Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 82(2): 99-106, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different countries have their own systems for evaluating new medicines, and they make decisions as to when and how each new medicine is adopted. PURPOSE: To compare the rate of uptake of new diabetes medicines (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP-4Is], glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP1-RAs], and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors [SGLT2Is]) in the five most populated European countries. METHODS: The monthly volume of sales of antidiabetic drugs was extracted for each country from the IQVIA™ MIDAS® database for the period 2007 to 2016 and the defined daily doses (DDDs) were calculated. For each new drug, market shares were expressed as a percentage of the total market of non-insulin antidiabetic agents. RESULTS: Sharp differences were observed between the countries. Overall, the highest and fastest rates of uptake were seen for Germany and Spain, compared to lower rates for the UK and Italy. This was especially marked for DPP-4Is, where the market share reached over 30% of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in Germany and Spain, compared to around 10% in the UK and Italy. In France, there was an initial rapid uptake, which stabilized at around 20% after three years. Rates of uptake were lower for the other drugs, with the GLP1-RAs reaching a market share of 2.5-4.5% in Germany, Spain and France, compared to less than 2.5% in the UK and Italy. The SGLT2Is reached a market share of 5-8% in Spain and Germany, compared to less than 4% in the UK and Italy, and they were not launched at all in France in March 2020. CONCLUSION: The differences in the uptake of new antidiabetic drugs may reflect different methods for assessing and introducing new medicines, as well as cultural factors. The uptake of the new medicines would appear to be more cautious in the UK and Italy, perhaps due to concerns about cost-effectiveness, whereas in Germany and Spain, and possibly also France, a new medicine's potential benefits may be prioritized.


Assuntos
Comércio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , França , Alemanha , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/provisão & distribuição , Itália , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/economia , Espanha , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...