Evaluating the Impact of a Novel Mobile Care Team on the Prevalence of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Presenting to Emergency Medical Services in Nova Scotia.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) is a proxy measure for access to primary care. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are increasingly called when primary care cannot be accessed. A novel paramedic-nurse EMS Mobile Care Team (MCT) was implemented in an under-serviced community. The MCT responds in a non-transport unit to referrals from EMS, emergency and primary care, and to low-acuity 911 calls in a defined geographic region. Our objective was to compare the prevalence of ACSC in ground ambulance (GA) responses before and after the introduction of the MCT. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of GA and MCT patients with ACSC (determined by chief complaint, clinical impression, treatment protocol, and medical history) from one year pre-MCT implementation to one year post-MCT implementation was conducted for the period of October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2014. Demographics were described. ACSC prevalence was compared using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: There were 975 calls pre-MCT and 1208 GA/95 MCT calls post-MCT. ACSC in GA patients pre- and post-MCT was similar: n=122, 12.5% vs. n=185, 15.3%; p=0.06. ACSC in patients seen by EMS (GA plus MCT) increased in the post-MCT period: 122 (12.5%) vs. 204 (15.7%) p=0.04. Pre-MCT implementation vs post-implementation, GA ACSC calls differed significantly by sex with higher female utilization (n=50 vs. n=105; p=0.007), but not age (65.38, ± 15.12 vs. 62.51 ± 20.48; p=0.16). Post-MCT, the prevalence of specific ACSC increased for GA: hypertension (p<0.001) and congestive heart failure (p=0.04). MCT patients with ACSC were less likely to have a primary care provider compared to GA (90.2% and 87.6% vs. 63.2%; p=0.003, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ACSC did not decrease for GA with the introduction of the MCT, but ACSC in the overall patient population served by EMS increased. It is possible more patients with ACSC call, or are referred to EMS, for the new MCT service. Given that MCT patients were less likely to have a primary care provider, this may represent an increase in access to care or a shift away from other emergency/episodic care. These associations must be further studied to inform the ideal utility of adding such services to EMS and healthcare systems.

Paramedic Clinical Consults with a Paramedic or Nurse in an EMS Communications Center Compared to Traditional Online Physician Consults.

OBJECTIVES: In many emergency medical services (EMS) systems, a direct medical oversight physician is available to paramedics for mandatory and/or elective consultations. At the time of this study, a clinical support desk (CSD) was being implemented within the medical communications center of a provincial EMS system in addition to the physician resource. The CSD was initially staffed with a registered nurse or an advanced care paramedic. The objective of the current study was to compare CSD "peer to peer" consults versus physician consults with regards to consultation patterns, transport dispositions, and patient safety measures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2 months before (September 1 to October 31, 2012) and 2 months after (September 1 to October 31, 2013) implementation of the CSD. In the before period, all clinical consults were fielded by the direct medical oversight physician. In the after period, consults were fielded by the physician, CSD or both. EMS databases were queried, and manual chart review and abstraction of audio recordings were done. Relapses back to EMS within 48 hours of non-transport were measured. RESULTS: 1621 consults were included, with 764 consults in the before period and 857 after (p = 0.02). The number of physician consults decreased from 764 before to 464 after (39.2%, p < 0.001), with the CSD taking 325 (37.9%) consults. The CSD was consulted more for police custody and trip destination. The physician was consulted more for cease resuscitation and clinical consults prior to medication administration. Overall non-transport rates were 595/764 before (77.9%), and 646/857 after (75.4%) (p = 0.2). Non-transports were 233/325 (71.7%) via the CSD, 364/464 (78.4%) via the physician, and 49/68 (72.1%) when both were involved (p = 0.07). Rate of relapse to EMS was similar before (25/524, 4.8%) and after (26/568, 4.6%) (p = 0.76), and between CSD (12/216, 5.5%) and physician consults (13/325, 4.0%) in the after period (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a novel "peer-to-peer" consult program was associated with an increased total number of consults made and reduced call volume for direct medical oversight physicians. There was no change in the patient safety measure studied.

Potential Candidates for Emergency Department Initiated Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) in a Canadian Institution.

Introduction Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients experience poor survival. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of heart-lung bypass, in the setting of cardiac arrest, termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has promise in improving survival with good neurologic outcomes. The study objective was to determine the number of potential annual ECPR candidates among the OHCA population in a health region within the Atlantic Canadian province of Nova Scotia. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted over a five-year period: January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2016. Consecutive non-traumatic OHCA and emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests occurring in a pre-determined catchment area (20-minute transport to ECMO center) defined by a geographic bounding box were identified. Criteria for ECPR were developed to identify candidates for activation of a "Code ECPR": (1) age 16-70, (2) witnessed arrest, (3) no flow duration (time to CPR, including bystander) <10 minutes, (4) resuscitation >10 minutes without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), (5) emergency medical service (EMS) transport to hospital <20 minutes, (6) no patient factors precluding ongoing resuscitation (do not resuscitate status (DNR), palliative care involvement, or metastatic cancer), and (7) initial rhythm not asystole. Candidates were stratified by initial rhythm. Candidates were considered ultimately ED ECPR eligible if they failed conventional treatment, defined by death or resuscitation >30 minutes. Clinical data related to candidacy was extracted by an electronic query from prehospital and ED electronic records and manual chart review by three researchers. Results Our search yielded 561 cases of EMS-treated OHCA or in-ED arrests. Of those 204/561 (36%; 95% CI 33-40%) met the criteria for activation of a "Code ECPR". Ultimately 79/204 (34%; 95% CI 28-41%) of those who met activation criteria were considered ED ECPR eligible; which is 14% (95% CI 11-17%) of the total number of arrests-of the total number of arrests, the initial rhythms were pulseless electrical activity (PEA) 33/79 (42%; 95% CI 32-53%) and shockable 46/79 (58%; 95% CI 47-69%). Conclusion Of all cardiac arrests in the area surrounding our ECMO center, approximately 41 per year met the criteria for a Code ECPR activation, with 16 per year ultimately being eligible for ED ECPR. This annual estimate varies based on the inclusion of initial rhythm. This provides insight into both prehospital and hospital implications of an ED ECPR program and will help guide the establishment of a program within our Nova Scotian health region. This study also provides a framework for similar investigation at other institutions contemplating ED ECPR program implementation.

Urban-Rural Differences in Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Background: Approximately 10% of people who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by paramedics survive to hospital discharge. Survival differs by up to 19.2% between urban centres and rural areas. Our goal was to investigate the differences in OHCA survival between urban centres and rural areas. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of OHCA patients treated by Nova Scotia Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in 2017. Cases of traumatic, expected, and noncardiac OHCA were excluded. Data were collected from the Emergency Health Service electronic patient care record system and the discharge abstract database. Geographic information system analysis classified cases as being in urban centres (population > 1000 people) or rural areas, using 2016 Canadian Census boundaries. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression covariates were age, sex, bystander resuscitation, whether the arrest was witnessed, public location, and preceding symptoms. Results: A total of 510 OHCAs treated by Nova Scotia Emergency Medical Services were included for analysis. A total of 12% (n = 62) survived to discharge. Patients with OHCAs in urban centres were 107% more likely to survive than those with OHCAs in rural areas (adjusted odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval = 1.1 to 3.8; P = 0.028). OHCAs in urban centres had a significantly shorter mean time to defibrillation of shockable rhythm (11.2 minutes ± 6.2) vs those in rural areas (17.5 minutes ± 17.3). Conclusions: Nova Scotia has an urban vs rural disparity in OHCA care that is also seen in densely populated OHCA centres. Survival is improved in urban centres. Further improvements in overall survival, especially in rural areas, may arise from community engagement in OHCA recognition and optimized healthcare delivery.

Contexte: Environ 10 % des personnes qui subissent un arrêt cardiaque en milieu extrahospitalier (ACEH), traité par des intervenants paramédicaux, survivent jusqu'à leur congé de l'hôpital. Le taux de survie peut différer de 19,2 % entre les centres urbains et les régions rurales. Notre étude visait à étudier les différences en matière de survie après un ACEH entre les centres urbains et les régions rurales. Méthodologie: Il s'agissait d'une étude de cohorte rétrospective portant sur des patients ayant subi un ACEH traité par les services médicaux d'urgence de la Nouvelle-Écosse en 2017. Les cas d'ACEH traumatique, prévu et non cardiaque ont été exclus. Les données ont été recueillies à partir du système de dossiers électroniques de soins aux patients des services médicaux d'urgence et de la Base de données sur les congés des patients. L'analyse du système d'information géographique a classé les cas selon qu'ils sont survenus dans un centre urbain (population de plus de 1 000 personnes) ou dans une région rurale, en utilisant les limites du recensement canadien de 2016. Le principal paramètre d'évaluation était la survie à la sortie de l'hôpital. Les covariables utilisées dans la régression logistique multivariée étaient l'âge, le sexe, la réanimation effectuée par des témoins si présents lors de l'arrêt cardiaque, l'emplacement public et les symptômes précédents. Résultats: Au total, 510 ACEH traités par les services médicaux d'urgence de la Nouvelle-Écosse ont été inclus aux fins de l'analyse. En tout, 12 % (n = 62) des sujets ont survécu jusqu'à leur congé hospitalier. Les patients ayant subi un ACEH dans un centre urbain étaient 107 % plus susceptibles de survivre que ceux ayant subi un ACEH dans une région rurale (rapport de cotes ajusté : 2,1; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,1 ­ 3,8; p = 0,028). Le temps moyen de délivrance d'un choc lors d'un ACEH avec rythme défibrillable est significativement plus court (11,2 ± 6,2 minutes) dans un centre urbain que dans une région rurale (17,5 ± 17,3 minutes). Conclusions: La Nouvelle-Écosse fait état d'une disparité dans les soins de l'ACEH entre les régions urbaines et les régions rurales, que l'on observe également dans les villes densément peuplées. La survie est plus longue dans les centres urbains. Il est possible de prolonger davantage la survie globale, en particulier dans les régions rurales, en sensibilisant la communauté à l'ACEH et en optimisant la prestation des soins de santé.

Methodology of a Cross-sectional Study Evaluating the Impact of a Novel Mobile Care Team on the Prevalence of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Presenting to Emergency Medical Services.

Introduction Hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) is often used as a proxy measure for access to primary care. The prevalence of ACSC has not been measured in the prehospital setting. Emergency medical services (EMS) are being used by patients who lack access to primary care for ACSC. Many novel models of care have been implemented within Canada and internationally, utilizing paramedics to ease the burden of poor primary care access. Recently, a mobile care team (MCT) consisting of a paramedic/nurse configuration has been deployed in the community of New Waterford, Nova Scotia. The team responds to low acuity 911 calls and follow-up appointments booked by primary care clinicians. This study will identify the prevalence of patients with ACSC presenting to EMS before and after the implementation of MCT and the differences after the implementation of the MCT. Methods Secondary data will be collected from the centralized EMS electronic patient care report (ePCR) database. All patients presenting to the ground ambulance with ACSC during the year prior to MCT implementation, all patients presenting to the ground ambulance with ACSC during the year post-MCT implementation, and all patients presenting to the MCT with ACSC will be included for analysis, allowing for a calculation of ACSC prevalence. Descriptive methods will be used for age, sex, primary care practitioner, and ASCS complaints. Prevalence data will be compared via the chi-squared test. A subgroup analysis of age, sex, and individual presenting conditions will also be analyzed using the chi-squared test. Confounding will be dealt with via multivariate logistic regression. Results The study results are pending; however, a literature review reveals a paucity of data on ACSC in EMS. Conclusions Due to the paucity of literature surrounding ACSC prevalence in EMS, the methodology developed to study these prevalence rates is a novel protocol of importance to prehospital research and the epidemiology of ACSC more broadly.

Evolution of a high-performance emergency health services system in Nova Scotia.

Since 1997, Emergency Health Services in Nova Scotia (NS) has evolved from a program providing prehospital care for patients in transport to a system providing integrated healthcare in both traditional (ie, ambulance) and non-traditional settings (eg, patient homes, hospital settings). This article highlights (1) the reorganization of the emergency medical service system design, (2) the strategies enabling efficient operation of this design, and (3) resultant innovations evolving from both system redesign and strategy application. Emergency Health Services has utilized a Public Utility Model (PUM) design providing prehospital healthcare, public safety, and public health responses to the population of NS. The success of the PUM has been complimented by three strategies: (1) co-leadership model operations, (2) common languages to translate evidence into practice, and (3) collaborative and integrated relationships with other regulated healthcare providers. This prehospital system design and application strategies could be applied in other sectors of community and hospital systems of care.

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a lifesaving technique for victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science, basic life support remains a critical factor in determining outcomes. The American Heart Association recommendations for adult basic life support incorporate the most recently published evidence and serve as the basis for education and training for laypeople and healthcare providers who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Contemporary evidence-based practice in Canadian emergency medical services: a vision for integrating evidence into clinical and policy decision-making.

Nationally, emphasis on the importance of evidence-based practice (EBP) in emergency medicine and emergency medical services (EMS) has continuously increased. However, meaningful incorporation of effective and sustainable EBP into clinical and administrative decision-making remains a challenge. We propose a vision for EBP in EMS: Canadian EMS clinicians and leaders will understand and use the best available evidence for clinical and administrative decision-making, to improve patient health outcomes, the capability and quality of EMS systems of care, and safety of patients and EMS professionals. This vision can be implemented with the use of a structure, process, system, and outcome taxonomy to identify current barriers to true EBP, to recognize the opportunities that exist, and propose corresponding recommended strategies for local EMS agencies and at the national level. Framing local and national discussions with this approach will be useful for developing a cohesive and collaborative Canadian EBP strategy.

Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4-83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2-82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8-38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6-97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy.

Impact of a Novel Collaborative Long-Term Care -EMS Model: A Before-and-After Cohort Analysis of an Extended Care Paramedic Program.

To compare system and clinical outcomes before and after an extended care paramedic (ECP) program was implemented to better address the emergency needs of long-term care (LTC) residents. Data were collected from emergency medical services (EMS), hospital, and ten LTC facility charts for two five-month time periods, before and after ECP implementation. Outcomes include: number of EMS patients transported to emergency department (ED) and several clinical, safety, and system secondary outcomes. Statistics included descriptive, chi-squared, t-tests, and ANOVA; α = <0.05. 413 cases were included (before: n = 136, 33%; after n = 277, 67%). Median patient age was 85 years (IQR 77-91 years) and 292/413 (70.7%) were female. The number of transports to ED before implementation was 129/136 (94.9%), with 147/224 (65.6%) after, p < 0.001. In the after period, fewer patients seen by ECP were transported: 58/128 (45.3%) vs. 89/96 (92.7%) of those not seen by ECP, p < 0.001. Hospital admissions were similar between phases: 39/120 (32.5%) vs. 56/213 (29.4%), p = NS, but in the after phase, fewer ECP patients were admitted vs. non-ECP: 21/125 (16.8%) vs. 35/88 (39.8%), p < 0.001. Mean EMS call time (dispatch to arrive ED or clear scene) was shorter before than after: 25 minutes vs. 57 minutes, p < 0.001. In the after period, calls with ECP were longer than without ECP: 1 hour, 35 minutes vs. 30 minutes, p < 0.001. The mean patient ED length-of-stay was similar before and after: 7 hours, 29 minutes compared to 8 hours, 11 minutes; p = NS. In the after phase, ED length-of-stay was somewhat shorter with ECPs vs. no ECPs: 7 hours, 5 minutes vs. 9 hours, p = NS. There were zero relapses after no-transport in the before phase and three relapses from 77 calls not transported in the after phase (3/77, 3.9%); two involved ECP (2/70, 2.8%). Reductions were observed in the number of LTC patients transported to the ED when the ECP program was introduced, with fewer patients admitted to the hospital. EMS calls take longer with ECP involved. The addition of ECP to the LTC model of care appears to be beneficial and safe, with few relapse calls identified.

Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Conflicts of Interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

The process for evaluating the resuscitation science has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades. The current process, which incorporates the use of the GRADE methodology, culminated in the 2015 CoSTR publication, which in turn will inform the international resuscitation councils' guideline development processes. Over the next few years, the process will continue to evolve as ILCOR moves toward a more continuous evaluation of the resuscitation science.

Part 3: Adult Basic Life Support and Automated External Defibrillation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

This review comprises the most extensive literature search and evidence evaluation to date on the most important international BLS interventions, diagnostics, and prognostic factors for cardiac arrest victims. It reemphasizes that the critical lifesaving steps of BLS are (1) prevention, (2) immediate recognition and activation of the emergency response system, (3) early high-quality CPR, and (4) rapid defibrillation for shockable rhythms. Highlights in prevention indicate the rational and judicious deployment of search-and-rescue operations in drowning victims and the importance of education on opioid-associated emergencies. Other 2015 highlights in recognition and activation include the critical role of dispatcher recognition and dispatch-assisted chest compressions, which has been demonstrated in multiple international jurisdictions with consistent improvements in cardiac arrest survival. Similar to the 2010 ILCOR BLS treatment recommendations, the importance of high quality was reemphasized across all measures of CPR quality: rate, depth, recoil, and minimal chest compression pauses, with a universal understanding that we all should be providing chest compressions to all victims of cardiac arrest. This review continued to focus on the interface of BLS sequencing and ensuring high-quality CPR with other important BLS interventions, such as ventilation and defibrillation. In addition, this consensus statement highlights the importance of EMS systems, which employ bundles of care focusing on providing high-quality chest compressions while extricating the patient from the scene to the next level of care. Highlights in defibrillation indicate the global importance of increasing the number of sites with public-access defibrillation programs. Whereas the 2010 ILCOR Consensus on Science provided important direction for the "what" in resuscitation (ie, what to do), the 2015 consensus has begun with the GRADE methodology to provide direction for the quality of resuscitation. We hope that resuscitation councils and other stakeholders will be able to translate this body of knowledge of international consensus statements to build their own effective resuscitation guidelines.