Digital twins for health: a scoping review.

The use of digital twins (DTs) has proliferated across various fields and industries, with a recent surge in the healthcare sector. The concept of digital twin for health (DT4H) holds great promise to revolutionize the entire healthcare system, including management and delivery, disease treatment and prevention, and health well-being maintenance, ultimately improving human life. The rapid growth of big data and continuous advancement in data science (DS) and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to significantly expedite DT research and development by providing scientific expertise, essential data, and robust cybertechnology infrastructure. Although various DT initiatives have been underway in the industry, government, and military, DT4H is still in its early stages. This paper presents an overview of the current applications of DTs in healthcare, examines consortium research centers and their limitations, and surveys the current landscape of emerging research and development opportunities in healthcare. We envision the emergence of a collaborative global effort among stakeholders to enhance healthcare and improve the quality of life for millions of individuals worldwide through pioneering research and development in the realm of DT technology.

A Phase Ib Study of the DNA-PK Inhibitor Peposertib Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Peposertib-an orally administered DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor-has shown potent radiosensitization in preclinical models. This dose-escalation study (NCT03770689) aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of peposertib plus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and assessed its safety and efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated for 5 to 5.5 weeks with 50- to 250-mg peposertib once daily, capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, and radiotherapy (RT), 5 days per week. Following clinical restaging (8 weeks after CRT completion), patients with clinical complete response (cCR) could opt for surveillance. Total mesorectal excision was recommended upon incomplete response (IR). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated with peposertib at doses of 50 mg (n = 1), 100 mg, 150 mg, and 250 mg (n = 6 each). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one out of five (100 mg), one out of six (150 mg), and three out of six (250 mg) evaluable patients. Peposertib ≤150 mg once daily was tolerable in combination with CRT. After 8 weeks of treatment with peposertib and CRT, the cCR was 15.8% (n = 3). Among the three patients with cCR, two underwent surgery and had residual tumors. Among the 16 patients with IR, seven underwent surgery and had residual tumors; five of the remaining nine patients opted for consolidative chemotherapy. The combined cCR/pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 5.3% (n = 1, 100 mg cohort). CONCLUSIONS: Peposertib did not improve complete response rates at tolerable dose levels. The study was closed without declaring the MTD/RP2D.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control. Objective: To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020. Interventions: Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord. Results: A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.

Tumor hyaluronan as a novel biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyaluronan (HA) accumulation is associated with tumorigenesis and aggressive tumor behavior. AIMS: We investigated the biomarker potential of HA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: HA levels were scored using affinity histochemistry in 137 NSCLC samples stratified by HA score ≤10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 with HA-high defined as ≥25% expression in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tumor surface area. Overall survival (OS) and time to progression from initiation of taxane therapy (TTP) were compared using log-rank tests based on HA score. RESULTS: Of 122 patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, 93 had mean HA scores that were not significantly different across clinicopathologic variables. Frequency of HA-high tumors did not differ by histology (34/68 adenocarcinomas vs. 12/25 squamous tumors, Fisher's p = 1.0000). Median OS for recurrent/metastatic adenocarcinoma was 35.5 months (95%, 23.6-50.3) vs. 17.9 months for squamous (95%, 12.7-37.0, log-rank test, p = 0.0165). OS was not significantly different by HA quartiles, high or low (<25) HA score and tumor histology, and HA biopsy site (all p > 0.05). Median TTP (n = 98) significantly differed by HA quartile (2.8 months for HA score ≤10; 5.0 months for 11-20; 7.9 months for 21-30; 3.9 months for >30, p = 0.0265). Improved TTP trended in HA-high over HA-low tumors (n = 98, p = 0.0911). CONCLUSION: In this NSCLC cohort, tumor HA level represents a potential biomarker for TTP, which remains a cornerstone of NSCLC therapy. Further validation is warranted to identify the HA accumulation threshold associated with clinical benefit.

Ablative radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with reduced treatment- and tumor-related liver failure and improved survival.

BACKGROUND: More than 70% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not candidates for curative therapy or recur after curative-intent therapy. There is growing evidence on the use of ablative radiation therapy (RT) for liver tumors. We aimed to analyze outcomes of HCC patients treated with conventional versus ablative RT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of HCC patients treated with liver RT from 2001 to 2019. We defined ablative RT as biologically effective dose (BED) ≥80 Gy. RECIST 1.1 was used to define early responses at 3-6 months after RT, and local control (LC) at last follow-up (FU). Data was analyzed using Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence rates, Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray competing risks. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were identified, of whom 14 (31.1%) received ablative RT using a stereotactic technique. With median FU of survivors of 10.1 months, 1-year cumulative incidence of LC was 91.7% for ablative and 75.2% for BED <80 Gy. At early FU, patients treated with ablative RT had better responses compared to BED <80 Gy, with 7% progressing versus 19%, and 21.4% with complete response versus none (P=0.038). On univariate analysis (UVA), Child-Pugh (CP) score [hazard ratio (HR): 3 for CP-B, HR: 16 for CP-C] and BED (HR: 7.69 for BED <80 Gy) correlated with deterioration of liver function, leading to liver failure. Most liver failure cases were due to disease progression. No RT-related liver failure occurred in the ablative RT group. On UVA, only BED ≥80 Gy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.4; P=0.044). Median OS (mOS) and 1-year OS were 7 months and 35% respectively for BED <80 Gy compared to 28 months and 66% for BED ≥80 Gy. No grade 3+ bowel toxicity was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 90% LC was achieved after stereotactic ablative RT, which was associated with minimized tumor- and treatment-related liver failure and improved survival for highly selected inoperable HCC patients.

Association of Ablative Radiation Therapy With Survival Among Patients With Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer.

IMPORTANCE: Surgical resection has been considered the only curative option for patients with pancreatic cancer. Nonoperative local treatment options that can provide a similar benefit are needed. Emerging radiation techniques that address organ motion have enabled curative radiation doses to be given in patients with inoperable disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (A-RT) with survival for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with a novel radiation planning and delivery technique. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included 119 consecutive patients treated with A-RT between June 2016 and February 2019 and enrolled in a prospectively maintained database. Patients were treated with a standardized technique within a large academic cancer center regional network. All patients with localized, unresectable, or medically inoperable pancreatic cancer with tumors of any size and less than 5 cm luminal abutment with the primary tumor were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Ablative RT (98 Gy biologically effective dose) was delivered using standard equipment. Respiratory gating, soft tissue image guidance, and selective adaptive planning were used to address organ motion and limit the dose to surrounding luminal organs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included incidence of local progression and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2019, 119 patients (59 men, median age 67 years) received A-RT, including 99 with T3/T4 and 53 with node-positive disease, with a median carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level greater than 167 U/mL. Most (116 [97.5%]) received induction chemotherapy for a median of 4 months (0.5-18.4). Median OS from diagnosis and A-RT were 26.8 and 18.4 months, respectively. Respective 12- and 24-month OS from A-RT were 74% (95% CI, 66%-83%) and 38% (95% CI, 27%-52%). Twelve- and 24-month cumulative incidence of locoregional failure were 17.6% (95% CI, 10.4%-24.9%) and 32.8% (95% CI, 21.6%-44.1%), respectively. Postinduction CA19-9 decline was associated with improved locoregional control and survival. Grade 3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 10 patients (8%) with no grade 4 to 5 events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study of patients with inoperable LAPC found that A-RT following multiagent induction therapy for LAPC was associated with durable locoregional tumor control and favorable survival. Prospective randomized trials in patients with LAPC are warranted.

Impact of palliative therapies in metastatic esophageal cancer patients not receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Palliative therapy has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in several tumor types. Not all patients with metastatic esophageal cancer receive palliative chemotherapy, and the roles of other palliative therapies in these patients are limited. AIM: To investigate the impact of other palliative therapies in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients between 2004-2015. Patients with M1 disease who declined chemotherapy and had known palliative therapy status [palliative therapies were defined as surgery, radiotherapy (RT), pain management, or any combination thereof] were included. Cases with unknown chemotherapy, RT, or nonprimary surgery status were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine factors influencing survival. RESULTS: Among 140234 esophageal cancer cases, we identified 1493 patients who did not receive chemotherapy and had complete data. Median age was 70 years, most (66.3%) had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0, and 37.1% were treated at an academic center. The majority (72.7%) did not receive other palliative therapies. On both univariate and multivariable analyses, there was no difference in OS between those receiving other palliative therapy (median 2.83 mo, 95%CI: 2.53-3.12) vs no palliative therapy (2.37 no, 95%CI: 2.2-2.56; multivariable P = 0.290). On univariate, but not multivariable analysis, treatment at an academic center was predictive of improved OS [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-1.00; P = 0.047]. On multivariable analysis, female sex (HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.71-0.92) and non-black, other race compared to white race (HR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.56-0.93) were associated with reduced mortality, while South geographic region relative to West region (HR 1.23, 95%CI: 1.04-1.46) and CCI of 1 relative to CCI of 0 (HR 1.17, 95%CI: 1.03-1.32) were associated with increased mortality. Higher histologic grade and T-stage were also associated with worse OS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Palliative therapies other than chemotherapy conferred a numerically higher, but not statistically significant difference in OS among patients with metastatic esophageal cancer not receiving chemotherapy. Quality of life metrics, inpatient status, and subgroup analyses are important for examining the role of palliative therapies other than chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal cancer and future studies are warranted.

Duration of therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Does it matter?

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based recommendations on duration of multiagent systemic therapy for LAPC are lacking. Herein, we assess the impact of duration of combination systemic therapy on survival of patients with LAPC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was interrogated to identify patients with untreated LAPC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014. Patients treated with ≥ 1 month of multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) and ≥ 6 months of follow-up were included. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to examine OS of each MAC duration group. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between OS with demographic and clinical variables. Statistical computations were performed using SAS Software Version 9.4. RESULTS: Of the 3410 patients, 1114 met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years. Median treatment duration was 3.2 months (range 1-19.8). Median follow-up was 23.5 months (range 3-120). Median OS of all patients was 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.7-10.1). Median OS of patients receiving ≥ 1-4 months, >4-6 months and > 6 months of MAC was 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.7-9), 10.2 months (95% CI: 9-11.8), and 12.8 months (95% CI 11.6-16). Twelve-month survival was 37% for patients receiving ≥ 1-4 months, 43% for > 4-6 months, and 56% for > 6 months. Female sex (P = .02), higher median household income (P = .03), and longer duration of MAC (P < .001) were independently associated with improved OS following multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This analysis in LAPC patients suggests that combination systemic therapy regimens of 6 months or more may optimize survival outcomes. Further investigation on the duration of systemic therapy question in LAPC is needed.

Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver-only Metastases: Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection.

BACKGROUND: Management of metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNET) remains controversial. The benefits of resecting the primary tumor are not clear and advocated only for select patients. This study aimed to determine whether resection of the primary MNET in patients with untreated liver-only metastases has an impact on survival. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed data of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 for patients with liver-only metastatic MNETs and compared those who received resection of their primary MNET with those who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after adjustment for patient, demographic, and tumor-related factors. RESULTS: The study identified 1952 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 18-90 years). The median primary tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 0.1-20 cm). Of these patients, 1295 (66%) underwent resection of the primary tumor and 667 (34%) did not. The patients who underwent resection were younger (median age, 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.001) and had smaller primary tumors (median, 2.3 vs 3.0 cm; p < 0.001). The patients with clinical T1 or T2 tumors were significantly less likely to undergo resection than those with stage T3 or T4 tumors (58.5% vs 89.7%; p < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1-83 months). In the entire cohort, 483 deaths occurred, with a 5-year OS of 61%. The 5-year OS rate was 49% for the patients who underwent resection and 66% for those who did not (p < 0.001). When the patients were grouped according to T stage, no OS difference between resection and no resection for stages T1 (p = 0.07) and T2 (p = 0.40) was identified. However, the 5-year OS rate was significantly better for the resected patient cohort with T3 (67.5% vs 37.2%; p < 0.001) or T4 (59.8% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with treatment-naïve liver-only metastatic MNET had improved OS when the primary tumor was resected, particularly those with clinical stage T3 or T4 tumors. These patients may benefit from surgical resection of their primary tumor.

Quantifying vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer-a contrast CT based method for surgical resectability evaluation.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers, with frequent local therapy resistance and dismal 5-year survival rate. To date, surgical resection remains to be the only treatment option offering potential cure. Unfortunately, at diagnosis, the majority of patients demonstrate varying levels of vascular infiltration, which can contraindicate surgical resection. Patients unsuitable for immediate resection are further divided into locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR), with different treatment goals and therapeutic designs. Accurate definition of resectability is thus critical for PC patients, yet the existing methods to determine resectability rely on descriptive abutment to surrounding vessels rather than quantitative geometric characterization. Here, we aim to introduce a novel intra-subject object-space support-vector-machine (OsSVM) method to quantitatively characterize the degree of vascular involvement-the main factor determining the PC resectability. Intra-subject OsSVMs were applied on 107 contrast CT scans (56 LA, BR and 26 resectable (RE) PC cases) for optimized tumor-vessel separations. Nine metrics derived from OsSVM margins were calculated as indicators of the overall vascular infiltration. The combined sets of matrics selected by the elastic net yielded high classification capability between LA and BR (AUC = 0.95), as well as BR and RE (AUC = 0.98). The proposed OsSVM method may provide an improved quantitative imaging guideline to refine the PC resectability grading system.

Six-dimensional quantitative DCE MR Multitasking of the entire abdomen: Method and application to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To develop a quantitative DCE MRI technique enabling entire-abdomen coverage, free-breathing acquisition, 1-second temporal resolution, and T1 -based quantification of contrast agent concentration and kinetic modeling for the characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Segmented FLASH readouts following saturation-recovery preparation with randomized 3D Cartesian undersampling was used for incoherent data acquisition. MR Multitasking was used to reconstruct 6-dimensional images with 3 spatial dimensions, 1 T1 recovery dimension for dynamic T1 quantification, 1 respiratory dimension to resolve respiratory motion, and 1 DCE time dimension to capture the contrast kinetics. Sixteen healthy subjects and 14 patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC were recruited for the in vivo studies, and kinetic parameters vp , Ktrans , ve , and Kep were evaluated for each subject. Intersession repeatability of Multitasking DCE was assessed in 8 repeat healthy subjects. One-way unbalanced analysis of variance was performed between control and patient groups. RESULTS: In vivo studies demonstrated that vp , Ktrans , and Kep of PDAC were significantly lower compared with nontumoral regions in the patient group (P = .002, .003, .004, respectively) and normal pancreas in the control group (P = .011, <.001, <.001, respectively), while ve was significantly higher than nontumoral regions (P < .001) and healthy pancreas (P < .001). The kinetic parameters showed good in vivo repeatability (interclass correlation coefficient: vp , 0.95; Ktrans , 0.98; ve , 0.96; Kep , 0.99). CONCLUSION: The proposed Multitasking DCE is promising for the quantification of vascular properties of PDAC. Quantitative DCE parameters were repeatable in vivo and showed significant differences between normal pancreas and both tumor and nontumoral regions in patients with PDAC.

Master transcription factors form interconnected circuitry and orchestrate transcriptional networks in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: While oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma remains infrequent in Western populations, the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased sixfold to eightfold over the past four decades. We aimed to characterise oesophageal cancer-specific and subtypes-specific gene regulation patterns and their upstream transcription factors (TFs). DESIGN: To identify regulatory elements, we profiled fresh-frozen oesophageal normal samples, tumours and cell lines with chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq). Mathematical modelling was performed to establish (super)-enhancers landscapes and interconnected transcriptional circuitry formed by master TFs. Coregulation and cooperation between master TFs were investigated by ChIP-Seq, circularised chromosome conformation capture sequencing and luciferase assay. Biological functions of candidate factors were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We found widespread and pervasive alterations of the (super)-enhancer reservoir in both subtypes of oesophageal cancer, leading to transcriptional activation of a myriad of novel oncogenes and signalling pathways, some of which may be exploited pharmacologically (eg, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) pathway). Focusing on EAC, we bioinformatically reconstructed and functionally validated an interconnected circuitry formed by four master TFs-ELF3, KLF5, GATA6 and EHF-which promoted each other's expression by interacting with each super-enhancer. Downstream, these master TFs occupied almost all EAC super-enhancers and cooperatively orchestrated EAC transcriptome. Each TF within the transcriptional circuitry was highly and specifically expressed in EAC and functionally promoted EAC cell proliferation and survival. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing cancer-specific and subtype-specific features of the EAC epigenome, our findings promise to transform understanding of the transcriptional dysregulation and addiction of EAC, while providing molecular clues to develop novel therapeutic modalities against this malignancy.

An open-label, single-arm pilot study of EUS-guided brachytherapy with phosphorus-32 microparticles in combination with gemcitabine +/- nab-paclitaxel in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (OncoPaC-1): Technical details and study protocol.

Current treatment options for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) include chemotherapy alone or followed by chemoradiation or stereotactic body radiotherapy. However, the prognosis for these patients remains poor, with a median overall survival <12 months. Therefore, novel treatment options are needed. Currently, there is no brachytherapy device approved for pancreatic cancer treatment. Hereby, we present the protocol of a prospective, multicenter, interventional, open-label, single-arm pilot study (OncoPac-1, Clinicaltrial.gov-NCT03076216) aiming to determine the safety and efficacy of Phosphorus-32 when implanted directly into pancreatic tumors using EUS guidance, for patients with unresectable LAPC undergoing chemotherapy (gemcitabine ± nab-paclitaxel).

18F-FDG PET Predicts Hematologic Toxicity in Patients with Locally Advanced Anal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: Hematologic toxicity (HT) during chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal cancer can lead to treatment breaks that compromise efficacy. We hypothesized that CRT-induced HT correlates with changes in active bone marrow (ABM) characterized by pre-/post-CRT positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 36 patients with anal cancer who were treated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography scans 2 weeks before and 6 to 16 weeks after CRT were analyzed. Complete blood counts with differential within 2 weeks from, weekly during, and 2 week after treatment were obtained. HT was defined as baseline complete blood count change to nadir and posttreatment recovery. Total bone marrow was segmented into 2 subregions: lumbosacral (LS) pelvis (L5 vertebrae, sacrum, and coccyx) and lower pelvis (LP) (ilium, femoral head/neck, and greater and lesser trochanter). PET ABM was characterized as the volume having standard uptake value (SUV) greater than the mean uptake of unirradiated extrapelvic bone marrow. PET variables of pre-/post-CRT and HT predictors were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: Average pelvic ABM was significantly reduced from 52% to 41% in pre- to post-CRT PET scans for all patients (P = .0012). Regional analysis indicated significant post-CRT reduction of LS-ABM (P < .0001) and LP-ABM (P = .006). Linear regression analysis identified post-CRT SUVmean, differential ΔSUVmean, and ΔABM as correlating significantly with pre- and posttreatment HT. ΔWBC linearly correlated with ΔABM of LS and LP pelvis (P = .033 and P = .028, respectively). Dosimetrically, ABM was sensitive to higher radiation doses (>50 Gy) in terms of acute hematologic ΔWBC (P = .021) and ΔANC(P = .028). HT increased with increasing volume of ABM receiving 40 Gy. The results also suggest that ABM V40 Gy ≤ 20% to 25% may significantly reduce the risk of HT. CONCLUSIONS: HT was significantly associated with ΔABM in patients with anal cancer who were treated with CRT. LS-ABM was a robust surrogate for evaluating CRT-induced HT. Our results suggest implementation of ABM dosimetric constraints, V40 Gy ≤ 20-25%, may significantly reduce HT and lead to decreased treatment delays associated with clinical outcomes.

Multiplatform profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Correlative analyses of clinicopathologic factors and identification of co-occurring pathogenic alterations.

BACKGROUND: Multi-omic profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) was performed to correlate genomic, proteomic, and molecular pathway alterations with clinicopathologic factors and identify novel co-occurring pathogenic alterations of potential clinical relevance to PanNET management. METHODS: PanNETs referred to Perthera, Inc. having undergone molecular profiling for precision matched therapeutic purposes were screened. Correlative analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test across individual pathogenic alterations or altered molecular pathways and clinicopathologic variables. Associations were visualized by hierarchical clustering. Prognostic associations with overall survival (OS) were identified using Cox regression for pathogenic alterations and pathway-level alterations. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: From 12/2014-1/2019, 46 patients with predominantly locally advanced and metastatic PanNETs were included. MEN1 alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were less associated with having high-grade PanNETs and metastatic disease at diagnosis (p ≤ 0.05). Genomic alterations associated with increased replicative stress (primarily driven by RB1 and TP53) correlated with higher grade (OR 6.87 [95% CI: 1.57-35.18], p = 0.0043) and worse OS (HR 13.62 [95% CI: 1.51-122.5], p = 0.0198). Other significant associations included: ERCC1 protein expression with DAXX or MEN1 alterations (NGS), PTEN (NGS) with ARID1A or TP53 alterations (NGS), and history of diabetes coincided with cell cycle pathway alterations but was mutually exclusive with replicative stress pathway alterations. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several molecular signatures of potential clinical significance for therapeutic targeting and prognostication in PanNETs warranting prospective validation. Our findings are hypothesis generating and can inform larger molecular profiling efforts in PanNETs.

Nationwide Survey of Patients' Perspectives Regarding Their Radiation and Multidisciplinary Cancer Treatment Experiences.

PURPOSE: The perspectives of patients with cancer about their treatment can inform interventions to improve the approaches of treating oncologists and experiences of future patients. We sought to identify areas where current toxicity management, informed consent processes, and physician-patient communication merit improvement. METHODS: In a Web-based survey administered from March to May 2018 using quota-based sampling to draw a nationwide sample of US patients with cancer treated with radiotherapy within the past 5 years, we evaluated patient perceptions of adequacy of information about adverse effects, severity of actual adverse effects experienced, and experiences divergent from expectations. RESULTS: Among 403 respondents, 18% felt inadequately informed about what adverse effects to expect from radiotherapy, and 37% experienced radiation adverse effects that they wished they had known more about. Similar proportions of patients treated with chemotherapy (36%) and surgery (34%) experienced toxicities related to those treatments that they wished they had known more about. Patients who noted their adverse effects to be minimal versus severe were significantly more likely to feel informed about radiotherapy adverse effects (odds ratio, 13.05; 95% CI, 5.6 to 30.38; P < .001). Across all evaluated measures, a majority of patients indicated that they did not experience the potentially anticipated radiotherapy adverse effect or that it was the same as or better than expected. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that experiences with radiation adverse effects generally are congruent with expectations. Nevertheless, improvement of pretreatment counseling across all cancer therapy modalities seems warranted to improve informed decision making and treatment experiences.

Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

PURPOSE: This guideline systematically reviews the evidence for treatment of pancreatic cancer with radiation in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, definitive, and palliative settings and provides recommendations on indications and technical considerations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 7 key questions focused on radiation therapy, including dose fractionation and treatment volumes, simulation and treatment planning, and prevention of radiation-associated toxicities. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS: The guideline conditionally recommends conventionally fractionated or stereotactic body radiation for neoadjuvant and definitive therapy in certain patients and conventionally fractionated regimens for adjuvant therapy. The task force suggests a range of appropriate dose-fractionation schemes and provides recommendations on target volumes and sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy. Motion management, daily image guidance, use of contrast, and treatment with modulated techniques are all recommended. The task force supported prophylactic antiemetic medication, and patients may also benefit from medications to reduce acid secretion. CONCLUSIONS: The role of radiation in the management of pancreatic cancer is evolving, with many ongoing areas of active investigation. Radiation therapy is likely to become even more important as new systemic therapies are developed and there is increased focus on controlling local disease. It is important that the nuances of available data are discussed with patients and families and that care be coordinated in a multidisciplinary fashion.