Accuracy in quantification of coronary calcification with CT: a cork-dog heart phantom study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcium is a sensitive risk predictor of cardiac events. However, measurement of calcium foci is affected by partial-volume effects, which ultimately have an effect on accuracy and reproducibility of calcium scores. In this study, we describe the accuracy of quantification of calcium foci of known size and density using cork-dog heart phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five study phantoms were constructed from cork chests and dog hearts containing 135 calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) foci of known volume, mass, and concentration located in the coronary arteries or the myocardium. Hearts were separated into two groups: (1) three hearts containing large, high-density foci and (2) two hearts containing small, low-density foci. The phantoms were scanned using a standard coronary artery calcium (CAC) protocol and the volume and mean intensity of foci were measured. RESULTS: In group 1, the total volume of 87 CaHA foci measured was 4284 and 3779 mm(3) with electron beam computed tomography (EBCT); multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), respectively (P < .001). Both were significantly larger than the true volume (2713.9 mm(3), P < .001). In Group 2, the total volume of 57 CaHA foci measured was 592.6 and 702.9 mm(3) with EBT and MDCT, respectively (P < .001). Both were significantly smaller than the true volume (1733.2 mm(3), P < .001). We found that EBCT values for volume were approximately generally higher than MDCT values, but strongly correlated (r = 0.95, P < .0001). Agatston scores were found to be nearly equivalent between EBCT and MDCT and were similarly strongly correlated (r = 0.97, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography images overestimate the volume of large, dense CaHA foci while underestimating the volume of smaller (<6.6 mm(3)), less dense foci. This may have significant implications on CAC scoring and volume measurement. EBCT overestimated calcium more than MDCT, most likely from increased image noise.

Prognostic value of number and site of calcified coronary lesions compared with the total score.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of the number and sites of calcified coronary lesions and to compare the accuracy of number of calcified lesions with the extent of total calcium score. BACKGROUND: There is a strong relationship between mortality and total coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. It is not known whether the number of calcified lesions or their location influences outcome. METHODS: A total of 14,759 asymptomatic patients were referred for evaluation of CAC scanning using electron beam tomography. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to estimate time to all-cause mortality at, on average, 6.8 years (n = 281). RESULTS: Risk-adjusted annual mortality was 0.19% (95% confidence interval 0.18% to 0.21%) for patients without any calcified lesions. For patients with >20 lesions, annual risk-adjusted mortality exceeded 2% per year. Mortality rates were significantly higher for left main lesions as compared to other coronary arteries with annual mortality rates of 1.3%, 2.1%, 9.2%, and 13.6% for 1 to 2, 3 to 5, and > or =6 lesions, respectively (p < 0.0001). For left main CAC scores of 0 to 10, 11 to 100, 101 to 399, and 400 to 999, annual risk-adjusted mortality was 0.33%, 0.81%, 1.73%, and 7.71%, respectively (p < 0.0001). All 4 patients with a CAC score of > or =1,000 in the left main died during follow-up. However, patients with more frequent calcified lesions also had higher CAC scores. Specifically, > or =81% of patients with >10 calcified lesions also had a CAC score > or =100. With exception, for patients with CAC scores > or =1,000, annual mortality was dramatically higher at 3.0% to 4.5% for those with 1 to 5 calcified lesions as compared with 1.1% to 2.0% for those with 6 or more lesions (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We report that mortality rates increased proportionally with the number of calcified lesions. Although predictive information is contained in the number of calcified lesions, its added statistical value is minimal. With exception, patients with frequent lesions in the left main or those with a few large calcified lesions have a particularly high mortality risk.

Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop risk-adjusted multivariable models that include risk factors and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores measured with electron-beam tomography in asymptomatic patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND: Several smaller studies have documented the efficacy of CAC testing for assessment of cardiovascular risk. Larger studies with longer follow-up will lend strength to the hypothesis that CAC testing will improve outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and safety of primary prevention efforts. METHODS: We used an observational outcome study of a cohort of 25,253 consecutive, asymptomatic individuals referred by their primary physician for CAC scanning to assess cardiovascular risk. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict all-cause mortality. Risk-adjusted models incorporated traditional risk factors for coronary disease and CAC scores. RESULTS: The frequency of CAC scores was 44%, 14%, 20%, 13%, 6%, and 4% for scores of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 100, 101 to 400, 401 to 1,000, and >1,000, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 6.8 +/- 3 years, the death rate was 2% (510 deaths). The CAC was an independent predictor of mortality in a multivariable model controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and cardiac risk factors (model chi-square = 2,017, p < 0.0001). The addition of CAC to traditional risk factors increased the concordance index significantly (0.61 for risk factors vs. 0.81 for the CAC score, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted relative risk ratios for CAC were 2.2-, 4.5-, 6.4-, 9.2-, 10.4-, and 12.5-fold for scores of 11 to 100, 101 to 299, 300 to 399, 400 to 699, 700 to 999, and >1,000, respectively (p < 0.0001), when compared with a score of 0. Ten-year survival (after adjustment for risk factors, including age) was 99.4% for a CAC score of 0 and worsened to 87.8% for a score of >1,000 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This large observational data series shows that CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of all-cause mortality.

Comparison of three generations of electron beam tomography on image noise and reproducibility, a phantom study.

UNLABELLED: The detection of coronary artery calcification (CAC) using the electron beam tomography (EBT) scanner provides a noninvasive indicator for coronary artery disease (CAD). Physicians interested in preventative medicine also are using this modality to track atherosclerosis over time. Two new iterations of the EBT scanner have been introduced. We sought to evaluate the image quality of each machine to examine whether patients scanned on a previous model would have similar image quality and results to those scanned on the newest scanner. METHODS: This study used the C-150 XP, C300, and the e-Speed EBT scanners in high-resolution volume mode. A cork chest phantom was constructed for use as a human chest. A mixture of calcium phosphate, cornstarch and glue was placed inside the wells to simulate coronary calcium. The foci masses were 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 200 mg (calcium mass), which provided the 55 foci of different masses and densities to simulate coronary calcium in the chest phantom. Each phantom was scanned multiple times, using both 1.5- and 3-mm slice thickness and table collimation settings with each scanner. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences found between the 1.5-mm and 3.0-mm slice thickness calcium foci scores (Agatston & volumetric) for all 3 EBT scanners. The C-150 XP scanner had a variability of 6.01% between 1.5-mm and 3.0-mm slice thickness. Analysis by t test revealed that the mean noise value of C-150 XP was significantly higher than the C300, e-Speed (50 milliseconds), and e-Speed (100 milliseconds) with P values of 0.001, 0.025, and 0.001, respectively. Comparison of 1.5-mm versus 3.0-mm slice thickness noise value showed a significant difference only for the C-150 XP scanner (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the 3 EBT scanners in longitudinal studies of patients coronary calcium score is feasible to obtain similar calcium score values. The C-150 XP has the greatest noise effect in comparison to the C300 and e-Speed scanners. Improved image noise should improve reproducibility of the calcium measurement with these newer devices.

Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular risk factor levels are substantially different in Caucasians, African-American, Hispanics, and Asians, the relative rates of coronary heart disease in these groups are not consistent with these differences. The objective of the study is to assess the differences in the prevalence and severity of coronary artery calcification, as a measure of atherosclerosis, in these different ethnic groups. METHODS: Electron-beam tomography was performed in 16,560 asymptomatic men and women (Asians=1336, African-Americans=610, Hispanics=1256) aged >or=35 years referred by their physician for cardiovascular risk evaluation. The study population encompassed 70% males, aged 52+/-8 years. RESULTS: Caucasians were more likely to present with dyslipidemia (p<0.0001), while African-Americans and Hispanics had a higher prevalence of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension (all p<0.001). After adjustment for age, gender, risk factors, and treatment for hypercholesterolemia, compared with Caucasians, the relative risks for men having coronary calcification were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.48-0.86) in African-Americans, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-1.15) in Hispanics, and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80) in Asians. After similar adjustments, the relative risks for women having coronary calcification, were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.13-2.19) for African-Americans, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.66-1.06) in Hispanics, and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.89) in Asian women. After adjusting for age and risk factors using multivariable analysis, African-American men were least likely to have any coronary calcium while African-American women had significantly higher OR of any calcification. Asian men and women had significantly lower OR of any calcification. There was no significant difference in prevalence or severity of atherosclerosis between Hispanics and Caucasians, in men or women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate significant difference in the presence as well as severity of calcification according to ethnicity, independent of atherosclerotic risk factors. Results from this study (physician referred) closely parallel the results from MESA (population based, measured risk factors). Ethnic specific data on the predictive value of differing coronary calcium scores are needed.