Is There a Change in Anxiety and Depression Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and depression change following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A secondary objective was to explore the association between preoperative variables and changes in anxiety and depression. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Participants (n = 1,852, age 64 ± 8.7 years, a body mass index of 31.3, a modified Comorbidity Index of 1.0 ± 1.3, and 61.7% were women) completed the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level preoperatively and at 1- and 3-month postoperatively. Fulfillment of physical activity expectations and preparedness to resume activities was assessed at 3 months. The anxiety or depression dimension was analyzed using the Paretian classification profile changes and compared with the sign Fisher's exact test. Logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between patient characteristics, preoperative anxiety or depression, activity expectations, preparedness to resume activities, and changes in anxiety/depression. RESULTS: The percentage of patients reporting Level 1 (no anxious or depressed feelings) significantly (P < .0001) increased from preoperative (62.2%) to 3 months (77.1%) postoperative, while levels 2 to 5 (slightly through extremely anxious or depressed) all decreased. The percentage of worsening anxiety and depression was significantly (P < .0001) greater in patients who did not feel they were well prepared to resume activities of daily living (17.7 versus 4.4%) and physical recreation (12.9 versus 3.9%). Preoperative anxiety and depression (odds ratio [OR] 52.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.98, 80.67), EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.04, 6.34), activity of daily living (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.06), and body mass index (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.08) were significant (P < .05) predictors of an improving Paretian change profile at 3 months postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression decrease following TKA, and these changes appear heavily dependent on a patient's preoperative psychological well-being and postoperative preparedness to resume daily activities. Physicians' awareness of preoperative patient psychological well-being and management of patient preparedness and expectations to resume physical activity may modulate postoperative anxiety and depression.

Association Between Digitally Provided Education and 90-Day Return to Sexual Activity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary total knee arthroplasty patients have increased expectations of returning to predisease function, including sexual activity (SA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients using a digital care management platform (DCMP) were more likely to have a higher rate and frequency of return to SA. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. A total of 304 patients were randomized to a DCMP (n = 119) providing preoperative and postoperative education regarding return to SA or standard postoperative care (control group; n = 185). Return to SA, assessed via questionnaire, patient-reported outcome measures, Timed Up and Go test, single leg stance, active range of motion and need for manipulation under anesthesia were assessed at 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: More patients in the DCMP group returned to SA compared to control at 90 days (58.4 versus 39.6%, P = .018); however, the control group resumed SA sooner (33.1 versus 42.0 days, P = .023). Patients who returned to SA were younger (61.6 versus 65.9 year), more often men (56 versus 35%) (P < .001), higher performing on the Timed Up and Go and single leg stance tests (P < .001), and had greater active range of motion (P = .007). There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures or need for manipulation under anesthesia between patients that returned to SA and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: More patients using a DCMP resumed SA at 90 days; however, patients in the control group returned to SA sooner. Those who returned to SA were younger, possessed greater physical function, and were more often men.

Multicenter, prospective cohort study: immediate postoperative gains in active range of motion following robotic-assisted total knee replacement compared to a propensity-matched control using manual instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) following total knee replacement (TKR) has been associated with patient satisfaction and knee function, and is also an early indicator of a successful procedure. Robotic-assisted TKR (raTKR) is considered to reproduce more precise resections, and, as a result, may be associated with improved early patient satisfaction compared to manual TKR (mTKR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative active ROM (aROM) between raTKR and mTKR. METHODS: A total of 216 mTKR patients were propensity-matched, in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, and BMI, to 216 raTKR cases. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative adverse events were collected. Knee flexion and extension aROM were measured preoperatively and at one- and three months after operation. RESULTS: Changes in flexion aROM were significantly greater in raTKR vs. mTKR at one- (6.9°, 95% CI: 3.5, 10.4°) and three months (4.9°, 95% CI: 2.1, 7.7°). Flexion aROM was greater at three postoperative months compared to preoperative aROM only in the raTKR group, and raTKR patients had higher odds of achieving ≥ 90° of flexion at one month after operation (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.99). There were no significant differences between groups in intraoperative (P > 0.999) or postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mTKR, raTKR resulted  in less loss of aROM immediately after operation and a faster recovery of aROM within three months after operation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT# 03737149).

Stepping Beyond Counts in Recovery of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study on Passively Collected Gait Metrics.

Gait quality parameters have been used to measure recovery from total hip arthroplasty (THA) but are time-intensive and previously could only be performed in a lab. Smartphone sensor data and algorithmic advances presently allow for the passive collection of qualitative gait metrics. The purpose of this prospective study was to observe the recovery of physical function following THA by assessing passively collected pre- and post-operative gait quality metrics. This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From six weeks pre-operative through to a minimum 24 weeks post-operative, 612 patients used a digital care management application that collected gait metrics. Average weekly walking speed, step length, timing asymmetry, and double limb support percentage pre- and post-operative values were compared with a paired-sample t-test. Recovery was defined as the post-operative week when the respective gait metric was no longer statistically inferior to the pre-operative value. To control for multiple comparison error, significance was set at p < 0.002. Walking speeds and step length were lowest, and timing asymmetry and double support percentage were greatest at week two post-post-operative (p < 0.001). Walking speed (1.00 ± 0.14 m/s, p = 0.04), step length (0.58 ± 0.06 m/s, p = 0.02), asymmetry (14.5 ± 19.4%, p = 0.046), and double support percentage (31.6 ± 1.5%, p = 0.0089) recovered at 9, 8, 7, and 10 weeks post-operative, respectively. Walking speed, step length, asymmetry, and double support all recovered beyond pre-operative values at 13, 17, 10, and 18 weeks, respectively (p < 0.002). Functional recovery following THA can be measured via passively collected gait quality metrics using a digital care management platform. The data suggest that metrics of gait quality are most negatively affected two weeks post-operative; recovery to pre-operative levels occurs at approximately 10 weeks following primary THA, and follows a slower trajectory compared to previously reported step count recovery trajectories.

Stepping beyond Counts in Recovery of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study on Passively Collected Gait Metrics.

Advances in algorithms developed from sensor-based technology data allow for the passive collection of qualitative gait metrics beyond step counts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pre- and post-operative gait quality data to assess recovery following primary total knee arthroplasty. This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From 6 weeks pre-operative through to 24 weeks post-operative, 686 patients used a digital care management application to collect gait metrics. Average weekly walking speed, step length, timing asymmetry, and double limb support percentage pre- and post-operative values were compared with a paired-samples t-test. Recovery was operationally defined as when the respective weekly average gait metric was no longer statistically different than pre-operative. Walking speed and step length were lowest, and timing asymmetry and double support percentage were greatest at week two post-operative (p < 0.0001). Walking speed recovered at 21 weeks (1.00 m/s, p = 0.063) and double support percentage recovered at week 24 (32%, p = 0.089). Asymmetry percentage was recovered at 13 weeks (14.0%, p = 0.23) and was consistently superior to pre-operative values at week 19 (11.1% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001). Step length did not recover during the 24-week period (0.60 m vs. 0.59 m, p = 0.004); however, this difference is not likely clinically relevant. The data suggests that gait quality metrics are most negatively affected two weeks post-operatively, recover within the first 24-weeks following TKA, and follow a slower trajectory compared to previously reported step count recoveries. The ability to capture new objective measures of recovery is evident. As more gait quality data is accrued, physicians may be able to use passively collected gait quality data to help direct post-operative recovery using sensor-based care pathways.

Outcomes Vary by Pre-Operative Physical Activity Levels in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Physical activity (PA) is suggested to reduce osteoarthritis pain; however, it may be avoided by patients requiring arthroplasty. Our goal was to investigate objective and patient-reported outcomes as a function of pre-operative PA levels in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 1941 patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study investigating a smartphone-based care management platform for self-directed rehabilitation underwent TKA and were included in the analysis. Activity was categorized based on the cohort's step count quartiles into low, moderate, and high pre-operative PA. Pre-operative and post-operative pain, EQ5D5L, KOOS JR, and step counts were compared by ANOVA according to activity group. Pre-operative pain scores increased with the decreasing activity level (all, p < 0.05) and were most improved post-operatively in the low PA group. High PA patients demonstrated the smallest improvements in EQ-5D-5L and KOOS JR. Low and moderate PA patients increased physical activity by three months, reaching 176% and 104% of pre-operative steps; high PA patients did not return to full step counts by one year post-operatively. Patients undergoing TKA who present with higher levels of physical activity report lower levels of pain and higher function pre-operatively but appreciate less improvement up to one year post-operatively. These results may be helpful in appropriate counseling of patient expectations before TKA.

A Smartwatch Paired With A Mobile Application Provides Postoperative Self-Directed Rehabilitation Without Compromising Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-directed rehabilitation (SDR) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been traditionally recommended. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was an impact on postoperative outcomes with the use of an SDR program after primary TKA. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial, we paired a smartwatch with a mobile application, providing an SDR program after TKA. Three groups were examined in this level I study: (1) control group (formal physical therapy [PT]), (2) high exercise compliance group, and (3) low exercise compliance group. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores, joint replacement (KOOS, JR), and EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) along with range of motion (ROM) and manipulation rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-seven patients were enrolled in two groups with 184 in the control group and 153 in the study groups (90 in the high-compliance group and 63 in the low-compliance group). The KOOS, JR score was statistically lower in the low-compliance group in net change from preoperative scores at 3 months (P = .046) and 6 months (P = .032) than that in the control group; difference was noted at 6 months for the high-compliance group, P = .036. However, these did not meet the threshold of 8.02 units for KOOS JR minimal clinically important difference. No differences were seen in PROMs at other time intervals and in manipulation rates or ROM. CONCLUSION: Postoperative outcomes including manipulation under anesthesia, ROM, and PROMs were not different when a smartwatch paired with a self-directed PT mobile application was compared with traditional formal PT. Surgeons can consider this an appropriate alternative to traditional PT programs after TKA.

Prospective, Randomized, Surgeon-Blinded Comparison of Standard Magnification Assumption vs Magnification Marker Usage for Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded study to compare the accuracy of using of a magnification marker on preoperative radiographs for templating vs using a standard 21% magnification. METHODS: One hundred consecutive total hip arthroplasties were randomized to preoperative templating using a 25-mm magnification marker (50 patients) or a standard 21% magnification (50 patients). Intraoperative data were collected regarding the actual and predicted size of the femoral and acetabular components. RESULTS: The 2 groups were found to be comparable with respect to body mass index (28.9 vs 27.9, P = .26) and gender (P = .69). In the magnification marker group, we predicted the femoral size within 1 size in 80% of the cases and the acetabular component in 94%. In the group of a standard 21% magnification, we predicted the femoral size within 1 size in 90% of the cases and the acetabular component in 96%. These proportions did not statistically differ (femur: χ2P = .16, odds ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.7-7.1; acetabulum: χ2P = .65, odds ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval = 0.3-9.6). CONCLUSION: We did not detect a statistically significant difference in accuracy by using one method over the other when comparing the accuracy of component size selection. As the use of the magnification marker adds to the time and expense of preoperative radiographic acquisition, we feel using a standard 21% magnification is an equally accurate technique.

Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is purported improvement in component positioning and hip stability with the use of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to determine if there is a difference in acetabular component position or dislocation frequency between DAA and posterior THA. METHODS: One arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeon introduced DAA THA into his practice. From the initiation of DAA in 4/2012-8/2015, this comparative series resulted in 66 DAA THAs. A matched cohort (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities) was then created for posterior THA, 66 hips. DAA THA used fluoroscopy with anterior capsular excision; posterior group used no image guidance and had capsular repair. Posterior group BMI was 27.8 and DAA group BMI was 27.6 (P = .36). Minimum 3-month follow-up occurred in both groups. RESULTS: Average acetabular abduction angle in the posterior group was 41.9° (range, 32°-60°; standard deviation [sdev], 6.24) and DAA group 43.8° (range, 30°-62°; sdev 6.9), P = .12. The percentage of outliers (outside Lewinnek safe zone, 30°-50°) was 9.1% (6 of 66) in posterior group and 13.6% (9 of 66) in DAA group. There were 2 anterior dislocations in the DAA THA group and 1 anterior dislocation in the posterior THA group, resulting in P = .56. The DAA dislocation frequency in this group was overall higher at 3.0% (2 of 66) compared with the matched posterior (1.5%, 1 of 66) and unmatched posterior larger series (.8%, 3 of 360). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated no observable difference in hip stability or acetabular abduction. This study provides realistic outcomes for surgeons implementing DAA THA into their practice.

Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: With the ubiquity of digital radiographs, the use of digital templating for arthroplasty has become commonplace. Although improved accuracy with digital radiographs and magnification markers is assumed, it has not been shown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wanted to (1) evaluate the accuracy of magnification markers in estimating the magnification of the true hip and (2) determine if the use of magnification markers improves on older techniques of assuming a magnification of 20% for all patients. METHODS: Between April 2013 and September 2013 we collected 100 AP pelvis radiographs of patients who had a THA prosthesis in situ and a magnification marker placed per the manufacturer's instructions. Radiographs seen during our standard radiographic review process, which met our inclusion criteria (AP pelvic view that included a well-positioned and observed magnification marker, and a prior total hip replacement with a known femoral head size), were included in the analysis. We then used OrthoView(TM) software program to calculate magnification of the radiograph using the magnification marker (measured magnification) and the femoral head of known size (true magnification). RESULTS: The mean true magnification using the femoral head was 21% (SD, 2%). The mean magnification using the marker was 15% (SD, 5%). The 95% CI for the mean difference between the two measurements was 6% to 7% (p < 0.001). The use of a magnification marker to estimate magnification at the level of the hip using standard radiographic techniques was shown in this study to routinely underestimate the magnification of the radiograph using an arthroplasty femoral head of known diameter as the reference. If we assume a magnification of 20%, this more closely approximated the true magnification routinely. With this assumption, we were within 2% magnification in 64 of the 100 hips and off by 4% or more in only four hips. In contrast, using the magnification marker we were within 2% of true magnification in only 20 hips and were off by 4% or more in 59 hips. CONCLUSION: We found the use of a magnification marker with digital radiographs for preoperative templating to be generally inaccurate, with a mean error of 6% and range from -5% to 15%. Additionally, these data suggest that the use of a magnification marker while taking preoperative radiographs of the hip may be unnecessary, as simply setting the software to assume a 20% magnification actually was more accurate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Modular Versus Nonmodular Femoral Necks for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), proximal femoral neck stem modularity (PFNSM) has theoretical advantages over nonmodular stems, including the ability to more closely reconstruct anatomy and improve stability. However, risks of metallosis and breakage at the junction must be considered. In this study, we compared the head centers of a modular neck system with that of its nonmodular counterpart. Of 463 primary THAs with a modular stem, 261 (56%) had a head center equivalent to that of its nonmodular counterpart, and an additional 132 (29%) had a head center within 4 mm in length and 2 mm of offset. Thus, only 70 stems (15%) had a head center that was more than 4 mm in length and more than 2 mm in offset different from the nonmodular stem. Only 12 stems had a verted neck. These findings suggest that, in a majority of primary THAs, use of a modular stem results in head center positions also achievable with a nonmodular stem. Given the risks of modularity, PFNSM should be used with caution. We recommend PFNSM in cases that cannot be reconstructed with the nonmodular option.

Lessons learned from managing a prospective, private practice joint replacement registry: a 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND: In 1984, we developed a private practice joint replacement registry (JRR) to prospectively follow patients undergoing THA and TKA to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and implant survival. Little has been reported in the literature regarding management of this type of database, and it is unclear whether and how the information can be useful for addressing longer-term questions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We answered the following questions: (1) What is the rate of followup for THA and TKA in our JRR? (2) What factors affect followup? (3) How successful is this JRR model in capturing data and what areas of improvement are identified? And (4) what costs are associated with maintaining this JRR? METHODS: We collected clinical data on all 12,047 patients having primary THA and TKA since 1984. Clinical and radiographic data were collected at routine followup intervals and entered into a prospective database. We searched this database to assess the rate of successful followup and data collection and to compare the effect of patient variables on followup. Costs related to database management were evaluated. RESULTS: Followup was poor at every time interval after surgery, with a tendency for worsening over time. Patients with a complication and those younger than 70 years tended to followup with greater frequency. There were difficulties with data capture and substantial expenses related to managing the database. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the difficulties in managing a JRR. Followup is poor and data collection is often incomplete. Newer technologies that allow easier tracking of patients and facilitate data capture may streamline this process and control costs.

Total hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures.

Between February 1987 and October 2008, we performed 102 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) after failed internal fixation of a prior hip fracture. There were 39 intertrochanteric fractures and 63 femoral neck fractures. Etiology of failure included 35 cases of osteonecrosis, 32 cases of arthritis, 25 cases of early failure of fixation, and 10 cases of nonunion. There were 12 patients who had early surgical complications related to the procedure (11.8%, 12/102). These included 5 patients who had dislocations (4.9%), 4 periprosthetic fractures (3.9%), 2 hematomas (2.0%), and 1 infection (1%). Of these 102 THAs, 50 were available for at least 2 years of follow-up (mean, 3.2 years). At a minimum 2-year follow-up, THA after failed internal fixation of hip fracture in these patients was clinically successful with an elevated risk of periprosthetic fracture and dislocation.

Cost comparison of cementless versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Hip hemiarthroplasties are frequently performed for displaced femoral neck fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the costs associated with cementless and cemented hemiarthroplasties, compare operative times, and identify complications. The hypothesis was that cementless hemiarthroplasties cost less than cemented hemiarthroplasties, require less operative time, and have fewer perioperative complications. A retrospective review was conducted of 2 surgeons' patients admitted for displaced femoral neck fractures between 2006 and 2010. Group 1 included 45 patients who underwent monopolar hemiarthroplasties with cementless femoral components via a standard posterior approach by a single surgeon. Group 2 included 49 patients who underwent monopolar hemiarthroplasties with cemented femoral components via a modified lateral approach by a single surgeon. Surgical and anesthesia times and the cost of implants and accessories were recorded. The cost for cementless components was $3275.60 (femoral stem, $2800; monopolar head, $400; sleeve, $75.60), whereas the cost of cemented components was $3694.47 (femoral stem, $1800; monopolar head, $400; sleeve, $75.60, 3 Simplex with tobramycin cement packets, $1221; cement mixer/irrigator with tip/centralizer and plug/pressurizer, $197.87), a cost savings of 12.7% ($418.87). Operative time was significantly reduced in group 1 vs group 2 (mean, 32.9 vs 56.1 minutes, respectively; P<.01). Anesthesia time was also significantly reduced in group 1 (mean, 82.3 vs 102.9 minutes, respectively; P<.01). The difference in mean anesthetic times demonstrates an overall cost savings of 18.6%, or $1161.30. No difference in complications was noted between the groups perioperatively. Regional cost variances, vendor-hospital contracts, and surgeons' operative times are factors that may influence cost savings. This study demonstrates significantly lower operative and anesthetic times and observable cost savings with cementless femoral implants.

Local infiltration analgesia in TKA patients reduces length of stay and postoperative pain scores.

Numerous postoperative pain protocols exist for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the length of stay, early range of motion (ROM), and pain scores of a control group with a femoral nerve block to those of a group with femoral nerve block and local infiltration analgesia following TKA. In a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary TKA at a Veteran's Administration hospital, 40 patients (40 TKAs) who had local infiltration analgesia were compared to a historical group of 43 patients (43 TKAs) who had a long-acting femoral nerve block without local infiltration analgesia. Local infiltration analgesia consisted of intraoperative injection of 150 mL of 300 mg ropivacaine, 30 mg ketorolac, and 500 µg epinephrine using 50 mL into each of 3 areas: (1) posterior capsule, (2) medial and lateral capsule, and (3) anterior capsule and subcutaneous tissues. A 17-gauge intra-articular catheter was used to inject an additional 100 mg of ropivacaine on postoperative day 1. The control group had a single-shot femoral nerve block using 150 mg of ropivacaine with epinephrine. Mean length of stay for the local infiltration analgesia group compared to controls was 3.2±1.4 days vs 3.8±1.6 days, respectively (P=.03). No significant differences existed in average ROM (6 weeks), discharge hematocrit, transfusions, and temperature. Mean pain scores were lower in the local infiltration analgesia group on postoperative day 1 (P=.04), but not on postoperative day 2 or 3. Maximum visual analog scale scores (P<.01) were reduced in the local infiltration analgesia group. Our early experience with local infiltration analgesia demonstrated a significantly reduced length of stay due to decreased postoperative pain.

Rotational references for total knee arthroplasty tibial components change with level of resection.

BACKGROUND: Various landmarks can guide tibial component rotational alignment in routine TKA, but with the deeper tibial resection levels common in complex primary and revision TKAs, it is unknown whether these landmarks remain reliable. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether three techniques for determining tibial component rotation based on local anatomic landmarks are reliable deeper tibial resection levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The femoral transepicondylar axis was identified by three independent reviewers on MR images of knees from 24 men and 24 women and transposed at a traditional tibial resection level and at the level of the proximal, middle, and distal parts of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Three axes were drawn on axial slices at these levels: the geometric center of the tibial plateau to the medial 1/3 of the tubercle, the posterior condylar line of the tibia, and the largest mediolateral dimension of the tibia. These lines were compared with the transposed femoral epicondylar axis line. RESULTS: The posterior condylar line of the tibia is the least variable local landmark for tibial component positioning at deep resection levels. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the normal posterior condylar line of the tibia is visible at revision, setting the tibial component at 10° external rotation with respect to the posterior condylar axis of the tibia gets the tibial component within 10° of proper rotation in 86% to 98% of patients, even to the distal part of the proximal tibiofibular joint. The experienced surgeon then can adjust this position based on cues from an assortment of other axes.

Common errors in the execution of preoperative templating for primary total hip arthroplasty.

We reviewed 75 primary total hip arthroplasty preoperative and postoperative radiographs and recorded limb length discrepancy, change in femoral offset, acetabular position, neck cut, and femoral component positioning. Interobturator line, as a technique to measure preoperative limb length discrepancy, had the least amount of variance when compared with interteardrop and intertuberosity lines (Levene test, P = .0527). The most common error in execution of preoperative templating was excessive limb lengthening (mean, 3.52 mm), primarily due to inferior acetabular cup positioning (Pearson correlation coefficient, P = .036). Incomplete medialization of the acetabular component contributed the most to offset discrepancy. The most common errors in the execution of preoperative templating resulted in excessive limb lengthening and increased offset. Identifying these errors can lead to more accurate templating techniques and improved intraoperative execution.

Prospective, surgeon-randomized evaluation of crossed pins versus lateral pins for unstable supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

Controversy exists concerning pin placement for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Both crossed pin and lateral only pin configurations have shown good results; however, prospective studies are lacking. We present a prospective, surgeon-randomized study comparing crossed pin (group A, n = 20) versus preferential lateral only pin (group B, n = 20) fixation for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. There was no difference in Baumann's angle (P>0.75), the humerotrochlear angle (P>0.85), or final elbow range of motion (P>0.25). Both groups had stable reductions and clinically normal alignment. The only complication in both groups was a transient ulnar nerve irritation, despite no intraoperative evidence of nerve violation with a nerve stimulator. One patient in each group required modification of the operative plan. In group B, one patient had a medial pin inserted because of medial comminution extending proximally limiting available lateral pin placement. In group A, the surgeon elected to use lateral pins only because of an obviously subluxating ulnar nerve. In conclusion, we recommend orthopedic surgeons treating unstable pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures be facile with both medial and lateral pin placement.

The effect of time delay to surgical debridement of open tibia shaft fractures on infection rate.

Historical practices have advocated emergent operative debridement for all open fractures. To date only studies in guinea pigs have demonstrated decreased infection with surgical intervention within 6 hours of injury. Recent studies have questioned this practice in humans. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was an increased infection rate based on time delay from presentation to initial operative debridement. A retrospective chart review was done from 1998 to 2004 to identify patients who presented to our level 1 trauma center with open tibia shaft fractures and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Two hundred fifteen open tibia shaft fractures in 206 patients were included in this study. A time delay of 0 to 6 hours revealed a 10.8% (7/65) infection rate, of 6 to 12 hours a 9.5% (9/95) infection rate, of 12 to 24 hours a 5.6% (2/36) infection rate, and no infections in a delay >24 hours (N=19). Using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test, P=.12; Fisher exact test P value was .53. Combining time intervals to 0 to 12 hours and >12 hours returned 10% (16/160) and 3.6% (2/55) infection rates, respectively. Fisher exact test P value was .17. Statistical analysis failed to show significant differences among the various time interval groups. Based on current evidence, we recommend that in the absence of gross contamination, early informal irrigation should be done on an urgent basis along with initiation of intravenous antibiotics, while a formal debridement combined with fixation, if indicated, can be done later in a timely manner.