Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Pain Med ; 22(3): 759-760, 2021 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459341
3.
Eur J Neurol ; 26(3): 407-414, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30184312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The presence of a continuum between physiological déjà vu (DV) and epileptic DV is still not known as well as epidemiological data in the Italian population. The aim was to identify the epidemiological distribution of DV in Italy, and secondly to look for specific features of DV able to discriminate between epileptic and non-epileptic DV. METHODS: In all, 1000 individuals, 543 healthy controls (C) (313 women; age 40 ± 15 years) and 457 patients with epilepsy (E) (260 women; age 39 ± 14 years), were prospectively recruited from 10 outpatient neurological clinics throughout Italy. All populations were screened using the Italian Inventory for Déjà Vu Experiences Assessment (I-IDEA) test and E and pairwise C underwent a comprehensive epilepsy interview. RESULTS: Of E, 69% stated that they experienced 'recognition' and 13.2% reported that this feeling occurred from a few times a month to at least weekly (versus 7.7% of the control group). Furthermore, a greater percentage of E (6.8% vs. 2.2%) reported that from a few times a month to at least weekly they felt that it seemed as though everything around was not real. In E, the feeling of recognition raised fright (22.3% vs. 13.2%) and a sense of oppression (19.4% vs. 9.4%). A fifth of E felt recognition during epileptic seizures. CONCLUSION: Only E regardless of aetiology firmly answered that they had the feeling of recognition during an epileptic seizure; thus question 14 of the I-IDEA test part 2 discriminated E from C. Paranormal activity, remembering dreams and travel frequency were mostly correlated to DV in E suggesting that the visual-memory network might be involved in epileptic DV.


Assuntos
Déjà Vu , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/fisiopatologia , Reconhecimento Psicológico/fisiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Epilepsia/complicações , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/etiologia
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 25(8): 1069-e83, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617060

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends the use of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA, Botox® ) in the management of chronic migraine (CM) following specific guidelines within the National Health Service. In view of the lack of data on the efficacy of this therapy following implementation of these guidelines in clinical practice and on the evaluation of guidance compliance, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BoNTA in patients with CM following the NICE guidelines. METHODS: This was a prospective real-life audit study. RESULTS: After two treatments, 127 of 200 patients (63.5%) obtained at least a 30% reduction in headache days. Those who continued the treatment up to 3 years reported a stable beneficial effect compared with baseline. Amongst responders, 68 patients (53.5%) were reclassified as episodic migraineurs. A total of 57 of these patients (83.8%) converted to an episodic migraine pattern at 6-month follow-up. The majority of those whose migraine became episodic after BoNTA extended the treatment intervals beyond 3 months (range 4-8 months) before noticing any worsening of headache. We observed no significant differences in the efficacy measures in patients treated with 155 U BoNTA compared with those treated with >155 U BoNTA. CONCLUSIONS: When administered according to the NICE guidance, BoNTA produced a clinically meaningful effect in the long-term management of CM with and without medication overuse headache. Treatment discontinuation when CM becomes episodic may be useful in clinical practice to identify those who may benefit from extended treatment intervals. Our clinical experience indicates a lack of additional benefit from using the 'follow-the-pain' paradigm.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Composição de Medicamentos , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Eur J Neurol ; 25(4): 666-671, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29322654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether switching from branded levetiracetam (Keppra® ) to a levetiracetam generic equivalent product (Matever® ) in an epilepsy cohort could provide adequate results in terms of seizure control and tolerability. METHODS: To be eligible for the study, patients had to have been taking Keppra® as monotherapy or polytherapy for at least 6 months. Between March 2013 and April 2017, patients were invited to switch to Matever® as part of their follow-up. We evaluated the number of seizures per month, drug-related adverse events and electroencephalography before the switch (T0, baseline) and 6 months after switching (T1). Furthermore, we reported the long-term follow-up of patients who continued to use Matever® after the end of the study, considering the most recent visit for each patient (T2). RESULTS: A total of 55 patients refused the switch. Among the remaining 125 patients, 59 (47%) were treated using Keppra® as monotherapy and 66 (53%) were on Keppra® as polytherapy. All 125 patients were subjected to switching from Keppra® to Matever® . Comparing patients before (T0) and after (T1) switching, we found no statistically significant differences in terms of seizure frequency and occurrence of adverse effects. There were no significant differences (number of seizures/month and drug-related adverse events) between patients treated with Matever® as monotherapy and patients who refused the switch and continued to use Keppra® as monotherapy for a long-term follow-up of 48 months. Electroencephalography findings were also unchanged. CONCLUSION: In our sample, brand-to-generic levetiracetam switching was effective and safe in both monotherapy and polytherapy regardless of the epilepsy syndrome.


Assuntos
Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Levetiracetam/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Medicamentos Genéricos , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Levetiracetam/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Equivalência Terapêutica , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Cephalalgia ; 35(5): 389-98, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25078717

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to determine whether cutaneous allodynia (CA) influences the response to treatment with occipital transcutaneous electrical stimulation (OTES) in chronic migraine (CM) and chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). METHODS: One hundred and sixty consecutive patients with CM or CTTH were randomized to be treated with real or sham OTES stimulation three times a day for two consecutive weeks. All patients completed the validated 12-item allodynia symptom checklist for assessing the presence and the severity of CA during headache attack. Primary end-point was change (≥50%) in number of monthly headache-free days. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the percentage of responders in the real OTES compared with sham OTES group (p <0.001). Importantly, there was not a significant change of monthly headache-free days in the allodynic patients with CM and CTTH treated both with real and sham OTES, while the number of headache-free days per month was significantly reduced in the real (86%) but not in the sham group (7%) of non-allodynic patients with CTTH and CM. CONCLUSIONS: Severe CA is associated with decreased response to treatment with OTES in patients with CM and CTTH.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Cefaleia/prevenção & controle , Hiperalgesia/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/prevenção & controle , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/complicações , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/complicações , Tato , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...