New medications and techniques in ambulatory anesthesia.

Novel anesthetic and analgesic agents are currently under development or investigation to improve anesthetic delivery and patient care. The pharmacokinetic and analgesic profiles of these agents are especially tailored to meet the challenges of rapid recovery and opioid minimization associated with ambulatory anesthesia practice.

Long-acting serotonin antagonist (Palonosetron) and the NK-1 receptor antagonists: does extended duration of action improve efficacy?

In a growing outpatient surgical population, postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) is unfortunately a common and costly anesthetic complication. Identification of risk factors for both postoperative nausea and vomiting and PDNV is the hallmark of prevention and management. New pharmacologic interventions with extended duration of action, including palonosetron and aprepritant, may prove to be more efficacious.

Combined lumbar-plexus and sciatic-nerve blocks: an analysis of plasma ropivacaine concentrations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lumbar-plexus and sciatic-nerve blocks are commonly combined for lower-extremity anesthesia using large doses of ropivacaine. Limited information is available about the pharmacokinetics of this practice. We analyzed plasma ropivacaine concentrations after single-injection lumbar-plexus blocks with and without sciatic-nerve blocks. METHODS: Twenty patients having lower-extremity surgery using a lumbar-plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine (35 mL, n = 10) or the same lumbar-plexus block with the addition of a sciatic-nerve block (25 mL, n = 10, 60 mL total) using the same solution were enrolled. Venous blood samples were collected at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after block placement and analyzed for total ropivacaine concentration by use of gas chromatography. Individual timepoints, maximum concentrations (C(max)), and time to C(max) (T(max)) were compared. Values are mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a rapid increase in plasma concentration over the first 30 to 45 minutes. Concentrations were greater for those who received both blocks (P = .0005) at all timepoints. The lumbar-plexus block C(max) was less (986 +/- 221 ng/mL) than for the combined blocks (1,560 +/- 351 ng/mL, P = .0004). The T(max) was greater for the lumbar plexus (80 +/- 49 min) than for the combined blocks (38 +/- 22 min, P = .03). There was no relationship between the C(max) and patient age, weight, or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the plasma ropivacaine concentrations increase quicker when a sciatic-nerve block is added to a lumbar-plexus block, but C(max) remains below the toxicity threshold.

The effect of age on sciatic nerve block duration.

The physiologic changes that occur with advancing age and their effect on the duration of peripheral nerve blocks have yet to be defined. We prospectively studied the duration of sciatic nerve block using mepivacaine in younger and older patients. Eighty ASA physical status I-III patients, aged 18-35 (n = 40) or 55-80 (n = 40) yr, having outpatient knee arthroscopy with a femoral block and a standardized sciatic nerve block were enrolled; 37 in each group completed the study. All patients received a Labat sciatic nerve block using 20 mL of 1.0% mepivacaine with 0.1 mEq/mL sodium bicarbonate and 1:400,000 (2.5 microg/mL) epinephrine and a femoral nerve block. The duration of sensory block (sensation of pinprick, temperature, and vibration), motor block (plantar and dorsi flexion), and complete sensory and motor block in the sciatic nerve distribution of the operative extremity were measured. The time for complete return of both sensory and motor function was longer in the older group, 329 +/- 47 min compared with 306 +/- 46 min (mean +/- sd) in the younger group (P = 0.04). The difference was small under the conditions of this study and would not be perceived clinically. Age also increased the time to return of vibratory sensation (younger = 292 +/- 58 min, older = 257 +/- 50 min; P = 0.007). The other measurements did not differ between groups. We conclude that age may affect peripheral nerve blocks and that more investigation is needed to determine the pharmacologic, physiologic, and chronologic factors behind these findings.

Peripheral nerve block techniques for ambulatory surgery.

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have an increasingly important role in ambulatory anesthesia and have many characteristics of the ideal outpatient anesthetic: surgical anesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and facilitated discharge. Critically evaluating the potential benefits and supporting evidence is essential to appropriate technique selection. When PNBs are used for upper extremity procedures, there is consistent opioid sparing and fewer treatment-related side effects when compared with general anesthesia. This has been demonstrated in the immediate perioperative period but has not been extensively investigated after discharge. Lower extremity PNBs are particularly useful for procedures resulting in greater tissue trauma when the benefits of dense analgesia appear to be magnified, as evidenced by less hospital readmission. The majority of current studies do not support the concept that a patient will have difficulty coping with pain when their block resolves at home. Initial investigations of outpatient continuous peripheral nerve blocks demonstrate analgesic potential beyond that obtained with single-injection blocks and offer promise for extending the duration of postoperative analgesia. The encouraging results of these studies will have to be balanced with the resources needed to safely manage catheters at home. Despite supportive data for ambulatory PNBs, most studies have been either case series or relatively small prospective trials, with a narrow focus on analgesia, opioids, and immediate side effects. Ultimately, having larger prospective data with a broader focus on outcome benefits would be more persuasive for anesthesiologists to perform procedures that are still viewed by many as technically challenging.

Peripheral nerve blocks and continuous catheter techniques.

Peripheral nerve blocks provide intense, site-specific analgesia and are associated with a lower incidence of side effects when compared with many other modalities of postoperative analgesia. Continuous catheter techniques further prolong these benefits. These advantages can facilitate a prompt recovery and discharge and achieve significant perioperative cost savings. This is of tremendous value in a modern health care system that stresses cost-effective use of resources and a continued shift toward shorter hospital stay as well as outpatient surgery.