Long-Term Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although nonsurgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA) provides short-term improvement, the durability of these effects beyond 1 year is unknown. In this study, we investigated patient-reported pain and limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) at >5 years following nonsurgical treatment (i.e., exercise therapy and use of an orthosis) for CMC-1 OA. We hypothesized that pain and limitations in ADL would not worsen after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were satisfaction with treatment results and health-related quality of life at >5 years of follow-up and the rate of conversion to surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study using 2 overlapping samples. The change in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) subscales of pain and ADL between 12 months and >5 years was the primary outcome as measured in the first sample (n = 170), which consisted of patients who did not undergo conversion to surgery. Additional measurement time points included baseline and 3 months. We evaluated conversion to surgery in a second sample, which included all patients who responded to the invitation for this follow-up study (n = 217). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 5.1 to 8.7 years), the score on the MHQ pain subscale did not differ significantly from that at 12 months. The score on the MHQ ADL improved by 4.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI],1.5 to 7.2) compared with 12 months, but this was not clinically relevant. At >5 years, 5% of the patients rated their satisfaction as "poor," 14% as "moderate," 26% as "fair," 39% as "good," and 16% as "excellent." The median EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) index score was 0.852 (range, 0.135 to 1). The rate of conversion to surgery was 22% (95% CI,16.4% to 27.7%) at a median follow-up of 7 years (range, 5.5 to 9.0 years). CONCLUSIONS: We found positive outcomes at >5 years of follow-up for nonsurgical treatment of CMC-1 OA, with no worsening of pain or of limitations in ADL after 12 months. Our findings support nonsurgical treatment as the first treatment choice and suggest that treatment effects are sustainable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictors of postoperative lumpectomy size in breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic reconstructive surgery as an extension of breast-conserving surgery leads to better aesthetic results, an increase in tumor-free margins, and a reduction of re-excision rates. However, oncologic resection is often more extensive than expected, sometimes resulting in the plastic surgeon deviating from the predetermined plan. For optimal planning of the reconstruction, it is mandatory to estimate volume defects after lumpectomy as accurately as possible. This study aims to find preoperative predictors of lumpectomy resection size. METHODS: All consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ and treated primarily with breast-conserving surgery between 2018 and 2020 at the University Medical Center Utrecht and Alexander Monro Hospital were included. Variables measured were patient characteristics and tumor characteristics. Data was analyzed in a multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 423 cases (410 patients) were included, with a median age of 58 (range 32-84) and a mean BMI of 25.0 (SD=9.3). The mean maximum radiological tumor diameter was 18.0 mm (SD=13.2), and the mean maximum lumpectomy diameter was 58.8 mm (SD=19.2). Multiple linear regression analysis found an explained variance of R 2 = 0.60 (p = < .00), corrected for operating surgeon. Significant predictors for postoperative lumpectomy size were BMI, breast size, and maximum preoperative radiological tumor diameter. Moreover, a predictive tool for lumpectomy size was developed and a web-based application was created on www.evidencio.com under the title ''Predicted lumpectomy size'', to facilitate the use of our tool in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: Postoperative lumpectomy size can be predicted with BMI, breast size and radiological tumor size. This model could be beneficial for (plastic) breast surgeons in planning reconstructions and to prepare and inform their patients more accurately.

Bulging after DIEP Breast Reconstruction: New Insights Concerning Rectus Diastasis and Medial Perforator Harvest.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between flap harvest technique and occurrence of abdominal bulging. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 159 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 in the University Medical Center Utrecht was conducted. Outcomes measured were preoperative rectus diastasis, flap weight, laterality of flap harvest (unilateral or bilateral), timing of the harvest (immediate or delayed), number of perforators harvested (single or multiple), and location of the harvested perforator (medial, lateral, or both). Results: In 159 patients, 244 DIEP flaps were performed, 16 of these donor-sites (6.6%) developed a clinically evident abdominal bulge. When preoperative rectus abdominis diastasis was found (n = 97), postoperative bulging occurred significantly more often (P < 0.01). Patients in whom the medial perforator artery was harvested for reconstruction (n = 114) showed less abdominal bulging than patients in whom the lateral (n = 92) was harvested (P = 0.02). Using single versus multiple perforators for the DIEP flap, bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction or timing of the operation showed no significant difference in outcome of bulging (P = 1.00, P = 0.78, P = 0.59, respectively). Conclusions: The incidence of bulging in our study cohort is comparable to the literature. Harvesting the medial perforator artery for the DIEP flap showed less abdominal bulging than using the lateral perforator artery in a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Also, preoperative rectus diastasis was found to be an important risk factor for the occurrence of bulging.

Psychological factors are more strongly associated with pain than radiographic severity in non-invasively treated first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent psychological factors are related to pain levels prior to non-invasive treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. METHODS: We included patients (n = 255) at the start of non-invasive treatment for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint who completed the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire. Psychological distress, pain catastrophizing behavior and illness perception was measured. X-rays were scored on presence of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis. We used hierarchical linear regression analysis to determine to what extent pain levels could be explained by patient characteristics, X-ray scores, and psychological factors. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and X-ray scores accounted for only 6% of the variation in pre-treatment pain levels. After adding the psychological factors to our model, 47% of the variance could be explained. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that psychological factors are more strongly related to pain levels prior to non-invasive treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint than patient characteristics and X-ray scores, which implies the important role of these factors in the reporting of symptoms. More research is needed to determine whether psychological factors will also affect treatment outcomes for patients treated non-invasively for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPain is the most important complaint for patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.Psychological factors are strongly associated with pain levels prior to treatment.Pain catastrophizing behavior appears to be a promising target for complementary treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.

Positive experience with treatment is associated with better surgical outcome in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between patients' experiences with trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty and treatment outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures, grip and pinch strength. We included 233 patients who received a Weilby procedure for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Before surgery and 12 months after surgery, patients completed the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and their pinch and grip strengths were measured. At 3 months after surgery, a patient-reported experience measure was completed. Using regression analysis, significantly positive associations were found between the Michigan Hand questionnaire and the patient-reported experience measure, with the strongest significant associations being for patients' experiences with information provision. No significant associations were found between the patients' experience and strength outcomes. The results highlight the potential importance of positive experience with the treatment process to improve treatment outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: IV.

Shorter vs Longer Immobilization After Surgery for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if shorter immobilization is noninferior to longer immobilization after Weilby procedure for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with propensity score matching. SETTING: Data collection took place in 16 outpatient clinics for hand surgery and hand therapy. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 131 participants with shorter immobilization and 131 participants with longer immobilization (N=262). INTERVENTION: Shorter immobilization (3-5 days plaster cast followed by a thumb spica orthosis including wrist until 4 weeks postoperatively) was compared with longer immobilization (10-14 days plaster cast followed by a thumb spica orthosis including wrist until 6 weeks postoperatively) after Weilby procedure for first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were pain measured with a visual analog scale and hand function measured with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire at 3 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were complications, range of motion, grip and pinch strength, satisfaction with treatment, and return to work. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in visual analog scale pain (effect size, 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.21 to 0.27) or the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (effect size, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.25) between the groups at 3 months or at 12 months. Furthermore, no differences were found in complication rate or in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, shorter immobilization of 3-5 days of a plaster cast after Weilby procedure is equal to longer immobilization for outcomes on pain, hand function, and our secondary outcomes. These results indicate that shorter immobilization is safe and can be recommended, since discomfort of longer immobilization may be prevented and patients may be able to recover sooner, which may lead to reduced loss of productivity. Future studies need to investigate effectiveness of early active and more progressive hand therapy following first carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty.

Response to Conservative Treatment for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Conversion to Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines for treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis recommend starting with conservative treatment before a surgical procedure is considered. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate how response to conservative treatment, in terms of pain and hand function, influences the hazard that patients convert to surgical treatment. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. METHODS: Participants comprised 701 patients who received 3 months of hand therapy and an orthosis. Pain and function were measured with the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) at baseline and at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up. Conversion to surgical treatment was recorded from clinical records. Joint modeling (a statistical method of combining prediction models) was used to perform the analysis and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: The joint analytical model showed that both MHQ pain score at a certain point (HR = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92-0.94) and change in MHQ pain score (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.06-1.09) during conservative treatment was significantly associated with conversion to surgical treatment. The joint analytical model between functional outcome and conversion to surgical treatment showed only a significant association between MHQ function at a certain point (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.99), and no significant association between the change in MHQ score for function (HR = 1.0; 95% CI = 1.0-1.0) and conversion to surgical treatment. LIMITATIONS: Missing data might have resulted in biased estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported pain and function, as well as change in self-reported pain during treatment, were associated with the hazard of conversion to surgical treatment, whereas change in self-reported functioning was not associated with conversion. Because a reduction in pain during conservative treatment appears to decrease the rate of conversion to surgical treatment, it is advised to structurally monitor pain levels during treatment. Listen to the author interview at https://academic.oup.com/ptj/pages/podcasts.

Predicting Outcome After Hand Orthosis and Hand Therapy for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify predictive factors for outcome after splinting and hand therapy for carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) and to identify predictive factors for conversion to surgical treatment; and (2) to determine how many patients who have not improved in outcome within 6 weeks after start of treatment will eventually improve after 3 months. DESIGN: Observational prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Xpert Clinic in the Netherlands. This clinic comprises 15 locations in the Netherlands, with 16 European Board certified (FESSH) hand surgeons and over 50 hand therapists. PARTICIPANTS: Between 2011 and 2014, patients with CMC OA (N=809) received splinting and weekly hand therapy for 3 months. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction and pain were measured with a visual analog scale and function with the Michigan Hand Questionnaire at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months posttreatment. Using regression analysis, patient demographics and pretreatment baseline scores were considered as predictors for the outcome of conservative treatment after 3 months and for conversion to surgery. RESULTS: Multivariable regression model explained 34%-42% of the variance in outcome (P<.001) with baseline satisfaction, pain, and function as significant predictors. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline pain and function were significant predictors for receiving surgery. Of patients with no clinically relevant improvement in pain and function after 6 weeks, 73%-83% also had no clinically relevant improvement after 3 months. CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients with either high pain or low function may benefit most from conservative treatment. We therefore recommend to always start with conservative treatment, regardless of symptom severity of functional loss at start of treatment. Furthermore, it seems valuable to discuss the possibility of surgery with patients after 6 weeks of therapy, when levels of improvement are still mainly unsatisfactory.

Exercise Therapy in Addition to an Orthosis Reduces Pain More Than an Orthosis Alone in Patients With Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of exercises and orthotics with orthotics alone on pain and hand function in patients with first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA) and to predict outcomes on pain and hand function of exercises and orthotics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with propensity score matching. SETTING: Data collection took place in 13 outpatient clinics for hand surgery and hand therapy in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive, population-based sample of patients with CMC-1 OA (N=173) was included in this study, of which 84 were matched on baseline demographics and baseline primary outcomes. INTERVENTIONS: Exercises and orthotics versus orthotics alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included pain and hand function at 3 months, measured using visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100) and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ, 0-100). RESULTS: A larger decrease in VAS pain at rest (11.1 points difference; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-20.3; P=.002) and during physical load (22.7 points difference; 95% confidence interval, 13.6-31.0; P<.001) was found in the exercise + orthotic group compared to the orthotic group. In addition, larger improvement was found for the MHQ subscales pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction in the exercise + orthotic group. No differences were found on other outcomes. Baseline scores of metacarpophalangeal flexion, presence of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid OA, VAS pain at rest, heavy physical labor, and MHQ total predicted primary outcomes for the total exercise + orthotic group (N=131). CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical treatment of patients with CMC-1 OA should include exercises, since there is a relatively large treatment effect compared to using an orthosis alone. Future research should study exercises and predictors in a more standardized setting to confirm this finding.

Outcome of a Hand Orthosis and Hand Therapy for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Daily Practice: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Initial treatment for symptomatic carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb is usually nonsurgical. However, evidence on the effect of a hand orthosis and hand therapy for mid- and long-term results is limited, and it is unknown how many patients undergo additional surgical treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study is to describe the outcome of a hand orthosis and hand therapy for CMC OA in a large cohort study, and to evaluate the conversion rate to surgical treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, patients treated with a hand orthosis and hand therapy for primary CMC OA between 2011 and 2014 were included. Pain (visual analog scale) and function (Michigan Hand Questionnaire) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and at 12 months after the start of treatment. All patients converted to surgery were recorded between 2012 and 2016. Outcome was compared with baseline, and post hoc comparisons were made between patients who were not converted to surgery and patients who were converted to surgery after initially receiving a hand orthosis and hand therapy. Lastly, subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline pain levels. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 0.9 years, 15% of all patients were surgically treated. In the group that was not converted to surgery, pain (visual analog scale) significantly improved from 49 ± 20 at baseline to 36 ± 24 at 12 months. The Michigan Hand Questionnaire score was essentially unchanged from 65 ± 15 at baseline to 69 ± 10 at 12 months. Post hoc testing showed that improvement in pain was only significant between baseline and 6 weeks, and thereafter stabilized until 1 year after the start of treatment. The group that converted to surgery did not show any improvement in pain and function at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with thumb CMC OA who underwent hand therapy including an orthosis, 15% of the patients underwent additional surgical treatment. The patients (85%) who did not undergo surgery improved in pain and function, although only improvements in pain were significant and clinically relevant. Most improvement was seen in the first 6 weeks and stabilized till 1 year after the start of treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Postoperative Rehabilitation Following Thumb Base Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of rehabilitation for patients who underwent first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) arthroplasty, with emphasis on early active mobilization. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Articles written in English that described the postoperative regimen (including immobilization period/method and/or description of exercises/physical therapy, follow-up 6wk) on CMC-1 arthroplasty were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used as guidance in this review, and methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. Randomized studies were additionally scored using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies were included consisting of 1015 participants, in whom 1118 surgical procedures were performed. A summary of the components of postoperative rehabilitation used in the included studies of CMC-1 osteoarthritis is presented for different surgical interventions. We found that early active recovery (including short immobilization, early initiation of range of motion and strength exercises) provides positive outcomes for pain, limitations in activities of daily living, and grip and pinch strength, but comparative studies are lacking. Furthermore, 3 postoperative exercises/therapy phases were identified in the literature-the acute phase, the unloaded phase, and the functional phase-but again comparative studies are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Early active recovery is used more often in the literature and does not lead to worse outcomes or more complications. This systematic review provides guidance for clinicians in the content of postoperative rehabilitation for CMC-1 arthroplasty. The review also clearly identifies the almost complete lack of high-quality comparative studies on postoperative rehabilitation after CMC-1 arthroplasty.