[Female pelvic floor dysfunction from the perspectives of genetic studies].

Currently, despite the growing prevalence of female pelvic floor dysfunction, no consensus exists among researchers regarding its etiology and pathogenesis. There is no doubt, however, that this is a multifactorial disorder with a genetic predisposition. The risk for developing pelvic floor dysfunction is determined by the interaction of multiple additive genetic (mutations and/or polymorphic alleles) and environmental factors. This review of the world literature presents a rationale for searching specific molecular genetic factors shaping the structure of the genetic susceptibility to female pelvic floor dysfunction. The pelvic organ prolapse in women has been found to be associated with the rs1800012 polymorphism of the COL1A1 gene, genotype rs1800255-A/A of COL3A1 gene and the rs2228480 polymorphism of ESR1, although this data still controversial and need to be validated in the independent samples. The systematic accumulation of data, their reproduction in different populations and ethnic groups is necessary to further generalize the evidence on the pathogenesis and the functional significance of each gene variant.

[Association of polymorphism of 1800255 COL3A1 gene with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: preliminary data].

RELEVANCE: Collagen type I and III have a significant role in the development of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence in women. The role of the COL3A1 gene polymorphism remains debatable. Some studies and meta-analyzes have found a direct correlation between genetic defects and POP, while other researchers have not confirmed this association. This study aimed to investigate the association of the 1800255 COL3A1 gene polymorphism with the development of POP and urinary incontinence in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 52 patients (mean age 64.4 years) with verified POP and stress urinary incontinence. The control group included 21 patients without pelvic floor dysfunction. Patients were comparable in age and had at least one or more risk factors for developing pelvic floor dysfunction. Exclusion criteria for both groups were Marfan and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and a history of surgery for POP or incontinence (for the control group). In all women, saliva samples were collected to detect polymorphism at the rs1800255 locus of the COL3A1 gene. Genotyping was conducted by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: In patients with isolated genital prolapse, homozygous polymorphism (AA) had a low sensitivity (0.06) but an extremely high specificity (0.95). Heterozygote (GA) had the sensitivity of 0.35, the specificity of 0.53, and the AUC of 0.44. For urinary incontinence by homozygote (AA), sensitivity was 0.08, specificity 0.96, and by heterozygote (GA) 0.45 and 0.63, respectively. For the combination of pelvic prolapse and urinary incontinence by homozygote (AA), sensitivity was 0.07, specificity 1.0, and heterozygote (GA) 0.41 and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the high specificity of the polymorphism at the rs1800255 locus of the COL3A1 gene, determined by the Sanger sequencing, it can be concluded that there is an association between this polymorphism and urinary incontinence and POP in women.