Immune changes in patients with colorectal cancer treated by adjuvant therapy with monoclonal antibody 17-1A: a pilot study.

We investigated the efficacy of Mo17-1A to improve important immunological parameters in vivo and in vitro in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients receiving no second-line treatment. Eighteen CRC patients stage Dukes' C were treated postoperatively with 5 doses of Mo17-1A. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed for proliferative responses and cytolytic activity. Serum levels of cytokines were determined during treatment. Enhancement in the proliferative activity of patients' T cells, improvement in their lymphocytes' killing ability of natural killer (NK) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) sensitive tumor targets, and an in vivo increase in serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12, IL-15, interferon (IFN)-gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were noted. We conclude that treatment of CRC patients with Mo17-1A partially restores deficient cellular immune responses and the secretion of cytokines with immuno-enhancing properties. The development of novel immunotherapeutic protocols using combinations of Mo17-1A with stimuli that enhance the lytic capacity of effector cells (e.g. cytokines), may improve clinical responses in these types of patients.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colon carcinoma relapsing after 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin combination.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between performance status (PS) and mean dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with recurrent advanced colorectal cancer relapsing after 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin chemotherapy. Patients who had completed their last chemotherapy course with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for at least 6 weeks and progressed were included. Based on PS, we administered a starting dose of 250 mg/m(2) in patients with a PS 70-80 (group A), and 350 mg/m(2) for those with a PS > 80 (group B). Of a total of 90 treated patients, all were evaluable, 18 had a partial response (PR) (20%), 39 stable disease (43%), and 15 progressed (37%). No significant difference was noticed between patients with PS > or = 90 or < or = 80 (p = 0.925), or between those who received a mean dose of CPT-11 > or = 300 or < or = 300 (p = 0.602), for response, survival and time to progression. Toxicity was increased in group B as expected, with significant differences for acute cholinergic syndrome (p = 0.02), diarrhea after the first 24 h (p = 0.03) and severe diarrhea (p = 0.03). According to these results, we conclude that response to CPT-11 is independent of its dose, and that a dose of 250 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks might be a cost-effective and less toxic alternative in this setting. However, further adequately powered phase II or III randomized studies might be required in order to confirm this observation.

Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin as second-line treatment in relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PIC) combination in relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those with SCLC who had progressed or relapsed after therapy with carboplatin and etoposide (with or without chest radiotherapy). The PIC regimen consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2; PIC was given every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (30 men and three women) were entered onto the study (median age, 62 years [range, 55 to 70 years]; median performance status, 1 [range, 0 to 2]). Metastatic sites at study entry included the lymph nodes (n = 13 patients), bone (n = 9), liver (n = 5), brain (n = 6), lung nodules (n = 8), adrenal glands (n = 9), and other (n = 2) Responses included eight complete remissions and 16 partial remissions (overall response rate, 73% [24 of 33 patients]). Five patients had stable disease and two had progressive disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 21 and 28 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 12%, with two patients alive without evidence of disease at 76 and 104 weeks since PIC initiation. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 30 patients (24 [73%] developed grade 4 neutropenia [ < 5 days]) and febrile neutropenia in six patients (18%); grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in nine patients (27%). No grade 3 neuropathy was observed; grade 1 or 2 CNS toxicity was seen in five patients, there was no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias were seen in nine patients, grade 2 diarrhea was seen in one patient, and grade 3 nausea or vomiting was seen in seven patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: In the present phase II study, the PIC combination seemed highly active and tolerable in patients with relapsed SCLC when it was administered as second-line treatment. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the PIC regimen as front-line treatment of SCLC is planned.

Extragonadal seminoma after renal transplantation and immunosuppression; treatment in the presence of renal dysfunction: a case report and literature review.

A 37-yr-old man who had undergone renal transplantation for end-stage renal failure presented with a large right pelvic mass obstructing the transplanted kidney. Initially, this was diagnosed as an anaplastic tumor while he had been on immunosuppressive treatment for kidney allograft rejection after transplantation. Despite difficulties of classic histopathology to reveal the origin of his tumor, FISH analysis revealed the presence of chromosome 12p abnormalities, strongly indicative of a germ-cell tumor-more likely seminoma-with extragonadal presentation. Because of renal dysfunction, he was treated with carboplatin (dose adjusted according to renal clearance) and etoposide, and when he experienced a rather atypical progression with bone metastases, he was treated with single-agent paclitaxel, and died almost 13 mo after initial presentation. The case adds further to the existing small list of seminoma/GCTs developing in transplant recipients, points to the unusual presentation patterns and diagnostic histopathology challenges, and presents the difficulty in therapeutic options, as a result of frequent renal dysfunction and intercurrent immunosuppressive therapy. All of these issues together with an extensive literature review are discussed in detail.

A phase II study of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin combination in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The necessity to develop more effective chemotherapy regimens in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) prompted the authors to evaluate the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (PIC) combination, developed on the basis of high individual single-agent activity, in vitro synergism, and tolerance as determined in a previous Phase I study by the authors. PATIENTS: Eligibility criteria included advanced NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC]/International Union Against Cancer [UICC] Stage III/IV), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) /= 10,000/microL. RESULTS: Fifty patients were entered, and all were evaluable for response and toxicity: median age, 58 years (range, 40-72), PS, 1 (range, 0-2), Gender: 44 males and 6 females, Stages IIIA, 6 patients; IIIB, 17; IV, 27; histologies: adenocarcinoma, 27 patients; squamous, 17; large cells, 5; unspecified, 1. Metastatic sites at diagnosis included lymph nodes, 33 patients; bone, 6; liver, 5; brain, 10; lung nodules, 7; adrenals, 6; other, 2. Thirty-two of 50 (64%; confidence interval, 50.7-77.3%) evaluable patients responded: 4 complete remissions, 28 partial remissions, 13 stable disease, and 5 progressive disease. The quality-of-life score improved in 37 of 50 (74%) patients. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-34+); median time-to-progression, 8 months (range, 1-36+), median overall survival, 12 months (range, 2-36+). One-year survival was 53%. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia 38 of 50 patients with 21 developing Grade 4 neutropenia (

Phase I study of dose-escalated paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PIC) combination chemotherapy in advanced solid tumours.

Based on the already known in vitro synergy between paclitaxel (taxol), cisplatin and oxazophosphorine cytostatics and the broad spectrum of activity of the above drugs we sought to evaluate the paclitaxel (taxol)-ifosfamide-cisplatin (PIC) combination in the outpatient setting in individuals with a variety of advanced solid tumours. Cohorts of patients were entered into six successive dose levels (DLs) with drug doses ranging as follows: paclitaxel 135-215 mg m(-2) day 1 - (1 h infusion), ifosfamide 4.5-6.0 g m(-2) (total dose) - divided over days 1 and 2, and cisplatin 80-100 mg m(-2) (total) - divided over days 1 and 2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given from day 5 to 14. Forty-two patients were entered. Eighteen patients had 2-8 cycles of prior chemotherapy with no taxanes or ifosfamide (cisplatin was allowed). The regimen was tolerated with outpatient administration in 36/42 patients. Toxicities included: grade 4 neutropenia for < or = 5 days in 27% of cycles; 5 episodes of febrile neutropenia in three patients at DL-III, -V and -VI. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and cumulative grade 3 anaemia were seen in 7% and 13% of cycles respectively. Three cases of severe grade 3 neuromotor/sensory neuropathy were recorded at DL-II, -III, and -V, all after cycle 3. The maximum tolerated dose was not formally reached at DL-V, but because of progressive anaemia and asthenia/fatigue, it was decided to test a new DL-VI with doses of paclitaxel 200 mg m(-2), ifosfamide 5.0 g m(-2) and cisplatin 100 mg m(-2); this appeared to be tolerable and is recommended for further phase II testing. The response rate was 47.5% (complete response + partial response: 20/42). The PIC regimen appears to be feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Care should be paid to neurotoxicity. Phase II studies are starting in non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and head and neck cancer at DL-VI.

Antiemetic prophylaxis with ondansetron and methylprednisolone vs metoclopramide and methylprednisolone in mild and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in 18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 + etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally x 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg x 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.

Risk of severe acute hypersensitivity reactions after rapid paclitaxel infusion of less than 1-h duration.

On the basis of the safety of the 1-h paclitaxel infusion schedule in prior studies we attempted to evaluate the feasibility of a shorter infusion schedule (< 1-h), given the general lack of published data or of attempts at applying this strategy. Before receiving paclitaxel, all patients were premedicated with promethazine, dexamethasone, and ranitidine; they were then given paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 diluted in 150 ml normal saline. Four patients were evaluated, two with breast cancer, one with ovarian carcinoma, and one with non-small-cell lung cancer. All had received at least two prior cycles of paclitaxel and had never exhibited any hypersensitivity reaction. In all four patients, adverse signs and symptoms were observed at 5-15 min after the start of paclitaxel administration. These included generalized erythema (three patients), angioedema (all patients), sinus tachycardia (all patients), dyspnea (all patients), and increased sweating (all patients). One patient experienced acute diarrhea. Significant changes in vital signs were recorded in all patients, but there was no dysrhythmia or syncope. Thereafter, drug infusion was interrupted and supportive measures were initiated with dimethidene maleate, ranitidine, and methylprednisolone. In all patients, symptoms resolved over the next 15-30 min, and paclitaxel was reinstituted at the standard 1-h rate with no further sequelae. Paclitaxel administration in < 1 h did not prove to be safe in the current pilot experience and, therefore, cannot be recommended.

Neutrophil 5-nucleotidase reaction in chronic myelogenous leukemia, myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, and polycythemia vera.

A readable and reproducible 5-nucleotidase (5N) cytochemical reaction was developed for blood smear preparation, after modification of the technique of Wachstein and Meisel. The reaction was applied to normal polymorphonuclear neutrophils (NPN) and to neutrophils from patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), and polycythemia vera (PV). The following observations were made: (a) 5N was present in NPN, with a mean score of 83.2+/-15.7. (b) In patients with MMM and PV an increased 5N score was observed (mean score 111+/-63.8 and 178.3+/-83.3, respectively). (c) In CML the mean score was 4.9+/-2.2. (c) A statistical comparison of neutrophil 5-nucleotidase (N5N) between CML and MMM and PV patients demonstrated a highly significant difference (p<0.0001). In the present study, we showed that the N5N activity parallels that of NAP in chronic myeloproliferative disorders such as CML, MMM, and PV. It appears that, apart from the already known activity of NAP in myeloproliferative disorders, other enzymes (e.g., N5N) can present a similar behavior with increased or decreased activity.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor improves immunological parameters in patients with refractory solid tumours receiving second-line chemotherapy: correlation with clinical responses.

In this report, we studied the immunorestorative properties of subcutaneously administered granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with refractory solid tumours receiving second-line chemotherapy. Such patients exhibit abnormal immune responses in vivo and in vitro and, therefore, it was of interest to examine the effect of GM-CSF-induced immunomodulation on clinical response. We examined patients with primary malignant carcinomas (head and neck, n = 10; urogenital tract, n = 17; penis n = 6; colorectal, n = 8) who were treated with carboplatin (JM8), 300 ng/m2 on days 1 and 22, leucovorin (LV), 200 mg/m2 plus 5-fluoracil (5-FU), 500 mg/m2 on days 8, 15 and 29 and four cycles of daily injections with placebo or GM-CSF, 300 micrograms/day on days 3-6, 10-13, 17-20 and 24-27. Peripheral blood was collected from the patients one day after the end of each of the four-cycle injections with placebo or GM-CSF, namely on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were tested in the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction (AMLR) and for natural killer (NK) or lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell activity. Cytokine levels in serum were measured by immunoenzymatic (ELISA) assay. A total of 21 patients received a four-cycle regimen with GM-CSF (Group 1) and 20 were similarly treated with placebo (Group 2). All received standard chemotherapy as outlined above. Before GM-CSF treatment, all patients exhibited increased serum levels of interleukin-1 (IL-1 beta), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-6 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and decreased serum levels of IL-2. Cellular immune responses (AMLR, NK- and LAK-cytotoxicity) were also low in all patients. Five patients from Group 1 had a PR (partial response), 2 patients had CR (complete response), and 14 patients had stable disease. Seven patients from Group 2 showed progressive disease, 3 had a PR and 10 had stable disease. All immune parameters were significantly improved during treatment in Group 1 but remained unchanged or even deteriorated in Group 2. Administration of GM-CSF during treatment of cancer patients with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs results in a marked potentiation of deficient cellular immune responses in vitro and a change towards normalisation of cytokine serum levels. The results reported herein support the use of GM-CSF as immunopotentiator during chemotherapy, but more patients must be studied before definite conclusions can be drawn.

5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin in advanced gastric carcinoma. A randomized trial.

Leucovorin (LV) enhances the activity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Based on these data, we performed a randomized trial with 5FU, epirubicin (EPI), mitomycin C(MMC) with/ without LV in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of our study was to investigate if the addition of LV improved the response rate of the combination 5FU EPI, MMC (FEM) over FEM. From January 1988 until April 1994, 88 patients with recurrent or metastatic AGC were randomly received 5FU, EPI, MMC with (group A) or without (group B) LV. Between the two arms of the study no difference was noticed in sex, performance status, primary site of tumor, and lymph node metastases. Therapy included group A (5FU 600 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on days 1, 8, 29, 36, and EPI 45 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on days 1 and 29, MMC 10 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on day 1) and group B (the same as group A plus LV 200 mg/m2/day by 2 h intravenous infusion with 5FU intravenous push at midinfusion). No significant difference in response rate was noticed between the two treatment arms; there were two (5%) patients with complete response in group A, and five (12%) in A and 11 (26%) partial responders in group B (p < 0.1). A significantly higher number of patients achieving stable disease was observed in group B; 19 (44%) in comparison to group A 10 (24%) (p < 0.048). There were more patients with progressive disease in group A 25 (59%) than in group B 12 (28%) (p < 0.003) (Table 2). No difference was noted in mean duration of response: group A, 15.8 (6-31) weeks; and group B, 17.6 (6-28) weeks. The mean time to progression was for group A [11.4 (6-35) weeks] and for group B [17.6 (8-33) weeks]. Mean survival was for group A [27.4 (12-59) weeks] and for group B [30.6 (17-53) weeks], for 50% of patients. Causes of death were, for group A, 40 patients from disease progression and two sudden deaths; for group B, causes of death were for 41 patients disease progression and two sudden deaths. There were two patients in group A and one in group B that were not evaluable because they abandoned therapy after the first cycle. Toxicity was increased in group B; anemia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia (p < 0.055) were more severe in group B, but not statistically different when compared to group A. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and fatigue of any grade were significantly more common and severe in group B. Significant dose reductions due to toxicity were required more commonly in group B. We conclude that the response rate was increased in the schedule with the addition of LV, at the cost of increased toxicity and with no difference in survival. A randomized trial comparing FEM-LV with new generation regimens would determine whether the addition of LV qualifies FAM equally active with these.

Comparison of different schedules of ondansetron (GR 38032F) administration during cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized trial.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate different schedules of ondansetron administration in cisplatin-induced emesis. All patients had previously received 2 cycles of CDDP-based chemotherapy in a dose of 100 mg/m2. Ondansetron was given by two schedules. Group A (45 patients) received a dose of 1 ampoule of 8 mg in 100 ml normal saline in a 10-min intravenous infusion before the infusion of CDDP; this was continued by 1 tablet of 8 mg in the afternoon and 1 before sleeping on the first day. For the next 3 days, the patients received 3 tablets of 8 mg daily. In group B (45 patients) the same doses were used at the same time and by the same route as in group A, except on the first day when all the dosages were intravenous. Nausea persisted for a longer time (A = 177 +/- 271 min, B = 78 +/- 83 min, p < 0.022), and it was intenser in group A (grade 0, p < 0.036, grade 1, p < 0.050) in comparison with group B. More patients of group B achieved complete (p < 0.015) and minor (p < 0.050) control of emesis, on the other hand group A presented an increased number with major (p < 0.015) and failure (p < 0.069) of control of emesis. There was no difference in nausea and vomiting for the next 3 days nor any difference in secondary side effects. We conclude that the intravenous administration schedule has shown superior antiemetic efficacy in patients who received cisplatin during the first 24 h.

Prevention of tissue necrosis due to accidental extravasation of cytostatic drugs by a conservative approach.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate comparatively the effectiveness of a conservative approach to treatment, using two therapeutic schedules (with and without sodium thiosulfate (ST), so as to minimize necrosis due to drug extravasation and to avoid the need for reconstructive surgery. The 63 patients entered into this study were separated into two groups; these in group A were treated with hydrocortisone and dexamethasone, and these in group B received the combination plus ST. In both groups, the drugs that had extravasated included doxorubicin, epirubicin, vinblastine, mitomycin C. The healing time varied with the different drugs used and was proportional to the extent of extravasation and to the time at which therapy was begun. The mean healing time for group B, which received ST was about half that for group A, which did not. We conclude that the application of conservative measures during chemotherapy may prevent tissue necrosis due to drug extravasation and the subsequent need for reconstructive surgery. The administration of ST can help in the achievement of this goal.

Decreased oral toxicity with the local use of allopurinol in patients who received high dose 5-fluorouracil.

5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is the most effective drug in gastrointestinal cancer. Mucositis and bone marrow toxicity are the two major limiting side effects. In our effort to reduce mucositis we administered Allopurinol mouthwash in 42 patients who had experienced oral mucositis during prior treatment with 5FU. In all patients significant reduction of oral toxicity was noticed as well as prolonged pain relief.

Conservative approach to the treatment of chemotherapy-induced extravasation.

One of the local complications of certain chemotherapeutic agents is tissue necrosis resulting from extravasation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a conservative approach to treatment in order to minimize necrosis and the need for reconstructive surgery. Fifty-three patients entered this study. Twenty-one had old lesions while 32 had recent extravasations. Drugs responsible for the extravasations were doxorubicin, epirubicin, vinblastine, mitoxantrone, and mitomycin C. The basis of treatment was betamethasone ointment, which was applied to the lesion with a tight elastic bandage and was replaced every 12 hours for the first 2 days and then every 24 hours until complete healing. For old lesions a keratolytic ointment was initially applied, whereas in the new lesions multiple subcutaneous injections with hydrocortisone solution preceded the application of betamethasone ointment. None of our patients developed tissue necrosis and sloughing that necessitated surgery. All lesions healed in patients. Healing time varied with the different drugs used and was proportional to the extension of extravasation and to the time when therapy was begun. We conclude that the application of conservative measures in extravasated areas from chemotherapy may avoid tissue necrosis and reconstructive surgery.

Comparison of antiemetic activity of chloropromazine and high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

High dose metoclopramide and different phenothiazines are widely used antiemetics in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. In a prospective randomized study we compared the antiemetic efficacy of high dose metoclopramide (M) and chloropromazine (C). We also tested the role of dexamethasone (D) when combined with either of these drugs. A total of 165 patients were randomly allocated to 5 groups with 33 patients in each group. Group A received only M, group B: M + D, group C: C + D, group D: M + D + C and group E: M + C. All patients received combination chemotherapy with cisplatin for the first time and were evaluated only once in order to exclude anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Patients in group C had less antiemetic protection than the other groups (p less than 0.001). Groups A, B, D, E, had more or less equal antiemetic efficacy, although the efficacy in group B was somewhat better; this difference was not statistically significant. Side-effects were minimal. Chloropromazine seemed to protect patients who received metoclopramide from extrapyramidal manifestations. In conclusion the results suggest that high dose metoclopramide has a better antiemetic effect than chloropromazine, dexamethasone is a helpful adjuvant drug when used in combination with an effective antiemetic agent, and chloropromazine and dexamethasone may prevent the extrapyramidal side-effects that can occur when metoclopramide is used as single antiemetic drug.

Association of neutrophil alkaline phosphatase activity and glycosylated haemoglobin in diabetes mellitus.

We determined neutrophil alkaline phosphatase (NAP) activity in diabetic patients in conjunction with HbA1c levels. NAP was estimated using semiquantitative cytochemical technique, and we studied its activity in different groups of diabetic patients. We found that NAP score is correlated with the HbA1c level. Non-diabetic patients were used as controls, in whom NAP score and HbA1c were found normal. In diabetic patients the NAP activity and the HbA1c level were altered similarly during the various phases of the disease. Our findings indicate that NAP score could be used as a simple new parameter for diabetes. The pathophysiologic mechanism of our observations needs further investigation.

Correlation of histoenzymological studies with the response to chemotherapy and survival in breast cancer patients.

The enzyme activity of cancerous tissue and the adjacent normal epithelium of 40 patients with breast cancer was determined. This enzymatic activity was correlated with the responsiveness of those tumors to the chemotherapy. It was found that the presence of cytochrome oxidase and alkaline phosphatase and the absence of leucine aminopeptidase, beta-glucuronidase and dehydrogenases in cancerous tissues was related to good response. On the contrary, the absence of alkaline phosphatase and cytochrome oxidase and the presence of leucine aminopeptidase, beta-glucuronidase and dehydrogenases in the cancerous tissues was related to poor response and therefore to poor survival.

Glucose-6-phosphatase activity of Reed-Sternberg and Hodgkin cells.

The glucose-6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) enzyme cytochemical reaction was successfully applied on lymph node imprints, after introducing the appropriate modifications related to fixation and to composition of the substrate solutions. Using this method we studied the G-6-Pase cytochemical profile on lymph node imprint preparations from 30 patients with Hodgkin's disease. Three cases had the histologic subtype of lymphocyte predominance, 14 the modular sclerosis, 11 the mixed cellularity and two the lymphocyte depleted. A strong G-6-Pase positivity was found in the Reed-Sternberg (RS) and Hodgkin cells of the mixed cellularity type, while the RS and Hodgkin cells of the other subtypes were less positive. The rest of the cell population present were G-6-Pase negative, with the exception of plasma cells which exhibited a strong G-6-Pase cytoplasmic positivity. We concluded from our study that RS and Hodgkin cells resemblance to plasma cells and therefore they may be of B-cell origin. In addition it appears that RS and Hodgkin cells express different functional properties in the various histologic subtypes of the disease.