Understanding immigrant Chinese Americans' participation in cancer screening and clinical trials.

The purpose of this study was to identify potential barriers and facilitators to Chinese immigrant participation in cancer screening and clinical trials. A series of focus groups, in English, Cantonese, and Mandarin, were conducted with physicians, community leaders, and first generation members of the Manhattan Chinatown community. Participants were asked to discuss their beliefs about cancer, cancer screening, clinical trials, and cancer health education materials. Focus group data were stratified by respondent group and analyzed for thematic content. Eleven physicians, 15 community leaders, and 38 community members participated. Some community members were not familiar with cancer screening as a preventive measure and had not received common screens such as PAP smears or mammograms. They described widespread misconceptions about cancer that act as screening deterrents, e.g. testing for cancer can cause cancer. Community members were unfamiliar with clinical trials and would not participate in a clinical trial unless "sick," and only on the recommendation of their physicians. Physicians did not see the relevance or value of clinical trials for their patients. Among first generation Chinese immigrants, there are many perceptual barriers to cancer screening and clinical trials recruitment. There is a need for effective culturally tailored health education on these health topics to address persistent misconceptions about cancer and to increase knowledge about cancer screening and clinical trials. Health education efforts and clinical trial recruitment in this community must involve community physicians.

FLT3 and MLL intragenic abnormalities in AML reflect a common category of genotoxic stress.

MLL rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) include translocations and intragenic abnormalities such as internal duplication and breakage induced by topoisomerase II inhibitors. In adult AML, FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITDs) are more common in cases with MLL intragenic abnormalities (33%) than those with MLL translocation (8%). Mutation/deletion involving FLT3 D835 are found in more than 20% of cases with MLL intragenic abnormalities compared with 10% of AML with MLL translocation and 5% of adult AML with normal MLL status. Real-time quantification of FLT3 in 141 cases of AML showed that all cases with FLT3 D835 express high level transcripts, whereas FLT3-ITD AML can be divided into cases with high-level FLT3 expression, which belong essentially to the monocytic lineage, and those with relatively low-level expression, which predominantly demonstrate PML-RARA and DEK-CAN. FLT3 abnormalities in CBF leukemias with AML1-ETO or CBFbeta-MYH11 were virtually restricted to cases with variant CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts and/or atypical morphology. These data suggest that the FLT3 and MLL loci demonstrate similar susceptibility to agents that modify chromatin configuration, including topoisomerase II inhibitors and abnormalities involving PML and DEK, with consequent errors in DNA repair. Variant CBFbeta-MYH11 fusions and bcr3 PML-RARA may also be initiated by similar mechanisms.

High-dose CD34+ cells are not clinically relevant in reducing cytopenia and blood component consumption following myeloablative therapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation as compared with standard dose.

BACKGROUND: No agreement exists about the number of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) to transfuse for optimal hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine CD34+ cell dosage following high-dose chemotherapy (in terms of hematologic recovery and blood component consumption), the effects of two schedules of CD34+ cell transfusions in a cohort of patients with myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were examined. Forty patients (Group 1) received between 2.5 and 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg, with a median of 3.4 x 106 per kg following high-dose chemotherapy, and 40 patients (Group 2), selected to match Group 1 for age, diagnosis, prior therapies, and procedure for PBPC mobilization, received a dose of CD34+ cells >5 x 106 per kg, with a median of 8.4 x 106 per kg (5-33). RESULTS: The median number of days to achieve a neutrophil count of >0.5 x 109 per L and unsupported platelets of >20 x 109 per L was identical for the two groups, but the time required to reach 1.5 x 109 neutrophils per L and 50 x 109 platelets per L was greatly delayed in Group 1. No significant difference was observed for the median number of RBC and platelet transfusions, or for the proportion of patients in each group that did not require either platelet or RBC transfusions. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm a dose-response relationship between CD34+ cell dose transfused and time to hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. However, the minimal Hb and platelet counts for transfusion independence in the two groups are similar when the CD34+ cell dose is greater than 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg. Therefore, our data suggest that it is not necessary to go on with apheresis procedures after 5 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg are harvested to sustain one high-dose chemotherapy.