Evaluation of bronchial challenge test results for use in assessment of paediatric eczema: a retrospective series.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and allergic rhinitis are associated diseases involved in the atopic march. The bronchial challenge test (BCT) is a tool that evaluates airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma. This study aimed to evaluate whether a positive BCT result is useful in assessment of paediatric AD. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 284 patients with AD who had BCT results. Clinical information and laboratory parameters were reviewed, including AD severity (using the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), skin hydration, and transepidermal water loss. RESULTS: Of the 284 patients who had BCT, 106 had positive BCT results and 178 had negative BCT results. A positive BCT result was associated with a history of asthma (P<0.0005), sibling with asthma (P=0.048), serum immunoglobulin E (P=0.045), eosinophil count (P=0.017), and sensitisation to food allergens in the skin prick test (P=0.027). There was no association between a positive BCT result and personal allergic rhinitis, parental atopy, sibling allergic rhinitis or AD, skin prick response to dust mites, objective SCORAD score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, exposure to smoking, incense burning, cat or dog ownership, or AD treatment aspects (eg, food avoidance and traditional Chinese medicine). Logistic regression showed significant associations of a positive BCT result with a history of asthma (adjusted odds ratio=4.05; 95% confidence interval=1.92-8.55; P<0.0005) and sibling atopy (adjusted odds ratio=2.25; 95% confidence interval=1.03-4.92; P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paediatric AD, a positive BCT result was independently and positively associated with personal history of asthma and sibling history of atopy, but not with any other clinical parameters.

Are skin equipment for assessing childhood eczema any good?

AIM: Symptomatology and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) can be objectively measured with equipment. This study aimed to compare skin measurements and investigate their correlations with various clinical severity scores. METHODS: Skin hydration (SH), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), pH, erythema, pigmentation, and ITA (individual typology angle) were measured (using Delfin, Courage + Khazaka, and Mettler Toledo equipment), and correlated with Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM, a short-term subjective-symptom score), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD, a short-term subjective-symptom and objective-sign score), Nottingham Eczema Severity Score (NESS, a long-term subjective-symptom score), Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI, a short-term subjective-symptom score) with Spearman's rho coefficient. RESULTS: 80 sets of clinical scores from eczema patients (mean age: 10.8 ± 4.9 years; 44.6% male) were evaluated. The POEM, objective SCORAD, CDLQI correlated well with each other. Skin pH ranged from 4.3 to 7.0 (mean 5.7 ± 0.61). Skin pH was correlated with Objective SCORAD components, including area (rho = 0.269, p = .036), erythema (rho = 0.302, p = .018), and lichenification (rho = 0.365, p = .026) and with the usage frequency of topical antibiotics. Skin pH was also correlated with other skin measurements, including SH (Delfin equipment: rho = -0.38, p < .001). SH and TEWL as measured by Delfin equipment correlated better with a number of symptoms and signs than Courage + Khazaka equipment. Other clinical measurements including erythema, melanin, and skin color did not demonstrate strong correlations with clinical symptom scores. CONCLUSION: Skin pH (using Mettler Toledo), SH, and TEWL (using Delfin equipment) correlated well with various clinical symptomatology scores. Less acidic pH appears to be associated with worse clinical scores of symptomatology, and increase usage of topical antibiotics, These findings not only support the supplementary usage of equipment in aiding objective documentation of clinical symptomatology in eczema therapeutic research but also the advocacy of maintaining more acidic skin and avoiding alkaline soap and emollient products.