Predictive capacity of FRAX in a spanish region with a hip fracture rate close to the national mean.

BACKGROUND: It is known that standardized incidence rates of hip fracture vary among older people in Spain. So far, the results published on the validation of the FRAX® tool in Spain have suggested that the major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) risk in our country is underestimated. These studies have practically been based on Spanish cohorts evaluated in Catalonia, a higher hip fracture rate area. The purpose of this study is to analyse the ability of the FRAX® in a Spanish mid-fracture rate population. METHODS: Study design: Retrospective cohort study. MEASURES: MOFs: hip, humerus, wrist, spine fractures. Risk of fracture assessed by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Predictive capacity of FRAX® according to the osteoporotic fractures observed between 2009 and 2018 (ObsFr) to predicted by FRAX® without densitometry in 2009 (PredFr) ratio. RESULTS: 285 participants (156 women, 54.7%) with a mean ± SD of 61.5 ± 14 years. Twenty-four people sustained 27 fractures (15 MOFs). Significant ORs were observed for an age ≥ 65 (2.92; 95% CI, 1.07-7.96), female sex (3.18; 95% CI, 1.24-8.16), rheumatoid arthritis (0.62; 95% CI, 2.03-55.55), proton pump (2.71; 95% CI, 1.20-6.09) and serotonin reuptake (2.51; 95% CI, 1.02-6.16) inhibitors. The ObsFr/PredFr ratio in women were 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95-1.29) for MOFs and 0.47 (95% CI, 0-0.94) for hip fractures. Men had a ratio of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.01-1.14) for MOF, no hip fractures were observed. The ratios for the overall group were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.12-1.48) for MOFs and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.22-1.17) for hip fractures. CONCLUSIONS: FRAX® accurately predicted MOFs in women population with a hip fracture incidence rate close to the national mean compared to previous studies conducted in higher incidence regions in Spain.

Information and consensus document for the detection and management of chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem worldwide that affects more than 10% of the Spanish population. CKD is associated with high comorbidity rates, poor prognosis and major consumption of health system resources. Since the publication of the last consensus document on CKD seven years ago, little evidence has emerged and few clinical trials on new diagnostic and treatment strategies in CKD have been conducted, apart from new trials in diabetic kidney disease. Therefore, CKD international guidelines have not been recently updated. The rigidity and conservative attitude of the guidelines should not prevent the publication of updates in knowledge about certain matters that may be key in detecting CKD and managing patients with this disease. This document, also prepared by 10 scientific associations, provides an update on concepts, clarifications, diagnostic criteria, remission strategies and new treatment options. The evidence and the main studies published on these aspects of CKD have been reviewed. This should be considered more as an information document on CKD. It includes an update on CKD detection, risk factors and screening; a definition of renal progression; an update of remission criteria with new suggestions in the older population; CKD monitoring and prevention strategies; management of associated comorbidities, particularly in diabetes mellitus; roles of the Primary Care physician in CKD management; and what not to do in Nephrology. The aim of the document is to serve as an aid in the multidisciplinary management of the patient with CKD based on current recommendations and knowledge.

Prevalencia y factores asociados de fragilidad en adultos mayores de 70 años en la comunidad / Prevalence and associated factors of frailty in adults over 70 years in the community

Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia y analizar los factores asociados al síndrome de fragilidad en adultos ≥70 años, pertenecientes a un centro de salud de Asturias. Diseño: Estudio observacional transversal. Emplazamiento: Centro de Salud El Llano, Asturias. Participantes: Adultos ≥70 años. Mediciones principales: La fragilidad se definió por la presencia de ≥3 criterios del fenotipo de fragilidad de Fried. Variables secundarias: características sociodemográficas, estado de salud, estado funcional, estado cognitivo-afectivo y riesgo social. Se realizó un análisis bivariante y regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 408 participantes con una edad media de 79,8 (DE 6,6) años, el 59,1% eran mujeres. La prevalencia de fragilidad fue del 27,7% y del 44,9% para la prefragilidad. El perfil sociodemográfico es de una mujer (77%), de elevada edad (>84 años) (50,4%), sin estudios (65,5%), viuda (48,7%), con bajo nivel económico (47,8%) y en riesgo social (OR: 3,3; IC 95%: 2,5-4). Los factores que se asociaron estadísticamente con el síndrome de fragilidad fueron: comorbilidad alta (OR: 2,7; IC 95%: 1,5-5), polimedicación (OR: 1,9; IC 95%: 1,3-3), percepción de la calidad de vida con la salud (OR: 0,95; IC 95%: 0,93-0,97); deambulación alterada (OR: 17,9; IC 95%: 7,1-45,3), apoyo para la marcha (OR: 10,5; IC 95%: 4,7-23,4), alto riesgo de caídas (OR: 6,4; IC 95%: 3,8-10,8), dependencia para las ABVD (OR: 4; IC 95%: 2,4-6,6), AIVD (OR: 9,7; IC 95%: 4,7-20), discapacidad (OR: 37,7; IC 95%: 52,2-274,5), deterioro cognitivo (OR: 4,1; IC 95%: 1,8-9,3) y depresión (OR: 4,8; IC 95%: 2,7-8,7). Conclusiones: La fragilidad es un síndrome multifactorial de elevada prevalencia en los mayores de 70 años, en el que además de los criterios de fragilidad de Fried deben de ser analizados aspectos del estado de salud, funcionales, cognitivos-afectivos y sociales.(AU)

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and analyze the factors associated with frailty syndrome, in adults ≥70 years old, belonging to a health center in Asturias. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Participants: Adults ≥70 years of age. Site: Health Centre of Llano (Asturias). Main measurements: Frailty was defined by the presence of ≥3 criteria of Fried's frailty phenotype. Secondary variables: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, functional status, cognitive-affective status and social risk. A bivariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. Results: Four hundred eight participants were included, with a mean age of 79.8 (SD 6.6), 59.1% female. The prevalence of frailty was 27.7% and 44.9% for pre-frailty. The sociodemographic profile is that of a woman (77%), of high age (>84 years) (50.4%), without studies (65.5%), widow (48.7%) with low economic status (47.8%) and at social risk (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5-4). Factors that were statistically associated with frailty syndrome were: high comorbidity (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.5-5), polypharmacy (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-3), perception of quality of life with health (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97), impaired ambulation (OR: 17.9; 95% CI: 7.1-45.3), support for walking (OR: 10.5; 95% CI: 4.7-23.4), high risk of falls (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 3.8-10.8), ABVD (OR: 4; 95% CI: 2.4-6.6), AIVD (OR: 9.7; 95% CI: 4.7-20), disability (OR: 37.7; 95% CI: 52.2-274.5), cognitive impairment (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.8-9.3) and depression (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 2.7-8.7). Conclusions: Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome, with a high prevalence in those over 70 years of age, in which, in addition to Fried's criteria of frailty, aspects of health, functional, cognitive-affective and social status must be analyzed.(AU)

[Prevalence and associated factors of frailty in adults over 70 years in the community]. / Prevalencia y factores asociados de fragilidad en adultos mayores de 70 años en la comunidad.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and analyze the factors associated with frailty syndrome, in adults ≥70 years old, belonging to a health center in Asturias. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥70 years of age. SITE: Health Centre of Llano (Asturias). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was defined by the presence of ≥3 criteria of Fried's frailty phenotype. Secondary variables: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, functional status, cognitive-affective status and social risk. A bivariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Four hundred eight participants were included, with a mean age of 79.8 (SD 6.6), 59.1% female. The prevalence of frailty was 27.7% and 44.9% for pre-frailty. The sociodemographic profile is that of a woman (77%), of high age (>84 years) (50.4%), without studies (65.5%), widow (48.7%) with low economic status (47.8%) and at social risk (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5-4). Factors that were statistically associated with frailty syndrome were: high comorbidity (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.5-5), polypharmacy (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-3), perception of quality of life with health (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97), impaired ambulation (OR: 17.9; 95% CI: 7.1-45.3), support for walking (OR: 10.5; 95% CI: 4.7-23.4), high risk of falls (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 3.8-10.8), ABVD (OR: 4; 95% CI: 2.4-6.6), AIVD (OR: 9.7; 95% CI: 4.7-20), disability (OR: 37.7; 95% CI: 52.2-274.5), cognitive impairment (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.8-9.3) and depression (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 2.7-8.7). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome, with a high prevalence in those over 70 years of age, in which, in addition to Fried's criteria of frailty, aspects of health, functional, cognitive-affective and social status must be analyzed.

El reto de la pandemia de la COVID-19 para la Atención Primaria / The challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic for Primary Care

La COVID-19 ha provocado muchos cambios en el sistema sanitario y, por supuesto, en Atención Primaria. La pandemia ha marcado un antes y un después, tanto a nivel organizativo en los centros de salud como en la manera de abordar las demandas y necesidades de los pacientes, y en el desempeño de la Medicina Familiar. En marzo de 2020 todos veíamos con preocupación cómo la Atención Primaria era invisible para las administraciones. La forma inicial de abordar la atención a la pandemia con un enfoque hospitalocentrista ha condicionado probablemente el diseño organizativo a lo largo de las diferentes oleadas. Al comienzo de la pandemia, la Atención Primaria no disponía de pruebas para el diagnóstico de la COVID-19, y fuimos testigos de cómo la inquietud y el miedo se apoderaba de los médicos y médicas de familia, muy especialmente en aquellas comunidades autónomas (CCAA) en las que el virus azotaba con fuerza a la población. La Atención Primaria, como siempre, se mantuvo cerca de la ciudadanía, priorizando la atención telefónica y dando respuesta a las demandas de los pacientes, muy especialmente al abordaje de la COVID-19. La Atención Primaria trabajó no solo como un eficaz muro de contención de la epidemia, sino también gestionando y resolviendo en el domicilio los casos leves o moderados que no necesitaban ingreso hospitalario. Sin embargo, para seguir haciendo frente a la pandemia y a la nueva situación se precisaban cambios organizativos y de gestión, más profesionales y nuevos roles. Es importante constatar que, para el buen desempeño de la Medicina Familiar del siglo XXI, para que la Atención Primaria salga reforzada de esta pandemia, las soluciones pasan por una adecuada financiación y una apuesta firme por mantener la longitudinalidad.(AU)

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to many changes in the healthcare system including of course in Primary Care. The pandemic has marked a before and after for primary care both on an organisational level in healthcare centres, how patient requests and requirements are tackled and how family medicine is conducted. In March 2020 we all worried at how primary care appeared to be invisible for administrations. How the pandemic was initially managed with a hospital-centric approach probably conditioned the organisational design over the different waves. At the onset of the pandemic, Primary Care did not have tests to diagnose COVID-19, and we witnessed how concern and fear took hold over family doctors, most especially in those autonomous communities in which the virus whipped the population hard. Primary Care as always, stayed close to citizens and priority was given to telephone attention and responding to patient requests, most especially when tackling COVID-19. Primary Care worked not only as an effective protective wall for the epidemic but also to manage and resolve mild or moderate cases at home that needed hospital admission. However, to continue managing the pandemic and the new situation organisational and management changes, more professionals and new roles were all required. It is important to observe that for family medicine to function correctly in the 21st century and so that Primary Care comes out of this pandemic stronger, solutions entail both correct financing and a firm commitment to upholding continuity.(AU)

Mapa bibliométrico de la investigación realizada en atención primaria en España durante el periodo 2013-2017 / Bibliometric map of research carried out in Primary Care in Spain during the period 2013-2017

OBJETIVO: Describir la producción científica española de atención primaria durante 2013-2017, analizando su distribución geográfica, factor de impacto, áreas de investigación y participación de diferentes sectores institucionales. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional bibliométrico. PARTICIPANTES: Publicaciones indexadas en Medline. MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Revista y año de publicación, primer/último autor, centro de trabajo y comunidad autónoma. Se clasificaron los artículos según su contenido. El factor de impacto fue obtenido de la base de análisis bibliométrico Journal Citation Reports. RESULTADOS: Incluidos 980 documentos. El índice de transitoriedad fue 78,8%. La mayoría de los artículos (43,2%) procedía de centros de salud, originados en unidades o institutos de investigación, desde 14,9% en 2013 hasta 19,1% en 2017. El 63,3% se clasificaron como «aspectos clínicos». El 19,3% fueron publicados en la revista Atención Primaria, el 40,6% en revistas extranjeras y el 72,4% en revistas con factor de impacto, siendo esta proporción significativamente inferior (p < 0,001) en los procedentes de centros de salud (59,6%) o de unidades docentes/gerencias/servicios de salud (70,0%) respecto a los originados en unidades/institutos de investigación (93,1%) o en universidades (89,0%). En relación al número de habitantes (documentos/100.000 habitantes), las comunidades más productivas fueron Cataluña (4,2), Aragón (3,9) e Islas Baleares (3,3). CONCLUSIONES: En las publicaciones de atención primaria existe gran diversidad tanto en áreas de investigación como en las revistas donde se publican. La mayoría proceden de centros de salud, tratan aspectos clínicos y se publican en revistas españolas. Se observan diferencias en el volumen de producción científica entre comunidades autónomas

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Spanish scientific production of primary care during 2013-2017 and analyze their geographical distribution, impact factor, areas of research and involvement of different institutional sectors. DESIGN: Observational study bibliometric. PARTICIPANTS: The study focused on publications indexed in Medline. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Journal and year of publication, first/last author, workplace and autonomous community. Later, articles were classified according to their content. The impact factor was obtained from the basis of bibliometric analysis Journal Citation Reports. RESULTS: Using search criteria, were selected 980 documents. The transiency rate was 78,8%. The highest proportion of articles (43.2%) came from health centers, but we observed an increase of the articles from units or research institutes (14.9% in 2013, 19.1% in 2017). Of the total, 63.3% were classified as “clinical aspects”, 19.3% were published in the journal Atención Primaria, 40.6% in foreign journals and 72.4% in journals with impact factor, being this proportion significantly lower (p <0.001) in those coming from health centers (59.6%) or teaching units/management/health services (70.0%) with respect to those originated in research units/institutes (93.1%) or in universities (89.0%). In relation to population (articles/100.000 inhab.), the most productive communities were Cataluña (4.2), Aragón (3.9), e Islas Baleares (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: In primary care publications there is great diversity in both research areas such as in journals where published. Most are from health centers, treat clinical aspects and published in Spanish journals. Differences in the volume of scientific production between regions are observed

[Bibliometric map of research carried out in Primary Care in Spain during the period 2013-2017]. / Mapa bibliométrico de la investigación realizada en atención primaria en España durante el periodo 2013-2017.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Spanish scientific production of primary care during 2013-2017 and analyze their geographical distribution, impact factor, areas of research and involvement of different institutional sectors. DESIGN: Observational study bibliometric. PARTICIPANTS: The study focused on publications indexed in Medline. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Journal and year of publication, first/last author, workplace and autonomous community. Later, articles were classified according to their content. The impact factor was obtained from the basis of bibliometric analysis Journal Citation Reports. RESULTS: Using search criteria, were selected 980 documents. The transiency rate was 78,8%. The highest proportion of articles (43.2%) came from health centers, but we observed an increase of the articles from units or research institutes (14.9% in 2013, 19.1% in 2017). Of the total, 63.3% were classified as "clinical aspects", 19.3% were published in the journal Atención Primaria, 40.6% in foreign journals and 72.4% in journals with impact factor, being this proportion significantly lower (p <0.001) in those coming from health centers (59.6%) or teaching units/management/health services (70.0%) with respect to those originated in research units/institutes (93.1%) or in universities (89.0%). In relation to population (articles/100.000 inhab.), the most productive communities were Cataluña (4.2), Aragón (3.9), e Islas Baleares (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: In primary care publications there is great diversity in both research areas such as in journals where published. Most are from health centers, treat clinical aspects and published in Spanish journals. Differences in the volume of scientific production between regions are observed.

Hacia el fortalecimiento de la atención primaria para alcanzar la cobertura sanitaria universal / Towards the strengthening of primary care to achieve universal health coverage

No disponible

Sobrediagnóstico, cuando las personas reciben un diagnóstico que no necesitan / Overdiagnosis, when people receive a diagnosis they do not need

No disponible

Razones para la pertinencia de la ecografía realizada por los médicos de familia / Reasons for the relevance of ultrasound performed by doctors family

No disponible

No hacer / Not to do

No disponible

Documento de consenso sobre la enfermedad renal crónica: una oportunidad de coordinación / Consensus document for the detection and management of chronic kidney disease: Coordination opportunity

No disponible