Analysis of opioid analgesics consumption in Africa: a longitudinal study from a 20-year continental perspective.

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesics are essential for managing acute and chronic pain in diseases such as cancer. Inadequate opioid access remains a major public health concern in low-income regions including Africa. This study aimed to provide updated and comprehensive data on changes in opioid consumption, specifically in Africa. METHODS: This longitudinal study has updated and expanded upon the International Narcotics Control Board data obtained from 1999 to 2021, assessing opioid consumption trends across all African countries. The defined daily doses for statistical purposes (SDDD) was used to determine the changes in opioid consumption in Africa. In addition, we used sub-analyses of the data to delve into individual substances, income levels, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and sub-regional cluster analysis (based on the language spoken) to identify possible disparities and inform further research and tailored solutions. FINDINGS: Our results indicate a persistently low and stagnant trend in opioid consumption between 2001-03 and 2019-21, from 73 SDDD (95% CI 69-77) to 55 SDDD (32-79). In-depth analysis revealed a morphine consumption increase from 735 SDDD in 1999 to 1115 SDDD in 2021. Moreover, opioid consumption was closely related to country-level income levels, with most of the low-income and lower-middle-income African countries reporting low opioid consumption. Notably, the escalating incidence and mortality rates associated with cancer in Africa indicated a misalignment with the trajectory of opioid use. Additionally, French-speaking African countries exhibited lower opioid usage than the rest of the continent, suggesting avenues for research into cultural, political, and social aspects. INTERPRETATION: In the context of global doubling in opioid consumption, Africa has shown insufficient and stagnant opioid consumption during the last 20 years. These findings underscore the need for policy reform to facilitate safe and responsible opioid access in Africa, particularly for legitimate indications such as cancer pain and palliative care. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Discussion on methadone initiation protocols: A case report.

Through a concrete case, we discuss the main published protocols to initiate methadone and illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of rapid or gradual initiation and on-demand or fixed doses with rescue doses. Daily doses can vary widely depending on the protocol chosen. An on-demand administration could lead to an overdose as illustrated in our case. A better understanding of particularities and limitations of these protocols could lead to safer methadone initiation. Systematic comparison of different protocols and calculation of the daily dose should be a standard in clinical practice.

Methadone Switching for Cancer Pain: A New Classification of Initiation Protocols, Based on a Critical Literature Review.

Background: The initiation of methadone, a known effective analgesic for cancer pain, is complex. The existing protocols are often inadequately described; therefore, a classification of literature is needed. We reviewed and classified the recent literature on methadone initiation protocols in cancer patients experiencing severe pain. Objective: To provide a new classification of initiation protocols, based on a critical literature review. Data Sources: The MEDLINE database was searched for articles published until March 25, 2021, using the terms "cancer pain," "methadone," "methadone introduction," or "methadone initiation." The search was limited to human studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), other clinical trials, meta-analyses, and case reports. Selected articles were assessed for initiation details (rapid or progressive), administered dose (fixed rescue dose or ad libitum), and dose calculation (fixed or progressive ratios using morphine equivalent daily dose [MEDD] for daily or unitary dose). Results: Twenty-four publications that met our inclusion criteria were analyzed. No large-scale prospective double-blind RCTs with robust design were identified. Most studies assessed relatively small numbers of patients. Eight initiation types were identified, of which three involved seven "high quality" studies: "rapid switch-fixed doses and rescue dose-progressive daily ratio," "progressive switch-fixed dose and rescue dose-progressive daily ratio," and "rapid switch-ad libitum-fixed ratio for unitary dose" protocols. This classification provides the latest information on methadone initiation protocols. The total daily dose of methadone varied largely across protocols. Conclusion: We recommend a maximal daily methadone dose of 100 mg (3 doses of 30 mg or 5 doses of 20 mg) for MEDD <500 mg, when the two "ad libitum" protocols are used. Further clinical research on this topic is warranted.

Practical management of opioid rotation and equianalgesia.

PURPOSE: To review the recent literature on opioid rotation (ie, switching from one opioid drug to another or changing an opioid's administration route) in cancer patients experiencing severe pain and to develop a novel equianalgesia table for use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched with terms "cancer pain," "opioid rotation," "opioid switching," "opioid ratio," "opioid conversion ratio," and "opioid equianalgesia" for the major opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, and hydromorphone) and the intravenous, subcutaneous, oral, and transdermal administration routes. Selected articles were assessed for the calculated or cited opioid dose ratio, bidirectionality, and use of the oral morphine equivalent daily dose or a direct drug-to-drug ratio. RESULTS: Twenty publications met our selection criteria and were analyzed in detail. We did not find any large-scale, prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial with robust design, and most of the studies assessed relatively small numbers of patients. Bidirectionality was investigated in seven studies only. CONCLUSION: The updated equianalgesic table presented here incorporates the latest data and provides information on bidirectionality. Despite the daily use of equianalgesic tables, they are not based on high-level scientific evidence. More clinical research is needed on this topic.