The control group matters: Pain, physical function and strength improvements relative to the comparator intervention in knee and hip osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: In knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), the mechanism for resistance exercise improving clinical outcomes and the dose-response between strength and clinical outcomes are unknown; in part due to inconsistent trial designs across studies. PURPOSE: To determine whether the effects of resistance exercise interventions on pain and function differ based on comparator group; and whether there is an association between improvements in lower extremity strength with improvements in pain and function in knee and hip OA. METHODS: We searched 6 databases (inception to January 28 2023,) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing land-based, resistance exercise-only interventions with no intervention or any other intervention. There were four subgroups for comparator intervention: NONE (none/placebo/sham/usual care), EXE (other exercise interventions alone), NONEXE (non-exercise interventions alone), COMBO (combined exercise + non-exercise interventions). The between-group effect (ES) was calculated for immediate post-intervention pain and function (activities of daily living (ADL) and sports/recreation (SPORT)). Meta-regression analyses were completed to evaluate the association between improvements in lower extremity strength (independent variable) and improvements in pain, ADL and SPORT (dependent variables), irrespective of comparator intervention. RESULTS: For knee OA (257 studies), there were large benefits for pain [ES (95 % CI) = -0.92 (-1.15, -0.69)], ADL [-0.79 (-1.01, -0.56)] and SPORT [-0.79 (-1.02, -0.56)] favouring resistance exercise interventions compared to NONE. For knee pain, there was also a moderate benefit favouring COMBO interventions compared to resistance exercise interventions [0.44 (0.23, 0.65)]. For hip OA (15 studies), there were moderate benefits for pain [-0.51 (-0.68, -0.33)], ADL [-0.57 (-0.78, -0.36)] and SPORT [-0.52 (-0.70, -0.35)] favouring exercise interventions compared to NONE. For hip pain, there was also a moderate benefit favouring NONEXE interventions compared to resistance exercise interventions [0.57 (0.17, 0.97)]. For knee OA, greater strength gains were associated with larger improvements in pain [ß (95 % CI) = -0.24 (-0.38, -0.09)], ADL [-0.43 (-0.73, -0.12)] and SPORT [-0.37 (-0.73, -0.00)]. CONCLUSION: In knee and hip OA, the effects of resistance exercise on pain and function improvements depend on the comparator intervention. For knee OA, a dose-response relationship was observed between lower extremity strength gains with pain and function improvements.

Are the Effects of Resistance Exercise on Pain and Function in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Dependent on Exercise Volume, Duration, and Adherence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine dose parameters for resistance exercise associated with improvements in pain and physical function in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) and whether these improvements were related to adherence. METHODS: We searched six databases, from inception to January 28, 2023, for randomized controlled trials comparing land-based, resistance exercise-only interventions with no intervention, or any other intervention. There were four subgroups of intervention duration: 0 to <3 months, 3 to 6 months, >6 to <12 months, ≥12 months. The between-group effect was calculated for immediate postintervention pain and physical function (activities of daily living [ADL] and sports/recreation [SPORT]). RESULTS: For both knee and hip, data from 280 studies showed moderate benefit for pain, physical function ADL, and physical function SPORT in favor of interventions 3 to 6 months. For the knee, there was also a moderate benefit for physical function ADL in favor of interventions >6 to <12 months. From 151 knee and hip studies that provided total exercise volume data (frequency, time, duration), there was no association between volume with the effect size for pain and physical function. A total of 74 studies (69 knee, 5 hip) reported usable adherence data. There was no association between adherence with the effect size for pain and physical function. CONCLUSION: In knee and hip OA, resistance exercise interventions 3 to 6 months (and for the knee >6 to <12 months) duration improve pain and physical function. Improvements do not depend on exercise volume or adherence, suggesting exercise does not require rigid adherence to a specific dose.

Improving muscle capacity utilization with a 12-week strengthening program for females with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Strengthening exercise improves symptoms in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but it remains unclear if biomechanical mechanisms contribute to this improvement. Muscle capacity utilization, which reflects the proportion of maximum capacity required to complete tasks, may provide insight into how strengthening exercise improves clinical outcomes in painful knee OA. PURPOSE: The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if a 12-week strengthening intervention reduced muscle capacity utilization during walking, squat and lunge tasks in females with painful knee OA. METHODS: Data from 28 females (age 59.6 ± 6.2 years old; body mass index 29.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with clinical knee OA were included. Participants completed a strengthening intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Knee extensor isometric torque was measured on a commercial dynamometer; peak values from three exertions were averaged. Peak KFM was extracted and averaged from five walking trials. Mean KFM was extracted and averaged from three trials for each of static lunges and squats. Muscle capacity utilization was the ratio of mean peak KFM to peak extensor torque for walking; and mean KFM to peak extensor torque for squats and lunges. Paired t-tests determined differences between peak extensor torque, peak KFM and muscle capacity utilization from pre to post intervention (p < 0.05). RESULTS & SIGNIFICANCE: Peak extensor torque increased at follow up (p = 0.02). Peak KFM during walking decreased (p = 0.005). Muscle capacity utilization during walking (p = 0.008) and squat (p = 0.002) decreased. Mean KFM and muscle capacity utilization during lunge remained unchanged from pre to post intervention. The reduction in muscle capacity utilization at follow up indicates the strengthening intervention produced a decrease in proportion of the maximal capacity a participant used to complete walking and squat tasks. Strengthening both increases maximal muscle capacity and decreases the net moment required during daily tasks in knee OA.

The relationship between muscle capacity utilization during gait and pain in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Muscle capacity utilization reflects the percentage of maximal knee extensor strength required to complete physical activities. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is pain associated with muscle capacity utilization during walking in older adults with knee osteoarthritis? Secondarily, is muscle capacity utilization in older adults with knee osteoarthritis sex-specific? METHODS: Twenty-three participants (15 females) with symptomatic knee OA completed this study [age 67 ( ± 8) years, body mass index 29.7 ( ± 3.9) kg/m2, gait speed during the Six Minute Walk test 1.25 ( ± 0.25) m/s]. Pain was measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Muscle capacity utilization was quantified as the peak external knee flexor moment during level walking normalized to knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction. The knee flexor moment was calculated from kinematic and kinetic data during barefoot level walking at a self-selected speed and at 1.1 m/s. Knee extensor maximum voluntary isometric contraction was measured on a dynamometer. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine the relationship between pain and muscle capacity utilization after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and gait speed. Independent sample t-tests examined sex differences. RESULTS: Pain was not associated with muscle capacity utilization during self-selected and standardized walking speeds (p = 0.38 and p = 0.36, respectively). Females did not require a greater muscle capacity utilization than males to complete gait at self-selected and standardized speeds (p = 0.28, and p = 0.40, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: Muscle capacity utilization was not associated with pain during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. Future work should explore more challenging activities of daily living in knee OA.