Individual, social, and environmental factors for infection risk among home healthcare patients: A multi-method study.

There has been limited research into the individual, social, and environmental factors for infection risk among patients in the home healthcare (HHC) setting, where the infection is a leading cause of hospitalisation. The aims of this study were to (1) explore nurse perceptions of individual, social, and environmental factors for infection risk among HHC patients; and (2) identify the frequency of environmental barriers to infection prevention and control in HHC. Data were collected in 2017-2018 and included qualitative interviews with HHC nurses (n = 50) and structured observations of nurse visits to patients' homes (n = 400). Thematic analyses of interviews with nurses suggested they perceived infection risk among patients as being influenced by knowledge of and attitudes towards infection prevention and engagement in hygiene practices, receipt of support from informal caregivers and nurse interventions aimed at cultivating infection control knowledge and practices, and the home environment. Statistical analyses of observation checklists revealed nurses encountered an average of 1.7 environmental barriers upon each home visit. Frequent environmental barriers observed during visits to HHC patients included clutter (39.5%), poor lighting (38.8%), dirtiness (28.5%), and pets (17.2%). Additional research is needed to clarify inter-relationships among these factors and identify strategies for addressing each as part of a comprehensive infection control program in HHC.

Observation of Hand Hygiene Practices in Home Health Care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe nurse hand hygiene practices in the home health care (HHC) setting, nurse adherence to hand hygiene guidelines, and factors associated with hand hygiene opportunities during home care visits. DESIGN: Observational study of nurse hand hygiene practices. SETTING: and Participants: Licensed practical/vocational and registered nurses were observed in the homes of patients being served by a large nonprofit HHC agency. METHODS: Two researchers observed 400 home care visits conducted by 50 nurses. The World Health Organization's "5 Moments for Hand Hygiene" validated observation tool was used to record opportunities and actual practices of hand hygiene, with 3 additional opportunities specific to the HHC setting. Patient assessment data available in the agency electronic health record and a nurse demographic questionnaire were also collected to describe patients and nurse participants. RESULTS: A total of 2014 opportunities were observed. On arrival in the home was the most frequent opportunity (n = 384), the least frequent was after touching a patient's surroundings (n = 43). The average hand hygiene adherence rate was 45.6% after adjusting for clustering at the nurse level. Adherence was highest after contact with body fluid (65.1%) and lowest after touching a patient (29.5%). The number of hand hygiene opportunities was higher when patients being served were at increased risk of an infection-related emergency department visit or hospitalization and when the home environment was observed to be "dirty." No nurse or patient demographic characteristics were associated with the rate of nurse hand hygiene adherence. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Hand hygiene adherence in HHC is suboptimal, with rates mirroring those reported in hospital and outpatient settings. The connection between poor hand hygiene and infection transmission has been well studied, and it has received widespread attention with the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. Agencies can use results found in this study to better inform quality improvement initiatives.

"A catalyst for action": Factors for implementing clinical risk prediction models of infection in home care settings.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to outline how a clinical risk prediction model for identifying patients at risk of infection is perceived by home care nurses, and to inform how the output of the model could be integrated into a clinical workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 50 home care nurses. Interviews explored nurses' perceptions of clinical risk prediction models, their experiences using them in practice, and what elements are important for the implementation of a clinical risk prediction model focusing on infection. Interviews were audio-taped and transcribed, with data evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two themes were derived from the data: (1) informing nursing practice, which outlined how a clinical risk prediction model could inform nurse clinical judgment and be used to modify their care plan interventions, and (2) operationalizing the score, which summarized how the clinical risk prediction model could be incorporated in home care settings. DISCUSSION: The findings indicate that home care nurses would find a clinical risk prediction model for infection useful, as long as it provided both context around the reasons why a patient was deemed to be at high risk and provided some guidance for action. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to evaluate the potential feasibility and acceptability of a clinical risk prediction model, to inform the intervention design and implementation strategy. The results of this study can provide guidance for the development of the clinical risk prediction tool as an intervention for integration in home care settings.

Home care nurses' identification of patients at risk of infection and their risk mitigation strategies: A qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: There is an increase in the number of individuals who receive care at home. A significant proportion of these patients acquire infections during their care episode. Whilst there has been significant focus on strategies for infection prevention and control in acute care environments, there is a lack of research into infection prevention in a home care setting. OBJECTIVES: To understand (1) if and how home care nurses identify patients at high risk of infection and (2) the strategies they use to mitigate that risk. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study, using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: A large not for profit home care agency located in the New York region of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty nurses with a range of experience in home care nursing. METHODS: Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit nurses from across the home care agency with varied years of work experience. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The interviews explored how home care nurses evaluate their patients' risk of developing an infection and if/how they modify the plan of care based on that risk. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were derived from the data; assessing a patient's risk of infection, the risk assessment process, and strategies for mitigating infection risk. Factors identified by nurses as putting a patient at higher risk of infection included being older, having diabetes, inadequate nutrition; along with inadequate clinical information available at start of care. The patient's knowledge and understanding of infection prevention, and the availability and knowledge of caregivers were also important, as was the cleanliness of the home environment. Given the context of home care, where nurses have little control over the environment and care processes in-between visits, the main strategy for infection prevention was patient and caregiver education. Nurses also discussed the importance of their own infection prevention behaviours, and the ability to adjust a patient's plan of care according to their infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the complexity of the risk assessment process in relation to infection. Existing guidelines for infection prevention and control do not adequately cover the home care environment and more research needs to determine which interventions (such as patient/caregiver education) would be most effective to prevent infections in the home care setting.

Reducing Hypertension in a Poststroke Black and Hispanic Home Care Population: Results of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) is a leading modifiable stroke risk factor contributing to global stroke disparities. This study is unique in testing a transitional care model aimed at controlling HTN in black and Hispanic poststroke, home health patients, an understudied group. METHODS: A 3-arm randomized controlled trial design compared (i) usual home care (UHC), with (ii) UHC plus a 30-day nurse practitioner transitional care program, or (iii) UHC plus nurse practitioner plus a 60-day health coach program. The trial enrolled 495 black and Hispanic, English- and Spanish- speaking adults with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) who had experienced a first-time or recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary outcome was change in SBP from baseline to 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Mean participant age was 67; 57.0% were female; 69.7% were black, non-Hispanic; and 30.3% were Hispanic. Three-month follow-up retention was 87%; 12-month retention was 81%. SBP declined 9-10 mm Hg from baseline to 12 months across all groups; the greatest decrease occurred between baseline and 3 months. The interventions demonstrated no relative advantage compared to UHC. CONCLUSION: The significant across-the-board SBP decreases suggest that UHC nurse/patient/physician interactions were the central component of SBP reduction and that additional efforts to lower recurrent stroke risk should test incremental improvements in usual care, not resource-intensive transitional care interventions. They also suggest the potential value of pragmatic home care programs as part of a broader strategy to overcome HTN treatment barriers and improve secondary stroke prevention globally. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Trial Number NCT01918891.

Assessing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Home Health Care: Perceptions and Attitudes of Nurses.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore home health care nurses' attitudes, perceptions, and experiences related to routine collection and documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data. Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive study. Twenty-four nurses from a large home health care agency in the New York metropolitan area were interviewed between November 2014 and December 2015. Results: Three broad categories of themes emerged from the content analysis: (1) current practices that relate to or influence the assessment of sexual orientation or gender identity by home health care nurses, (2) attitudes and perceptions regarding perceived barriers and facilitators to discussing and documenting sexual orientation and gender identity, and (3) training and resources identified as helpful in preparing nurses to discuss sexual orientation and gender identity with their patients. Nurses emphasized wanting to provide everyone with the same quality of care and wanted documentation to inform the care. They felt unprepared to discuss sexual orientation or gender identity with their patients and indicated a need for training and education related to LGBT health disparities. Conclusions: Results from this study can help inform the development of training materials and resources to enable nurses to collect patients' sexual orientation and gender identity data routinely and in a sensitive and culturally competent manner.

Improving patient prioritization during hospital-homecare transition: A pilot study of a clinical decision support tool.

Patient admission to homecare is a complex process. Medicare policy requires that all patients receive a first home visit within 48 hr after the referral is received at the homecare agency. For unstable or high risk patients, waiting 48 hr to be seen by homecare nurses may not be safe. In this pilot study we tested an innovative clinical decision support tool (called PREVENT), designed to identify patients who may need to be prioritized for early homecare visits. The study was conducted in 2016 at a large homecare agency in the Northeastern US with 176 patients admitted to homecare from the hospital. In the control phase (n = 90 patients), we calculated the PREVENT priority score (indicative of high or medium/low first nursing visit priority) but did not share the score with the homecare intake nurses who influence visit scheduling. In the experimental phase, the PREVENT score was shared with the homecare intake nurses (n = 86 patients). During the experimental phase, high-risk patients received their first homecare nursing visit about one-half a day sooner than in the control phase (1.8 days vs. 2.2 days). Rehospitalizations from homecare decreased by 9.4% between the control (21.1%) and experimental phases (11.7%). This pilot study of patient prioritization showed promising results: high priority patients received their first homecare visit sooner and overall rehospitalization rates were lower.

Translating Evidence-Based Protocols Into the Home Healthcare Setting.

Activity-limiting pain is common among older home care patients and pain management is complicated by the high prevalence of physical frailty and multimorbidity in the home care population. A comparative effectiveness study was undertaken at a large urban home care agency to examine an evidence-based pain self-management program delivered by physical therapists (PTs). This article focuses on PT training, methods implemented to reinforce content after training and to encourage uptake of the program with appropriate patients, and therapists' fidelity to the program. Seventeen physical therapy teams were included in the cluster randomized controlled trial, with 8 teams (155 PTs) assigned to a control and 9 teams (165 PTs) assigned to a treatment arm. Treatment therapists received interactive training over two sessions, with a follow-up session 6 months later. Additional support was provided via emails, e-learning materials including videos, and a therapist manual. Program fidelity was assessed by examining PT pain documentation in the agency's electronic health record. PT feedback on the program was obtained via semistructured surveys. There were no between-group differences in the number of PTs documenting program elements with the exception of instruction in the use of imagery, which was documented by a higher percentage of intervention therapists (p = 0.002). PTs felt comfortable teaching the program elements, but cited time as the biggest barrier to implementing the protocol. Possible explanations for study results suggesting limited adherence to the program protocol by intervention-group PTs include the top-down implementation strategy, competing organizational priorities, program complexity, competing patient priorities, and inadequate patient buy-in. Implications for the implementation of complex new programs in the home healthcare setting are discussed.