Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictive Factors for Mortality and Length of Hospital Stay after Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are widely accepted indices positively correlated with disease severity, progression, and mortality. In this study, we tested whether NLR and PLR could predict mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS) after cardiac surgery. METHODS: NLR and PLR were calculated on days 0, 3, 5, and 7 postoperatively. A ROC curve was generated to assess their prognostic value; multivariate logistic analysis identified independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 179 patients' data, 11 of whom (6.15%) died within 90 days. The discriminatory performance for predicting 90-day mortality was better for NLR7 (AUC = 0.925, 95% CI:0.865-0.984) with the optimal cut-off point being 7.10. NLR5 and PLR3 also exhibited a significant strong discriminative performance. Similarly, a significant discriminative performance was prominent for PLR3, NLR5, and NLR7 with respect to LOS. Moreover, NLR7 (OR: 2.143, 95% CI: 1.076-4.267, p = 0.030) and ICU LOS (OR:1.361, 95% CI: 1.045-1.774, p = 0.022) were significant independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR are efficient predictive factors for 90-day mortality and LOS in cardiac surgery patients. Owing to the simplicity of determining NLR and PLR, their postoperative monitoring may offer a reliable predictor of patients' outcomes in terms of LOS and mortality.

Volumetric Tissue Imaging of Surgical Tissue Specimens Using Micro-Computed Tomography: An Emerging Digital Pathology Modality for Nondestructive, Slide-Free Microscopy-Clinical Applications of Digital Pathology in 3 Dimensions.

OBJECTIVES: Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is a novel, nondestructive, slide-free digital imaging modality that enables the acquisition of high-resolution, volumetric images of intact surgical tissue specimens. The aim of this systematic mapping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on clinical applications of micro-CT tissue imaging and to assess its relevance and readiness for pathology practice. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. To gain insight into regulatory and financial considerations for performing and examining micro-CT imaging procedures in a clinical setting, additional searches were performed in medical device databases. RESULTS: Our search identified 141 scientific articles published between 2000 and 2021 that described clinical applications of micro-CT tissue imaging. The number of relevant publications is progressively increasing, with the specialties of pulmonology, cardiology, otolaryngology, and oncology being most commonly concerned. The included studies were mostly performed in pathology departments. Current micro-CT devices have already been cleared for clinical use, and a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code exists for reimbursement of micro-CT imaging procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-CT tissue imaging enables accurate volumetric measurements and evaluations of entire surgical specimens at microscopic resolution across a wide range of clinical applications.

Dirofilariasis pulmonar: un reto diagnóstico en la práctica clínica / Pulmonary dirofilariasis: A diagnostic pitfall in clinical practice

No disponible

A model of ex vivo perfusion of porcine donor lungs injured by gastric aspiration: a step towards pretransplant reconditioning.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of aspiration remains a major reason for declining donor lungs contributing to current organ shortage. The aim of the present ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) study was to compare lungs injured by gastric juice (GJ) with normal lungs. METHODS: Pigs (32.3 ± 11.2 kg) were divided into two groups. Study group [GJ; n = 6] was intratracheally instilled with GJ, while sham bronchoscopy was performed in control group [C; n = 6]. Graft function was assessed during EVLP for 2 h. Oxygenation, aerodynamic, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded every 30 min. Wet to dry weight ratio (W/D) was calculated. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. Tissue samples were collected. RESULTS: Pulmonary vascular resistance was higher and pulmonary flow was lower in [GJ] versus [C] at T120; (P < 0.05). Mean airway pressure was higher in (P < 0.05) and compliance was lower (P < 0.001) in [GJ]. No differences in oxygenation were seen between groups. W/D of left lung in [GJ] after EVLP was slightly (P < 0.05) higher compared with the nonperfused right lung. More neutrophils were present in [GJ] before (P < 0.01) and after EVLP (P < 0.05). Histologic alterations were more prominent in [GJ], but did not worsen after EVLP. CONCLUSION: EVLP of injured lungs is possible for 2 h despite increased edema. This model could help to investigate ways to repair caustic lung injury during EVLP.

Single-lung transplantation: does side matter?

OBJECTIVE: Single-lung transplantation (SLTx) is a valid treatment option for patients with non-suppurative end-stage pulmonary disease. This strategy helps to overcome current organ shortage. Side is usually chosen based on pre-transplant quantitative perfusion scan, unless specific recipient considerations or contralateral lung offer dictates opposite side. It remains largely unknown whether outcome differs between left (L) versus right (R) SLTx. METHODS: Between July 1991 and July 2009, 142 first SLTx (M/F=87/55; age=59 (29-69) years) were performed from 142 deceased donors (M/F=81/61; age=40 (14-66) years) with a median follow-up of 32 (0-202) months. Indications for SLTx were emphysema (55.6%), pulmonary fibrosis (36.6%), primary pulmonary hypertension (0.7%), and others (7.0%). Recipients of L-SLTx (n=72) and R-SLTx (n=70) were compared for donor and recipient characteristics and for early and late outcome. RESULTS: Donors of L-SLTx were younger (37 (14-65) vs 43 (16-66) years; p=0.033). R-SLTx recipients had more often emphysema (67.1% vs 44.4%; p=0.046) and replacement of native lung with ≥ 50% perfusion (47.1% vs 23.6%; p=0.003). The need for bypass, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78.4%, 60.5%, and 49.4%, respectively, with a median survival of 60 months, with no significant differences between sides. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) improved (p<0.01) in both groups to comparable values up to 36 months. Complications overall (44.4% vs 50.0%) or in allograft (25.0% vs 24.3.0%) as well as time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (35 months) and 5-year freedom from BOS (68.9% vs 75.0%) were comparable after L-SLTx versus R-SLTx, respectively. There were no differences in all causes of death (p=0.766). On multivariate analysis, BOS was a strong negative predictor for survival (hazard ratio (HR) 6.78; p<0.001), whereas side and mismatch for perfusion were not. CONCLUSION: The preferred side for SLTx differed between fibrotic versus emphysema recipients. Transplant side does not influence recipient survival, freedom from BOS, complications, or pulmonary function after SLTx. Besides surgical considerations in the recipient, offer of a donor lung opposite to the preferred side should not be a reason to postpone the transplantation until a better-matched donor is found.