Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Digestion ; 74(2): 69-77, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17135728

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sedation rates may vary among countries, depending on patients' and endoscopists' preferences. The aim of this survey was to investigate the rate of using premedication for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy in endoscopy societies, members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS: We evaluated a multiple-choice questionnaire which was e-mailed to representatives of national endoscopy societies, which are members of the ESGE. The questionnaire had 14 items referring to endoscopy practices in each country and the representatives' endoscopy units. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (34/45). In 47% of the countries, less than 25% of patients undergo routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy with conscious sedation. In 62% of the responders' endoscopy units, patients are not asked their preference for sedation and do not sign a consent form (59%). Common sedatives in use are midazolam (82%), diazepam (38%) or propofol (47%). Monitoring equipment is not available 'in most of the endoscopy units' in 46% (13/28) of the countries. Though they were available in 91% of the national representatives' endoscopy units, they are rarely (21%) used to monitor unsedated routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In about 50% of ESGE-related countries, less than 25% of patients are sedated for routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. Major issues to improve include availability of monitoring equipment and the use of a consent form.


Assuntos
Sedação Consciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Clin Ther ; 15(4): 657-61, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8221815

RESUMO

Fifty-four patients (41 men, 13 women), aged 17 to 78 years (mean +/- SD, 48.13 +/- 13.5 years), with endoscopically confirmed healing of their duodenal ulcer after treatment with sucralfate (2 gm BID for 4 to 8 weeks) were recruited for this study. They were started on a 6-month maintenance treatment with sucralfate 1 gm BID. Endoscopy was done at the end of the 6-month period or whenever there was any evidence of ulcer relapse. Helicobacter pylori antral colonization (CLO test) and antral gastritis were estimated from biopsy samples taken before, and at the end of, the healing treatment, as well as at the end of the maintenance treatment. Cumulative relapse rate after 6 months was 15% (8 of 54). No patient discontinued treatment because of side effects. No influence of sucralfate on H pylori antral colonization or antral gastritis was observed after the healing or maintenance treatment. It is concluded that sucralfate 1 gm BID for 6 months is an effective maintenance treatment for duodenal ulcer, but has no beneficial effect on either H pylori antral colonization or antral gastritis.


Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal/tratamento farmacológico , Gastrite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Sucralfato/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Úlcera Duodenal/microbiologia , Feminino , Gastrite/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Antro Pilórico/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...