Mortality of patients presented with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to the status of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) remain well-established elements of assessing cardiovascular risk scores. However, there is growing evidence that patients presented without known SMuRFs at admission demonstrate worse post-myocardial outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the SMuRF status on short- and long-term mortality rates in patients with first-time ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study covered 182,726 patients admitted between 2003-2020 to the CathLabs, according to data from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Both baseline characteristics and mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month) were examined and stratified by SMuRF status. The predictors of mortality were assessed at selected time points by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The majority of STEMI patients had at least one SMuRF (88.7%), however, mortality rates of SMuRF-less individuals were greater at selected time points of the follow-up (p < 0.001), and persisted at a higher level during each year of the follow-up period compared to the SMuRF group and general population. Furthermore, the SMuRFs status constituted an independent predictor of mortality at the 30-day (OR: 1.345; 95% CI: 1.142-1.585, p < 0.001) and 12-month (OR: 1.174; 95% CI: 1.054-1.308, p < 0.001) follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: SMuRF-less individuals presented with STEMI are at an increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to those with at least one SMuRF. Consequently, further investigations regarding the recognition and treatment of risk factors, irrespective of SMuRF status, are indicated.

Management of myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Expert opinion of the Association of Intensive Cardiac Care and Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Society of Cardiology.

Despite significant advances in interventional cardiology and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) techniques, outcomes for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain suboptimal. This expert consensus aims to provide information on the current management of patients with MI complicated by CS in Poland and to propose solutions, including systemic ones, for all stages of care. The document uses data from the Polish PL-ACS Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes, which includes records of more than 820 000 hospital admissions. We describe the role of medical rescue teams, highlighting the necessity to expand their range of competencies at the level of prehospital care. We emphasize the importance of treating the underlying cause of CS and direct patient transfer to centers capable of performing percutaneous coronary interventions. We present current recommendations of scientific societies on MCS use. We underline the role of the Cardiac Shock Team in the management of patients with MI complicated by CS. Such teams should comprise an interventional cardiologist, a cardiothoracic surgeon, and an intensive care physician. Patients should be transferred to highly specialized CS centers, following the example of so-called Cardiac Shock Care Centers described in some other countries. We propose criteria for the operation of such centers Other important aspects discussed in the document include the role of rehabilitation, multidisciplinary care, and long-term follow-up of treatment outcomes. The document was developed in cooperation with experts from different scientific societies in Poland, which illustrates the importance of interdisciplinary care in this patient population.

Stepwise relationship between delay in percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend coronary catheterization in patients with non-ST- -segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) within 24 hours of hospital admission. However, whether there is a stepwise relationship between the time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and long-term mortality in patients with NSTEMI treated invasively within 24 hours of admission has not been established yet. AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the association between door-to-PCI time and all-cause mortality at 12 and 36 months in NSTEMI patients presenting directly to a PCI-capable center who underwent PCI within the first 24 hours of hospitalization. METHODS: We analyzed data of patients hospitalized for NSTEMI between 2007-2019, included in the nationwide registry of acute coronary syndromes. Patients were stratified into twelve groups based on 2-hour intervals of door-to-PCI time. The mortality rates of patients within those groups were adjusted for 33 confounding variables by the propensity score weighting method using overlap weights. RESULTS: A total of 37 589 patients were included in the study. The median age of included patients was 66.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 59.0-75.8) years; 66.7% were male, and the median GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score was 115 (98-133). There were increased 12-month and 36-month mortality rates in consecutive groups of patients stratified by 2-hour door-to-PCI time intervals. After adjustment for patient characteristics, there was a significant positive correlation between the time to PCI and the mortality rates (rs = 0.61; P = 0.04 and rs = 0.65; P = 0.02 for 12-month and 36-month mortality, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The longer the door-to-PCI time, the higher were 12-month and 36-month all-cause mortality rates in NSTEMI patients.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Do we have to perform coronary angiography?

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of global mortality, while survivors are burdened with long-term neurological and cardiovascular complications. OHCA management at the hospital level remains challenging, due to heterogeneity of OHCA presentation, the critical status of OHCA patients reaching the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the demands of post ROSC treatment. The validity and optimal timing for coronary angiography is one important, yet not fully defined, component of OHCA management. Guidelines state clear recommendations for coronary angiography in OHCA patients with shockable rhythms, cardiogenic shock, or in patients with ST-segment elevation observed in electrocardiography after ROSC. However, there is no established consensus on the angiographic management in other clinical settings. While coronary angiography may accelerate the diagnostic and therapeutic process (provided OHCA was a consequence of coronary artery disease), it might come at the cost of impaired post-resuscitation care quality due to postponing of intensive care management. The aim of the current statement paper is to discuss clinical strategies for the management of OHCA including the stratification to invasive procedures and the rationale behind the risk-benefit ratio of coronary angiography, especially with patients in critical condition.

Dyslipidemia treatment and attainment of LDL-cholesterol treatment goals in patients participating in the Managed Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors program.

BACKGROUND: Patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Therefore, appropriate management of dyslipidemia with adequate lipid-lowering therapy is crucial for preventing subsequent CV events in these patients. AIMS: Our analysis aimed to assess the treatment of dyslipidemia and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals in patients after AMI who participated in the Managed Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors (MACAMIS) program. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with AMI who agreed to participate and completed the 12-month MACAMIS program at one of three tertiary referral cardiovascular centers in Poland between October 2017 and January 2021. RESULTS: 1499 patients after AMI were enrolled in the study. High-intensity statin therapy was prescribed for 85.5% of analyzed patients on hospital discharge. Combined therapy with high-intensity statin and ezetimibe increased from 2.1% on hospital discharge to 18.2% after 12 months. In the whole study cohort, 20.4% of patients achieved the LDL-C target of < 55 mg/dl ( < 1.4 mmol/l), and 26.9% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in LDL-C level one year after AMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that participation in the managed care program might be associated with improved quality of dyslipidemia management in AMI patients. Nonetheless, only one-fifth of patients who completed the program achieved the treatment goal for LDL-C. This highlights the constant need for optimizing lipid-lowering therapy to meet treatment targets and reduce CV risk in patients after AMI.

The influence of severe mitral regurgitation on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after myocardial infarction in 1-year follow-up: Data from PL-ACS registry.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently observed in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, the incidence of severe MR in contemporary population is unknown. AIMS: The study evaluates the prevalence and prognostic impact of severe MR in contemporary population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: The study group consists of 8062 patients enrolled in the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes over the years 2017‒2019. Only the patients with full echocardiography performed during the index hospitalization were eligible. Primary composite outcome was 12-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (death, non-fatal MI, stroke and heart failure [HF] hospitalization) compared between patients with and without severe MR. RESULTS: 5561 NSTEMI patients and 2501 STEMI patients were enrolled into the study. Severe MR occurred in 66 (1.19%) NSTEMI patients and 30 (1.19%) STEMI patients. Multivariable regression models revealed that severe MR is an independent risk factor of all-cause death in 12-month observation (odds ratio [OR], 1.839; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.012‒3.343; P = 0.046) in all MI patients. Patients with NSTEMI and severe MR had higher mortality (22.7% vs. 7.1%), HF rehospitalization rate (39.4% vs. 12.9%) and MACCE occurrence (54.5% vs. 29.3%). Severe MR was associated with higher mortality (20% vs. 6%) and higher HF rehospitalization (30% vs. 9.8%), stroke (10% vs. 0.8%) and MACCE rates (50% vs. 23.1%) in STEMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Severe MR is associated with higher mortality and MACCE occurrence in patients with MI in 12-month follow-up. Severe MR is an independent risk factor of all-cause death.

Role of catheter-directed therapies in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Expert opinion of the Polish PERT Initiative, Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation, Association of Cardiovascular Interventions, and Association of Intensive Cardiac Care of the Polish Cardiac Society.

Thanks to advances in interventional cardiology technologies, catheter-directed treatment has become recently a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism at high risk of early mortality. Current transcatheter techniques allow for local fibrinolysis or embolectomy with minimal risk of complications. Therefore, these procedures can be considered in high-risk patients as an alternative to surgical pulmonary embolectomy when systemic thrombolysis is contraindicated or ineffective. They are also considered in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism who do not improve or deteriorate clinically despite anticoagulation. The purpose of this article is to present the role of transcatheter techniques in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. We describe current knowledge and expert opinions in this field. Interventional treatment is described in the broader context of patient care organization and therapeutic modalities. We present the organization and responsibilities of pulmonary embolism response team, role of pre-procedural imaging, periprocedural anticoagulation, patient selection, timing of intervention, and intensive care support. Currently available catheter-directed therapies are discussed in detail including standardized protocols and definitions of procedural success and failure. This expert opinion has been developed in collaboration with experts from various Polish scientific societies, which highlights the role of teamwork in caring for patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

COVID-19 Related Myocarditis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Despite the progress of its management, COVID-19 maintains an ominous condition which constitutes a threat, especially for the susceptible population. The cardiac injury occurs in approximately 30% of COVID-19 infections and is associated with a worse prognosis. The clinical presentation of cardiac involvement can be COVID-19-related myocarditis. Our review aims to summarise current evidence about that complication. The research was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022338397). We performed a systematic analysis using five different databases, including i.a. MEDLINE. Further, the backward snowballing technique was applied to identify additional papers. Inclusion criteria were: full-text articles in English presenting cases of COVID-19-related myocarditis diagnosed by the ESC criteria and patients over 18 years old. The myocarditis had to occur after the COVID-19 infection, not vaccination. Initially, 1588 papers were screened from the database search, and 1037 papers were revealed in the backward snowballing process. Eventually, 59 articles were included. Data about patients' sex, age, ethnicity, COVID-19 confirmation technique and vaccination status, reported symptoms, physical condition, laboratory and radiological findings, applied treatment and patient outcome were investigated and summarised. COVID-19-related myocarditis is associated with the risk of sudden worsening of patients' clinical status, thus, knowledge about its clinical presentation is essential for healthcare workers.

Does the presence of physician-staffed emergency medical services improve the prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Substantial differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been observed between countries. These might be attributed to the organization of emergency medical service (EMS) systems, including prehospital physician involvement. However, limited data exist on the physician's role in improving survival after OHCA. AIMS: To compare prehospital and in-hospital outcomes of OHCA patients attended by physician-staffed EMS vs. paramedic-staffed EMS units. METHODS: Among all patients enrolled in the regional, prospective registry of OHCA in southern Poland, we excluded those aged <18 years, with unwitnessed or EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest, without attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), attended by more than one EMS, or with traumatic cardiac arrest. The groups were matched 1:1 using propensity scores for baseline characteristic variables that might influence physician-staffed EMS dispatch. RESULTS: A total of 812 OHCA cases were included in the current analysis. Among them, 351 patients were attended by physician-staffed EMS. There were no differences in baseline characteristics in the propensity-score matched cohort consisting of 351 pairs. The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was more often achieved in the physician-staffed EMS group (42.7% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.01). The prehospital survival rate was also higher in this group (34.1% vs. 19.2%; P <0.01). However, there were no significant differences in survival rate to discharge between cases treated by physician-staffed and paramedic-staffed EMS (9.7% vs. 7.0%; P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients attended by physician-staffed EMS were more likely to have ROSC and survive till hospital admission. However, better prehospital outcomes might not translate into improved in-hospital prognosis in these patients.

In-Hospital and One-Year Outcomes of Patients after Early and Late Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction-Data from a Nationwide Database.

The prognostic role of early (less than 48 h) resuscitated cardiac arrest (ErCA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still controversial. The present study aimed to analyse the short-term and one-year outcomes of patients after ErCA and late resuscitated cardiac arrest (LrCA) compared to patients without cardiac arrest (CA) complicating AMI. Data from the prospective nationwide Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS) were used to assess patients with resuscitated cardiac arrest (rCA) after AMI. Baseline clinical characteristics and the predictors of all-cause death were assessed. The all-cause mortality rate, complications, performed procedures, and re-hospitalisations were assessed for the in-hospital period, 30 days after discharge, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Among 167,621 cases of AMI, CA occurred in 3564 (2.1%) patients, that is, 3100 (87%) and 464 (13%) patients with ErCA and LrCA, respectively. The mortality rates in the ErCA vs. LrCA and CA vs. non-CA groups were as follows: in-hospital: 32.1% vs. 59.1% (p < 0.0001) and 35.6% vs. 6.0% (p < 0.0001); 30-day: 2.2% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.42) and 9.9% vs. 5.2% (p < 0.0001); 6-month: 9.2% vs. 17.9% (p = 0.0001) and 12.3% vs. 21.1% (p < 0.0001); and 12-month: 12.3% vs. 21.1% (p = 0.001) and 13% vs. 7.7% (p < 0.0001), respectively. ErCA (hazard ratio (HR): 1.54, confidence interval (CI):1.28-1.89; p < 0.0001) and LrCA (HR: 2.34, CI: 1.39-3.93; p = 0.001) increased the risk of 12-month mortality. During the 12-month follow-up, patients after LrCA more frequently required hospitalisation due to heart failure compared to patients after ErCA. ErCA was related to a higher hospitalisation rate due to coronary-related causes and a higher rate of percutaneous coronary intervention. An episode of LrCA was associated with higher in-hospital and long-term mortality compared to ErCA. ErCA and LrCA were independent risk factors for one-year mortality.

Mechanical circulatory support. An expert opinion of the Association of Intensive Cardiac Care and the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) methods are used in patients with both acute and chronic heart failure, who have exhausted other options for pharmacological or surgical treatments. The purpose of their use is to support, partially or completely, the failed ventricles and ensure adequate organ perfusion, which allows patients to restore full cardiovascular capacity, prolonging their life and effectively improving its quality. The three most popular devices include an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous assist devices (including Impella, TandemHeart), and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). A multidisciplinary approach with the special participation of the Heart Team is required to determine the proper MCS strategy, the choice of the supporting method, and the time of its use. The studies published so far do not allow us to determine which MCS method is the safest and the most effective. Thus, the site experience and accessibility of the method seem to matter most today. MCS finds particular application in patients with acute coronary syndromes complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock, as well as in patients with acute heart failure of the high potential for reversibility. It can also serve as a backup for percutaneous coronary interventions of high risk (complex and high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], complex and high-risk indicated PCI [CHIP]). The use of appropriate supportive drugs, precise hemodynamic and echocardiographic monitoring, as well as optimal non-invasive or mechanical ventilation, are extremely important in the management of a patient with MCS. The most serious complications of MCS include bleeding, thromboembolic events, as well as infections, and hemolysis.

Changes in the diagnosis and non-invasive treatment of chronic coronary syndromes in the last three European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

One of the most common forms of ischemic heart disease is chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), formerly known as stable coronary artery disease. During the last 15 years, the European Society of Cardiology has modified the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of CCS three times. The aim of this study was to analyze the changes in non-invasive diagnostics and pharmacotherapy of CCS that occurred in the last three guidelines. In non-invasive diagnostics, the most important change was reduction of the role of the electrocardiographic exercise test in favor of non-invasive stress imaging tests and computed tomography angiography. In pharmacotherapy, the role of ß-blockers and calcium channel blockers has increased in controlling heart rate and symptoms. Intensive hypolipemic treatment for prevention of cardiovascular events and treatment with low doses of novel oral anticoagulants for those at high risk of cardiovascular events with sinus rhythm are among the recommendations.

Risk-factors associated with extremely high cardiovascular risk of mid- and long-term mortality following myocardial infarction: Analysis of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk-factor identification and risk stratification are prerequisites to the effective primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients at the highest risk benefit the most from the intensive risk-factor reduction. However, the high-risk patients' group is heterogeneous, and it is increasingly recognised that there is an 'extreme-risk' category of patients who may require particularly close attention and intensive therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of patients at the highest risk of death following myocardial infarction (MI) that might be considered as those at extremely high CVD risk. METHODS: We used data from 19,582 participants of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry (NCT03065543) of patients with ischaemic heart disease in Poland from 2006 to present. Characteristics of 13,052 patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) were compared with those of 4295 patients with myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise backward elimination was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality in the 12-36 months following the index hospitalisation. RESULTS: The mortality rates were significantly higher in patients after MI than in patients with CCS. In the multivariable analysis, the risk factors most strongly associated with 12-month mortality in patients after MI were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% (hazard ratio [HR] 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.14-4.67), age >75 years (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.55-2.35), multivessel coronary artery disease (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.30-1.99), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.21-1.94) diabetes mellitus (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.11-1.64) and increased LDL-C (HR per 1 mmol/l 1.09, 95%CI 1.01-1.19) or creatinine levels (HR per 10 µmol/L 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.05). The risk factors that influenced mortality after 24-36 months were consistent with those after 12 months, with additional low haemoglobin (20-25% risk increase per 1 mmol reduction) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (65% risk increase after 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: In our large, single-center real-world analysis, we identified the patients with the highest risk of death who could probably benefit the most from the most intensive therapy, and hence should be considered to be an 'extreme risk' population.

Multivessel Intervention in Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial Outcomes in the PL-ACS Registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was a comparison of culprit-lesion-only (CL-PCI) with the multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in terms of 30-day and 12-month mortality in a national registry. METHODS: Patients from the PL-ACS registry with MI and CS were analyzed. Patients meeting the criteria of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were divided into two groups: CL-PCI and MV-PCI groups. RESULTS: Of the 3265 patients in the PL-ACS registry with MI complicated by CS, the criteria of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were met by 2084 patients (63.8%). The CL-PCI was performed in 883 patients, and MV-PCI was performed in 1045 patients. After the propensity score matching analysis, 617 well-matched pairs were obtained. In a 30-day follow-up, death from any cause occurred in 49.3% in the CL-PCI group and 57.0% in the MV-PCI group (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, p = 0.0081). After 12 months, the rate of mortality was 62.5% in the CL-PCI group and 68.0% in the MV-PCI group (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.01, p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the validity of CULPRIT-SHOCK findings in a national registry and current guideline-recommended strategy of revascularization limited to the infarct-related artery.

Comparison of clinical characteristics, in-hospital course, and 12-month prognosis in women and men with chronic coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of men and women with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remains ambiguous. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and 12­month prognosis of women and men with CCS included in the prospective single­center registry. METHODS: The study was based on the Prospective Registry of Stable Angina Management and Treatment (PRESAGE) including 11 021 patients with CCS hospitalized between 2006 and 2016 and subjected to coronary angiography. The composite endpoint included all­cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome with revascularization, unstable coronary artery disease, or stroke. RESULTS: Women were older than men (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [9] vs 63.5 [9.6] years; P <0.001). Arterial hypertension (85.8% vs 79%; P <0.001) and type 2 diabetes (38.2% vs 33.7%; P <0.001) were more often diagnosed in women compared with men. Multivessel disease or left main disease were more frequent in men. Percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting were more often performed in men than in women (47.1% vs 36%, P <0.001 and 10.6% vs 6.1%, P <0.001, respectively). At 12­month follow­up, the composite endpoint was more frequently reached in men (7.4% vs 10.2%; P <0.001), including death (3.3% vs 4.5%; P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, sex was not an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.31, P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Women and men with CCS differ in terms of the incidence of risk factors and revascularization treatments received. In men, a higher frequency of death and the composite endpoint was noted at 12­month follow­up. However, sex was not an independent predictor of patient outcomes at 12 months.

Epidemiology, management, and survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Upper Silesia, Poland: an Utstein-style report.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the growing number of studies on the epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Poland, this issue has not been sufficiently studied. Notably, there has been a lack of uniform Utstein-style data reporting. AIM: To evaluate the epidemiology of OHCA, patient characteristics, the laypeople and emergency medical service (EMS) response to cardiac arrest, and outcomes of OHCA patients, based on a prospective registry encompassing a population of 2.7 million Poles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive, adult, EMS-treated OHCA cases in 2018 were analyzed. Prehospital data were collected using case report forms by EMS. Information on in-hospital procedures and outcomes was based on data from the public payer of health care services. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to find independent predictors of survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 1392 patients were included. Most OHCA occurred at home (74.7%). In 66.8% of OHCA cases, the cardiac arrest was witnessed by bystanders and in another 20.4% by EMS. Laypeople performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in 54.4% of non-EMS-witnessed events, and an automated external defibrillator (AED) was used in 4.6% of patients who received bystander CPR. Finally, 30.7% of all patients were transported to the hospital, and 9.2% survived to hospital discharge. Epinephrine administration, unwitnessed OHCA, longer response time, older age, and initial non-shockable rhythm were independently associated with lower survival to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of OHCA patients in Poland is poor. There is still room for improvement in increasing the prevalence of bystander CPR and AED use before EMS arrival.

Practical aspects of endomyocardial left ventricular biopsy - own experience.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (LV-EMB) is the only procedure that allows a direct assessment of the left ventricular myocardium, thus enabling the diagnosis of myocarditis or other myocardial diseases. AIM: To describe the characteristics of a population that underwent LV-EMB, as well as to address the periprocedural and technical aspects of the LV-EMB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since its initiation in our center in 2016, a total of 43 patients have undergone LV-EMB. In the manuscript, the indications for LV-EMB and the detailed technical aspects of its safe performance, including the equipment used, are described. A large part of the text is also devoted to the possible complications of LV-EMB. RESULTS: The results of the initial population that underwent LV-EMB in our center are presented. The patients who were qualified for LV-EMB were predominantly male (85.7%), with a mean age of 38.8 years. Of those, 38 (88.3%) had acute heart failure. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 19.6%. The primary indications for LV-EMB were unexplained heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% and (1) hemodynamic abnormalities or electrical instability of the heart and/or (2) recent worsening of heart failure (NYHA class II, III, or IV) with no response to standard therapy for 2 weeks. The mean fluoroscopy time was 5.4 min, and the mean radiation dose was 87 mGy. No periprocedural complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis indicate that LV-EMB can be performed safely by skilled physicians in an experienced center.

Long-term outcomes of 11 021 patients with chronic coronary syndromes and after coronary angiography: the PRESAGE registry.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of real­world registries concerning patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the long­term outcomes of patients with CCS and after coronary angiography performed in accordance with the treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis involved 11 021 patients treated in a single center between 2006 and 2016 who were enrolled into the ongoing PRESAGE registry. Based on the results of coronary angiography and the treatment strategy adopted, patients were classified into 4 groups: with nonsignificant lesions (n = 3637), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 4678), undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 997), and receiving conservative treatment (notwithstanding significant lesions on an angiogram; n = 1709). All­cause death, assessed in every study group at 1-, 3-, and 5­year follow­up, was regarded as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 64.6 (9.5) years, and women constituted 35% of the cohort. Patients treated conservatively were the oldest (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.3] years) in the group and showed the highest prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (50.5%), CABG (31.8%), diabetes (40.3%), chronic total occlusion (65.5%), and left ventricular ejection fraction below 35% (24.4%). Death from any cause in patients with nonsignificant lesions, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, undergoing CABG, and receiving conservative treatment occurred 5 years following the index hospitalization in 11.2%, 16.2%, 9.7%, and 21% of those patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PRESAGE registry provides valuable information about the clinical characteristics and long­term outcomes of patients with CCS. The population of CCS patients is heterogeneous, and long­term prognosis is also varied. The poorest characteristics and outcomes were reported in patients with significant lesions and ineligible for revascularization procedures.

The Silesian Registry of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Study design and results of a three-month pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of the concept known as "Chain of Survival" has significantly increased survival rates in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), short-term mortality in this group of patients is still very high. Epidemiological data on OHCA in Poland are limited. The aim of this study was to create a prospective registry on OHCA covering a population of 2.7 million inhabitants of Upper Silesia in Poland. Presented herein is the study design and results of a 3-month pilot study. METHODS: The Silesian Registry of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (SIL-OHCA) is a prospective, population-based registry of OHCA, of minimum duration which was planned for 12 months; from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2018. The first 3 months of the study constituted the pilot phase. The inclusion criterion is the occurrence of OHCA in the course of activity of the Voivodeship Rescue Service in Katowice, Poland. RESULTS: During the 3-month pilot phase of the study there were 390 cases of OHCA in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation was undertaken. Estimated frequency of OHCA in the population analyzed was 57 per 100,000 population per year. Shockable rhythm was present in 25.8% of cases. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 35.1% of the whole cohort. 28.7% of patients were admitted to the hospital, including 2.8% of patients, who were admitted during an ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital survival of patients with OHCA in Poland is still unsatisfactory. It is believed that data collected in SIL-OHCA registry will allow identification factors, which require improvement in order to reduce short- and long-term mortality of patients with OHCA.