Phase IB study of doxorubicin in combination with the multidrug resistance reversing agent S9788 in advanced colorectal and renal cell cancer.

S9788 is a new triazineaminopiperidine derivate capable of reversing multidrug resistance (MDR) in cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin. It does not belong to a known class of MDR revertants, but its action involves the binding of P-glycoprotein. Thirty-eight evaluable patients with advanced colorectal or renal cell cancer were treated with doxorubicin alone (16 patients) followed after disease progression with combination treatment of doxorubicin plus S9788 (12 patients) or upfront with the combination of doxorubicin plus S9788 (22 patients). S9788 was given i.v. as a loading dose of 56 mg m-2 over 30 min followed by doxorubicin given at 50 mg m-2 as a bolus infusion. Thereafter, a 2-h infusion of S9788 was administered at escalating doses ranging from 24 to 120 mg m-2 in subsequent cohorts of 4-10 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that concentrations of S9788 that are known to reverse MDR in vitro were achieved in patients at non-toxic doses. Compared with treatment with doxorubicin alone, treatment with the combination of doxorubicin and S9788 produced a significant increase in the occurrence of WHO grade 3-4 granulocytopenia. Treatment with S9788 was cardiotoxic as it caused a dose-dependent and reversible increase in corrected QT intervals as well as clinically non-significant arrhythmias on 24- or 48-h Holter recordings. Although clinically relevant cardiac toxicities did not occur, the study was terminated as higher doses of S9788 may increase the risk of severe cardiac arrhythmias. Twenty-nine patients treated with S9788 plus doxorubicin were evaluable for response, and one patient, who progressed after treatment with doxorubicin alone, achieved a partial response. We conclude that S9788 administered at the doses and schedule used in this study results in relevant plasma concentrations in humans and can safely be administered in combination with doxorubicin.

A single-blind, randomised, vehicle-controlled dose-finding study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers and lymphoma.

This study evaluated the effect of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF; lenograstim) on neutrophil granulocyte counts and on cells of other haematopoietic lineages in 66 patients with solid cancer or lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Beginning 1 day after completion of chemotherapy, patients received lenograstim (at dosages of 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 micrograms/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously once daily for 14 consecutive days. Compared with vehicle, lenograstim significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy in a dose-dependent manner. Mean neutrophil counts recovered to > 1.0 x 10(9) cells/l by day 13 in the vehicle group compared with days 11, 10, 8 and 7 in the 0.5, 2, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg lenograstim groups, respectively. Doses of 0.5 and 2 micrograms/kg of lenograstim had a significant effect on the duration of neutropenia (< 1.0 x 10(9) cells/l), the area under the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) curve and the time to ANC nadir. The dose of 5 micrograms/kg additionally decreased the total area of neutropenia and gave the narrowest range of values for all neutrophil parameters, while the 10 micrograms/kg dose brought no added benefit. A dose-response effect of lenograstim on time to neutrophil recovery was observed both for patients who received chemotherapy on a single day (n = 35) and for those who received chemotherapy over several days (n = 29). Based on these findings, a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day was chosen for further trials.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone. RESULTS: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Unusual behaviour of the LNCaP prostate tumour xenografted in nude mice.

The tumourigenicity of the LNCaP prostatic cell line was investigated in vivo after prostatic (orthotopic), subcutaneous (ectopic) and concomitant implantations in male Balb/c nude mice. Swollen lymph nodes were detected in the inguinal region only after subcutaneous implantation but could not be characterized by immunohistochemistry. However, when grafted to Endoxan-pretreated mice, they generated well differentiated tumours which secreted prostate-specific acid phosphatase. A parallel study was conducted to investigate the metastatic potential of the LNCaP tumour using several routes of implantation (intravenous, bone contact, intrasplenic and intracranial). Tumours grew only after intracranial implantation. No production of either haematogenous or bony metastases was recorded.

The use of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor with combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced adult soft-tissue sarcomas: early results from the EORTC Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

We gave the "optimal" dose of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) with ifosfamide (5 g/m2), the two most active agents against metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas, in an attempt to determine the feasibility of administration of these doses in combination. To offset complications arising from the myelosuppression associated with this regimen, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF, 250 micrograms/m2 daily) was given by subcutaneous injection during the intervals between courses of chemotherapy. In all, 111 patients with progressive metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma were entered, 104 of whom were eligible for preliminary analysis. Use of rhGM-CSF allowed full doses of chemotherapy to be given to the majority of patients, although cumulative thrombocytopenia became a dose-limiting toxicity during subsequent courses. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, one from presumed septicemia while the patient was at home and one as a result of cardiac failure. An overall response rate of 45% was achieved. The activity of this high-dose combination (with rhGM-CSF) will be compared with that of standard treatment doses in a future phase III randomized trial.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor allows safe escalation of dose-intensity of chemotherapy in metastatic adult soft tissue sarcomas: a study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to test the feasibility of administering doxorubicin at an optimal dose-intensity (> 70 mg/m2 per 21 days) in combination with ifosfamide under recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) cover in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four eligible patients (of 111 entered) in 16 centers received doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 plus ifosfamide 5 g/m2 every 3 weeks for up to seven cycles. rhGM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2) was administered once or twice daily by subcutaneous injections for up to 14 days between cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Full protocol dose-intensity of chemotherapy was administered to the majority of patients with only 15 of 293 cycles being complicated by febrile episodes that required hospitalization. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from septicemia and one from cardiac failure. The main toxicities attributed to rhGM-CSF were pruritus and rash. A 45% response rate (10% complete remission [CR]) was seen, with a median response duration of 9 months and median survival of 15 months. CONCLUSION: This high-dose regimen of chemotherapy was feasible under rhGM-CSF cover and produced a higher response rate and median survival than previously seen by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group. A randomized phase III study is now underway comparing this regimen with conventional-dose doxorubicin/ifosfamide to test the dose-response relationship.

Experience of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology with single-administration 5 g/m2 ifosfamide with mesna as second- or third-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.

In an ongoing phase II trial conducted in advanced breast cancer, we tested a therapy schedule consisting of continuous, 24-h infusion of 5 g/m2 ifosfamide (IFO) in 3 1 dextrose saline with mesna (MSN), repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression. Since September 1988, 16 heavily pretreated patients with advanced disease (11 with visceral lesions) considered refractory to standard chemotherapy (regimens always including cyclophosphamide) have been included. Objective partial remissions were observed in two cases (one in liver and one in soft-tissue and pleural lesions), and disease stabilization for at least 3 months occurred in four cases. No treatment-related death was recorded and tolerance was judged to be excellent (six cases) or acceptable in all instances. The haematological toxicity consisted mainly of transient leucopenia (nadirs evaluated by WHO scale as grade 3 in 43% and grade 4 in 29%), sometimes associated with thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 7% and grade 4 in 7%). Other side effects included nausea and/or vomiting (grade 3-4 in 33%); worsening of preexisting alopecia (five cases); haemorrhagic cystitis (one case); mild, transient somnolence (two cases); and moderate fluid retention (two cases). We concluded that infusion of 5 g/m2 IFO over 24 h with MSN rescue might represent an acceptable second- or third-line salvage regimen. Close monitoring of haematological and renal function parameters is recommended. A larger number of patients will be treated in a continuation of this study to evaluate the true response rate within narrower confidence limits.

Validation of clinical predictive value of in vitro colorimetric chemosensitivity assay in head and neck cancer.

For chemosensitivity testing, a rapid in vitro colorimetric method (MTT assay) was used. Eleven head and neck cancer cell lines were investigated to distinguish five known active agents from five compounds inactive in phase II studies. Evaluation of the reliability of the assay for assessing drug sensitivity in this tumor cell population was done by correlating the in vitro results with reported in vivo response data. Methotrexate and cisplatin (clinically active) and vindesine and doxorubicin (less active clinically) were recognized in vitro as active and correlated well with clinical experience. Bleomycin (clinically active) was ineffective against some cell lines. The in vitro findings for the clinically inactive drugs (deoxyazacytidine, lomustine, and carmustine) also corresponded. Amsacrine and etoposide, contrary to clinical experience, showed activity in vitro. Further comparison of MTT assay results with clinical data is warranted and essential before its use in large-scale drug screening studies.

Local postoperative morbidity following pre-operative irradiation in locally advanced breast cancer.

The authors have reviewed the medical files of 100 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (Stage III), who were treated in the Department of Surgery at the Institut Jules Bordet between 1974 and 1988. All patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (average total dose 45 Gy), which was associated with chemotherapy in 74% of patients. All patients were subsequently subjected to surgery, using a modified mastectomy in 92% of cases. Our data reveal an incidence of 25% local wound infection, 34% delayed wound healing, 63% seroma formation and 22% lymphoedema of the upper limb. It seems that local postoperative morbidity is increased in patients pre-operatively irradiated. This indicates that pre-operative chemotherapy may be preferable in these patients to minimize the local postoperative morbidity and its impact on the quality of life.

In vitro activity of bleomycin, tallysomycin S10b, and liblomycin against fresh human tumor cells.

The objective of this study was to compare the relative in vitro cytotoxicity of bleomycin to that of two newer-generation analogues, tallysomycin S10b and liblomycin. The latter compound is of particular interest as it has recently been shown in preclinical studies to be free of a potential to cause pulmonary injury and yet to possess only a minor potential to produce myelotoxicity. Using the adhesive tumor cell culture system, we evaluated the activity of these three drugs against a panel of 13 human tumors of various types. The range of concentrations chosen was determined and normalized using a nonleukemic permanent mouse hematopoietic progenitor cell line. Those drug concentrations achieving 90% inhibition of growth (IC90) against the murine cell line were: 6.11 microM bleomycin; 7.53 microM tallysomycin S10b; and 0.6 microM liblomycin. When tested against fresh human tumors at equally myelotoxic IC90 concentrations, bleomycin and tallysomycin S10b (nonmyelotoxic compounds) both achieved 90% growth inhibition of all tumors, while liblomycin (a myelotoxic compound) produced an IC90 inhibition in 69% of all tumors. A comparison of drug IC90 values against individual fresh tumors indicated a correlation between bleomycin and its structurally related analogue tallysomycin S10b. No such correlation, however, was seen with liblomycin in comparison to either bleomycin or tallysomycin S10b. The relative activity of liblomycin versus that of bleomycin and tallysomycin S10b varied with individual tumors tested. The response rate of liblomycin, a myelotoxic compound within this normalized range, appears promising. These data represent the first comparison of liblomycin to bleomycin against a spectrum of fresh human tumors using a stem cell assay technique.

Antitumor activity against human tumor samples of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and analogues at equivalent in vitro myelotoxic concentrations.

We compared the antitumor activity of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin; CDDP) with three CDDP analogues: cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylateplatinum(II) (CBDCA), N-methyliminodiacetato-1,2-diamino(cyclohexane)platinum(II) (MIDP), and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-iminodiacetato-1,2-diamino(cyclohexane)platinum (II) (HIDP). Fresh human tumor samples in the adhesive tumor culture system were utilized for this comparison. The equitoxic concentrations of all four drugs were derived based on their inhibitory activity against human bone marrow samples. For these normalized concentrations, CDDP proved to have a higher cytotoxic activity than its analogues. CBDCA's in vitro activity had a significant correlation with CDDP activity (r = 0.67) in vitro. However, the structurally similar substances MIDP and HIDP demonstrated a much greater degree of association (r = 0.90). Our data suggest that CBDCA, HIDP, and MIDP have overall less activity than CDDP when tested at equitoxic in vitro concentrations. Close association between CDDP and CBDCA also reflects known clinical experience with these two drugs, suggesting the method of comparison used here is probably appropriate. These conclusions, however, must be validated by clinical trials.

Phase I study of a carboplatin-etoposide combination in advanced thoracic cancer.

We conducted a phase I trial with the combination carboplatin (CBDCA)-etoposide (VP-16) in thoracic cancer. CBDCA, at a starting dose of 300 mg/m2 dl, was associated with a fixed dose of VP-16 (100 mg/m2 dl-3). Escalation of doses was permitted after three patients entered at each dose level without grade IV toxicity. As expected, hematologic toxicity was the limiting factor. Severe myelosuppression (grade IV) occurred in three out of four patients treated at 350 mg/m2. Only three out of 19 patients treated at 325 mg/m2 exhibited a reversible grade IV hematologic toxicity. Other toxicities were mild and acceptable. Among 15 evaluable patients three showed a partial response. Two of the three responders have previously had a progression while receiving cisplatin and etoposide. The recommended dose of carboplatin to be associated with VP-16 (100 mg/m2 dl-3) is thus 325 mg/m2 dl.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of oral menogaril administered on three consecutive days.

Eighteen adult patients with solid tumors were treated with oral menogaril, a new anthracycline antibiotic active against human breast cancer after intravenous administration. The drug was given orally on 3 consecutive days every 4 weeks at doses ranging from 50 to 175 mg/m2/day. Reversible and dose-related leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was less frequent. Hematologic toxicity was maximal usually 2 weeks after treatment and recovery usually occurred within 4 weeks. At doses from 50 to 150 mg/m2/day, non-hematologic side-effects of oral menogaril were infrequent and mild and consisted of nausea and vomiting (one patient), alopecia (two patients), mucositis (two patients) and liver function test abnormalities (three patients). The single patient treated at a daily dose of 175 mg/m2/day developed grade IV leucothrombocytopenia, with fever and gastrointestinal bleeding. This was followed by heart failure and the patient died from multisystem organ failure. Peak plasma concentrations of menogaril ranged from 0.043 to 0.409 microM and were linearly correlated with the dose. Similarly, the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve varied from 0.33 to 9.59 microM X h and was linearly correlated with the dose. The mean harmonic half-life was 11.3 +/- 6.4 h. A comparison of the data from the present trial and our previous study with intravenous menogaril indicates a bioavailability of 32 +/- 12%. There was an excellent relationship between the white blood cell decrease (as a percentage of the pretreatment value) and several pharmacokinetic parameters; the best correlation was obtained with the plasma concentration of menogaril at 4 h after treatment. A dose of 150 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days is recommended for phase II trials with oral menogaril but the bioavailability of the drug should be monitored carefully and, more specifically, the concept of a pharmacokinetic adjustment of the dose of menogaril should be evaluated prospectively.

Endocrine effects of Trilostane: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Trilostane (4-alpha-5-epoxy-17 beta-hydroxy-3-oxo-5-alpha-androstan-2-carbonitrile) is a modified steroidal molecule. In vitro and in vivo studies in rats have shown that it inhibits adrenal, ovarian and placental steroid synthesis. It seems to act by exerting a selective blockade on 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. In this study, we investigated whether this molecule interacts with hormone receptors for estrogen, androgen or progesterone. We also tried to demonstrate the effect which Trilostane may have on cellular cultures of human mammary carcinoma (MCF-7 Evsa-T). We also studied hormonal modifications in a series of 12 patients treated with different doses of Trilostane, since this drug is supposed to inhibit the production by the adrenal glands of mineralocorticoids, of glucocorticoids and of the precursors of estrogens. Our results indicate that Trilostane does not react with any of the main hormonal sex steroid receptors, nor does it interfere with cultures of human mammary cancer cells either containing estrogen receptors and therefore allegedly hormone-dependent (MCF-7 line), or estrogen receptor-negative cells, presumably independent of hormonal manipulations (Evsa-T cell line). Finally, endocrine studies on postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer show that Trilostane significantly reduces the plasma levels of estrone and of its major androgen precursor (androstenedione). However, the latter inhibition is no different from that exerted by hydrocortisone acetate administered alone at a dose of 40 mg/day. The results of clinical trials comparing hydrocortisone alone with hydrocortisone plus Trilostane are awaited.

Subrenal capsule assay for fresh human tumors in immunocompetent mice; an inappropriate technique for non-small cell lung cancer.

The subrenal capsule assay (SRA) seems to present some difficulties for the evaluation of the chemosensitivity of antineoplastic agents against fresh tumor xenografts. A study was therefore carried out to verify whether two different xenografts would behave in a similar way. Tumors such as melanoma provided adequate homogeneous material for this technique, while non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were heterogeneous since the 1 mm3 specimen grafted under the renal capsule usually contained diffuse areas of necrosis and of infection. Furthermore, a large proportion of the grafted specimens, 257 out of 298, did not contain any tumor at all on microscopic examination even when they showed macroscopic growth. Added to these discrepancies, a random microscopic analysis of 180 adjacent fragments of NSCLC and melanomas demonstrated that the variability of heterogeneous tumors precludes any meaningful comparison between homologous tumor tissues designed to be grafted on treated and on control mice. The anti-inflammatory effect of chemotherapeutic drugs on the host's reaction to the graft is probably responsible for the differences between the macroscopic growth results observed in pieces grafted to both treated and control mice: however, it could not be simulated by hydrocortisone (HC) under our experimental conditions. This allows us to conclude that fresh tumors from NSCLC cannot be used in SRA.