Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 36(4): 742-9, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24899212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A drug related problems database (DRP-database) was developed on request by clinical pharmacists. The information from the DRP-database has only been used locally e.g. to identify focus areas and to communicate identified DRPs to the hospital wards. Hence the quality of the data at the national level is unknown, which may compromise national analyses for benchmarking and identification of national focus areas. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use in practice, reliability and reproducibility of the DRPs documented in the Danish drug related problems database. SETTING: Danish hospital pharmacies. METHODS: Practice use of the DRP-database was explored by an electronic questionnaire distributed to hospital pharmacies, and consisted of questions regarding current and previous use of the DRP-database. The reliability was evaluated by comparing the categorization of 24 cases by clinical pharmacists with categorization performed by the project group. Reproducibility was explored by re-categorization of a sample of existing records in the DRP-database by two project group members individually. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Observed proportion of agreement and Fleiss' kappa as measures of inter-rater reliability and reproducibility. RESULTS: The practice use study of 12 hospital pharmacy locations revealed that when implementing the DRP-database, the majority of identified DRPs are documented in the DRP-database, however, some variations throughout the country exist. The interrater reliability study of 34 clinical pharmacists showed high inter-rater reliability with the project group (Fleiss' kappa = 0.79 with 95 % CI (0.70; 0.88)), and the reproducibility study also documented high inter-rater reliability of a sample of 379 records from the DRP-database re-categorized by two project group members (Fleiss' kappa = 0.81 with 95 % CI (0.78; 0.85)). CONCLUSION: The study showed high reliability and reproducibility of the DRP-database, however, some local variation in the use of the DRP-database throughout the country existed affecting the overall quality. These findings indicate that data in the DRP-database may be pooled, and national analyses may be conducted to explore development areas for common interest.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Reconciliação de Medicamentos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Farmacologia Clínica , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Dinamarca , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Seguimentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Recursos Humanos
2.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 36(4): 734-41, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24736894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2010, a database of drug related problems (DRPs) was implemented to assist clinical pharmacy staff in documenting clinical pharmacy activities locally. A study of quality, reliability and generalisability showed that national analyses of the data could be conducted. Analyses at the national level may help identify and prevent DRPs by performing national interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the DRP characteristics as documented by clinical pharmacy staff at hospital pharmacies in the Danish DRP-database during a 3-year period. SETTING: Danish hospital pharmacies. METHOD: Data documented in the DRP-database during the initial 3 years after implementation were analyzed retrospectively. The DRP-database contains DRPs reported at hospitals by clinical pharmacy staff. The analyses focused on DRP categories, implementation rates and drugs associated with the DRPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Characteristics of DRPs. RESULTS: In total, 72,044 DRPs were documented in the DRP-database during the first 3 years of implementation, and the number of documented DRPs increased every year. An overall stable implementation rate of approximately 58 % was identified. The DRPs identified were multi-facetted, however evenly distributed for each of the 3 years. The most frequently identified DRP categories were: "Dose", followed by "Nonadherence to guidelines" and "Supplement to treatment". The highest implementation rates were found for the following DRP categories: "Non-adherence to guidelines" (79 %) followed by "Therapeutic duplication" (73 %) and "Dosing time and interval" (70 %). Even though the top 25 drugs were involved in 58 % of all DRPs, multiple drugs were associated with DRPs. The drugs most frequently involved in DRPs were paracetamol (4.6 % of all DRPs), simvastatin (3.0 %), lansoprazole (2.7 %), morphine (2.6 %) and alendronic acid (2.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The study found that a national database on DRPs contained multi-facetted DRPs, however evenly distributed for each of the 3 years. Even though the top 25 drugs were involved in 58 % of all DRPs, multiple drugs were associated with DRPs. The study emphasizes the importance of detecting and intervening for DRPs.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Reconciliação de Medicamentos , Farmacologia Clínica , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Dinamarca , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Seguimentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recursos Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA