Comparison of acute versus stable coronary syndrome in patients treated with the Magmaris scaffold: Two-year results from the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry.

BACKGROUND: The magnesium Magmaris scaffold is the latest resorbable technology with low thrombogenicity, short scaffolding time, and almost complete resorption at 12 months (95 %). As compared with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. We analyzed the data of the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry to compare clinical outcomes in SCAD versus ACS patients. METHODS: We evaluated the 24-month rates of target lesion failure (TLF) and scaffold thrombosis (ST). Device implantation procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations (proper patient/lesion selection, pre-dilatation, proper scaffold sizing, and post-dilatation). Dual antiplatelet therapy was terminated after 12 months. RESULTS: Data from 207 patients (145 SCAD and 62 ACS) were collected from July 2016 to June 2018. The 2-year follow-up compliance was 92.8 % (192 patients). At 2 years, TLF rates were 7.4 % in the SCAD group and 8.8 % in the ACS group (p = 0.7); ST rates were 0 % in the SCAD group and 1.8 % in the ACS group (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The 2-year clinical results from the Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry are favorable in terms of TLF and ST, indicating the safety and effectiveness of the Magmaris scaffold in both SCAD and ACS patients.

Patent foramen ovale closure with the Occlutech Figulla flex II device: A long-term (up to 10-years) follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure represents the first line of treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke and documented patent foramen ovale (PFO). Scarce data report the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing PFO closure with the Figulla Flex II device (Occlutech, Germany). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure with a Figulla Flex II device at a single, high-volume Institution were included. Baseline clinical and procedural features were collected and patients were followed up for up to 10 years. The device's long-term safety was assessed, as well as mortality, recurrent cerebrovascular events, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and residual shunt. RESULTS: Overall, 442 patients were included. The main indication for PFO closure was cryptogenic stroke/transitory ischemic attack (65.5%), followed by migraine (21.7%), silent lesions at MRI (10.8%), and decompression disease (2.0%). Atrial septal aneurysm was present in 20.8% of cases, Eustachian valve in 9.0%, Chiari network in 19.9%. The most frequently implanted device was the 23/25 mm (49.5% of cases). One procedural failure due to device embolization; in-hospital complications occurred in 15 cases (3.4%; 4 minor access site complications, 11 transient supraventricular tachycardias (SVT)/AF). After a follow-up of 9.2 years, 2 patients suffered recurrent TIA (with no residual R-L shunt detected). A moderate or severe residual shunt was observed in 3 patients after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Figulla Flex II devices for PFO closure are associated with high procedural success and low incidence of adverse events even at long-term follow-up.

Diagnostic accuracy of subendocardial vs. transmural myocardial perfusion defect for the detection of in-stent restenosis or progression of coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The ADVANTAGE study demonstrated in a cohort of stented patients a diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) significantly higher than that of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) or CAD progression vs. quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). This is a pre-defined subanalysis of the ADVANTAGE aimed at assessing the difference in terms of diagnostic accuracy vs. QCA of a subendocardial vs. a transmural perfusion defect using static stress CTP. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients who previously underwent coronary stenting and were referred for QCA. All patients underwent stress CTP and rest CTP â€‹+ â€‹CCTA. The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA and CTP were evaluated in territory-based and patient-based analyses. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of "subendocardial" perfusion defect, defined as hypo-enhancement encompassing >25% but <50% of the transmural myocardial thickness within a specific coronary territory vs. "transmural" perfusion defect, defined as hypo-enhancement encompassing >50% of the transmural thickness. RESULTS: In 150 patients (132 men, mean age 65.1 â€‹± â€‹9.1 years), the diagnostic accuracy of subendocardial vs. transmural perfusion defect in a vessel-based analysis was 93.5% vs. 87.7%, respectively (p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of subendocardial vs. transmural defect were 87.9% vs. 46.9% (p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and 94.9% vs. 97.9% (p â€‹= â€‹0.004), respectively. In a patient-based analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of the subendocardial vs. transmural approach was 86.6% vs. 68% (p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that detection of a subendocardial perfusion defect as compared to a transmural defect is significantly more accurate to identify coronary territories with ISR or CAD progression.

Transradial/brachial carotid artery stenting with proximal protection: technical instructions, acute results and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of transradial/brachial (TR/TB) carotid artery stenting (CAS) with proximal cerebral protection (PCP) as a first line of treatment of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Among 556 patients with significant (>50% if symptomatic or >70% if asymptomatic by Doppler US) unilateral, lipid-rich carotid artery stenosis undergoing TR/TB CAS, 137 (24.5%) deemed at high-risk for periprocedural cerebral embolization were scheduled for PCP with Mo.MA Ultra or Mo.MA mono-balloon. In patients with very complex anatomy the standard technique was modified loading the Mo.MA catheter without mandrel on two-wire system (so called 'No MAndrel 2 wire' technique, No.MA2) to increase support and deliverability. Device, technical and procedural successes both acute and at follow-up were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 74±7 years (93% male), 15% were symptomatic and 59.6% owned 'high-surgical-risk' features. Stenosis degree was 85±7% with soft composition in all (by CT-angiography). TR and TB approach were selected in 92 (67%) and 45 (33%) patients, respectively. Target carotid axes were right, left bovine and left non bovine in 55%, 38% and 7% of patients. Procedures were successfully completed in all patients (intention-to-treat basis) with the standard Mo.MA Ultra system in 129 patients and the Mo.MA mono-balloon in 8 patients. No.MA2 technique was succesfully used in 16 patients as 'bailout' and in 27 patients as 'first line'). Device and technical success was 97% (133/137 patients) due to crossover to femoral access in 3 cases, and Mo.MA too short to engage the ECA in 1 patient. The procedural success was 96.7% (131/137, two minor strokes). Procedural time and fluoroscopy time were increased with No.MA2 technique. One major vascular complication occurred, in the TB group, while chronic radial occlusion was detected by Doppler ultrasound in 7/92 patients (7.1%) at 372±163 days of follow-up. The event-free survival was 91% and the stroke rate was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: TR/TB CAS with proximal protection is a feasible, safe and effective strategy and may be considered a first line strategy in all comer patients.

Outcomes and mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction during the second wave pandemic in a Milan HUB center for cardiac emergencies.

Aims: COVID-19 has dramatically impacted the healthcare system. Evidence from previous studies suggests a decline in in-hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the pandemic. However, the effect of the pandemic on mechanical complications (MC) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been comprehensively investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of the pandemic on MC and in-hospital outcomes in STEMI during the second wave, in which there was a huge SARS-CoV-2 diffusion in Italy. Methods and results: Based on a single center cohort of AMI patients admitted with STEMI between February 1, 2019, and February 28, 2021, we compared the characteristics and outcomes of STEMI patients treated during the pandemic vs. those treated before the pandemic. In total, 479 STEMI patients were included, of which 64.5% were during the pandemic. Relative to before the pandemic, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) declined (87.7 vs. 94.7%, p = 0.014) during the pandemic. Compared to those admitted before the pandemic (10/2019 to 2/2020), STEMI patients admitted during the second wave (10/2020 to 2/2021) presented with a symptom onset-to-door time greater than 24 h (26.1 vs. 10.3%, p = 0.009) and a reduction of primary PCI (85.2 vs. 97.1%, p = 0.009). MC occurred more often in patients admitted during the second wave of the pandemic than in those admitted before the pandemic (7.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.032). In-hospital mortality increased during the second wave (10.6 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.058). Conclusion: Although the experience gained during the first wave and a more advanced hub-and-spoke system for cardiovascular emergencies persists, late hospitalizations and a high incidence of mechanical complications in STEMI were observed even in the second wave.

Sustained Safety and Efficacy of Magnesium Reabsorbable Scaffold: 2-Year Follow-Up Analysis From First Magmaris Multicenter Italian Registry.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium Reabsorbable Scaffold (MRS), is the newest reabsorbable technology with low thrombogenicity, short scaffolding time and almost complete resorption at 12-months (95%). Preliminary 12-months data in selected patients has shown that safety and efficacy are comparable with second generation Drug Eluting Stent (DES). Magmaris Multicenter registry showed 1-and 2-years clinical outcome on the first patients suitable for MRS enrolled in 4 Italian centers. METHODS: We evaluated 12- and 24-months clinical results in "real world" experience with Magnesium Reabosrbable Scaffold in terms of Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and scaffold thrombosis (ST). TLF is the primary endpoint and was defined as composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). 4P's strategy (Patient/lesion selection, Pre-dilatation, Proper scaffold sizing and Post-dilatation) was strongly recommended. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) has been recommended for 12 months. RESULTS: Data from 207 patients, including initial experience, have been collected. Patients were 83% male, 20% diabetic and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in 23%. Lesion type were A-B1 in 54% and B2C in 46%. 4P's strategy was respected in 94%. Procedural success was 98% (2% peri-procedural MI). Compliance at 12-months follow up was 97.6%, TLF rate was 5.4% (including 1 case of myocardial infarction with late scaffold thrombosis (ST), all patients were successfully treated with in-scaffold segment DES implantation). At 24-months compliance was 92.8% (192 patients) and TLF was 7.4%. In the period between 13 and 24 months only 4 patients had TLF (including 1 case of myocardial infarction, all patients were successfully treated with in-scaffold segment DES implantation). None of the patients died for a cardiac reason. CONCLUSION: Our 2-years results confirm safety and efficacy showed at 12-months, reinforcing long-term performance with only 2% rate of TLF increase and no ST after 1 year.

Absolute and relative contraindications to proximal protection: do they really matter? A case-illustrative approach.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an established technique to treat carotid artery stenosis. Favorable results have been reported in different subsets of patients in both acute and long-term settings. Among the CAS periprocedural variables the type of cerebral protection - distal filter and proximal protection - play a pivot role to reduce cerebral embolization. Accumulating evidence is in favor of better performance of proximal protection vs. distal filters. However, the rate of worldwide penetration of this devise is low. Potential reasons include a lengthy list of technical issues that may account for the reluctance of filter-oriented operators to change systems. This paper shows how to identify, treat, and overcome these technical obstacles.

Intolerance to occlusion during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection: causes, mechanisms, treatment and prevention.

Periprocedural cerebral microembolization is the most important complication of carotid artery stenting. Among several variables that play a role to reduce this risk, brain protection (proximal vs. distal) plays a pivot role. Data are accumulating in favor of a better performance of proximal vs. distal especially in symptomatic patients and high-risk carotid plaques. A prerequisite for the technique to be safe and effective is the presence of a valid intracranial collateral circulation to compensate for the target vessel hemisphere avoiding patient intolerance. This complication may occur either soon after the common carotid balloon occlusion or slowly developing during the procedure peaking at the stent post-dilation step. While Willis' circle anatomic variants are the most frequent cause of acute intolerance, a mix of anatomic, hemodynamic and patient cerebral condition play a role for the late developing form. Prevention is the best treatment of intolerance through a pre- and procedural imaging with different techniques (CT angiography, NMR angiography, transcranial Doppler assessment, digital subtraction angiography and back pressure monitoring).

Case Report: A Cluster of Complications During Carotid Artery Stenting Managed With Peripheral, Coronary, and Imaging Techniques.

We describe the case of a 72-year-old man with severe, asymptomatic in-stent restenosis detected 4 years after index carotid artery stenting (CAS). The patient was deemed at low risk and scheduled for re-angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon as per institution protocol. What at first seemed a simple case suddenly turned into a series of cerebral and vascular complications that were successfully managed with a mix of peripheral, coronary, and imaging techniques.

Results of paclitaxel-drug-coated balloons (Pantera Lux) for coronary in-stent restenosis: Italian experience from REGistry of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon in ISR study.

AIMS: Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is an effective treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, literature data indicate that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) may be a valid alternative, particularly for recurrent ISR. We sought to evaluate clinical results on the long-term efficacy of a new DCB for ISR treatment. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients were treated with paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (Pantera Lux, Biotronik, Switzerland) in the Italian REGistry of Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon in ISR (REGPEB study). Clinical follow-up was scheduled at 1 and 12 months. A subgroup of patients received adjunctive 5-year follow-up. Primary end point was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 214 ISR coronary lesions were treated (75.4% DES-ISR). Mean time between stent implantation and DCB treatment is 41 months. DCBs were successfully delivered in 99% of the cases; crossover to a DES occurred in 3% of cases. Procedural success rate was 98.5%. Clinical success rate was 98.5%. First-month follow-up compliance was 98% and freedom from MACE was 96.9%. Twelve-month follow-up compliance was 89.3% with a freedom from MACE rate of 87.3% (CI: 81.3-91.5%). Five-year long-term follow-up showed 65.2% of freedom from MACE. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that Pantera Lux treatment is effective and well tolerated in ISR, showing good acute and long/very long-term results in the treatment of complex lesions (DES and late ISR).

Carotid Wallstent Versus Roadsaver Stent and Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to randomly compare the double-layer Roadsaver stent (RS) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) with the single-layer Carotid Wallstent (CW) (Boston Scientific, Santa Clara, California) in association with either distal embolic protection with the FilterWire (FW) device (Boston Scientific) or proximal protection with the Mo.Ma Ultra device (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) in patients with lipid-rich carotid plaques. BACKGROUND: The role of both stent type and brain protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains unsettled. METHODS: A total of 104 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomized to CAS with FW + RS (group 1, n = 27), FW + CW (group 2, n = 25), Mo.Ma + RS (group 3, n = 27), or Mo.Ma + CW (group 4, n = 25). The primary endpoint was the number of microembolic signals (MES) on transcranial Doppler among groups in the following CAS steps: 1 and 2) target vessel access; 3) lesion wiring; 4) pre-dilation; 5) stent crossing; 6) stent deployment; 7) stent dilation; and 8) device retrieval and deflation. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found among the 4 groups. Compared with the FW device, the Mo.Ma Ultra device significantly reduced mean MES count (p < 0.0001) during lesion crossing, stent crossing, stent deployment, and post-dilation. Compared with the CW, the RS significantly reduced MES count (p = 0.016) in steps 6 to 8, including spontaneous MES (29% of patients). The combination of Mo.Ma + RS performed significantly better than Mo.Ma + CW (p = 0.043). Clinical major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 3 patients (p = 0.51). After CAS, peak systolic velocity significantly decreased in all patients. In-stent restenosis developed in 1 patient (0.98%) at 6-month follow-up. The RS was an independent predictor of external carotid artery patency over time. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque undergoing CAS, Mo.Ma + RS led to the lowest microembolic signals count. (Role of the Type of Carotid Stent and Cerebral Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting. A Randomized Study Comparing Carotid Wallstent vs Roadsaver® Stent and Distal vs Proximal Protection; NCT02915328).

A Long-Term Single-Center Registry of 6893 Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Xience Everolimus-Eluting Stent.

BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) have been previously demonstrated. AIMS: To assess very long-term performance and outcomes of the EES in a real-world population. METHODS: This single-center registry prospectively enrolled 6893 patients (mean age, 66 ± 9.7 years; 81.4% men) undergoing elective coronary intervention with the EES over a decade. Clinical follow-up (FU) was performed at 1 year and then yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Multiple risk factors were present in 34%. Stable angina was the main stenting indication (78.1%), followed by unstable angina (5.3%) and positive stress test (16.6%) for 1-vessel (44%) or 2/3-vessel disease (56%). Multiple stents (stent/patient ratio: 2.1 ± 0.8) in >1 vessel were implanted in 36.9% (mean stent length, 43 ± 31.3 mm). At 1 year, 80% of patients were on dual-antiplatelet therapy, while only 3% were on therapy at 2 years. A low 1-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate of 5.0% was observed; stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 19 patients (0.3%), with a prevalence of early (n = 9) over late (n = 4) and very late events (n = 6; 0.08%). Clinically driven target- lesion revascularization/target-vessel revascularization (TLR/TVR) occurred in 3.3% at 1-year follow-up. Long-term FU (3 years) completed in 6210 patients (90.0%) showed a MACE rate of 5.9%, while very long-term FU (>5 years and up to 10 years), available in 3550 out of 4635 exposed patients (76.6%), showed a MACE rate of 8.6%. Independent MACE predictors were stented segment length (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-2.82), small vessel stenting (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.08-1.68), and multivessel disease (2-vessel disease: OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.21-2.08; 3-vessel disease: OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.72-2.97). CONCLUSIONS: This large, prospective registry confirms the very long-term safety and efficacy of the EES in unselected real-world and complex coronary lesions.

Drug-eluting balloon for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: preliminary report.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: Among 830 consecutive patients undergoing CAS between November 2001 and June 2012, significant ISR (>80% stenosis) occurred in 10 (1.2%) asymptomatic patients. Angioplasty with DEB treatment was performed in 7 patients (6 internal and 1 common carotid arteries) at a mean of 20.9 ± 19.4 months (median 12.1) after CAS. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided predilation with distal cerebral protection was carried out with a cutting balloon followed by inflation of a DEB with a 1:1 stent-to-balloon size ratio. RESULTS: Technical/procedural success was achieved in all cases. Angiographic stenosis decreased from 83%± 5% to 18%± 6%. At IVUS evaluation, minimal lumen area increased from 3.19 ± 1.73 to 12.78 ± 1.97 mm(2) (p=0.0001), stent area was unchanged (from 17.36 ± 4.36 to 17.52 ± 4.34 mm(2), p=0.70), and the restenosis area decreased from 13.58 ± 5.27 to 4.71 ± 3.06 mm(2) (p=0.0005). At a mean follow-up of 13.7 ± 1.5 months (median 13.7), 1 patient had a minor stroke ipsilateral to the ISR vessel 2 months after DEB treatment; the stent was widely patent on duplex ultrasound and angiographic images. Overall, the average PSV decreased from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 0.9 ± 0.1 m/s (p=0.0001). At 6 and 12 months, PSVs after DEB treatment were significantly lower compared to those assessed at comparable intervals after CAS. CONCLUSION: The use of DEBs to treat ISR after CAS shows promising acute and midterm results.