Radiotherapy for salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the indications for radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer and to specify the modalities and target radiation volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method. RESULTS: Postoperatively, radiotherapy to the primary tumor site±to the lymph nodes is indicated if one or more of the following adverse histoprognostic factors are present (risk>10% of locoregional recurrence): T3-T4 category, lymph node invasion, extraglandular invasion, close or positive surgical margins, high tumor grade, perineural invasion, vascular emboli, and/or bone invasion. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the gold standard. For unresectable cancers or inoperable patients, carbon ion hadrontherapy may be considered. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer is indicated in postoperative situations in case of adverse histoprognostic factors and for inoperable tumors.

Long duration of immunotherapy before radiosurgery might improve intracranial control of melanoma brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm3. RESULTS: The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm3 was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials.

Histosurgical mapping of endoscopic endonasal surgery of sinonasal tumours to improve radiotherapy guidance.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is becoming a standard for most malignant sinonasal tumours. Margin analysis after piecemeal resection is complex and optimally relies on accurate histosurgical mapping. Postoperative radiotherapy may be adapted based on margin assessment mapping to reduce the dose to some sinonasal subvolumes. We assessed the use of histosurgical mapping by radiation oncologists (RO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A French practice survey was performed across 29 ENT expert RO (2 did not answer) regarding integration of information on EES, as well as quality of operative and pathology reportsto refine radiotherapy planning after EES. This was assessed through an electronic questionnaire. RESULTS: EES was ubiquitously performed in France. Operative and pathology reports yielded accurate description of EES samples according to 66.7% of interviewed RO. Accuracy of margin assessment was however insufficient according to more than 40.0% of RO. Additional margins/biopsies of the operative bed were available in 55.2% (16/29) of the centres. In the absence of additional margins, quality of resection after EES was considered as microscopically incomplete in 48.3% or dubious in 48.3% of RO. As performed, histosurgical mapping allowed radiotherapy dose and volumes adaptation according to 26.3% of RO only. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized histosurgical mapping with margin and additional margin analysis could be more systematic. Advantages of accurate EES reporting could be dose painting radiotherapy to further decrease morbidity in sinonasal tumours.

Radiotherapy of salivary gland tumours.

Primary tumours of the salivary glands account for about 5 to 10% of tumours of the head and neck. These tumours represent a multitude of situations and histologies, where surgery is the mainstay of treatment and radiotherapy is frequently needed for malignant tumours (in case of stage T3-T4, nodal involvement, extraparotid invasion, positive or close resection margins, histological high-grade tumour, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, bone involvement postoperatively, or unresectable tumours). The diagnosis relies on anatomic and functional MRI and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnostic of benign or malignant tumors. In addition to patient characteristics, the determination of primary and nodal target volumes depends on tumor extensions and stage, histology and grade. Therefore, radiotherapy of salivary gland tumors requires a certain degree of personalization, which has been codified in the recommendations of the French multidisciplinary network of expertise for rare ENT cancers (Refcor) and may justify a specialised multidisciplinary discussion. Although radiotherapy is usually recommended for malignant tumours only, recurrent pleomorphic adenomas may sometimes require radiotherapy based on multidisciplinary discussion. An update of indications and recommendations for radiotherapy for salivary gland tumours in terms of techniques, doses, target volumes and dose constraints to organs at risk of the French society for radiotherapy and oncology (SFRO) was reported in this article.

[State of art of photobiomodulation in the management of radiotherapy adverse events: Indications and level of evidence]. / État de l'art de la photobiomodulation dans la prise en charge des effets secondaires de la radiothérapie : indications et niveaux de preuve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current and potential indications of photobiomodulation (PBM) and their level of evidence in the prevention or management of radiation therapy-related side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Scopus, and LILACS databases were systematically reviewed to include and analyze publications of clinical studies that have assessed PBM in the prevention or management of radiotherapy-related side effects. The keywords used were "photobiomodulation"; "low level laser therapy"; "acute oral mucositis"; "acute dysphagia"; "acute radiation dermatitis"; "lymphedema"; "xerostomia"; "hyposalivation"; "trismus"; "bone necrosis"; "osteoradionecrosis"; and "radiation induced fibrosis". Prospective studies were included, whereas retrospective cohorts and non-original articles were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: PBM in the red or infrared spectrum has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in the prevention and management of radiotherapy-related side effects, especially acute oral mucositis, acute radiation dermatitis, and upper extremity lymphedema. The level of evidence associated with PBM was heterogeneous, but overall was still moderate. The main shortcomings were the diversity and lack of detail in treatment protocols, which could have compromised efficiency and reproducibility of PBM results. CONCLUSION: The published data suggest that PBM may be considered as a full-fledged supportive care for patients treated with radiotherapy, or at least in the setting of a therapeutic clinical trial. However, until strong evidence has been published on its long-term safety, the use of PBM should be considered with caution, specifically when applied near areas with proven or potential tumors. The patient should be informed of the theoretical benefits and risks of PBM in order to obtain his informed consent before treatment.

[Impact of neck dissection in N2-3 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: An observational real-life study]. / Impact du curage ganglionnaire cervical dans la prise en charge par chimioradiothérapie exclusive des cancers de l'oropharynx de stade N2-3 : étude observationnelle en vie réelle.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy in terms of neck failure of an initial neck dissection before definitive chemoradiotherapy in N2-3 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, as well as the dosimetric impact and the acute and delayed morbidity of this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients consecutively treated between 2009 and 2018 with definitive chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy (IMRT) for a histologically proven N2-3 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas were retrospectively included. The therapeutic approach consisted of induction chemotherapy, followed by cisplatine-based chemoradiotherapy preceded or not by neck dissection. Neck dissection was discussed on a case-by-case basis in a dedicated multidisciplinary tumour board for patients with a dissociated response to induction chemotherapy, defined as a better response on the primary than on the node. Chemoradiotherapy without neck dissection was systematically performed in case of a major lymph node response to induction chemotherapy (decrease in size of 90% or more). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a simultaneous-integrated boost delivered 70Gy in 35 fractions on macroscopic tumour volumes, 63Gy on intermediate-risk levels or extra-nodal extension and 54Gy on prophylactic lymph node areas. RESULTS: Two groups were constituted: 47 patients without an initial neck dissection (62.7%), and 28 patients with a neck dissection prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (37.3%). Initial patient characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. The median follow-up was 60.1months (range: 3.2-119months). Incidence of neck failure was higher in patients without neck dissection (P=0.015). The neck failure rate at 5years was 19.8% (95% confidence interval: 7.4-30.6%; P=0.015) without neck dissection versus 0% following neck dissection. All lymph node failures occurred in the planned target volume at 70Gy. Upfront neck dissection suggested a decrease in the mean dose received by the homolateral parotid gland (P=0.01), mandible (P=0.02), and thyroid gland (P=0.02). Acute toxicity of chemoradiotherapy after neck dissection suggested a reduction in grade≥3 adverse events (P=0.04), early discontinuation of concomitant chemotherapy (P=0.009) and feeding tube-dependence (P=0.008) in univariate analysis. During follow-up, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of xerostomia, dysgeusia, dysphagia or gastrostomy dependence in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Neck dissection prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy in N2-3 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma was associated with high neck control without additional mid and long-term morbidity.

Radiosurgery and stereotactic irradiation of multiple and contiguous brain metastases: A practical proposal of dose prescription methods and a literature review.

PURPOSE: In literature, there are no guidelines on how to prescribe dose in the case of radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic irradiation of multiple and adjacent BM. Aim of this work is to furnish practical proposals of dosimetric methods for multiple neighboring BM, and to make a literature review about the SRS treatment of multiple BM, comparing radiotherapy techniques on the basis of different dosimetric parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A theoretical proposal of dosimetric approaches to prescribe dose in case of multiple contiguous BM is done. A literature review between 2010 and 2020 was performed on MEDLINE and Cochrane databases according to the PRISMA methodology, with the following keywords dose prescription, radiosurgery, multiple BM. Papers not reporting dosimetric solutions to irradiate multiple BM were excluded. RESULTS: Only one article in the literature reports a practical modality of dose prescription for multiple adjacent BM. Thus, we proposed other five practical solutions to prescribe radiation dose in case of two or more neighboring BM, describing advantages and drawbacks of each method in terms of different dosimetric parameters. The literature review about dosimetric solutions to irradiate multiple BM led to 56 titles; 14 articles met the chosen criteria and we reported their results in terms of dosimetric indexes and low doses to the normal brain tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The six dosimetric approaches here described can be used by physicians for multiple contiguous BM, depending on the clinical situation. These methods may be applied in clinical studies to better evaluate their usefulness in practice.

[From bunker construction to patient treatment: quality controls applied to modern radiotherapy techniques]. / De la construction du bunker à la prise en charge du patient : contrôles qualité des techniques modernes de radiothérapie.

Installation and use of a new radiotherapy device require an adequate quality and safety policy. The process leading to the commissioning of an accelerator following the construction of a bunker includes, among other tasks, the installation of the accelerator, the verification of compliance with the specifications, the signature of the acceptance specification as well as the process of characterization and modeling of the accelerator before its clinical use. The emergence of modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated conformational radiotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy, has resulted in more complex quality controls. The purpose of this article is to explain the different stages of the implementation of innovative radiotherapy techniques and to specify their features.

[Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: A critical review of the literature]. / Chimioradiothérapie des cancers de l'œsophage : revue critique de la littérature.

Locally advanced oesophageal cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for preoperative and definitive strategy. Preoperative chemoradiation improves the locoregional control and overall survival after surgery for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Definitive chemoradiation can also be proposed for non-resectable tumours or medically inoperable patients. Besides, definitive chemoradiation is considered as an alternative option to surgery for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas. Chemotherapy regimen associated to radiotherapy consists of a combination of platinum derived drugs (cisplatinum or oxaliplatin) and 5-fluorouracil or a weekly scheme combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel according to CROSS protocol in a neoadjuvant strategy. Radiation doses vary from 41.4Gy to 45Gy for a preoperative strategy or 50 to 50.4Gy for a definitive treatment. The high risk of lymphatic spread due to anatomical features could justify the use of an elective nodal irradiation when the estimated risk of microscopic involvement is higher than 15% to 20%. An appropriate delineation of the gross tumour volume requires an exhaustive and up-to-date evaluation of the disease. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy represents a promising approach to spare organs-at-risk. This critical review of the literature underlines the roles of radiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancers and describes doses, volumes of treatment, technical aspects and dose constraints to organs-at-risk.

[Quality and safety policy implementation for a new radiotherapy device]. / Mise en place d'une politique de qualité et de sécurité lors de l'installation d'un nouvel équipement dans un service de radiothérapie.

Modern radiotherapy techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arctherapy, image-guided radiotherapy) or stereotactic radiotherapy are in expansion in most French cancer centres. The arrival of such techniques requires updates of existing equipment or implementation of new radiotherapy devices with adapted options. With the arrival of these new devices, there is a need to develop a quality and safety policy. This is necessary to ease the process from the setup to the first treated patient. The quality and safety policy is maintained to ensure the quality assurance of the radiotherapy equipment. We conducted a review of the literature on the quality and safety policy in the French legal framework that can be proposed when implementing a new radiotherapy device.

[Advances in the management of cervical lymphadenopathies of unknown primary with intensity modulated radiotherapy: Doses and target volumes]. / Évolutions dans la prise en charge des métastases ganglionnaires cervicales sans cancer primitif retrouvé : doses et volumes cibles de la radiothérapie avec modulation d'intensité.

The definition of nodal and/or mucosal target volumes for radiation therapy for lymphadenopathies of unknown primary is controversial. Target volumes may include all nodal areas bilaterraly and be pan-mucosal or unilateral, selective, including the sole oropharyngeal mucosa. This review presents current recommendations in light of changes in the TNM classification, Human papillomavirus status and therapeutic advances. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the following keywords: lymphadenopathy; head and neck; unknown primary and radiation therapy. There are no direct comparative studies between unilateral or bilateral nodal irradiation or pan-mucosal and selective mucosal irradiation. Contralateral lymph node failure rates range from 0 to 6% after unilateral nodal irradiation and 0 and 31% after bilateral irradiation. Occurrence of a mucosal primary varies between 0 and 19.2%. Initial clinical presentation and Human papillomavirus status are critical to define mucosal target volumes. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is recommended (rather than three-dimensional irradiation) to avoid toxicities. Systemic treatments have similar indications as for identified primary head and neck cancers. Failures do not appear superior in case of unilateral nodal irradiation but comparative studies are warranted due to major biases hampering direct comparisons. Human papillomavirus status should be incorporated into the therapeutic strategy and practice-changing TNM staging changes will need to be evaluated.

[Lung dose constraints for normo-fractionated radiotherapy and for stereotactic body radiation therapy]. / Doses aux organes à risque en radiothérapie conformationnelle et en radiothérapie stéréotaxique : les poumons.

Radiation-induced lung disease (RILD) is common after radiation therapy and represents cornerstone toxicities after treatment of thoracic malignancies. From a review of literature, the objective of this article was to summarize clinical and non-clinical parameters associated with the risk of RILD in the settings of normo-fractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). For the treatment of lung cancers with a normo-fractionated treatment, the mean lung dose (MLD) should be below 15-20Gy. For a thoracic SBRT, V20Gy<10% and MLD<6Gy are recommended. One should pay attention to central tumors and respect specific dose constraints to the bronchial tree. The recent technological improvements may represent an encouraging way to decrease lung toxicities. Finally, our team developed a calculator in order to predict the risk of radiation pneumonitis.

[Clinical research for rectal carcinoma: State of the art and objectives]. / Acquis et objectifs de la recherche clinique sur le cancer du rectum.

The treatment of rectal carcinoma is based on multidisciplinary strategy and multimodal approaches including gastrointestinal tract specialists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and surgery. The different objectives should be declined according to the characteristics of the tumours. The aim of the therapist would be to select the best strategy offering to the patient to be cured with as less as possible late adverse toxicity. The challenge of the treatment of small tumours is to maintain a functional anal sphincter while minimizing the risk of local recurrence. The standard treatment of locally advanced disease is aiming firstly to cure the patient and secondly to prevent late complications. Each of these clinical presentations of the disease has to be considered as a whole taking into account the new surgical techniques and a personalized approach adapted to the tumour. Nowadays they should be studied with dedicated clinical trials.

[Clinical and paraclinical follow-up after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer]. / Suivi clinique et paraclinique après radiothérapie pour un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

Head and neck cancer management often involves heavy multimodal treatments including radiotherapy. Despite the improvement of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, acute and late toxicities remain important. After such treatment, patients have to face different potential problems, depending on the post-therapeutic delay. In this way, short-term follow-up permits to appreciate the healing of acute toxicities and response to treatment. Long-term follow-up aims to recognize second primitive tumours and distant failure, and to detect and manage late toxicities. Medical and psychosocial supportive cares are essential, even after several years of complete remission. The objective of this article is to review the modalities of short-term and long-term follow-up of patients who receive a radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

[Management of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma with modulated arctherapy and concurrent chemotherapy]. / Place de l'arcthérapie modulée et de la chimiothérapie concomitante dans la prise en charge des cancers du canal anal localement évolués.

The standard treatment of locally advanced (stage II and III) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal consists of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of 5-fluoro-uracil, mitomycin C, on a 28-day cycle), with a dose of 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction in the prophylactic planning target volume and additional 14 to 20 Gy in the boost planning target volume (5 days per week) with a possibility of 15 days gap period between the two sequences. While conformal irradiation may only yield suboptimal tumor coverage using complex photon/electron field junctions (especially on nodal areas), intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques (segmented static, dynamic, volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy) allow better tumour coverage while sparing organs at risk from intermediate/high doses (small intestine, perineum/genitalia, bladder, pelvic bone, etc.). Such dosimetric advantages result in fewer severe acute toxicities and better potential to avoid a prolonged treatment break that increases risk of local failure. These techniques also allow a reduction in late gastrointestinal and skin toxicities of grade 3 or above, as well as better functional conservation of anorectal sphincter. The technical achievements (simulation, contouring, prescription dose, treatment planning, control quality) of volumetric modulated arctherapy are discussed.

[Target volumes in cervical lympadenopathies of unknown primary: toward a selective customized approach? On behalf of REFCOR]. / Volumes cibles en radiothérapie des adénopathies cervicales de primitif inconnu : état des lieux et pistes vers une approche sélective raisonnée sous l'égide du Refcor (Réseau d'expertise français des cancers ORL rares).

The treatment of carcinomas of unknown primary revealed by cervical lymphadenopathy is based on neck dissection and nodal and pan-mucosal irradiation to control the neck and avoid the emergence of a metachronous primary. The aim of this review was to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and criteria that may be used for a customized selective approach to avoid severe toxicities of pan-mucosal irradiation. A literature search was performed with the following keywords: cervical lymphadenopathy, unknown primary, upper aerodigestive tract, cancer, radiotherapy, squamous cell carcinoma, variants. The diagnostic workup includes a head and neck scanner or MRI, ((18)F)-FDG PET CT, a panendoscopy and tonsillectomy. Squamous cell carcinoma represents over two thirds of cases. The number of metastatic cervical nodes, nodal level, and histological variant (associated with HPV/EBV status) may determine the primary site origin and might be weighted for the determination of radiation target volumes on a multidisciplinary basis. A selective customized approach is relevant to decrease radiation toxicity only if neck and mucosal control is not impaired. Although no recommendation can yet be made in the absence of sufficient level of evidence, the relevance of systematic pan-mucosal irradiation appears questionable in a number of clinical situations. Accordingly, a customized selective redefinition of target volumes may be discussed and be prospectively evaluated in relation to the therapeutic index obtained.