psoriasis (12.6%), significant cardiac disease (8.4%), significant liver disease (7.3%), elevated liver enzymes (4.9-9.6%) and personal history of diabetes (9.2%). There was no difference in drug survival between the two groups. The incidence ratio of adverse events was significantly lower in eligible versus non-eligible patients [0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.97) (P = 0.03)]. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients treated with biologics in the PsoBioTeq real-life registry would not have been eligible for phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials. Patients not eligible for psoriasis phase III clinical trials have a higher incidence of adverse events.