Incidence of preoperative instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) dependence and adverse outcomes in older surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) are essential to patient function and quality of life after surgery. In older surgical patients, the incidence of preoperative IADL dependence has not been well characterized in the literature. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence of preoperative IADL dependence and the associated adverse outcomes in the older surgical population. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase/Embase Classic, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.Gov, the WHO ICTRP (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched for relevant articles from 1969 to April 2022. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥60 years old undergoing surgery with preoperative IADL assessed by the Lawton IADL Scale. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative assessment. MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome was the pooled incidence of preoperative IADL dependency. Additional outcomes included post-operative mortality, postoperative delirium [POD], functional status improvement, and discharge disposition. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (n = 5690) were included. In non-cardiac surgeries, the pooled incidence of preoperative IADL dependence was 37% (95% CI: 26.0%, 48.0%) among 2909 patients. Within cardiac surgeries, the pooled incidence of preoperative IADL dependence was 53% (95% CI: 24.0%, 82.0%) among 1074 patients. Preoperative IADL dependence was associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium than those without IADL dependence (44.9% vs 24.4, OR 2.26; 95% CI: 1.42, 3.59; I2: 0%; P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of IADL dependence in older surgical patients undergoing non-cardiac and cardiac surgery. Preoperative IADL dependence was associated with a two-fold risk of postoperative delirium. Further work is needed to determine the feasibility of using the IADL scale preoperatively as a predictive tool for postoperative adverse outcomes.

Validation of the STOP questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA among different populations: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep breathing disorder associated with adverse health outcomes, but it remains largely underdiagnosed. The STOP questionnaire is a simple tool for screening OSA and is widely used in various populations. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive parameters of the STOP questionnaire to detect OSA in sleep clinics, medical population, surgical population, commercial drivers, and the general population. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from January 2008 to April 2021. Pooled predictive parameters were recalculated using 2 × 2 contingency tables and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The combined test characteristics at different OSA severities (any OSA [apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 events/h], moderate-to-severe OSA [apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h], severe OSA [apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 30 events/h]) were used to compare the accuracy of the STOP questionnaire with polysomnography. The quality of the studies was evaluated using Cochrane Methods criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria: 16 were in the sleep clinic population (n = 8,132), 4 in the medical population (n = 1,023), 2 in the surgical population (n = 258), and 1 study each on commercial drivers (n = 85) and the general population (n = 4,770). A STOP score ≥ 2 showed excellent sensitivity to the different OSA severities for the sleep clinic population (> 89%) and to severe OSA for the medical population (85.6%). In both populations, the STOP questionnaire also had excellent discriminative power to exclude severe OSA (negative predictive values > 84%). The pooled sensitivity and negative predictive values for the surgical population with moderate-to-severe OSA was 81% and 75%. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the STOP questionnaire is a valid and effective screening tool for OSA among these populations. CITATION: Patel D, Tsang J, Saripella A, et al. Validation of the STOP questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA among different populations: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1441-1453.