Low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall survival benefit in advanced NSCLC patients with low PD-L1 expression and receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Although combination therapy including chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a higher incidence of adverse events and treatment discontinuation. Since programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) could not serve as a predictive biomarker, we investigated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictive biomarker. In our previous research, we demonstrated that a low NLR could predict survival benefits when patients with high PD-L1 expression (> 50%) received chemoimmunotherapy as opposed to immunotherapy alone. In this current study, our objective is to evaluate this predictive capacity in patients with low PD-L1 expression (< 50%). A total of 142 patients were enrolled, 28 receiving combination therapy and 114 receiving chemotherapy alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Patients who received combination therapy had significantly better PFS and OS than those who received monotherapy. In the subgroup of patients with low NLR, those who received combination therapy exhibited extended PFS and OS with clinical significance, which was also confirmed by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Our study demonstrates the potential use of NLR as a biomarker for predicting survival benefits when receiving combination therapy with chemotherapy and ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC and low PD-L1 expression.

Navigating the challenges of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in lung cancer treatment: a propensity score study.

Background: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) can negatively impact cancer patients' survival. It remains uncertain whether IPA's impact on patient outcomes varies by treatment approach in advanced lung cancer. Objectives: To explore the association between IPA and outcomes in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving different treatments. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: We enrolled patients with advanced-stage lung cancer between 2013 and 2021 at a college hospital in Taiwan and used the 2021 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium consensus for IPA diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the IPA risk factors. We compared overall survival (OS) and postgalactomannan (GM) test survival between the IPA and control groups using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier method with propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Among 2543 patients with advanced-stage lung cancer, 290 underwent a GM test, of which 34 (11.7%) were diagnosed with IPA. Patients undergoing chemotherapy (HR = 4.02, p = 0.027) and immunotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.41, p = 0.076] tended to have IPA. Compared to the control group, the IPA group had shorter median OS (14.4 versus 9.9 months, p = 0.030) and post-GM test survival (4.5 versus 1.9 months, p = 0.003). IPA was associated with shorter OS (log-rank p = 0.014 and 0.018 before and after PSM, respectively) and shorter 1-year and 2-year survival post-GM test (HR = 1.65 and 1.66, respectively). Patients receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy had a shorter post-GM test survival if they had IPA. Conclusions: IPA tended to be diagnosed more frequently in patients receiving chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Patients diagnosed with IPA are associated with shorter survival. Larger cohort studies are needed to verify the observations.

Chemotherapy outcomes in EGFR-TKI resistant patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutation: An exploratory retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Some prospective studies have shown that second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide better control in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, studies comparing second-line chemotherapy efficacy between NSCLC patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations remain rare. This retrospective study compared treatment outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced-stage NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKIs in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed between January 2010 and August 2022. Patients with a negative T790M test at disease progression who received second-line chemotherapy were enrolled. We compared progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival between advanced NSCLC patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. RESULTS: In total, 209 (54.8%) patients had a negative T790M mutation test and received second-line chemotherapy, of which 192 (91.8%) had a common EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution), and 17 (8.2%) had an uncommon EGFR mutation. Patients with common EGFR mutations had significantly longer PFS than those with uncommon EGFR mutations (4.57 vs. 2.57 months, p = 0.031). A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis controlling for potential confounding factors indicated that an uncommon EGFR mutation was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with uncommon EGFR mutations have poorer chemotherapy responses and shorter survival than those with common EGFR mutations. The development of new treatment strategies for these patients remains an unmet need.

Cigarette smoke increases susceptibility of alveolar macrophages to SARS-CoV-2 infection through inducing reactive oxygen species-upregulated angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression.

Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the drivers of pulmonary cytokine storm in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This study aimed to investigate clinical-regulatory factors for the entrance protein of SARS-CoV-2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in AMs. Human AMs were collected from 56 patients using bronchoalveolar lavage. ACE2 expression in AMs was positively correlated with smoking pack-year (Spearman's r = 0.347, P = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, current smoking was associated with increased ACE2 in AMs (ß-coefficient: 0.791, 95% CI 0.019-1.562, P = 0.045). In vitro study, ex-vivo human AMs with higher ACE2 were more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (CoV-2 PsV). Treating human AMs using cigarette smoking extract (CSE) increases the ACE2 and susceptibility to CoV-2 PsV. CSE did not significantly increase the ACE2 in AMs of reactive oxygen species (ROS) deficient Cybb-/- mice; however, exogenous ROS increased the ACE2 in Cybb-/- AMs. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) decreases ACE2 by suppressing intracellular ROS in human AMs. In conclusion, cigarette smoking increases the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 by increasing ROS-induced ACE2 expression of AMs. Further investigation into the preventive effect of NAC on the pulmonary complications of COVID-19 is required.

Effect of BIM expression on the prognostic value of PD-L1 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

The role of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) efficacy remains controversial. Recent studies have highlighted that tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling can be modulated by STAT3, AKT, MET oncogenic pathway, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, or BIM expression. This study aimed to investigate whether these underlying mechanisms affect the prognostic role of PD-L1. We retrospectively enrolled patients with EGFR mutant advanced stage NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKI between January 2017 and June 2019, the treatment efficacy of EGFR-TKI was assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) revealed that patients with high BIM expression had shorter PFS, regardless of PD-L1 expression. This result was also supported by the COX proportional hazard regression analysis. In vitro, we further proved that the knockdown of BIM, instead of PDL1, induced more cell apoptosis following gefitinib treatment. Our data suggest that among the pathways affecting tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling, BIM is potentially the underlying mechanism that affects the role of PD-L1 expression in predicting response to EGFR TKI and mediates cell apoptosis under treatment with gefitinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Further prospective studies are required to validate these results.

Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Combination Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NSCLC with High PD-L1 Expression and Low Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. However, studies comparing ICIs monotherapy with combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy in programmed death-ligand 1 high expressors remain limited. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the treatment efficacy of the therapies by studying 47 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC who received ICI monotherapy (n = 28) or combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy (n = 19). Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. It was observed that patients who received combination therapy had a better PFS than monotherapy, but no such significant benefit was observed in OS. The difference in PFS was higher in the subgroup of patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) than in the high-NLR patient subgroup. This study suggests that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy could provide a significant benefit in PFS, especially in patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with low NLR. Furthermore, our study also demonstrates the potential use of NLR as a biomarker for prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving combination therapy.

The impact of driver mutation on the treatment outcome of early-stage lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy have improved the major pathological response (MPR) in patients with early-stage operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess whether the presence of targetable driver mutations affects the efficacy of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We enrolled patients with early-stage operable NSCLC who received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2020. Neoadjuvant therapy was delivered with platinum-doublet chemotherapy; moreover, pembrolizumab was added at the attending physician's discretion based on patient's request. Pathological responses were assessed; moreover, disease-free survival was estimated. Next-generation sequencing was performed in case sufficient preoperative biopsy specimens were obtained. We included 23 patients; among them, 11 received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy while 12 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The MPR and pathological complete response rates were 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively, in patients who received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These rates were significantly higher than those in patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients in the combination group experienced disease recurrence during the follow-up period even though two of them showed an MPR. These three patients had targetable driver mutations, including an EGFR exon 20 insertion, EGFR exon 21 L858R substitution, and MET exon 14 skipping. Only one patient who remained disease-free had a targetable driver mutation. Among patients with early-stage operable NSCLC requiring neoadjuvant therapy, comprehensive genomic profiling is crucial before the administration of the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Survival benefit of osimertinib combination therapy in patients with T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to osimertinib treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Osimertinib is the main treatment choice for pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations. However, the choice of subsequent therapy when progressive disease has developed after osimertinib treatment remains a major therapeutic challenge. This study evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib-based combination therapies in patients who developed progressive disease after treatment with osimertinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled NSCLC patients harbouring T790M mutations pretreated with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and were receiving osimertinib at two tertiary referral centres between August 2015 and July 2019, and the subsequent treatment efficacy was assessed. RESULTS: Osimertinib-based combination therapy yielded better overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy alone (not achieved vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 % confidence interval 0.17-0.89; P = 0.025) according to the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for possible confounders. Synergism (combination index <1) between AZD9291 and chemotherapy and a higher proportion of apoptosis cells in combination treatment were also demonstrated in the T790M-positive PC9 cell line with acquired resistance to AZD9291. CONCLUSION: Our data supported the hypothesis that osimertinib-based combination therapy is associated with improved OS among patients with clinical progression following the use of osimertinib. These findings warrant further validation in a randomised controlled study.

EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab versus EGFR-TKI monotherapy for patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer-A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent study showed that the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab had better disease control than erlotinib monotherapy in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is lack of real-world evidence for this therapeutic regimen. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and bevacizumab and those treated with EGFR-TKI alone in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-line EGFR-TKI in a tertiary referral center from October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We performed 1:2 propensity score-matching: one EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab recipient with two patients who received EGFR-TKI alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Total 313 patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 45 patients who received first-line EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab and 89 patients who received EGFR-TKI alone were analyzed. The combination group showed improved PFS (17.0 vs. 11.0 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48; p = 0.002) compared to the monotherapy group. In subgroup analysis of patients with an L858R mutation, the combination group showed longer PFS (23.1 vs. 10.7 months; HR = 0.40; p = 0.011) and OS (not reached vs. 40.6 months; HR = 0.27; p = 0.040) than the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab could improve PFS in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. In patients harboring L858R mutation, the combination therapy provides better OS than TKI alone.