Good stents gone bad: endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic duct stents are used for a variety of endoscopic pancreatic manipulations, and small surgical stents are used prophylactically to bridge pancreatic-enteric anastomoses. With increasing use of pancreatic stents, many complications have been recognized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the complications and outcomes of pancreatic stent migration. DESIGN: Case series from a retrospective review of all cases of upstream or proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents, placed either endoscopically or surgically, identified between 2000 and 2007. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: This study involved 33 patients; 23 postendoscopic and 10 postsurgical stents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Retrieval rates, minor/major complications. RESULTS: Endoscopic stents had a successful retrieval rate of 78%. Most patients were asymptomatic. The most common procedure was balloon extraction (8 of 18; 44%). Nine patients required multiple procedures (3 patients, 2 attempts; 5 patients, 3 attempts; 1 patient, 4 attempts). Five stents could not be retrieved. Of these, 4 were associated with downstream stenosis. Four patients underwent surgery, and 1 patient was treated with observation. Complications included pancreatic duct disruption (1 of 23), stent fragmentation (1 of 23), and postprocedure pancreatitis (1 of 23). Surgically placed stents had a successful retrieval rate of 80%. Most surgical stents had migrated into the biliary tree (8 of 10). All of these patients were symptomatic with pain or fever. Two stents could not be retrieved; 1 of those patients underwent surgery. LIMITATION: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: The majority of upstream-migrated stents can be endoscopically removed. Despite manipulation of the pancreatic duct, pancreatitis was infrequent. Surgically placed pancreatic stents migrate downstream and into the open biliary anastomosis and are associated with pain, cholangitis, or liver abscesses.

Use of self-expandable metallic stents in benign GI diseases.

BACKGROUND: The self-expandable metallic stent is of proven benefit in patients with malignant disease; however, its use in patients with benign disease is not well established. There are few data available regarding long-term complications and outcomes with use of self-expandable metallic stents in benign disease and virtually none regarding attempted removal once the acute problem is resolved. METHODS: Thirteen patients who had a self-expandable metallic stent placed for benign GI disorders were included in a retrospective analysis. Data collected included patient demographics, indication for procedure, type of stent used, complications, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (7 women, 6 men; mean age 67 years, range 34-84 years) had one or more self-expandable metallic stents placed for benign disease and were followed for a mean of 3.4 years (3 weeks to 10 years). Of the 13 patients, 8 had esophageal stents, 4 biliary stents, and 1 had dual stents placed in the pancreaticobiliary tree. Complications developed in 8 (62%) patients; 4 (31%) ultimately died, either from the primary disease process (3) or from stent-related complications (1). CONCLUSIONS: Self-expandable metallic stent placement is effective treatment for benign esophageal leaks, providing the stent can be removed. It also may be used in either the esophagus or biliary tree in patients who are poor candidates for surgery and short expected survival. However, a self-expandable metallic stent should not be placed in a patient with a benign GI disorder who has a significant life expectancy and is a good candidate for surgery.