The effects of bolus compared to continuous administration of adrenaline on cerebral oxygenation during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Background: Bolus administration of adrenaline during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) results in only short-term increases in systemic and cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP) with unclear effects on cerebral oxygenation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of bolus compared to continuous adrenaline administration on cerebral oxygenation in a porcine CPR model. Methods: After five minutes of cardiac arrest, mechanical CPR was performed for 15 min. Adrenaline (45 µg/kg) was administered either as a bolus every five minutes or continuously over the same period via an infusion pump. Main outcome parameter was brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2), secondary outcome parameters included mean arterial pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), CePP and cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) as well as arterial and cerebral venous blood gases. Results: During CPR, mean MAP (45 ± 8 mmHg vs. 38 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.0827), mean ICP (27 ± 7 mmHg vs. 20 ± 7 mmHg; p = 0.0653) and mean CePP (18 ± 8 mmHg vs. 18 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.9008) were similar in the bolus and the continuous adrenaline group. Also, rSO2 (both 24 ± 6 mmHg; p = 0.9903) and cerebral venous oxygen saturation (18 ± 12% versus 27.5 ± 12%; p = 0.1596) did not differ. In contrast, relative PbtO2 reached higher values in the continuous group after five minutes of CPR and remained significantly higher than in the bolus group until the end of resuscitation. Conclusion: Continuous administration of adrenaline improved brain tissue oxygen tension compared with bolus administration during prolonged CPR.

Impact of COVID-19 on elective, emergency and oncological surgery during the first and the second wave in a tertiary university hospital : Have we learned the lessons?

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an important reduction in surgical activities during the first wave. Aim of this retrospective time-trend analysis was to examine whether also during the second wave in fall and winter 2020/2021 surgical interventions decreased. METHODS: Absolut numbers and types of surgeries in a tertiary university hospital during the second COVID-19 wave in fall/winter 2020/2021 were collected from the surgical planning software and compared with the same time frame over the last 5 years. In a second step, the reduction of surgical interventions during the second wave was compared with the reduction of surgical procedures during the first wave in spring 2020 at the same hospital. RESULTS: Despite a higher 7­day incidence of COVID-19 infection and a higher number of patients needing ICU treatment during the second wave, the reduction of surgical interventions was 3.22% compared to 65.29% during the first wave (p < 0.0001). Elective surgical interventions decreased by 88.63% during the first wave compared to 1.79% during the second wave (p < 0.0001). Emergency and oncological interventions decreased by 35.17% during the first wave compared to 5.15% during the second wave (p : 0.0007) and 47.59% compared to 3.89% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Surgical activity reduction in our institution was less pronounced despite higher occupancy of ICU beds during the second COVID-19 wave in fall/winter 2020/2021. CONCLUSION: Better understanding of the disease, adequate supply of disposables and improved interdisciplinary day by day management of surgical and ICU resources may have contributed to this improvement.