Is Ketamine an Effective Treatment of Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department? Implications for APRN Practice.

This article reviews the results of a randomized controlled trial, "Rapid Agitation Control with Ketamine in the Emergency Department: A Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial" by D. Barbic et al. (2021), comparing time to sedation, level of sedation, and adverse outcomes between intramuscular ketamine versus intramuscular midazolam and haloperidol among acutely agitated patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The findings are discussed in the context of practice change for patient stabilization within the ED. Emergency department nurse practitioners must employ continuing education and remain current with clinical practices and treatment options to ensure that patients receive optimal safe care. Although the use of midazolam and haloperidol has historically been the first-line treatment for the acutely agitated patient, use of ketamine shows promise in providing a safe alternative for expedited patient stabilization for acutely agitated patients presenting to the ED.

Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Controversies in Treatment.

The Research to Practice column critiques a current research article and translates the findings, in the context of a case, to a practice change within emergency settings. This article reviews the findings of a randomized controlled trial conducted by A. Theille et al. (2017) comparing the use of needle decompression versus chest tube insertion for management of spontaneous pneumothorax. The study found that use of needle aspiration was safe and effective and was associated with fewer procedure-related complications and significantly shorter hospital stays. The investigators concluded that needle aspiration be used as a first-line, definitive treatment in management of a spontaneous pneumothorax. As emergency providers examine improved and equally effective approaches to care that are associated with less costs and potential complications, needle aspiration offers a beneficial approach and should be shared with patients when discussing treatment options to ensure shared decision making.

Stakeholder perspectives on navigating the pediatric concussion experience: Exploring the needs for improved communication across the care continuum.

BACKGROUND: For children, the post-concussion return to school process is a critical step towards achieving positive health outcomes. The process requires integration between healthcare professionals, parents, and school personnel. OBJECTIVE: This research team conducted focus groups with stakeholders including parents, education personnel, school nurses, external healthcare providers (nurses) and athletic trainers to identify communication patterns between healthcare providers outside of the school setting and school personnel. METHODS: Data from focus groups were analyzed using a Thematic Analysis approach. Researchers used an inductive (bottom-up) coding process to describe semantic themes and utilized a critical realist epistemology. RESULTS: We identified four key themes within focus group data: (1) lack of effective communication between hospital and outpatient healthcare providers to school personnel; (2) parents who were strong advocates had improved communication with healthcare professionals and garnered more accommodations for their children; (3) non-school professionals and families were often confused about who the point of contact was at a given school; and (4) differing experiences for athletes vs. non-athletes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests gaps in communication between healthcare and school professionals when children return to school following a concussion. Improving communication between healthcare providers and school staff will require a multi-faceted approach.

Measuring the impact of a COVID-19 continuing education program.

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapidly shifting health care environment, with frequent changes to best practices, which can lead to knowledge and practice gaps among health care providers, including nurse practitioners (NPs). The purpose of this paper was to describe a continuing education (CE) program developed to address COVID-19 knowledge gaps and to report on the changes in knowledge, competence, and confidence following program completion. The CE program was a 2.5 to 2.67 contact hour webinar delivered in July 2020, October 2020, and February 2021. Content included COVID-19 prevention, diagnosis, and management and was updated before the second and third webinars. Changes in content and webinar audience participation in the question and answer portion were reflected in the CE credit awarded. Preactivity and postactivity knowledge, competence, and confidence levels were assessed among activity completers. Changes between the preactivity and postactivity evaluation were compared. A total of 2,901 learners were included in the analysis, of whom 91.6% were NPs. Overall, baseline knowledge of COVID-19 transmission, diagnosis, and treatment was low. Substantial improvements in knowledge, competence, and confidence were reported from baseline to postactivity evaluation, with increases of 47-73% overall. Furthermore, learner confidence in identifying patients at risk for severe COVID-19 and counseling patients on prevention and transmission significantly increased. Despite plans to implement strategies to improve COVID-19 management, several barriers to uptake were identified. The rapid development of a COVID-19 CE program resulted in substantial gains in NP knowledge related to prevention, diagnosis, and management, with possible implications for nearly 68,000 patient encounters per month.

Application of the RE-AIM Framework for the Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Management Intervention: A Study Protocol for Program Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Children who experience a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) may encounter cognitive and behavioral changes that often negatively impact school performance. Communication linkages between the various healthcare systems and school systems are rarely well-coordinated, placing children with an mTBI at risk for prolonged recovery, adverse impact on learning, and mTBI re-exposure. The objective of this study is to rigorously appraise the pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Management (TEaM) Intervention that was designed to enhance diagnosis and management of pediatric mTBI through enhanced patient discharge instructions and communication linkages between school and primary care providers. METHODS: This is a combined randomized and 2 × 2 quasi-experimental study design with educational and technology interventions occurring at the clinician level with patient and school outcomes as key endpoints. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework will be utilized as a mix methods approach to appraise a multi-disciplinary, multi-setting intervention with the intent of improving outcomes for children who have experienced mTBI. DISCUSSION: Utilization of the RE-AIM framework complemented with qualitative inquiry is suitable for evaluating effectiveness of the TEaM Intervention with the aim of emphasizing priorities regarding pediatric mTBI. This program evaluation has the potential to support the knowledge needed to critically appraise the impact of mTBI recovery interventions across multiple settings, enabling uptake of the best-available evidence within clinical practice.

Becoming fall-safe: a framework for reducing inpatient falls.

This article describes a 10-year programme of work that has reduced inpatient falls rate by 46% and how this improvement has been sustained. The methodology applied in this initiative has forced one Trust to challenge expectations about the inevitability of patient falls in hospital. This initiative has resulted in approximately 568 fewer falls each year. Based on costings from NHS Improvement, the estimated 5108 fewer falls between 2011 and 2019 have saved the Trust £13.3 million.

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department: A Clinical Practice Gap.

This article, "Concussion Care in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Brief Report," by seeks to examine current clinician practice patterns related to the evaluation and management of patients identified as at risk for a sustained mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The findings are discussed in the context of an evaluation and management gap surrounding mTBI care among emergency department (ED) providers at a Level I trauma and emergency care center. Although variabilities exist among mTBI care in the ED, provider education, standardization of guidelines, and implementation practices are strategies for increasing the uptake of care in the ED for patients presenting with mTBI.

Are Pelvic Exams Necessary Anymore?

This article, "Is the pelvic examination still crucial in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain when an intrauterine pregnancy is identified on ultrasonography? A randomized controlled trial," by J. A. ) seeks to determine whether excluding a pelvic examination among patients presenting to the ED with first-trimester vaginal bleeding or lower abdominal pain, and indication of intrauterine pregnancy recorded on ultrasound increases morbidity. The findings are discussed in the context of changing practice and patient preference. Emergency nurse practitioners should remain informed about changing practices to ensure that patients receive safe care. Although pelvic examination does provide additional information for specific clinical conditions, the current practice to always include it in the evaluation of a pregnant patient with vaginal bleeding or pelvic pain may no longer be relevant given the improved diagnostic capabilities available within the ED setting.

Evaluation of Pain in the Cognitively Impaired Patient in the Emergency Department.

The Research to Practice column is intended to improve the research critique skills of the advanced practice registered nurse and the emergency nurse, and to assist with the translation of research into practice. For each column, a topic and a research study are selected. The stage is set with a case presentation. The research article is then reviewed and critiqued, and the findings are discussed in relation to the case presented. In the current column, we examine the findings of A. from their article titled "An Iceberg Phenomenon in Dementia: Pain."

Acute Headache in the Emergency Department: Is Lumbar Puncture Still Necessary to Rule Out Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?

The purpose of the Research to Practice column is to review current primary journal articles that directly affect the practice of the advanced practice nurse (APN) in the emergency department. This review examines the findings of Carpenter et al. (2016) from their article, "Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Exam, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds." The authors concluded that although no history or physical examination finding can be used to rule in or rule out spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), the complaint of neck stiffness can increase the likelihood of SAH. In addition, the authors concluded that noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) is accurate in ruling out/in SAH when performed within 6 hr of symptom onset in adults with symptoms consistent with SAH and that the traditional gold standard of confirmatory lumbar puncture after a negative head CT scan is only helpful in patients with a very high pretest probability of SAH. By applying the evidence-based criteria presented in this study, the emergency department APN can confidently rule out SAH and reduce patient risks from unnecessary invasive and costly testing.

Feasibility of nurses measuring gait speed in older community-dwelling Emergency Department patients.

Gait speed assessment is a rapid, simple and objective measure for predicting risk of unfavorable outcomes which may provide better prognostic and reliable information than existing geriatric ED (Emergency Department) screening tools. This descriptive pilot project was designed to determine feasibility of implementing gait speed screening into routine nursing practice by objectively identifying patients with sub-optimal gait speeds. Participants included community-dwelling adults 65 years and older with plans for discharge following ED treatment. Patients with a gait speed <1.0 m/s were identified as "high-risk" for an adverse event, and referred to the ED social worker for individualized resources prior to discharge. Thirty-five patients were screened and nurse initiated gait speed screens were completed 60% of the time. This project demonstrates ED gait speed screening may be feasible. Implications for practice should consider incorporating gait speed screening into routine nursing assessment to improve provider ED decision-making and disposition planning.

Gait speed in the emergency department: improving assessment among older adults.

The research to practice column is intended to improve the research critique skills of the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) and to assist with the translation of research into practice. This column critiques the findings from a meta-analysis, "Gait speed and survival in older adults," by S. Studenski et al. (2011). The study was designed to assess the use of gait speed as a physical performance measure that is associated with survival. The findings are reviewed in the context of increasing emergency department (ED) visits among older adults and their unique assessment needs, with implications for APRN best care practices. The implementation of gait speed as a screening tool for identifying adults 65 years of age and older in the ED who may be at risk for adverse events and functional decline will also be discussed.

Vibration signaling in mobile devices for emergency alerting: a study with deaf evaluators.

In the United States, a nationwide Commercial Mobile Alert Service (CMAS) is being planned to alert cellular mobile device subscribers to emergencies occurring near the location of the mobile device. The plan specifies a unique audio attention signal as well as a unique vibration attention signal (for mobile devices set to vibrate) to identify that the incoming message pertains to an emergency. Ratings of vibration signals of varying lengths and patterns were obtained from 44 deaf users of mobile devices for the perceived effectiveness of the signal in getting their attention in an emergency situation. Longer signals received higher ratings than shorter ones, and three signals with temporal on-off patterns were rated significantly better than a constant vibration. The U.S. government's recommended vibration signal for the CMAS, an important feature for access to emergency alerts by deaf persons, is supported by the results of the study.

An internet survey of individuals with hearing loss regarding assistive listening devices.

An Internet survey of individuals with hearing loss was conducted to determine their use of assistive listening devices for face-to-face conversation and, while part of an audience, their satisfaction with assistive listening devices, their interest in the concept of a universal assistive listening device receiver, and their interest in receiving audiologic information and services through the Internet. The 423 respondents who used assistive listening devices found them to be of significant benefit across a range of listening situations. Most respondents were open to the idea of purchasing a personal device that could work both with hearing aids and a range of transmission media. Probably because of the sampling bias inherent in an Internet survey, respondents were inclined to choose Internet-based and peer-based sources of information, and made many suggestions for both improving assistive listening devices and for improving information available about them by using the Internet.