Endoscopic features with associated histological and molecular alterations in serrated polyps with dysplasia: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary case series.

BACKGROUND: Serrated polyps are incompletely understood lesions and include serrated sessile lesion (SSL) without or with dysplasia and traditional serrated adenoma (TSA). AIMS: We investigated prevalence and characteristics of serrated lesions, especially SSL with dysplasia (mixed polyps). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy at a tertiary care center. Endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of identified lesions were studied. SSLs with dysplasia were molecularly analyzed for mutations and microsatellite instability. RESULTS: Among 1147 patients, a total of 436 polyps were found, including 288 adenomas (66.1 %) and 114 serrated lesions (SLDR 26.2 %). PDR was 34.5 % and ADR was of 30.2 %. Serrated lesions included 75 hyperplastic polyps (17.2 %), 24 SSLs without dysplasia (5.5 %), 6 SSLs with dysplasia (mixed polyps) (1.4 %) and 9 TSA (2.1 %). The mixed polyps were evaluated molecularly: these analyses found no KRAS mutation, a single NRAS mutation in one lesion, the Val600Glu BRAF mutation in four lesions in both their serrated non-dysplastic and dysplastic areas, and microsatellite instability in four lesions, limited to the dysplastic areas. CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience confirms the high prevalence of serrated lesions, a part of which are SSL with dysplasia. These lesions seem to carry specific molecular alterations.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Endoscopy Assisted Treatment of Colorectal Anastomotic Stenosis.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a type of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, developed for rectal tumors and used also to treat other rectal diseases. Anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery, including stenosis, represent a challenging problem. We present the case of a 36-year-old woman with a diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease that was submitted to a modified Duhamel operation. A postoperative barium enema showed a complete stricture of the anastomosis that was impossible to resolve by flexible endoscopic approach. Then an intraoperative endoscopic approach to facilitate the localization of preanastomotic colon (proximal colon from the anastomosis) was performed by a small colotomy and the colonic recanalization was obtained by the creation of a neo-anastomosis by TEM, under fluoroscopic-endoscopic control. The patient underwent a control barium enema showing regular retrograde transit of contrast medium without evidence of stenosis. In our experience, transanal approach by TEM-colonoscopy assisted is safe and feasible and represents a model of combined minimally invasive technique.

Early and late effects of the sequential transfixed stich technique for the treatment of the symptomatic rectocele without rectal mucosa prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Different surgical techniques have been proposed for rectocele repair. However, controversial aspects exist on the best approach to use. The study aims to report the early and late outcomes of the sequential transfixed stich technique (STST) for the treatment of rectocele in the absence of mucosal prolapse. METHODS: One hundred patients presenting a symptomatic rectocele were treated with STST from January 2010 through August 2015. Patients with mucosal prolapse were not considered eligible for STST. After a period of 24 months from surgery, all the patients were clinically evaluated with the intent to investigate the risk of recurrence of the preoperative symptoms. RESULTS: All the patients were women (median age=54.7 years; ranges=37-75). Median discharge time was 1.5 days. One-month severe complications were: hemorrhoid thrombosis (6.0%), self-solved bleeding (6.0%), urinary retention (4.0%), anal secretion (4.0%) and urinary incontinence (1.0%). No post-operative cases of fecal incontinence were observed. Two years after surgery, 76.0% of patients reported a global improvement of the preoperative symptoms, with 73 and 35% of cases showing a reduced difficulty in the evacuation and need for digitation. Only 8.0% of patients showed a recurrence of the initial symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The STST is a feasible, safe, and cost-effective technique for the treatment of the rectocele without rectal mucosal prolapse. The method does not increase the risk of postoperative anal incontinence and presents a short hospital stay. STST presents long-term results in line with other transvaginal and transanal approaches.

Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic colonoscopy (RC) is a pneumatically-driven self-propelling platform (Endotics System®) able to investigate the colon, in order to reduce pain and discomfort. AIMS: (1) to describe the progress in gaining experience and skills of a trainee in RC; (2) to show the clinical outcomes of RC. METHODS: Pilot study. An experienced endoscopist started a training on RC whose progress was assessed comparing the results of 2 consecutive blocks of 27 (Group A) and 28 (Group B) procedures. CIR (Cecal Intubation Rate), CIT (Cecal Intubation Time) and Withdrawal Time (WT) were measured. Polyp Detection Rate (PDR), Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) and Advanced Neoplasia Detection Rate (ANDR) were calculated. Possible adverse events were recorded. At the end of the procedure all patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS) to measure their perceived pain during RC and reported their willingness to repeat RC. RESULTS: General CIR was 92.7%, reaching 100% in Group B. Comparing the two groups, CIT significantly decreased from 55 to 22 min (p value 0.0007), whereas procedures with CIT ≤ 20 min increased (p value 0.037). WT significatively reduced from 21 to 16 min (p value 0.0186). PDR was 40% (males 62.5%, females 14.3%). ADR was 26.7% (males 27.5%, females 14.3%). Most of patients judged the procedure as mild or no distress, with high willingness-to-repeat the RC (92.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results about RC are encouraging as preliminary experience, with clear individual learning progress, accurate diagnosis in a painless or comfortable procedure and with possibility to remove polypoid lesions. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm obtained results.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors: results from a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A submucosal tumor (SMT) of the stomach, which is an occasional finding during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, may pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. METHODS: To assess whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a feasible approach to definitively cure SMTs, the authors performed a retrospective cohort study with two endoscopic italian centers. RESULTS: The study consisted of 20 patients with SMTs who underwent ESD. The patients underwent ESD and were followed up by endoscopy. We analyzed complete resection rate, frequency of complications, and survival. The overall rate of R0 resection was 90 % (18/20), with two endoscopic failures, one for a submucosal tumor and one for a neoplasm deeply infiltrating the proper muscle layer. The median procedure time was 119.1 min (range 40-240 min). The median size of the resected specimens was 29 mm (range 15-60 mm). Perforation occurred in 3 patients; all were treated conservatively. There were no cases of severe bleeding. Based on histopathological findings, 6 cases of ectopic pancreas, 1 of ectopic spleen, 3 of leiomyoma, and 10 of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were diagnosed. Complete resection was obtained in all GIST cases. Among the 10 GIST cases treated by ESD, no death occurred: the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: The high success rate of 90 % and the low incidence of complications should indicate ESD is the correct diagnostic and definitive treatment in selected patients.

Efficacy of two different surgical techniques combined in the treatment of rectocele.

Rectocele is defined as the herniation of rectal wall due to a rectovaginal septum defect in direction of the vagina. In most of cases it is a result of vaginal delivery or repeated increases of intra-abdominal pressure due to chronic constipation. Some patients can develop rectocele as a consequence of congenital or inherited weakness of the pelvic support system. The rectopexy procedure by a single mechanical stapler allows to ablate the exceeding tissue. This surgery is performed through transanal access without laparotomy, by means of a circular stapler which simultaneously resects portion of the rectal wall and re-anastomizes it. Also the technique of sequential transfixed stitches (TSTS) represents a minimally invasive procedure for the rectocele treatment, allowing the performance of a complete plasty of rectal wall through transanal access. Hence, starting from a more effective stadiation of rectocele, the authors of this study will show the advantages of an endorectal approach for the treatment of the above-mentioned disease using both methods. A total of 25 female patients attending our colonproctology outpatient department, with an age ranging between 38 and 63 years, have been selected for our study; following a careful assessment of stadiation, they have undergone rectopexy with circular stapler first, thereafter fulfilling the surgery with TSTS. the mean duration of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range 2-3). Twelve patients out of 25 have shown early complications, and 11 patients late ones. Among the early complications, 3 patients reported pain (12 %), 3 patients urinary retention (12 %), and 2 patients bleeding (8 %). Among late complications, 5 cases of urgency defecation disorders (>4 months) (20 %), 1 intestinal flatus incontinence (4 %), 1 stenosis (4 %), 2 prolonged pain and 2 cases of persistent obstructive defecation syndrome were reported. No cases of life-threatening local or pelvic sepsis as well as of rectovaginal fistulae were reported. At the 6 months post-surgery evaluation, neither rectocele recurrence nor prolapse was observed. The association of circular stapler and TSTS in the rectopexy treatment of rectocele showed its short-term efficacy, producing an improvement of patient's clinical conditions, without inducing further alterations of pelvic statics, of the sphincteric tone as well as of rectum emptiness deficit.

[Usefulness of plug test for the intraoperative staging of rectal mucosal prolapse]. / Utilità del test della garza per la stadiazione intraoperatoria del prolasso mucoso del retto.

Rectal mucosal prolapse is characterised by protrusion of the rectal mucosa alone in the anal lumen. To correctly establish the intraoperative stage of rectal mucosal prolapse the authors performed a test based on the intrarectal introduction of a large-sized hydrophilic plug, to be extracted later from the anal canal. A total of 40 patients with proctological symptoms and with a diagnosis of rectal mucosal prolapse were submitted, in the outpatient setting, to a minimally invasive test with a small plug and later, in the preoperative stage, in patients under anaesthesia, using a plug entirely inserted into the rectal lumen and extracted via the anus. The same procedure was performed after surgery to verify the results of the excision. In all cases the plug test used in the preoperative stage permitted the perfect surgical evaluation of the extent of the prolapse. The plug test revealed a mucosal prolapse occupying 25% of the anal circumference in 10 patients, up to 50% in 20 patients and more than 50% in 10 patients. The first 30 patients were treated with the transfixed stitch technique, while for the others the Longo surgical technique was preferred. The plug test for the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of rectal mucosal prolapse is an effective tool for obtaining a more precise indication as to the optimal surgical intervention and for verifying the radicality of the surgical excision. The plug test, moreover, proved to be a minimally invasive and easily performed test for evaluating rectal mucosal prolapse.

[Use of an evaluation score for rectal mucosal prolapse]. / Utilità di uno score nel prolasso mucoso del retto.

Rectal mucosal prolapse is characterised by the protrusion of the mucosa alone in the rectal lumen. The authors, after an experience conducted in ambulatory patients, have produced a score to classify the extent of rectal mucosal prolapse based on evaluation of qualitative and quantitative factors that should help in the correct management of proctological patients. A total of 30 patients with proctological symptoms during outpatient visits were submitted to a minimally invasive test in comparison to the traditional ones, using a simple gauze plug connected to the end of a suture thread, inserted in the rectal lumen and removed via the anus. The score designed by the authors made it possible to classify 96.6% of patients accurately. In 4 patients the score was equal to zero. In 12 patients there was a mucosal prolapse of less than 25% with a reduction score equal to 2.4 and therefore these were treated with a single rubber ligature (7 patients with classes a and b) and 5 patients were treated with the transfixed stitch technique (TST) (class c). In 10 patients a 50% mucosal prolapse of the anal circumference and a mean reduction score of 5.6 were found. In 5 of these patients (classes a and b) it was possible to perform a multiple ligature while the other 5 (class c) were treated with TST. In 3 patients a prolapse ranging from 50 to 75% with a mean reduction index of 8.1 was found. The therapeutic procedure preferred for these patients was TST. In one patient a circumferential prolapse was diagnosed with a reduction score of 11 treated with Longo's surgical technique. The mucosal prolapse score seems to be useful to stratify patients more precisely in the choice of surgical intervention and during follow-up. The plug test is a minimally invasive test, useful for the application of the rectal mucosal prolapse score.

The modern treatment of early gastric cancer: our experience in an Italian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) by Japanese authors. However, there are no reports about its possible implementation in the Western setting. The aim of the present work is to determine the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic treatments for EGC in an Italian cohort. METHODS: Forty-five patients for a total of 48 gastric lesions were enrolled in the study. Thirty-six EMR procedures were performed with the strip biopsy technique using a double-channel endoscope. En bloc resection refers to resection in one piece, while piecemeal refers to resections in which the lesion was removed in multiple fragments. A total of 12 ESD were performed and completed with IT knife. We define as curative treatment lateral and vertical margins of the resected specimens free of cancer and repeat endoscopic finding of no recurrent disease. RESULTS: Out of 36 EMR procedures, 10 were piecemeal resections (28%), while 26 were en bloc (72%). ESD led to en bloc resection in 11/12 cases (92%). Histological assessment of curability in the EMR group was achieved in 56% of the cases, and in 92% of the ESD group. Mean follow-up period was 31 months (range: 12-71 months). There was no local recurrence or distant metastasis in the curative group patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to confirm the safety and the clinical efficacy of the ESD procedure in the Western world too.

[A new needle for colon-proctological surgery: personal experience]. / Un nuovo ago per la chirurgia colonproctologica: esperienza personale.

Rectocele and haemorrhoidal prolapse are two pathologies that in all cases entail partial excision of anorectal tissue possibly with less invasive surgical procedures. For these pathologies, the authors have recently improved their treatment procedures, introducing the sequential transfixed stitch technique (STST) for rectocele and the transfixed stitch technique (TST) for haemorrhoidal prolapse, and thereby obtaining a significant technical and clinical improvement in terms of both outcomes (complete correction of rectal prolapse and haemorrhoidal prolapse) and discomfort and quality of life in the postoperative period. Moreover, in the present study the authors propose a subsequent innovation of the technique developed recently for the treatment of rectocele and haemorrhoidal disease using a new curved siliconate needle, thinner than the traditional lanceolate needles, with a longer, more rigid needle-thread junction in order to achieve less invasiveness and mucosal trauma, enabling the surgeon to perform sutures in a simple, easy manner. Ten consecutive patients with a clinical and instrumental diagnosis of rectocele--6 type II and 4 type III--were treated with TSTS and 20 patients with third (12 patients) and fourth degree (8 patients) haemorrhoidal disease were treated with TST. The surgical procedures were the same for all patients, although patients were divided into two groups. To the first group (A) were allocated patients treated with traditional stitches with a cylindrical, half circle needle, (Hr 25.9 mm). To the second group (B) were allocated, for the same objective, patients treated with the new siliconate needle, with an ultrafine tip, manufactured by Assut Europe S.p.A. The mean duration of the TST surgical procedures was 16 minutes using the new siliconate needle, whereas the mean duration using the traditional lanceolate needle was 17 minutes (p = ns). The surgical team judged the TST performed with the siliconate needle to be easier in 90% of cases in comparison to 70% of cases treated with the traditional lanceolate needle (p < 0,05). In patients treated with TSTS using the traditional lanceolate needle the mean duration of the surgical procedures was 20 minutes as against 18 minutes in the cases treated with the siliconate needle (p = ns). The surgical team judged the TSTS performed with the siliconate needle to be easier in all cases, while in two cases treated with the traditional lanceolate needle there were technical difficulties related to the use of the needle. The use of the ultrafine siliconate siliconate needle is more effective for the treatment of rectocele with TSTS and for haemorrhoidectomy with TST, particularly with a view to improving the surgical procedures and limiting the extent of mucosal damage related to suture oedema.

Role of magnified ileoscopy in the diagnosis of cases of coeliac disease with predominant abdominal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Less severe histological changes have sometimes been reported in the terminal ileum (TI) of coeliac patients. The aim of this work was to assess whether magnified ileoscopy and the corresponding biopsy could be used when diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). This would be of clinical value in coeliac patients who show predominant abdominal symptoms and who undergo colonoscopy with ileoscopy as first clinical examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients underwent conventional and magnified ileoscopy, along with histological examination of macroscopic mucosal abnormalities, if present. Patients whose ileoscopy with biopsy suggested CD underwent a blood test for quantitative determination of anti-transglutaminase antibodies and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with corresponding duodenal biopsy. RESULTS: Out of 143 patients enrolled, 21 had a TI mucosal lesion, and 10 of these showed villous atrophy at ileoscopy only after magnification. Six showed a count of intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELs) >25/100 enterocytes and upper intestinal lesions, confirming the diagnosis of CD. Finally, of four patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease, TI mucosal aftoid lesions were seen in two only in magnified view. CONCLUSIONS: Magnified ileoscopy reliably recognizes the presence of mucosal villous subtotal or total atrophy at TI. This finding, even if not specific to CD, can address the diagnosis of CD. Magnification in the course of ileoscopy could also be useful in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease.

[Should surgical thread influence the outcome of haemorrhoidectomy with the transfixed stitch technique?]. / Il filo di sutura è in grado di influenzare gli esiti dell'emorroidectomia con tecnica dei punti transfissi (TPT)?

The technique of haemorrhoidectomy with the transfixed stitch technique (TST) is a surgical treatment modality for haemorrhoids that is available to the surgeon. The authors, through a personal interpretation of haemorrhoids based on the PATE 2006 classification, report the results of a comparative trial, using TST with two different surgical threads, Assufil and Monofil. The aim of this prospective randomised trial was to compare the results with the use of each surgical thread, analysing early postoperative side effects (bleeding, urinary retention, pain), late postoperative side effects (pain, bleeding, stricture, anal secretion, tenesmus and faecal incontinence), return to active life and quality of life. Patients with grade III-IV haemorrhoids were enrolled in our study and divided into two groups, one treated with TST using Assufil and the other treated with TST using Monofil. The main outcome measures such as analgesic intake during the first week, early and late side effects, return to active life and quality of life were evaluated. Patients were followed for six months after surgery. A total of 40 patients were enrolled, 20 per group. The pain score after surgery was significantly lower in all patients treated with TST. Thirty percent of TST patients treated with Monofil took analgesics in comparison to 35% of the Assufil group (p = ns). Postoperative pain after the start of bowel movements in TST patients was similar in the two groups. TST patients treated with Monofil showed a low incidence of discomfort and surgical oedema in comparison to the Assufil group. Side effects, surgical time and return to active life in patients treated with TST were similar in the two groups. TST haemorrhoidectomy is more advantageous utilising Monofil surgical thread because of its lower complication rate.

[New disposable exploratory vaginal valve: advantages and efficacy]. / Nuova valva vaginale esplorativa monouso: vantaggi ed efficacia.

In current clinical practice, proctological diseases are now classed more appropriately as pertaining to the area of pelvic floor dysfunction. For this reason all proctological examinations should be combined with a gynaecological assessment. The authors report the results of clinical experimentation with a new vaginal valve for use after surgery and in outpatient settings for exploratory purposes. The most important characteristics of the new valve are small size, simple shape and safe manoeuvrability in the vaginal canal, minimising vaginal injury. A total of 50 patients with symptomatic anal pathologies were submitted to surgery and subsequently followed-up with periodic outpatient examinations. The new disposable vaginal valve, used for exploratory purposes, permits complete, thorough exploration of the vagina, preserving the vaginal wall and avoiding misdiagnosis of possible associated pathologies or iatrogenic lesions related to surgery. The new vaginal valve was judged to be helpful in all treated cases, proving simple to use, and enabling vaginal exploration to be performed without traumatism during surgery. Moreover, the valve can be a useful accessory for the surgeon, to be used in everyday practice when vaginal exploration is necessary and particularly for the postoperative monitoring of transanal rectocele surgery.

[Severe postoperative complications in colorectal surgery for cancer. Incidence related to the techniques employed: open versus laparoscopic colectomy]. / Complicanze maggiori postoperatorie nella chirurgia colo-rettale per cancro. Incidenza in rapporto alla tecnica utilizzata: open versus laparoscopica.

In this preliminary retrospective study, severe postoperative complications following surgery for colorectal cancer were analysed, comparing the results obtained with open versus laparoscopic colectomy. Over the period 2005-2007, 50 patients (29 female, 21 male; age range: 32-85 years) underwent surgical treatment for colorectal-anal cancer. Twenty-nine (58%) were submitted to the traditional open technique and 21 (42%) to the laparoscopic technique. No mortality occurred with either technique. None of the cases submitted to laparoscopy presented anastomotic dehiscence or severe intraoperative bleeding. In the group submitted to open surgery, 3 cases of severe complications occurred (10.3%), consisting in acute faecal peritonitis due to immediate dehiscence of the colorectal anastomosis; angulation of the intestinal loop with microdehiscence of the ileo-colic anastomosis; and pulmonary embolism. In the group submitted to laparoscopic surgery, 2 cases of severe complications occurred (9.5%), consisting in enterorrhagia due to haemoperitoneum; and intrafascial haematoma due to haemorrhage of the epigastric artery. The overall complication rate was 10%, corresponding to the minimum values reported in the literature. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of these complications with the two methods employed. A very low incidence of minor complications was observed, limited to repercussions on the postoperative course. Furthermore, the laparoscopic technique led to early canalisation, a reduction in hospital stay, less need of drugs (antibiotics and pain killers) and better aesthetic results. The advantages obtained with the laparoscopic technique, with no significant differences in severe complications, indicate that this approach is preferable to the traditional technique in colorectal surgery for cancer.